A review of treatment options in HER2-low breast cancer and proposed treatment sequencing algorithm.

The expansion of the spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-status to HER2-low, defined as HER2 expression of 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or 2+ by IHC without gene amplification, has made a major impact in the field of oncology. The HER2-low expression has emerged as a targetable biomarker, and anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown significant survival benefit in pretreated metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (BC). With these recent data, the treatment algorithm for hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative BC needs to be reconsidered, as approximately half of these BCs are HER2-low. Although there are different therapeutic agents for hormone receptor-positive and hormone receptor-negative HER2-low BCs, there is no consensus regarding the sequencing of these agents. In this article, the treatment options for HER2-low BC are enumerated and a treatment sequencing algorithm based on the current clinical evidence proposed.

Using Oncotype DX breast recurrence score® assay to define the role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the treatment of patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer is not well defined. Tools to better determine which patients may benefit from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy or upfront surgery remain an unmet need. METHODS: We assessed the rate of clinical and pathologic complete response (cCR, pCR) among a pooled cohort of patients with early-stage HR + breast cancer who had been randomized to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in two earlier studies to understand better how outcomes varied by Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay. RESULTS: We observed that patients with intermediate RS results had no statistically significant differences in pathologic outcomes at the time of surgery based on whether they received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that a subgroup of women with a RS 0-25 may omit chemotherapy without compromising outcomes. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that Recurrence Score® (RS) results may serve as a useful tool in treatment decision-making in the neoadjuvant setting.

Margetuximab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Several anti-HER2 agents are approved for third-line treatment and beyond (after first-line and second-line); however, no specific treatment strategy is recommended for third-line and beyond. Although these agents improve disease outcomes, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer remains incurable and there is an unmet need for effective therapies in the later line setting. This review focuses on the development of margetuximab-cmkb, a novel, Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, and its role in the systemic treatment of adult patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more prior anti-HER2 regimens, at least one of which was for metastatic disease.

In about 20% of patients with breast cancer, their tumor cells make too many copies of a protein called HER2. We call them HER2-positive breast cancer cells. HER2 is a protein that signals to breast cancer cells to make them grow. Certain drugs, known as antibodies, are able to bind to the HER2 proteins on the surface of the tumor cells. This stops their signaling and slows down the growth of the tumor cells. These antibodies are called anti-HER2 antibodies. In addition to its 'head' region binding to HER2, the 'tail' region of the anti-HER2 antibody can bind to certain other proteins (receptors) found on the surface of immune cells. When the anti-HER2 antibodies bind to the receptors on immune cells, this starts an anticancer immune response against the HER2-positive breast cancer cells and kills them. This review explains how anti-HER2 antibodies may block and destroy HER2-positive breast cancer cells. In particular, we focus on the beneficial and adverse effects of margetuximab, an anti-HER2 antibody. The tail region of margetuximab has been changed to boost the immune responses against HER2-positive cancer cells. Margetuximab is approved in the USA for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after they have already received two or more anti-HER2 therapies. The decision to approve this was based on the pivotal clinical trial SOPHIA.

Utility of Oncotype DX score in clinical management for T1 estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative, and lymph node negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The management of estrogen receptor positive (ER+)/HER2- and lymph node (LN) negative breast cancers can be influenced by Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) in the USA. However, the benefit of RS in T1 tumors (≤ 1 cm) is not clear. METHODS: We retrieved 199 T1 ER+/HER2-/LN- breast cancer diagnosed between 1993 and 2016 that had undergone RS testing. The median follow-up time was 51 months. We examined the disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis and their association with RS and other clinicopathologic features. RESULTS: Of the 199 cases, 40 were T1a (≤ 0.5 cm) and 159 were T1b (> 0.5 cm to 1 cm) tumors. In the 40 T1a tumors, 11 would benefit from chemotherapy by the TAILORx study results. Of these T1a tumors, 36 were Nottingham grade 1/2, 3 were grade 3, and 1 was microinvasive carcinoma; 2 (5%) had local recurrence and 1 (2.5%) had distant metastasis to the bone. The only patient with T1a tumor (Nottingham grade 3, RS = 42) and distant metastasis to bone had received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the 159 T1b tumors, 25 would benefit chemotherapy by the TAILORx results. Of the T1b tumors, 149 were Nottingham grade 1/2 and 10 were grade 3. Nine (5.7%) had local recurrence and 2 (1.3%) had distant metastasis to bone and mediastinum, respectively. The two T1b tumors with distant metastasis had a RS 20 and Nottingham grade 2, and RS 27 and Nottingham grade 3, respectively. Both patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort (T1a and T1b tumors), Nottingham tumor grade and receiving chemotherapy were significantly associated with DFS. In univariate analysis of the entire cohort, Nottingham tumor grade, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, and RS were significantly associated with distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the metastatic rate of T1a and T1b ER+/HER2-/LN- breast cancer is very low. Patients with low grade (1 or 2), T1a ER+/HER2-/LN- breast cancer may not need RS for treatment decision-making; however, in patients with high-grade T1a or T1b ER+/HER2-/LN- breast cancer, RS analysis should be strongly considered.

Systemic Therapy Approaches for Breast Cancer Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases.

OPINION STATEMENT: Brain metastasis arising from breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Various systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies which are effective against breast cancer often fail to provide benefits against brain metastasis. This is mainly due to limited penetration of the therapies across the blood-brain barrier, and divergent evolution of brain metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Thus, brain metastasis is typically treated upfront with local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, followed by systemic therapies. Systemic therapies with CNS permeability are favored in patients with brain metastasis. This paper reviews various systemic therapy options for breast cancer brain metastasis.

Adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: One Monarch to rule them all?

The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with metastatic, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Because of the continued high rate of relapse in patients with node-positive, HR-positive disease, evaluating these agents in the adjuvant setting is the logical next step. Three adjuvant CDK inhibitor trials have been reported to date, with only 1 of them showing a statistical advantage for the CDK inhibitor in comparison with endocrine therapy alone. These trials have key similarities and differences that could explain the disparate results. The one positive trial has a relatively short follow-up, and continued analysis is critical to confirm the benefit of adjuvant CDK inhibition in this setting. It is imperative that predictive biomarkers be determined so that these agents can be used in the patients most likely to benefit and thus the additional toxicity and expense can be avoided in those who do not require these agents. LAY SUMMARY: There is a critical need for new agents to prevent relapse in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Trials to date evaluating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, which decrease how quickly cancer cells multiply, have shown mixed results, with only 1 trial demonstrating that these agents decrease recurrence.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021.

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer-focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

PI3Kinase Inhibition in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Derangement of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is implicated in several subtypes of breast cancers. Mutation or upregulation of PI3K enhances cancer cells' survival, proliferation, and ability to metastasize, making it an attractive molecular target for systemic therapy. PI3K has four isoforms, and several drugs targeting individual isoforms or pan-PI3K have been or are currently being investigated in clinical trials. However, the search for an effective PI3K inhibitor with a robust therapeutic effect and reasonable safety profile for breast cancer treatment remains elusive. This review focuses on the recently completed and ongoing clinical trials involving PI3K inhibitors as mono- or combination therapy in breast cancer. We review the salient findings of clinical trials, the therapeutic efficacy of PI3K inhibitors, and reported adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation. Lastly, we discuss the challenges and potential opportunities associated with adopting PI3K inhibitors in the clinic.

The emerging role of mediator complex subunit 12 in tumorigenesis and response to chemotherapeutics.

Transcriptional dysregulation induced by disease-defining genetic alterations of proteins in transcriptional machinery is a key feature of cancers. Mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) is the central architectural subunit in the kinase module of Mediator, a large transcriptional regulatory complex that controls essential steps of transcription. Emerging evidence links deregulated MED12 to human cancers. MED12 is frequently mutated in benign tumors and cancers. Although the missense mutations of MED12 in benign tumors disrupt the kinase activity of Mediator, MED12 mutations in cancers could eliminate the interaction between Mediator complex and RNA polymerase II, leading to severe transcriptional misregulation. Aberrant expression of MED12 is associated with the prognosis of various types of human cancers. Loss of MED12 function has been associated with the development of resistance to chemotherapeutics. Moreover, MED12 is modified by posttranscriptional regulations. Arginine methylation of MED12 has been shown to regulate MED12-mediated transcriptional regulation and response to chemotherapeutics in human cancer cell lines. In this mini-review, the authors provide an overview of the roles of MED12 in the development of benign and malignant tumors as well as its roles in chemoresistance. The studies of MED12 exemplify that aberrant transcriptional programming is a therapeutic vulnerability for certain types of cancer.

Therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Resistance mechanisms and novel treatment strategies.

Endocrine therapy has been the standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer since the 1970s, improving survival while avoiding the toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, all HR-positive tumors ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have more recently become an important component of the management of this breast cancer subtype, significantly delaying time to the disease progression and improving survival when combined with endocrine therapy. However, as with endocrine therapy alone, treatment resistance remains a universal phenomenon. As more women receive CDK4/6 inhibitors as part of their treatment, the management of de novo and acquired resistance to combined CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy regimens has emerged as an important clinical challenge. Several resistance mechanisms have been described, including alterations in the CDK4/6/cyclin D complex or its major effector retinoblastoma protein (pRb), bypass signaling through other cyclin/CDK complexes and activation of upstream signaling pathways, in particular the PI3K/mTOR pathway, but robust biomarkers to predict resistance remain elusive, and the role for continuing CDK4/6 inhibitors after progression remains under investigation. Novel strategies being evaluated in clinical trials include the continuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors through progression, as well as triplet therapy combinations with PI3K inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Evaluation of PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and CD8+ and FOXP3+ immune cells in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapies.

BACKGROUND: The tumor immune microenvironment plays a critical role in the prognosis and outcome of breast cancers. This study examined the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD8+, FOXP3+ lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression, and other clinicopathological parameters in HER2+ breast cancer and correlate with tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: We included 173 HER2+ patients treated with neoadjuvant HER2-targeted chemotherapy regimens from 2010 to 2016. 67 cases had biopsy blocks to evaluate TIL, CD8, FOXP3, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining. Tumors were classified as pCR vs non-pCR group. Clinicopathological parameters, TIL, CD8+ and FOXP3+ cell count, and PD-L1 expression were correlated with pCR rate. RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that pCR rate was significantly correlated with low PR, low ER, high Ki-67, high FOXP3, HER2 IHC3+ , high HER2 ratio and copy number. By multivariate analysis, Ki-67 was the only variable significantly correlated with pCR. PD-L1 expression was detected in 9.2% cases. TIL hotspot has a non-significant correlation with pCR rate (p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: High Ki-67 is a strong predictor for pCR in HER2+ breast cancer. TIL and FOXP3 T cells may play a role in tumor response in HER2+ cancer. PD-L1 is expressed in a subset of HER2+ breast cancer, supporting a role of immunotherapy in treating a subset of HER2+ breast cancers. The role of PD-L1, TIL, and other markers of immunogenicity as predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2+ breast cancer should be further evaluated.

Phase 1 study of TTC-352 in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing on endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.

PURPOSE: TTC-352 is a selective human estrogen receptor (ER) partial agonist developed for treatment of hormone-refractory ER + breast cancer. METHODS: This was an accelerated dose escalation study with the primary endpoint of maximum tolerated dose that evaluated five dose levels of TTC-352 in breast cancer progressing after at least two lines of hormonal therapy including one in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The secondary objectives were to determine treatment tolerability, pharmacokinetics of TTC-352, best response, progression-free survival (PFS), and PKCα expression in tumors. RESULTS: The study enrolled 15 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Patients experienced the following grade 3 toxicities: asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, diarrhea, aspartate transaminase elevation, and myalgia, and one grade 4 toxicity of gamma glutamyltransferase elevation. Pharmacokinetic half-life was 7.6-14.3 h. The intra- and inter-individual variability for AUC0-∞ hampered assessment of the relationship between dose and AUC0-∞. Median PFS was 58 days (95% CI = 28,112). Higher PKCα expression in tumor stroma was associated with a trend toward longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS: TTC-352 demonstrates safety and early clinical evidence of antitumor activity against heavily pretreated hormone-refractory breast cancer. Based upon TTC-352 plasma concentrations and tolerability, the 180 mg twice a day is recommended for further testing. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201913).

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Several new systemic therapy options have become available for patients with metastatic breast cancer, which have led to improvements in survival. In addition to patient and clinical factors, the treatment selection primarily depends on the tumor biology (hormone-receptor status and HER2-status). The NCCN Guidelines specific to the workup and treatment of patients with recurrent/stage IV breast cancer are discussed in this article.

Molecular Assays to Determine Optimal Duration of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer has a high propensity for late recurrences that might be prevented with longer durations of endocrine therapy (ET). However, trials evaluating extended adjuvant ET have produced somewhat conflicting results. Additionally, ET is associated with not only day to day side effects that can impact quality of life, but more detrimental effects that can cause significant morbidity. Although patients with higher stage disease are at greater risk of late recurrences, even patients with stage 1 disease have a significant risk of recurrence after 5 years. Current guidelines recommend extending therapy for patients with node-positive disease, but recommendations for patients with node-negative disease are less clear. This has led to the development of various genomic tests to aid oncologists in further individualizing their approach when it comes to deciding which subpopulation of patients with HR-positive breast cancer may benefit from extending their endocrine therapy beyond 5 years. There are several assays that are prognostic of recurrences years 6 to 10 following diagnosis. Additionally, the breast cancer index has been shown to be predictive of extended ET in patients who have completed 5 years of tamoxifen. None of the available assays are, to date, predictive of recurrence after 10 years. Genomic testing is not appropriate for all patients, especially if the results will not predict the choice of further treatment. Ultimately, genomic testing should help facilitate shared decision making between the patient and oncologist.

Neratinib: an option for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is currently incurable. The primary goals of treatment are to prolong survival while optimizing quality of life. Several agents are now available in this setting, including neratinib, tucatinib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Neratinib in combination with capecitabine was recently approved for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have received 2 or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Neratinib is an oral pan-HER inhibitor that binds covalently to the kinase site, providing irreversible binding. Phase 3 data showed that the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine improved progression-free survival vs lapatinib plus capecitabine. The duration of response was longer among patients in the neratinib arm. Neratinib plus capecitabine was also active against brain metastases associated with refractory, HER2-positive breast cancer, and this combination is listed in guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for this indication. When combined with fulvestrant, neratinib demonstrated efficacy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, regardless of their hormone receptor status. Ongoing trials are evaluating the ability of neratinib to treat brain metastases, as well as the efficacy and safety of the triplet combination of neratinib, fulvestrant, and trastuzumab in this setting.

Neratinib in the early-stage/extended adjuvant breast cancer patient.

Breast cancer is the most common tumor type observed in women in the United States. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an early stage, but the disease often recurs after initial treatment. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification is present in approximately 20% to 25% of breast tumors and is associated with invasive disease and an aggressive phenotype. The addition of anti-HER2 therapy to chemotherapy has significantly improved the prognosis for patients with these aggressive tumors. However, despite the dramatic advances in survival achieved by targeting HER2, patients with these tumors are still at risk for recurrence after initial treatment. In an effort to address the risk for recurrence, recent clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-HER2 antibodies and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors as adjuvant or extended adjuvant therapy. Meaningful reductions have been observed in the risk for invasive and distant recurrence, particularly in certain HER2-positive breast cancer subpopulations. To optimize adjuvant treatment, therapies should be prescribed for patient subpopulations based on factors such as underlying risk profile, response to initial therapy, and patient preference. Neratinib is a small-molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER1, HER2, and HER4 that penetrates the blood-brain barrier. This monograph examines neratinib in the setting of early-stage/extended adjuvant breast cancer, with a focus on clinical trial data, the mechanism of action, and ways to optimize clinical use.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 3.2018.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the updated recommendations for use of multigene assays to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic chemotherapy therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage invasive breast cancer. This report summarizes these updates and discusses the rationale behind them.

Buparlisib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer progressing on or after mTOR inhibition (BELLE-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway occurs frequently in breast cancer that is resistant to endocrine therapy. Approved mTOR inhibitors effectively inhibit cell growth and proliferation but elicit AKT phosphorylation via a feedback activation pathway, potentially leading to resistance to mTOR inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who were pretreated with endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors. METHODS: BELLE-3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had relapsed on or after endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors, were recruited from 200 trial centres in 22 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via interactive response technology (block size of six) to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg per day) or matching placebo starting on day 1 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by visceral disease status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by local investigator assessment as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis population (all randomised patients, by intention-to-treat). Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline safety assessment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01633060, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2013, and March 31, 2016, 432 patients were randomly assigned to the buparlisib (n=289) or placebo (n=143) groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the buparlisib versus placebo group (3·9 months [95% CI 2·8-4·2] vs 1·8 months [1·5-2·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·53-0·84, one-sided p=0·00030). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib versus placebo group were elevated alanine aminotransferase (63 [22%] of 288 patients vs four [3%] of 140), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (51 [18%] vs four [3%]), hyperglycaemia (35 [12%] vs none), hypertension (16 [6%] vs six [4%]), and fatigue (ten [3%] vs two [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 64 (22%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group versus 23 (16%) of 140 in the placebo group; the most frequent serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (six [2%] vs none), dyspnoea (six [2%] vs one [1%]), and pleural effusion (six [2%] vs none). On-treatment deaths occurred in ten (3%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group and in six (4%) of 140 in the placebo group; most deaths were due to metastatic breast cancer, and two were considered treatment-related (cardiac failure [n=1] in the buparlisib group and unknown reason [n=1] in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of buparlisib plus fulvestrant does not support its further development in this setting. Nonetheless, the efficacy of buparlisib supports the rationale for the use of PI3K inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with PIK3CA mutations. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.