RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and gynecologist experience of introducing laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of leiomyomas into surgical practice. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: Five academic medical centers across California. PATIENTS: Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas, uterus size ≤16 weeks size, and all leiomyomas ≤10 cm with no more than 6 total leiomyomas. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic RFA of leiomyomas. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed intraoperative complications, blood loss, operative time, and adverse events. Gynecologists reported the operative difficulty and need for further training after each case. Participants reported leiomyoma symptoms preoperatively and at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. We analyzed all outcome data from the first case performed by gynecologists with no previous RFA experience. Patient demand for RFA was high, but poor insurance authorization prevented 74% of eligible women from trial participation; 26 women underwent surgery and were enrolled. The mean age of the participants was 41.5 ± 4.9 years. The mean operating time was 153 ± 51 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 24 ± 40 cc. There were no intraoperative complications and no major adverse events. Menstrual bleeding, sexual function, and quality of life symptoms improved significantly from baseline to 12 weeks, with a 25 ± 18-point, or 47%, decrease in the Leiomyoma Symptom Severity Score. After the first procedure, the mean difficulty score was 6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-7.5) on a 10-point scale, and 89% of surgeons felt "very or somewhat" confident in performing laparoscopic RFA. The difficulty score decreased to 4.25 (95% CI, 1.2-6) after the fourth procedure, with all gynecologists reporting surgical confidence. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RFA of leiomyomas can be introduced into surgical practice with good clinical outcomes for patients. Gynecologists with no previous experience are able to gain confidence and skill with the procedure in fewer than 5 cases.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Leiomioma/cirugía , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , California/epidemiología , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica Continua/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica Continua/tendencias , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/tendencias , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/educación , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Leiomioma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the most common reasons for outpatient gynecologic visits. Proper evaluation and diagnosis is essential and allows the clinician to present individualized treatment options to their patients.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Uterina/terapia , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos Orales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Examen Ginecologíco , Pruebas Hematológicas , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Anamnesis , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Uterina/clasificación , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Objective: The aim of this study is to examine complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among women with symptomatic uterine fibroids in the United States. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study of premenopausal women undergoing surgery for symptomatic fibroids and who enrolled in the Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation study from 2017 to 2019, we contrast women indicating use of at least one CAM modality specifically for fibroid symptoms against women using CAM for other reasons and CAM nonusers. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to identify participant characteristics independently associated with CAM use for fibroids. Results: Among 204 women, 55% were Black/African American and the mean age was 42 (standard deviation 6.6) years. CAM use was common (67%), with 42% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35%-49%) reporting use of CAM specifically to treat fibroid symptoms. Most commonly, CAM treatments used for fibroids were diet (62%) and herbs (52%), while CAM treatments for other reasons were exercise (80%) and massage (43%). On average, each participant who reported CAM use utilized three different types of CAM modalities. In a multivariable model, participants were more likely to use CAM for fibroids if they had pelvic pressure (odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% CI: 1.07-5.87, p = 0.04), a body-mass index lower than average (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60-0.97, p = 0.03), and a lower health-related quality of life score (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46-0.81, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this diverse sample of women with symptomatic fibroids, CAM use was highly prevalent. Our findings highlight the need for providers to query patients about CAM use and understand the role of CAM in fibroid management. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02100904.