Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 1120, 2020 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rural hospitals face unique challenges to adopting Enhanced Recovery protocols after colorectal surgical procedures. There are few examples of successful implementation in the United States, and fewer yet of prospective, outcomes-based trials. METHODS: This study drew data from elective bowel resection prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed cases 2 years prior (n = 214) and 3 years after (n = 224) implementing an ERAS protocol at a small, rural health network in upstate New York. Primary outcomes were cost, length-of-stay, readmission rate, and complications. RESULTS: The implementation required changes and buy-in at multiple levels of the institution. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean length of stay (6.9 versus 5.1 days) and per-patient savings to hospital ($3000) after implementation of ERAS protocol. There was no significant change in rate of 30-day readmissions or complications. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that for rural-specific barriers to implementation of Enhanced Recovery protocols there are specific organizational strategies that can ultimately yield sustainable endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , New York , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Surg Clin North Am ; 100(3): 629-634, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32402305

RESUMEN

Anal cancer is a rare cancer, comprising less than 5% of gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Diagnosis of anal canal cancer can be difficult given that presenting symptoms are similar to those of benign anorectal diseases. General surgeons who encounter suspected anal canal cancer need to have a good understanding of the anatomy of the anal canal, high index of suspicion for malignancy, and low threshold to biopsy lesions when indicated. This article discusses the most commonly encountered anal canal tumors, the evaluation of these tumors, and their management. The foundation for successful therapy includes timely diagnosis, accurate staging, and routine surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Melanoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Canal Anal/patología , Canal Anal/cirugía , Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estudios de Seguimiento , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Metástasis Linfática/terapia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proctoscopía , Pronóstico
3.
Surg Oncol ; 26(2): 212-217, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether receipt of radiation in patients with anal carcinoma is related to income level and other demographic factors. METHODS: The SEER database (1988-2011) was queried and linked to the Area Health Resources File (AHRF). We used logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses to correlate receipt of radiation and overall and cancer-specific survival with tumor stage, age, gender, and income. RESULTS: Of 28,028 patients with anal cancer, 14,783 (53%) received radiation. Patients in the lowest quartile for median household income were significantly more likely to present at higher stages, were 1.87 times more likely to receive radiation (95% CI 1.74-2.00, p < 0.001), and 1.27 times more likely to die of anal cancer (95% CI 1.18-1.33, p < 0.001) than those in the highest income quartile. Within most stages, however, the wealthiest patients were more likely to receive radiation therapy than the poorest patients. Additionally, we found that women presented at higher stages (p < 0.001), were 2.67 times more likely to receive radiation (95% CI 2.55-2.81, p < 0.001), and were 1.25 times more likely to die of anal cancer than men (95% CI 1.17-1.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women and poorer patients present with more advanced stages of anal cancer, more commonly receive radiation, and are more likely to die of anal cancer than men and wealthier patients, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Programa de VERF , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
Vascular ; 20(5): 268-72, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22962044

RESUMEN

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been performed by interventional radiology since the 1990s for symptomatic uterine fibroids with considerable success. Endovascular-trained vascular surgeons possess the necessary skills to successfully perform this procedure after an adequate but brief training period. Fourteen successful UAE procedures were performed by two vascular surgeons over a one-year period. Indications for the procedures were bleeding (12/14 patients, 86%), pain/bloating/pressure (13/14 patients, 93%) and dyspareunia (2/14 patients, 14%). All patients were initially evaluated by a gynecologist and referred for this procedure. Complications were minor and limited. Clinical follow-up demonstrated near-complete to complete symptom resolution in all but one patient for a 93% short-term success rate. Follow-up ultrasound studies demonstrated a reduction in the uterine fibroid size in all patients three months or more postprocedure. The mean fibroid size reduction was 4.07-3.26 cm (20%), P < 0.005. UAE is a procedure of proven benefit, well-matched to many vascular surgeons' skills and practice. Up to this point, few vascular surgeons have incorporated this endovascular procedure into their practices. This initial and somewhat limited study demonstrates one vascular surgery group's early success with this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma/terapia , Leiomiomatosis/terapia , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina , Arteria Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Leiomioma/irrigación sanguínea , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomiomatosis/irrigación sanguínea , Leiomiomatosis/diagnóstico por imagen , New York , Radiografía Intervencional/normas , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/educación , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/normas , Neoplasias Uterinas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA