RESUMEN
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has emerged as a promising tool for the preservation, viability assessment, and repair of deceased-donor kidneys prior to transplantation. These kidneys inevitably experience a period of ischemia during donation, which leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury when NMP is subsequently commenced. Ischemia-reperfusion injury has a major impact on the renal vasculature, metabolism, oxygenation, electrolyte balance, and acid-base homeostasis. With an increased understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, renoprotective strategies and therapeutic interventions can be devised to minimize additional injury during normothermic reperfusion, ensure the safe implementation of NMP, and improve kidney quality. This review discusses the pathophysiological alterations in the vasculature, metabolism, oxygenation, electrolyte balance, and acid-base homeostasis of deceased-donor kidneys and delineates renoprotective strategies and therapeutic interventions to mitigate renal injury and improve kidney quality during NMP.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Preservación de Órganos , Perfusión , Daño por Reperfusión , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Humanos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Riñón/fisiopatología , AnimalesRESUMEN
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is increasingly considered for pretransplant kidney quality assessment. However, fundamental questions about differences between in vivo and ex vivo renal function, as well as the impact of ischemic injury on ex vivo physiology, remain unanswered. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), alongside conventional parameters to explore differences between in vivo and ex vivo renal function and the impact of warm ischemia on a kidney's behavior ex vivo. Renal MRI scans and samples were obtained from living pigs (n = 30) in vivo. Next, kidney pairs were procured and exposed to minimal, or 75 minutes of warm ischemia, followed by 6 hours of hypothermic machine perfusion. Both kidneys simultaneously underwent 6-hour ex vivo perfusion in MRI-compatible NMP circuits to obtain multiparametric MRI data. Ischemically injured ex vivo kidneys showed a significantly altered regional blood flow distribution compared to in vivo and minimally damaged organs. Both ex vivo groups showed diffusion restriction relative to in vivo. Our findings underscore the differences between in vivo and ex vivo MRI-based renal characteristics. Therefore, when assessing organ viability during NMP, it should be considered to incorporate parameters beyond the conventional functional markers that are common in vivo.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is a promising pretransplant kidney quality assessment platform, but it remains crucial to increase its diagnostic potential while ensuring minimal additional injury to the already damaged kidney. Interventions that alter tubular transport can influence renal function and injury during perfusion. This study aimed to determine whether furosemide and desmopressin affect renal function and injury during NMP. METHODS: Eighteen porcine kidneys (n = 6 per group) were subjected to 30 min of warm ischemia and 4 h of oxygenated hypothermic perfusion before being subjected to 6 h of NMP. Each organ was randomized to receive no drug, furosemide (750 mg), or desmopressin (16 µg) during NMP. RESULTS: Compared with the other groups, the addition of furosemide resulted in significantly increased urine output, fractional excretion of sodium and potassium, and urea clearance during NMP. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels decreased significantly with furosemide supplementation compared with the other groups. The addition of desmopressin did not result in any significantly different outcome measurements compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the addition of furosemide affected renal function while attenuating tubulointerstitial injury during NMP. Therefore, furosemide supplementation may provide renal protection and serve as a functional test for pretransplant kidney viability assessment during NMP.
Asunto(s)
Furosemida , Riñón , Preservación de Órganos , Perfusión , Animales , Furosemida/farmacología , Porcinos , Perfusión/métodos , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/patología , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Desamino Arginina Vasopresina/farmacología , Trasplante de Riñón , Isquemia Tibia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is a promising tool for assessing an isolated kidney prior to transplantation. However, there is no consensus on the perfusate's optimal oxygen-carrying capacity to support renal function. To investigate the association of hemoglobin levels with renal function parameters, a retrospective analysis of isolated, normothermically, perfused porcine kidneys was performed. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 228 kidneys underwent 4 h of NMP with perfusates that varied in hemoglobin levels. A generalized linear model was used to determine the association of hemoglobin levels with time-weighted means of renal function markers, such as fractional sodium excretion (FENa) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). Stratified by baseline hemoglobin level (<4.5, 4.5-6, or >6 mmol/L), these markers were modeled over time using a generalized linear mixed-effects model. All models were adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Until a hemoglobin level of around 5 mmol/L was reached, increasing hemoglobin levels were associated with superior FENa and CrCl. Thereafter, this association plateaued. When hemoglobin levels were categorized, hemoglobin <4.5 mmol/L was associated with worse renal function. Hemoglobin levels were neither significantly associated with proteinuria during NMP nor with ATP levels at the end of NMP. Hemoglobin levels >6 mmol/L showed no additional benefits in renal function. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found an association between baseline hemoglobin levels and superior renal function parameters, but not injury, during NMP of porcine kidneys. Furthermore, we show that performing a retrospective cohort study of preclinical data is feasible and able to answer additional questions, reducing the potential use of laboratory animals.