Dual inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK conquers MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers by accumulating DNA damage.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations frequently occur in cancers, particularly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Although KRASG12C inhibitors have recently been approved, effective precision therapies have not yet been established for all KRAS-mutant cancers. Many treatments for KRAS-mutant cancers, including epigenome-targeted drugs, are currently under investigation. Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins are a family of small proteins covalently attached to and detached from other proteins in cells via the processes called SUMOylation and de-SUMOylation. We assessed whether SUMOylation inhibition was effective in KRAS-mutant cancer cells. METHODS: The efficacy of the first-in-class SUMO-activating enzyme E inhibitor TAK-981 (subasumstat) was assessed in multiple human and mouse KRAS-mutated cancer cell lines. A gene expression assay using a TaqMan array was used to identify biomarkers of TAK-981 efficacy. The biological roles of SUMOylation inhibition and subsequent regulatory mechanisms were investigated using immunoblot analysis, immunofluorescence assays, and mouse models. RESULTS: We discovered that TAK-981 downregulated the expression of the currently undruggable MYC and effectively suppressed the growth of MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers across different tissue types. Moreover, TAK-981-resistant cells were sensitized to SUMOylation inhibition via MYC-overexpression. TAK-981 induced proteasomal degradation of MYC by altering the balance between SUMOylation and ubiquitination and promoting the binding of MYC and Fbxw7, a key factor in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The efficacy of TAK-981 monotherapy in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models using a mouse-derived CMT167 cell line was significant but modest. Since MAPK inhibition of the KRAS downstream pathway is crucial in KRAS-mutant cancer, we expected that co-inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK might be a good option. Surprisingly, combination treatment with TAK-981 and trametinib dramatically induced apoptosis in multiple cell lines and gene-engineered mouse-derived organoids. Moreover, combination therapy resulted in long-term tumor regression in mouse models using cell lines of different tissue types. Finally, we revealed that combination therapy complementally inhibited Rad51 and BRCA1 and accumulated DNA damage. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MYC downregulation occurred via SUMOylation inhibition in KRAS-mutant cancer cells. Our findings indicate that dual inhibition of SUMOylation and MEK may be a promising treatment for MYC-expressing KRAS-mutant cancers by enhancing DNA damage accumulation.

Case report: Navigating treatment pathways for cardiac intimal sarcoma with PDGFRß N666K mutation.

In the realm of rare cardiac tumors, intimal sarcoma presents a formidable challenge, often requiring innovative treatment approaches. This case report presents a unique instance of primary intimal sarcoma in the left atrium, underscoring the critical role of genomic profiling in guiding treatment. Initial genomic testing unveiled a somatic, active mutation in PDGFRß (PDGFRß N666K), accompanied by MDM2 and CDK4 amplifications. This discovery directed the treatment course toward pazopanib, a PDGFRß inhibitor, following irradiation. The patient's response was remarkable, with the therapeutic efficacy of pazopanib lasting for 16.3 months. However, the patient experienced a recurrence in the left atrium, where subsequent genomic analysis revealed the absence of the PDGFRß N666K mutation and a significant reduction in PDGFRß expression. This case report illustrates the complexities and evolving nature of cardiac intimal sarcoma treatment, emphasizing the potential of PDGFRß signaling as a strategic target and highlighting the importance of adapting treatment pathways in response to genetic shifts.

Challenges in the treatment of BRAF K601E-mutated lung carcinoma: a case report of rapid response and resistance to dabrafenib and trametinib.

We report a case of limited effectiveness of dabrafenib and trametinib in a 59-year-old man with poorly differentiated lung carcinoma and a rare BRAF K601E mutation. The patient, unresponsive to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, received these targeted agents as second-line treatment. Despite a notable initial response, tumor regression lasted only 52 days. A subsequent liquid biopsy revealed additional alterations (BRAF amplification, KIT amplification, TP53 S241F), indicating a complex resistance mechanism. This case underscores the challenges in treating BRAF K601E-mutant lung carcinoma, emphasizing the need for advanced molecular diagnostics, personalized approaches, and further research into more effective therapies for unique genetic profiles.