Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Parasitol Res ; 116(8): 2131-2137, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28526990

RESUMEN

Supplementary feeding is widely used in game management but may aid the transmission of parasites. Firstly, feeding sites attract animals and may be regarded as high-risk areas for parasite transmission. Secondly, high host population densities resulting from and supported by supplementary feeding, as well as accumulation of parasites in the environment, may increase parasite prevalence. Our aim was to investigate whether host density or the number of feeding sites drives endoparasite infection in an Estonian wild boar (Sus scrofa) population. For this, we collected wild boar faeces from forests, and soil samples from supplementary feeding sites in central and south-eastern Estonia. The role of host density and number of feeding sites on both the risk and mean abundance of endoparasite infection was modelled using generalized linear models (GLM). The presence of biohelminths in faecal samples was associated with both wild boar and feeding site density, whereas the presence of Eimeria sp. oocysts in faecal samples was only associated with wild boar density. Helminth eggs were found more often from the soil of active and abandoned feeding sites than from control areas. This could reflect parasitic contamination or indicate that supplementary feeding sites are suitable habitat for soil-dwelling nematodes. These results suggest that the effects of supplementary feeding on parasite prevalence in wild boar are mediated by the characteristics of parasite life cycles.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Nematodos/fisiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Sus scrofa , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Ecosistema , Estonia/epidemiología , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Nematodos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Óvulo , Densidad de Población , Prevalencia , Suelo/parasitología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología
3.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 20187, 2019 Dec 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874973

RESUMEN

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

4.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 17372, 2018 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30478374

RESUMEN

After a strong demographic decline before World War II, wild boar populations are expanding and the species is now the second-most abundant ungulate in Europe. This increase raises concerns due to wild boar impact on crops and natural ecosystems and as potential vector of diseases. Additionally, wild boar can hybridize with domestic pigs, which could increase health risks and alter wild boar adaptive potential. We analysed 47,148 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in wild boar from Europe (292) and the Near East (16), and commercial (44) and local (255) pig breeds, to discern patterns of hybridization across Europe. We identified 33 wild boars with more than 10% domestic ancestry in their genome, mostly concentrated in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and Serbia. This difference is probably due to contrasting practices, with free-ranging vs. industrial farming but more samples would be needed to investigate larger geographic patterns. Our results suggest hybridization has occurred over a long period and is still ongoing, as we observed recent hybrids. Although wild and domestic populations have maintained their genetic distinctiveness, potential health threats raise concerns and require implementation of management actions and farming practices aimed at reducing contact between wild and domestic pigs.


Asunto(s)
Hibridación Genética/genética , Sus scrofa/genética , Porcinos/genética , Animales , Austria , Cruzamiento/métodos , Ecosistema , Europa (Continente) , Medio Oriente , Hibridación de Ácido Nucleico/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética
5.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0179463, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594953

RESUMEN

Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and other grouse species represent conservation concerns across Europe due to their negative abundance trends. In addition to habitat deterioration, predation is considered a major factor contributing to population declines. While the role of generalist predators on grouse predation is relatively well known, the impact of the omnivorous wild boar has remained elusive. We hypothesize that wild boar is an important predator of ground-nesting birds, but has been neglected as a bird predator because traditional morphological methods underestimate the proportion of birds in wild boar diet. To distinguish between different mammalian predator species, as well as different grouse prey species, we developed a molecular method based on the analysis of mitochondrial DNA that allows accurate species identification. We collected 109 wild boar faeces at protected capercaillie leks and surrounding areas and analysed bird consumption using genetic methods and classical morphological examination. Genetic analysis revealed that the proportion of birds in wild boar faeces was significantly higher (17.3%; 4.5×) than indicated by morphological examination (3.8%). Moreover, the genetic method allowed considerably more precise taxonomic identification of consumed birds compared to morphological analysis. Our results demonstrate: (i) the value of using genetic approaches in faecal dietary analysis due to their higher sensitivity, and (ii) that wild boar is an important predator of ground-nesting birds, deserving serious consideration in conservation planning for capercaillie and other grouse.


Asunto(s)
Aves/fisiología , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Dieta , Heces/química , Comportamiento de Nidificación/fisiología , Sus scrofa/fisiología , Animales , Estonia , Conducta Predatoria
6.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0135254, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26244659

RESUMEN

Supplementary feeding of ungulates, being widely used in game management, may have unwanted consequences. Its role in agricultural damage is well-studied, but few studies have considered the potential for the practice to attract ground nest predators. Our goal was to identify the factors influencing ground nest predation in the vicinity of year-round supplementary feeding sites for wild boar and to characterise their spatiotemporal scope. We conducted two separate artificial ground nest experiments in five different hunting districts in south-eastern Estonia. The quantity of food provided and distance of a nest from the feeding site were the most important factors determining predation risk. Larger quantities of food resulted in higher predation risk, while predation risk responded in a non-linear fashion to distance from the feeding site. Although predation risk eventually decreases if supplementary feeding is ceased for at least four years, recently abandoned feeding sites still pose a high predation risk.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Comportamiento de Nidificación/fisiología , Conducta Predatoria/fisiología , Sus scrofa/fisiología , Animales , Ecosistema , Estonia , Geografía , Modelos Teóricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Parasit Vectors ; 8: 182, 2015 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Echinococcus granulosus and E. multilocularis are tapeworm parasites of major medical and veterinary importance, causing cystic and alveolar echinococcosis, respectively. Both diseases are listed among the most severe parasitic diseases in humans, representing 2 of the 17 neglected diseases prioritised by the World Health Organisation. However, little is known about the role of urban animals in transmission of both parasite species. FINDINGS: A sensitive non-invasive genetic method was used to monitor E. granulosus and E. multilocularis infection among dog faecal samples collected from an urban area in Estonia in 2012-13. Out of 181 dog faecal samples analysed, 2.2% tested positive for E. granulosus, determined by sequencing as genotype G1. None of the samples tested positive for E. multilocularis. CONCLUSIONS: We report contamination of an urban environment with highly pathogenic E. granulosus G1 disseminated by dogs, and a potential risk to human health.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/parasitología , Equinococosis/veterinaria , Echinococcus granulosus/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Secuencia de Bases , Perros , Equinococosis/parasitología , Echinococcus granulosus/genética , Heces/parasitología , Genotipo , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Óvulo/parasitología , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA