RESUMEN
In the United Kingdom, endometrial biopsy reports traditionally consist of a morphologic description followed by a conclusion. Recently published consensus guidelines for reporting benign endometrial biopsies advocate the use of standardized terminology. In this project we aimed to assess the acceptability and benefits of this simplified "diagnosis only" format for reporting non-neoplastic endometrial biopsies. Two consultants reported consecutive endometrial biopsies using 1 of 3 possible formats: (i) diagnosis only, (ii) diagnosis plus an accompanying comment, and (iii) the traditional descriptive format. Service users were asked to provide feedback on this approach via an anonymized online survey. The reproducibility of this system was assessed on a set of 53 endometrial biopsies among consultants and senior histopathology trainees. Of 370 consecutive benign endometrial biopsies, 245 (66%) were reported as diagnosis only, 101 (27%) as diagnosis plus a brief comment, and 24 (7%) as diagnosis following a morphologic description. Of the 43 survey respondents (28 gynecologists, 11 pathologists, and 4 clinical nurse specialists), 40 (93%) preferred a diagnosis only, with 3 (7%) being against/uncertain about a diagnosis only report. Among 3 histopathology consultants and 4 senior trainees there was majority agreement on the reporting format in 53/53 (100%) and 52/53 (98%) biopsies. In summary, we found that reporting benign specimens within standardized, well-understood diagnostic categories is an acceptable alternative to traditional descriptive reporting, with the latter reserved for the minority of cases that do not fit into specific categories. This revised approach has the potential to improve reporting uniformity and reproducibility.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Endometrial/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Biopsia , Consenso , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patología , Endometrio/patología , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Enfermeras Clínicas , Patólogos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Informe de Investigación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Pelvic pain (acute or chronic) is a common symptom in women of all ages. Ultrasonography is the least invasive investigative tool available to the clinician. Transvaginal probes produce high-resolution images of the pelvic organs, providing reliable and reproducible information without the need for a full bladder. Common gynaecological pathology involving the uterus, Fallopian tube and/or the ovary can be diagnosed with confidence. Non-gynaecological pathology involving the bowel can also be diagnosed with accuracy, and will often be seen in the acute gynaecological setting. Ultrasound can be used to triage patients into appropriate treatment protocols, enabling the clinician to avoid surgery in some cases and select the correct surgical approach in others. If the patient has a negative pregnancy test, no pelvic tenderness on bimanual examination and a normal scan, significant pathology is very unlikely.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/complicaciones , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
The authors report the case history of a patient with symptoms and signs suggestive of endometriosis, who was found to have Schistosomiasis. The laparoscopic appearance was of gelatinous deposits throughout the pelvis which were thought to be "non-pigmented" endometriosis. However, histological examination of the biopsy specimens revealed Schistosomiasis.
Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Esquistosomiasis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endometriosis/patología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/parasitología , Dolor Pélvico/patología , Esquistosomiasis/parasitología , Esquistosomiasis/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the current diagnostic and therapeutic role of ultrasound in the management of pelvic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in ultrasound technology and expertise have facilitated the accurate diagnosis of common gynaecological and nongynaecological pathologies. Peritoneal and deep infiltrating endometriosis can now be diagnosed using hard and soft ultrasound-based markers. The combination of ultrasound-guided aspiration and instillation of a sclerosant is an alternative to surgery in the management of adnexal masses. SUMMARY: Experience is a key factor in the ability of transvaginal ultrasound to characterize common gynaecological disorders with accuracy. Therapeutic ultrasound provides an alternative to surgery.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses various aspects of the management of women with pregnancies of unknown location. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of pregnancies of unknown location is dependent on the quality of scanning for a given early-pregnancy unit. The higher the quality of scanning, the better the detection of ectopic pregnancy using ultrasound as a single diagnostic test, which in turn results in fewer women being classified with a pregnancy of unknown location. Varying the discriminatory zone does not significantly improve the detection of ectopic pregnancies in a pregnancy of unknown location population. A single serum human chorionic gonadotrophin, when used in a specialized transvaginal scanning unit, is not only potentially falsely reassuring but also unhelpful in excluding the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. A single-visit approach has also been shown to be ineffective. The vast majority of women with a pregnancy of unknown location are at low-risk for ectopic pregnancy. Traditional strategies are capable of detecting the failing pregnancies of unknown location and intra-uterine pregnancies within a pregnancy of unknown location population, but they lack sensitivity for detecting ectopic pregnancies. This justifies the recent development and use of mathematical modelling techniques to predict ectopic pregnancies in the pregnancies of unknown location population. SUMMARY: New mathematical models have been developed to predict the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location; however, prospective studies are needed to assess the reproducibility of these models in different centres on different populations. Hopefully such models will enable the clinician to correctly classify pregnancies of unknown location earlier, in turn reducing the number of follow-up visits.
Asunto(s)
Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo Ectópico/terapia , Biomarcadores , Gonadotropina Coriónica Humana de Subunidad beta/sangre , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/sangre , Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) for the detection of ectopic pregnancies (EPs) in women undergoing surgery for presumed ectopic pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective, observational study. Women were diagnosed with an EP using TVS if any of the following were noted in the adnexal region: (i) an inhomogeneous mass or blob sign adjacent to the ovary and moving separately from the ovary; or (ii) a mass with a hyper-echoic ring around the gestational sac or bagel sign; or (iii) a gestational sac with a fetal pole with or without cardiac activity. The final diagnosis was based on the findings at surgery and subsequent histology of removed tissues. RESULTS: 6621 consecutive women underwent TVS during the study; 200/6621 (3.0%) women were diagnosed as having an EP using TVS. Forty-eight non-surgically managed women were excluded from the analysis. 85.5% of women presented with symptoms and 14.5% were asymptomatic. In 88 (57.9%) cases an inhomogeneous mass or blob sign was visualized and in 20 cases (13.2%) an embryo +/- cardiac activity. Thirty-one (20.4%) had a hyper-echoic ring in the adnexa. In 11 (7.2%) cases there was no evidence of either an intra-uterine (IUP) or EP on ultrasound. Two (1.3%) IUPs were subsequently diagnosed as heterotopic pregnancies. There was no association between the presenting complaints and TVS findings. 152 surgical procedures were performed. In 5.9% (9/152) of these cases no EPs were confirmed in fallopian tube or pelvis at laparoscopy. In 9.1% (13/143) of cases an EP was visualized at surgery when not seen on the index ultrasound scan. The sensitivity and specificity of TVS to detect EP were 90.9% and 99.9%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 93.5% and 99.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 90.9% of ectopic pregnancies in this study population can be accurately diagnosed using TVS prior to surgery. The diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy should be based on the positive visualization of an adnexal mass using TVS. This should in turn result in a decrease in the number of false positive laparoscopies.