Length of Stay and Hospital Cost Reductions After Implementing Bedside Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) in a Critical Care Unit.

Background: Critical care patients receive 50% of gastrostomy tubes placed in the United States. Several gastrostomy placement methods exist, however care processes remain variable and often lack health system cost effectiveness. No data exists on efficiency or cost impact of performing bedside percutaneous ultrasound gastrostomy (PUG) on patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure. This study's objective was to determine if implementing bedside PUG would positively impact efficiency and cost outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared to usual care gastrostomy. Design and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure who received a gastrostomy consult or procedure in the ICU. Patients received PUG or usual care gastrostomy, determined by the presiding attending's skillset, and both groups were compared across patients' demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total hospital costs. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis, 45 patients in the PUG group and 43 in the usual care gastrostomy group. No differences were observed in demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients who received PUG had a significantly shorter mean ICULOS and hospital LOS, with reductions of 5.0 and 8.7 days, respectively. Total hospital costs were significantly reduced in the PUG group, with a cost savings of US $26,621 per patient. No differences in mortality or discharge disposition were observed. PUG patients received concomitant percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) and PUG ("TPUG") 70% of the time, whereas no usual care patients received concomitant procedures. Off-hour procedures occurred in 53.3% of PUG and 4.6% of usual care gastrostomy. Conclusions: This study demonstrates bedside PUG leads to decreased LOS and total hospital costs in patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure. Hospital costs were significantly reduced with a per patient savings of $26,621 compared to usual care gastrostomy.

Bedside percutaneous ultrasound gastrostomy tube placement by critical care physicians.

Critically ill patients often require gastrostomy tubes. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has become the most common method of placement but is not widely performed by critical care physicians, in part due to their lack of familiarity and training in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Percutaneous ultrasound gastrostomy (PUG) is a novel procedure for gastrostomy tube placement that utilizes ultrasound-based methods already familiar to critical care physicians. This technical note describes bedside PUG in the first five intensive care unit patients. All patients received timely gastrostomy placement, without complication, and were able to quickly achieve goal enteral nutrition.

A Pilot Study of Ultrasonography-Naïve Operators' Ability to Use Tele-Ultrasonography to Assess the Heart and Lung.

INTRODUCTION: Remotely tele-mentored ultrasound (RTMUS) involves the real-time guidance of US-naïve providers as they perform point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by remotely located, US-proficient providers via telemedicine. The concordance between RTMUS and POCUS in the evaluation of critically ill patients has not been reported. This study sought to evaluate the concordance between RTMUS and POCUS for the cardiopulmonary evaluation of patients in acute respiratory insufficiency and/or shock. METHODS: Ultrasound-naÏve nurses performed RTMUS on critically ill patients. Concordance between RTMUS and POCUS (performed by critical care fellows) in the evaluation of the heart and lungs was reported. The test characteristics of RTMUS were calculated using POCUS as a gold standard. Concordance between RTMUS and available transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT) scans was also reported. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Concordance between RTMUS and POCUS was good (90%-100%) for left ventricle function, right ventricle (RV) dilatation/dysfunction, pericardial effusion, lung sliding, pulmonary interstitial syndrome, pleural effusion, and fair (80%) for lung consolidation. Concordance between RTMUS and TTE or CT was similar. RTMUS was highly specific (88%-100%) for all abnormalities evaluated and highly sensitive (89%-100%) for most abnormalities although sensitivity for the detection of RV dilatation/dysfunction (33%) and pulmonary interstitial syndrome (71%) was negatively impacted by false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: RTMUS may be a reasonable substitute for POCUS in the cardiopulmonary evaluation of patients with acute respiratory insufficiency and/or shock. These findings should be validated on a larger scale.

A novel method of calculating stroke volume using point-of-care echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care transthoracic echocardiography (POC-TTE) is essential in shock management, allowing for stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) estimation using left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTD) and left ventricular velocity time integral (VTI). Since LVOTD is difficult to obtain and error-prone, the body surface area (BSA) or a modified BSA (mBSA) is sometimes used as a surrogate (LVOTDBSA, LVOTDmBSA). Currently, no models of LVOTD based on patient characteristics exist nor have BSA-based alternatives been validated. METHODS: Focused rapid echocardiographic evaluations (FREEs) performed in intensive care unit patients over a 3-year period were reviewed. The age, sex, height, and weight were recorded. Human expert measurement of LVOTD (LVOTDHEM) was performed. An epsilon-support vector regression was used to derive a computer model of the predicted LVOTD (LVOTDCM). Training, testing, and validation were completed. Pearson coefficient and Bland-Altman were used to assess correlation and agreement. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven TTEs with ideal images of the LVOT were identified. LVOTDCM was the best method of SV measurement, with a correlation of 0.87. LVOTDmBSA and LVOTDBSA had correlations of 0.71 and 0.49 respectively. Root mean square error for LVOTDCM, LVOTDmBSA, and LVOTDBSA respectively were 13.3, 37.0, and 26.4. Bland-Altman for LVOTDCM demonstrated a bias of 5.2. LVOTDCM model was used in a separate validation set of 116 ideal images yielding a linear correlation of 0.83 between SVHEM and SVCM. Bland Altman analysis for SVCM had a bias of 2.3 with limits of agreement (LOAs) of - 24 and 29, a percent error (PE) of 34% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 13.9. CONCLUSIONS: A computer model may allow for SV and CO measurement when the LVOTD cannot be assessed. Further study is needed to assess the accuracy of the model in various patient populations and in comparison to the gold standard pulmonary artery catheter. The LVOTDCM is more accurate with less error compared to BSA-based methods, however there is still a percentage error of 33%. BSA should not be used as a surrogate measure of LVOTD. Once validated and improved this model may improve feasibility and allow hemodynamic monitoring via POC-TTE once it is validated.

Brief training increases nurses' comfort using tele-ultrasound: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Nurses and other non-physician providers have demonstrated proficiency at obtaining images in the tele-ultrasound system. However, use of this skill requires comfort with the procedure and willingness to incorporate it into practice. OBJECTIVES: To assess 1) level of comfort of non-physician providers performing tele-ultrasound before and after brief training and 2) feasibility of implementing an educational programme that improves level of comfort. METHODS: Feasibility study including a brief training session followed by hands-on tele-ultrasound. The pilot cohort performed tele-ultrasound on a healthy volunteer. The clinical cohort performed tele-ultrasound on criticalli ill patients with shock or respiratory failure. Remote intensivists provided real-time guidance via tele-medicine technology. Each participant completed a survey assessing training experience and level of comfort before and after training. RESULTS: Sixteen non-physician providers participated. All participants agreed that the training session prepared them for image acquisition and that the training experience was positive. The number of participants comfortable with ultrasound improved significantly (before vs. after training: 5/16 [31%] vs. 16/16 [100%], mean Likert score 2.7 vs. 4.8, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After brief training, participants could comfortably perform tele-ultrasound and were more willing to incorporate it into tele-ICU-directed care. Results support conducting a larger-scale trial of tele-US to assess clinical utility.

Echo is a good, not perfect, measure of cardiac output in critically ill surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Compared with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been shown to have good agreement in cardiac output (CO) measurement in nonsurgical populations. Our hypothesis is that the feasibility and accuracy of CO measured by TTE (CO-TTE), relative to CO measured by PAC thermodilution (CO-PAC), is different in surgical intensive care unit patients (SP) and nonsurgical patients (NSP). METHODS: Surgical patients with PAC for hemodynamic monitoring and NSP undergoing right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled. Cardiac output was measured by CO-PAC and CO-TTE. Pearson coefficients were used to assess correlation. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine agreement. RESULTS: Over 18 months, 84 patients were enrolled (51 SP, 33 NSP). Cardiac output TTE could be measured in 65% (33/51) of SP versus 79% (26/33) of NSP; p = 0.17. Inability to measure the left ventricular outflow tract diameter was the primary reason for failure in both groups; 94% (17/18) in SP versus 86% (6/7) NSP; p = 0.47. Velocity time integral could be measured in all patients. In both groups, correlation between PAC and TTE measurement was strong; SP (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001), NSP (r = 0.86; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated bias of -0.1 L/min, limits of agreement of -2.5 and +2.3 L/min, percentage error (PE) of 40% for SP, and bias of +0.4 L/min, limits of agreement of -1.8 and +2.5 L/min, and PE of 40% for NSP. CONCLUSION: There was strong correlation and moderate agreement between TTE and PAC in both SP and NSP. In both patient populations, inability to measure the left ventricular outflow tract diameter was a limiting factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic tests or criteria, level III.