Cross-reactive antibodies against H7N9 and H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Thai population.

BACKGROUD: Avian influenza H5N1 and H7N9 viruses have jumped across species from avian to humans and become a threat to public health. Not much is known about pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies against these avian viruses in human population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cross-reactive anti-HA and anti-NA antibodies to avian influenza H5N1 and H7N9 viruses in Thai population. METHOD: Archival serum samples from 100 blood donors and 21 patients infected with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pdmH1N1) virus were investigated by hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) and neuraminidase-inhibition (NAI) assays for anti-HA and anti-NA antibodies, respectively. The test antigens comprised 2 human viruses (pdmH1N1 and H3N2 viruses), and 6 reassortant viruses carrying HA and NA genes of avian H5N1 or H7N9 virus generated by reverse genetics. RESULTS: HAI antibody titers ≥ 10 were found in 58, 89, 0 and 15% of blood donors as tested against pdmH1N1, H3N2, H5N1 and H7N9 viruses, respectively. On the other hand, NAI antibodies were detected in 98, 94, 73 and 53% of blood donors when reverse genetic-derived viruses harboring NA gene from pdmH1N1, H3N2, H5N1 or H7N9 virus were used as the test antigens. Moreover, 66.7% of pdmH1N1 patients who had > 4 fold increase in HAI antibody titers in paired sera developed > 4 fold increase in NAI antibody titers. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-NA antibody has broader reactivity than anti-HA antibody, therefore, it can be a supplement to anti-HA antibody in the prevention against novel influenza viruses.

Serological response to the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus for disease diagnosis and estimating the infection rate in Thai population.

BACKGROUND: Individuals infected with the 2009 pandemic virus A(H1N1) developed serological response which can be measured by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (microNT) assays. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MicroNT and HI assays for specific antibody to the 2009 pandemic virus were conducted in serum samples collected at the end of the first epidemic wave from various groups of Thai people: laboratory confirmed cases, blood donors and health care workers (HCW) in Bangkok and neighboring province, general population in the North and the South, as well as archival sera collected at pre- and post-vaccination from vaccinees who received influenza vaccine of the 2006 season. This study demonstrated that goose erythrocytes yielded comparable HI antibody titer as compared to turkey erythrocytes. In contrast to the standard protocol, our investigation found out the necessity to eliminate nonspecific inhibitor present in the test sera by receptor destroying enzyme (RDE) prior to performing microNT assay. The investigation in pre-pandemic serum samples showed that HI antibody was more specific to the 2009 pandemic virus than NT antibody. Based on data from pre-pandemic sera together with those from the laboratory confirmed cases, HI antibody titers ≥ 40 for adults and ≥ 20 for children could be used as the cut-off level to differentiate between the individuals with or without past infection by the 2009 pandemic virus. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the cut-off criteria, the infection rates of 7 and 12.8% were estimated in blood donors and HCW, respectively after the first wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Among general population, the infection rate of 58.6% was found in children versus 3.1% in adults.