Clinical Decision Support Principles for Quality Improvement and Research.

Pediatric hospitalists frequently interact with clinical decision support (CDS) tools in patient care and use these tools for quality improvement or research. In this method/ology paper, we provide an introduction and practical approach to developing and evaluating CDS tools within the electronic health record. First, we define CDS and describe the types of CDS interventions that exist. We then outline a stepwise approach to CDS development, which begins with defining the problem and understanding the system. We present a framework for metric development and then describe tools that can be used for CDS design (eg, 5 Rights of CDS, "10 commandments," usability heuristics, human-centered design) and testing (eg, validation, simulation, usability testing). We review approaches to evaluating CDS tools, which range from randomized studies to traditional quality improvement methods. Lastly, we discuss practical considerations for implementing CDS, including the assessment of a project team's skills and an organization's information technology resources.

Development and evaluation of trigger tools to identify pediatric blood management errors.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patient blood management (PBM) programs require continuous surveillance of errors and near misses. However, most PBM programs rely on passive surveillance methods. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a set of automated trigger tools for active surveillance of pediatric PBM errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Rand-UCLA method with an expert panel of pediatric transfusion medicine specialists to identify and prioritize candidate trigger tools for all transfused blood products. We then iteratively developed automated queries of electronic health record (EHR) data for the highest priority triggers. Two physicians manually reviewed a subset of cases meeting trigger tool criteria and estimated each trigger tool's positive predictive value (PPV). We then estimated the rate of PBM errors, whether they reached the patient, and adverse events for each trigger tool across four years in a single pediatric health system. RESULTS: We identified 28 potential triggers for pediatric PBM errors and developed 5 automated trigger tools (positive patient identification, missing irradiation, unwashed products despite prior anaphylaxis, transfusion lasting >4 hours, over-transfusion by volume). The PPV for ordering errors ranged from 38-100%. The most frequently detected near miss event reaching patients was first transfusions without positive patient identification (estimate 303, 95% CI: 288-318 per year). The only adverse events detected were from over-transfusions by volume, including 4 adverse events detected on manual review that had not been reported in passive surveillance systems. DISCUSSION: It is feasible to automatically detect pediatric PBM errors using existing data captured in the EHR that enable active surveillance systems. Over-transfusions may be one of the most frequent causes of harm in the pediatric environment.