Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 133(1): 39-47, 2016 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26555329

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Angina often persists or returns in populations following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We hypothesized that ranolazine would be effective in reducing angina and improving quality of life (QOL) in incomplete revascularization (ICR) post-PCI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In RIVER-PCI, 2604 patients with a history of chronic angina who had ICR post-PCI were randomized 1:1 to oral ranolazine versus placebo; QOL analyses included 2389 randomized subjects. Angina and QOL questionnaires were collected at baseline and months 1, 6, and 12. Ranolazine patients were more likely than placebo to discontinue study drug by month 6 (20.4% versus 14.1%, P<0.001) and 12 (27.2% versus 21.3%, P<0.001). Following qualifying index PCI, the primary QOL outcome (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] angina frequency score) improved markedly, but similarly, in the ranolazine and placebo groups, respectively, from baseline (67.3±24.5 versus 69.7±24.0, P=0.01) to month 1 (86.6±18.1 versus 85.8±18.5, P=0.27) and month 12 (88.4±17.8 versus 88.5±17.8, P=0.94). SAQ angina frequency repeated measures did not differ in adjusted analysis between groups post baseline (mean difference 1.0; 95% CI -0.2, 2.2; P=0.11). Improvement in SAQ angina frequency was observed with ranolazine at month 6 among diabetics (mean difference 3.3; 95% CI 0.6, 6.1; P=0.02) and those with more angina (baseline SAQ angina frequency ≤60; mean difference 3.4; 95% CI 0.6, 6.2; P=0.02), but was not maintained at month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Despite ICR following PCI, there was no incremental benefit in angina or QOL measures by adding ranolazine in this angiographically-identified population. These measures markedly improved within 1 month of PCI and persisted up to 1 year in both treatment arms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01442038.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina de Pecho/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Ranolazina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Revascularización Miocárdica/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Lancet ; 387(10014): 136-45, 2016 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26474810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incomplete revascularisation is common after percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. We aimed to assess whether adjunctive anti-ischaemic pharmacotherapy with ranolazine would improve the prognosis of patients with incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We performed this multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial at 245 centres in 15 countries in Europe, Israel, Russia, and the USA. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with a history of chronic angina with incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention (defined as one or more lesions with ≥50% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery ≥2 mm diameter) were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive web-based block randomisation system (block sizes of ten), to receive either twice-daily oral ranolazine 1000 mg or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by diabetes history (presence vs absence) and acute coronary syndrome presentation (acute coronary syndrome vs non-acute coronary syndrome). Study investigators, including all research teams, and patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to first occurrence of ischaemia-driven revascularisation or ischaemia-driven hospitalisation without revascularisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01442038. FINDINGS: Between Nov 3, 2011, and May 27, 2013, we randomly assigned 2651 patients to receive ranolazine (n=1332) or placebo (n=1319); 2604 (98%) patients comprised the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 643 days (IQR 575-758), the composite primary endpoint occurred in 345 (26%) patients assigned to ranolazine and 364 (28%) patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·82-1·10; p=0·48). Incidence of ischaemia-driven revascularisation and ischaemia-driven hospitalisation did not differ significantly between groups. 189 (14%) patients in the ranolazine group and 137 (11%) patients in the placebo group discontinued study drug because of an adverse event (p=0·04). INTERPRETATION: Ranolazine did not reduce the composite rate of ischaemia-driven revascularisation or hospitalisation without revascularisation in patients with a history of chronic angina who had incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Further studies are warranted to establish whether other treatment could be effective in improving the prognosis of high-risk patients in this population. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences, Menarini.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Ranolazina/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
3.
Invest New Drugs ; 31(2): 355-62, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22615058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This Phase I study assessed the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor AZD4877 in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and lymphoma. METHODS: In this multicenter study, a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. AZD4877 was given as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each 21-day cycle. Responses were assessed with CT scans +/- PET after 6 and 12 weeks, then every 12 weeks while on therapy. An additional four patients with lymphoma were enrolled at the MTD. RESULTS: 29 patients were enrolled and 22 patients received at least one dose of AZD4877 and were evaluable for safety. The MTD was 11 mg. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia (n = 2 patients, 15 mg cohort). The most common adverse events were grade 1/2 fatigue, nausea, neutropenia and dyspnea. AZD4877 exposure generally increased with dose, with mean elimination half-life approximately 16 h at the MTD. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated moderate correlation between plasma drug concentrations at 6 or 24 h and monoaster formation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). CONCLUSIONS: AZD4877 is generally well-tolerated with pharmacodynamic evidence of target inhibition in circulating PBMCs.


Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/farmacocinética , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Cinesinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinonas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Distribución Tisular
4.
Invest New Drugs ; 31(4): 1001-7, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23329066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: AZD4877 is a potent inhibitor of the mitotic spindle kinesin, Eg5. Early-phase clinical studies in a broad range of cancers showed that AZD4877 is well tolerated. This Phase II study evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (Cmax) of AZD4877 in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00661609). PATIENTS AND METHODS: AZD4877 25 mg was administered once-weekly for 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate (RECIST). Recruitment was to be halted if ≤ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients achieved an objective tumor response. Cmax was assessed on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1. RESULTS: None of the first 20 patients evaluable for efficacy achieved an objective response; enrollment was therefore halted. During this initial analysis, a further 21 patients were recruited. Overall, 39 patients were evaluable for efficacy, including one with confirmed partial response (PR) and seven patients with stable disease for ≥ 8 weeks (including one unconfirmed PR). The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (22 patients), fatigue (12), leukopenia (7) and constipation (6); the most commonly reported grade ≥ 3 TRAE was neutropenia (21). Four patients had serious TRAEs. On days 1 and 8, the geometric mean Cmax of AZD4877 was 138 ng/ml (CV = 75 %) and 144 ng/ml (CV = 109 %), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AZD4877 was generally tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Given the limited clinical efficacy, further development of AZD4877 in urothelial cancer is not planned.


Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Cinesinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Huso Acromático/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Urotelio/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/farmacocinética , Benzamidas/farmacología , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Cinesinas/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pirimidinonas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinonas/farmacología , Huso Acromático/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
5.
JACC Basic Transl Sci ; 7(8): 763-775, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36061336

RESUMEN

This phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aficamten (formerly CK-3773274) in healthy adults identified a pharmacologically active range of doses and exposures. At doses that were pharmacologically active (single doses of ≤50 mg or daily dosing of ≤10 mg for 14 or 17 days), aficamten appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Adverse events were generally mild and no more frequent than with placebo. Pharmacokinetic assessments showed dose proportionality over the range of single doses administered, and pharmacokinetics were not affected by administration with food or in otherwise healthy individuals with a cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype. (A Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study of CK-3773274 in Health Adult Subjects; NCT03767855).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA