Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 119(23): 5367-73, 2012 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22422824

RESUMEN

The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine. We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(12): 2101-7, 2010 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20308656

RESUMEN

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate frequency and prognostic significance of high EVI1 expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS A diagnostic assay detecting multiple EVI1 splice variants was developed to determine the relative EVI1 expression by single real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 1,382 newly diagnosed adult patients with AML younger than 60 years. Patients were treated on four Dutch-Belgian HOVON (n = 458) and two German-Austrian AML Study Group protocols (n = 924). Results The EVI1 assay was tested in the HOVON cohort and validated in the AMLSG cohort. High EVI1 levels (EVI1(+)) were found with similar frequencies in both cohorts combined, with a 10.7% incidence (148 of 1,382). EVI1(+) independently predicted low complete remission (CR) rate (odds ratio, 0.54; P = .002), adverse relapse-free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; P = .05), and event-free survival (EFS; HR, 1.46; P < .001). This adverse prognostic impact was more pronounced in the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (EFS; HR, 1.64; P < .001; and RFS; HR, 1.55; P = .02), and was also apparent in cytogenetically normal AML (EFS; HR, 1.67; P = .008). Besides inv(3)/t(3;3), EVI1(+) was significantly associated with chromosome abnormalities monosomy 7 and t(11q23), conferring prognostic impact within these two cytogenetic subsets. EVI1(+) was virtually absent in favorable-risk AML and AML with NPM1 mutations. Patients with EVI1(+) AML (n = 28) who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first CR had significantly better 5-year RFS (33% +/- 10% v 0%). CONCLUSION EVI1 expression in AML is unequally distributed in cytogenetic subtypes. It predicts poor outcome, particularly among intermediate cytogenetic risk AML. Patients with EVI1(+) AML may benefit from allogeneic transplantation in first CR. Pretreatment EVI1 screening should be included in risk stratification.


Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 11 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 7 , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Monosomía , Proto-Oncogenes/genética , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Translocación Genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis Citogenético , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Proteína del Locus del Complejo MDS1 y EV11 , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nucleofosmina , Oportunidad Relativa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante de Células Madre , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Regulación hacia Arriba , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA