Implementation of Situational Awareness in the Pediatric Oncology Setting. Does a 'huddle' Work and Is it Sustainable?

BACKGROUND: Huddles are short, regular debriefings that are designed to engage clinical staff in discussions about existing or emerging safety issues. They allow a brief conversation to take place creating a 'situational awareness' about the complexities of the healthcare environment for that day. METHODS: The huddle was implemented in a pediatric oncology service as an intervention aimed at improving patient safety and staff communication to enhance situational awareness. To ensure an efficient format for each huddle a huddle observational tool (HOT) was developed. An initial electronic anonymous survey focusing on safety and situational awareness was distributed to all of the multi-disciplinary (MDT) team. A second survey was disseminated 18 months post huddle introduction to scrutinize its effectiveness. Sustainability was assessed using staff attendance and huddle numbers. RESULTS: Four key areas demonstrated high situational awareness; safety awareness, incident management, communication and teamwork. Positive/negative pooled responses from both survey time points demonstrated a high percentage of positive responses, particularly relating to teamwork enhancement. The overwhelming finding was sustainability of the intervention of the huddle. The pediatric oncology services have now conducted over 700 huddles events over a three-year period. CONCLUSION: The initiation of the huddle has led to increased situational awareness and promotion of safety. It has been shown to be sustainable in the pediatric oncology setting, with durability and attendance of the huddle being the most significant outcome.

Increased Survival for Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Results From Improved Postrelapse Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not changed significantly over the past 3 decades, yet outcomes have improved with cure rates increasing from 30% to over 60% of all newly diagnosed children over this period. This improvement in survival has been attributed to both treatment intensification and improved supportive care over the decades, although the precise impact of each remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a unique cohort of 276 patients with de novo AML diagnosed in childhood, all treated with the same chemotherapy protocol over a 25-year period from 1986 to 2012. RESULTS: The contemporary cohort (2000-2012), compared with the historical cohort (1986-1999) had significantly improved overall survival (75% vs. 50%; hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.93), lower disease-related mortality (38% vs. 19%, P=0.02) and were significantly more likely to receive an allogeneic transplant after relapse (stem cell transplantation [SCT], 73% vs. 12%; P<0.0001). Allogeneic transplant postrelapse was associated with a significantly improved survival across the entire cohort (overall survival 50% for allogeneic SCT vs. 12% for autologous or none, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the contemporary and historical cohorts in treatment-related mortality (13% vs. 7%, P=0.42) or relapse rates after induction (50% in older cohort vs. 40% in recent era, P=0.25), suggesting consistency of induction treatment efficacy and toxicity across the 2 periods. CONCLUSIONS: This data suggests improved survival in pediatric AML in the modern era has predominantly resulted from changes in treatment after relapse, including increased use of allogeneic SCT.

Transplant-related mortality following allogeneic hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 25-year retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 25 years, donor source, conditioning, graft-versus-host disease prevention and supportive care for children undergoing hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have changed dramatically. HSCT indications for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) now include high-risk patients in first and subsequent remission. There is a large burden of infectious and pre-HSCT morbidities, due to myelosuppressive therapy required for remission induction. We hypothesized that, despite these trends, overall survival (OS) had increased. PROCEDURE: A retrospective audit of allogeneic pediatric HSCT for ALL was performed in our institution over 25 years. Outcomes for 136 HSCTs were analyzed in three consecutive 8-year periods (Period 1: 1/1/1984-31/8/1992, Period 2: 1/9/1992-30/4/2001, Period 3: 1/5/2001-31/12/2009). RESULTS: Despite a significant increase in unrelated donor HSCT, event-free and OS over 25 years improved significantly. (EFS 31.6-64.8%, P = 0.0027; OS 41.8-78.9%, P < 0.0001) Concurrently, TRM dropped from 33% to 5% (P = 0.0004) whilst relapse rate was static (P = 0.07). TRM reduced significantly for matched sibling and unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCT) in Period 3 compared with earlier periods (P = 0.036, P = 0.0098, respectively). Factors leading to improved survival in patients undergoing UCT include better matching, higher total nucleated cell doses, and significantly faster neutrophil engraftment. Length of initial HSCT admission was similar over time. CONCLUSION: EFS and OS have increased significantly despite heightened HSCT complexity. This survival gain was due to TRM reduction. Contemporary patients have benefited from refined donor selection and improved supportive care. Overall rates of leukemic relapse post-HSCT are unchanged, and remain the focus for improvement.

Treatment of children with poor risk solid tumors by further escalation of the VETOPEC regimen including very high-dose cyclophosphamide and peripheral stem cell support: an Australian and New Zealand Children's Hematology and Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Children with solid tumors deemed to be poor risk at diagnosis and those who fail to respond or recur after chemotherapy have adverse outcomes. We sought to increase the dosage of cyclophosphamide (CPA) in the VETOPEC regimen (vincristine, etoposide, and CPA) with a view to improving the response rate and survival. PROCEDURE: Patients underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest after standard dose VETOPEC (CPA 40 mg/kg/day for 3 days) followed by filgrastim. Those with sufficient PBSC received up to four intensive cycles (ICs) of VETOPEC with CPA dosages of 60-90 mg/kg/day for 3 days (escalated by 5 mg/kg/day in cohorts of at least five patients) followed by PBSC and filgrastim. RESULTS: Of the 59 enrolled patients, 58 were treated with mobilization chemotherapy and 57 proceeded to PBSC harvest. From 1 to 4 VETOPEC ICs were administered to 51 patients. The maximum tolerated dosage of CPA was not reached. The best response rate during the ICs for patients with recurrent or refractory/progressive disease was 67%; overall survival was 28% at 5 years and 25% at 10 years. The response rate for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk tumors was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: The VETOPEC regimen with CPA dosages up to 90 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by PBSC and filgrastim can be given in a timely manner with manageable toxicity. Outcomes were not improved when compared to prior VETOPEC studies. VETOPEC produces high response rates and warrants further evaluation in appropriate patients with newly diagnosed high-risk solid tumors.

Efficacy of vincristine and etoposide with escalating cyclophosphamide in poor-prognosis pediatric brain tumors.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of the VETOPEC regimen, a regimen of vincristine and etoposide with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (CPA), in pediatric patients with high-risk brain tumors. Three consecutive studies by the Australia and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group--VETOPEC I, Baby Brain 91, and VETOPEC II--have used a specific chemotherapy regimen of vincristine (VCR), etoposide (VP-16) and escalating CPA in patients with relapsed, refractory, or high-risk solid tumors. Patients in the VETOPEC II cohort were treated with very high dose CPA with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue. We analyzed the subset of patients with high-risk brain tumors treated with these intensive VETOPEC-based protocols to assess the response, toxicity, and survival. We also assessed whether the use of very high dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue improved the response rate or affected toxicity. Seventy-one brain tumor patients were treated with VETOPEC-based protocols. Of the 54 patients evaluable for tumor response, 17 had a complete response (CR) and 20 a partial response (PR) to treatment, which yielded an overall response rate of 69%. The CR + PR was 83% (19/23) for medulloblastomas, 56% (5/9) for primitive neuroectodermal tumors, 55% (6/11) for grade 3 and 4 astrocytomas, and 80% (6/8) for ependymomas. At a median follow-up of 36 months, overall survival for the entire cohort of 71 patients was 32%, with event-free survival of 13%. There were no toxic deaths within the PBSC-supported VETOPEC II cohort, despite higher CPA doses, compared with 7% among the non-PBSC patients. This regimen produces high response rates in a variety of very poor prognosis pediatric brain tumors. The maximum tolerated dose of CPA was not reached. Higher escalation in doses of CPA did not deliver a further improvement in response. With PBSC rescue in the VETOPEC II study, hematologic toxicity was no longer a limiting factor. The response rates observed support further development of this chemotherapy regimen.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Shwachman-Diamond disease: a study from the European Group for blood and marrow transplantation.

This report assessed the results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in 26 patients with Shwachman-Diamond disease (SDS) and severe bone marrow abnormalities. The conditioning regimen was based on busulphan (54%), total body irradiation (23%), fludarabine (15%) or other chemotherapy combinations (8%). Standard prevention of graft versus host disease (GVHD) with cyclosporin +/- methotrexate was adopted in 54% of the patients whilst in vivo or in vitro T-cell depletion was used in 17 and four patients respectively. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were achieved in 21 (81%) and 17 (65%) of 26 patients after a median time of 18 days and 29 days respectively. The incidence of grade III and IV acute GVHD was 24% and of chronic GVHD 29%. Nine patients died after a median time of 70 d, post-SCT. After a median follow-up of 1.1 years, the transplant-related mortality was 35.5% (95% CI 17-54) whilst the overall survival was 64.5% (95% CI 45.7-83.2). Allo-SCT was found to be successful in more than half of SDS patients with severe bone marrow dysfunction. Further improvements would be anticipated by a better definition of the optimum time in the course of disease to transplant and by the adoption of less toxic conditioning regimens.

Results of consecutive trials for children newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia from the Australian and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group.

Despite improvements in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), approximately 50% of children die of the disease. Clinical trials in adult patients with AML indicate that idarubicin may have superior efficacy when compared to daunorubicin in the remission-induction phases of chemotherapy. We conducted consecutive clinical trials in children with newly diagnosed AML in which daunorubicin (group 1, n = 102) or idarubicin (group 2, n = 160) was used during the remission-induction (RI) and the early consolidation phases of chemotherapy. Idarubicin was given at a dose of either 10 mg/m(2) (group 2A, n = 106) or 12 mg/m(2) (group 2B, n = 53). A high rate of RI was achieved for all groups (95% group 1, 90% group 2A, 94% group 2B). There were no significant differences in 5-year event-free survival (EFS) or in overall survival (OS) when the 3 groups were compared (group 1: EFS 50%, OS 56%; group 2A: EFS 50%, OS 60%; group 2B: EFS 34%, OS 50%). RI deaths resulting from treatment toxicity were low-2% for group 1 and 5% for group 2. More gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and renal toxicity but fewer infections were observed in patients receiving idarubicin (P <.001, P =.04, P =.03, respectively). Following RI chemotherapy, all patients received 3 to 4 more courses of identical chemotherapy and then underwent either autologous (n = 156) or an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 35). OS was higher in allogeneic BMT patients than in autologous BMT patients (79% vs 63%; P =.23). We conclude that daunorubicin is as effective as idarubicin for remission-induction therapy for childhood AML and has reduced toxicity.