RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Plague caused by Yersinia pestis is a highly infectious and potentially fatal zoonotic disease that can be spread by wild and domestic animals. In endemic areas of the northern hemisphere plague typically cycles from March to October, when flea vectors are active. Clinical forms of disease include bubonic, septicemic, and pneumonic plague. All clinical forms are uncommon in dogs and the pneumonic form is exceedingly rare. CASE PRESENTATION: Two mixed breed young-adult male domestic dogs presented to Colorado veterinarians with fever and vague signs that progressed to hemoptysis within 24 h. Case 1 presented in June 2014, while Case 2 occurred in December 2017. Thoracic radiography of Case 1 and 2 revealed right dorsal and right accessory lobe consolidation, respectively. In Case 1 initial differential diagnoses included pulmonary contusion due to trauma or diphacinone toxicosis. Case 1 was euthanized ~ 24 h post presentation due to progressive dyspnea and hemoptysis. Plague was confirmed 9 days later, after the dog's owner was hospitalized with pneumonia. Case 2 was treated as foreign body/aspiration pneumonia and underwent lung lobectomy at a veterinary teaching hospital. Case 2 was euthanized after 5 days of hospitalization when bacterial culture of the excised lobe yielded Yersinia pestis. Both dogs had severe diffuse necrohemorrhagic and suppurative pneumonia at post mortem examination. CONCLUSIONS: Both dogs were misdiagnosed due to the atypical lobar presentation of an extremely rare form of plague in a species that infrequently succumbs to clinical disease. Presentation outside of the typical transmission period of plague was also a factor leading to delayed diagnosis in Case 2. Erroneous identification by automated bacterial identification systems was problematic in both cases. In endemic areas, plague should be ruled out early in febrile dogs with acute respiratory signs, hemoptysis, lobar or diffuse pathology, and potential for exposure, regardless of season. Seasonal and geographic distributions of plague may shift with climate change, so vigilance by primary care veterinarians is warranted. Timely submission of samples to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory could expedite accurate diagnosis and reduce potential for human and domestic animal exposure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Peste/veterinaria , Neumonía Bacteriana/veterinaria , Yersinia pestis/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Colorado , Diagnóstico Tardío/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/microbiología , Perros , Hemoptisis/veterinaria , Humanos , Masculino , Peste/diagnóstico , Peste/patología , Neumonía/veterinaria , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/patología , Zoonosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Eleven laboratories collaborated to determine the periodic prevalence of Salmonella in a population of dogs and cats in the United States visiting veterinary clinics. Fecal samples (2,965) solicited from 11 geographically dispersed veterinary testing laboratories were collected in 36 states between January 2012 and April 2014 and tested using a harmonized method. The overall study prevalence of Salmonella in cats (3 of 542) was <1%. The prevalence in dogs (60 of 2,422) was 2.5%. Diarrhea was present in only 55% of positive dogs; however, 3.8% of the all diarrheic dogs were positive, compared with 1.8% of the nondiarrheic dogs. Salmonella-positive dogs were significantly more likely to have consumed raw food (P = 0.01), to have consumed probiotics (P = 0.002), or to have been given antibiotics (P = 0.01). Rural dogs were also more likely to be Salmonella positive than urban (P = 0.002) or suburban (P = 0.001) dogs. In the 67 isolates, 27 unique serovars were identified, with three dogs having two serovars present. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 66 isolates revealed that only four of the isolates were resistant to one or more antibiotics. Additional characterization of the 66 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Sequence data compared well to resistance phenotypic data and were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). This study suggests an overall decline in prevalence of Salmonella-positive dogs and cats over the last decades and identifies consumption of raw food as a major risk factor for Salmonella infection. Of note is that almost half of the Salmonella-positive animals were clinically nondiarrheic.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/veterinaria , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Alimentación Animal/microbiología , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gatos , Estudios Transversales , Perros , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/microbiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonelosis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
On July 8, 2014, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) laboratory identified Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that causes plague, in a blood specimen collected from a man (patient A) hospitalized with pneumonia. The organism had been previously misidentified as Pseudomonas luteola by an automated system in the hospital laboratory. An investigation led by Tri-County Health Department (TCHD) revealed that patient A's dog had died recently with hemoptysis. Three other persons who had contact with the dog, one of whom also had contact with patient A, were ill with fever and respiratory symptoms, including two with radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Specimens from the dog and all three human contacts yielded evidence of acute Y. pestis infection. One of the pneumonia cases might have resulted through human-to-human transmission from patient A, which would be the first such event reported in the United States since 1924. This outbreak highlights 1) the need to consider plague in the differential diagnosis of ill domestic animals, including dogs, in areas where plague is endemic; 2) the limitations of automated diagnostic systems for identifying rare bacteria such as Y. pestis; and 3) the potential for milder plague illness in patients taking antimicrobial agents. Hospital laboratorians should be aware of the limitations of automated identification systems, and clinicians should suspect plague in patients with clinically compatible symptoms from whom P. luteola is isolated.
Asunto(s)
Vectores de Enfermedades , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Perros/transmisión , Peste/epidemiología , Peste/transmisión , Animales , Colorado/epidemiología , Errores Diagnósticos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peste/diagnóstico , Peste/microbiología , Peste/veterinaria , Yersinia pestis/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
Valvular endocarditis has been well described in northern sea otters Enhydra lutris kenyoni of Alaska and in many cases no cause has been identified. It is also one of the most common conditions observed in people with chronic Coxiella burnetii infection. Given the high levels of C. burnetii exposure in marine mammals distributed throughout the same geographic range as the northern sea otter, and the presence of valvular lesions seen in otters, the objective of this study was to determine the level of C. burnetii exposure in otters and investigate any association between exposure, infection and valvular disease in this species. Archived serum from 75 live captured, apparently healthy otters (25 from each of 3 stocks) and 30 dead otters were tested for C. burnetii antibodies by indirect florescent antibody assay (IFA). Archived bone marrow and heart valves were tested for C. burnetii DNA by real-time PCR (qPCR). Overall, the seroprevalence in live otters was 17%, with significantly more exposed animals in the south central (40%) stock relative to the southwest (8%) and southeast (4%). The seroprevalence of animals sampled post mortem was 27%, although none of the bone marrow or heart valve samples were positive by qPCR. Results of this study failed to demonstrate a significant association between C. burnetii infection and valvular endocarditis in sea otters; however, the differing seroprevalence suggests that exposure opportunities vary geographically.
Asunto(s)
Coxiella burnetii , Endocarditis Bacteriana/veterinaria , Nutrias , Fiebre Q/veterinaria , Alaska/epidemiología , Animales , Endocarditis Bacteriana/epidemiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Femenino , Masculino , Fiebre Q/epidemiología , Estudios SeroepidemiológicosAsunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Microbiología Ambiental , Vivienda para Animales , Infecciones por Salmonella/epidemiología , Salmonella enterica/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Humanos , Michigan/epidemiología , Servicios Postales , Aves de Corral , Infecciones por Salmonella/microbiología , Salmonella enterica/genética , Serogrupo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Environmental changes associated with global warming create new opportunities for pathogen and parasite transmission in Arctic wildlife. As an apex predator ranging over large, remote areas, changes in pathogens and parasites in polar bears are a useful indicator of changing transmission dynamics in Arctic ecosystems. We examined prevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to parasites and viral and bacterial pathogens in Chukchi Sea polar bears. Serum antibodies to six pathogens were detected and prevalence increased between 1987-1994 and 2008-2017 for five: Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Francisella tularensis, Brucella abortus/suis, and canine distemper virus. Although bears have increased summer land use, this behavior was not associated with increased exposure. Higher prevalence of F. tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, and B. abortus/suis antibodies in females compared to males, however, could be associated with terrestrial denning. Exposure was related to diet for several pathogens indicating increased exposure in the food web. Elevated white blood cell counts suggest a possible immune response to some pathogens. Given that polar bears face multiple stressors in association with climate change and are a subsistence food, further work is warranted to screen for signs of disease.
Asunto(s)
Toxoplasma , Ursidae , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Regiones Árticas , Toxoplasma/inmunología , Ursidae/parasitología , Ursidae/microbiología , Virus del Moquillo Canino/inmunología , Neospora/inmunología , Calentamiento Global , Francisella tularensis/inmunología , Francisella tularensis/patogenicidad , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/sangre , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Ecosistema , Cambio ClimáticoRESUMEN
In late 2019, SARS-CoV-2 spilled-over from an animal host into humans, where it efficiently spread, resulting in the COVID-19 pandemic. Through both natural and experimental infections, we learned that many animal species are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, animals in close proximity to humans, including companion, farmed, and those at zoos and aquariums, became infected, and many studies demonstrated transmission to/from humans in these settings. In this study, we first review the literature of SARS-CoV-2 infections in tigers and lions, and compare species, sex, age, virus and antibody detection assay, and types, frequency and length of clinical signs, demonstrating broad heterogeneity amongst infections. We then describe a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in lions, tigers and hyenas at Denver Zoo in late 2021. Animals were tested for viral RNA (vRNA) for four months. Lions had significantly more viral RNA in nasal swabs than both tigers and hyenas, and many individual lions experienced viral recrudescence after weeks of undetectable vRNA. Infectious virus was correlated with high levels of vRNA and was more likely to be detected earlier during infection. Four months post-infection, all tested animals generated robust neutralizing antibody titers. Animals were infected with Delta lineage AY.20 identical to a variant circulating at less than 1% in Colorado humans at that time, suggesting a single spillover event from an infected human spread within and between species housed at the zoo. Better understanding of epidemiology and susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals is critical to limit the current and future spread and protect animal and human health.
RESUMEN
The surveillance of migratory waterbirds (MWs) for avian influenza virus (AIV) is indispensable for the early detection of a potential AIV incursion into poultry. Surveying AIV infections and virus subtypes in understudied MW species could elucidate their role in AIV ecology. Oropharyngeal-cloacal (OPC) swabs were collected from non-mallard MWs between 2006 and 2011. OPC swabs (n = 1158) that molecularly tested positive for AIV (Cts ≤ 32) but tested negative for H5 and H7 subtypes were selected for virus isolation (VI). The selected samples evenly represented birds from all four North American flyways (Pacific, Central, Mississippi, and Atlantic). Eighty-seven low pathogenic AIV isolates, representing 31 sites in 17 states, were recovered from the samples. All isolates belonged to the North American lineage. The samples representing birds from the Central Flyway had the highest VI positive rate (57.5%) compared to those from the other flyways (10.3-17.2%), suggesting that future surveillance can focus on the Central Flyway. Of the isolates, 43.7%, 12.6%, and 10.3% were obtained from blue-winged teal, American wigeon, and American black duck species, respectively. Hatch-year MWs represented the majority of the isolates (70.1%). The most common H and N combinations were H3N8 (23.0%), H4N6 (18.4%), and H4N8 (18.4%). The HA gene between non-mallard and mallard MW isolates during the same time period shared 85.5-99.5% H3 identity and 89.3-99.7% H4 identity. Comparisons between MW (mallard and non-mallard) and poultry H3 and H4 isolates also revealed high similarity (79.0-99.0% and 88.7-98.4%), emphasizing the need for continued AIV surveillance in MWs.
RESUMEN
Giardia and Cryptosporidium are zoonotic protozoan parasites that can infect humans and other taxa, including wildlife, often causing gastrointestinal illness. Both have been identified as One Health priorities in the Arctic, where climate change is expected to influence the distribution of many wildlife and zoonotic diseases, but little is known about their prevalence in local wildlife. To help fill information gaps, we collected fecal samples from four wildlife species that occur seasonally on the northern Alaska coastline or in nearshore marine waters-Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus), polar bear (Ursus maritimus), Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens), and caribou (Rangifer tarandus)-and used immunofluorescence assays to screen for Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. We detected Giardia cysts in 18.3% and Cryptosporidium oocysts in 16.5% of Arctic foxes (n = 109), suggesting that foxes may be potentially important hosts in this region. We also detected Giardia cysts in a single polar bear (12.5%; n = 8), which to our knowledge represents the first such report for this species. Neither parasite was detected in walruses or caribou.
RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the family Coronaviridae which includes multiple human pathogens that have an outsized impact on aging populations. As a novel human pathogen, SARS-CoV-2 is undergoing continuous adaptation to this new host species and there is evidence of this throughout the scientific and public literature. However, most investigations of SARS-CoV-2 evolution have focused on large-scale collections of data across diverse populations and/or living environments. Here we investigate SARS-CoV-2 evolution in epidemiologically linked individuals within a single outbreak at a skilled nursing facility beginning with initial introduction of the pathogen. The data demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 was introduced to the facility multiple times without establishing an interfacility transmission chain, followed by a single introduction that infected many individuals within a week. This large-scale introduction by a single genotype then persisted in the facility. SARS-CoV-2 sequences were investigated at both the consensus and intra-host variation levels. Understanding the variability in SARS-CoV-2 during transmission chains will assist in understanding the spread of this disease and can ultimately inform best practices for mitigation strategies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Prueba de COVID-19 , Brotes de EnfermedadesRESUMEN
Backyard gallinaceous bird flocks may play an important role in the spread of infectious diseases within poultry populations as well as the transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. An epidemiologic characterization was conducted of Colorado backyard flocks to gather information on general flock characteristics, human movement of birds, human-bird interaction, biosecurity practices, and flock health. Our results suggest that backyard poultry flocks in Colorado are small-sized flocks (68.6% of flocks had < 50 birds); consist primarily of layer chickens (85.49% of flocks), show chickens (32.18% of flocks), and waterfowl (34.07% of flocks); and are primarily owned for food (meat or egg) production for the family (86.44%) or as pet or hobby birds (42.27%). The backyard flock environment may promote bird-to-bird transmission as well as bird-to-human transmission of infectious disease. Birds are primarily housed with free access to the outside (96.85%), and many are moved from the home premises (46.06% within 1 yr). Human contact with backyard flocks is high, biosecurity practices are minimal, and bird health is negatively impacted by increased movement events. Increased knowledge of backyard bird characteristics and associated management practices can provide guidelines for the development of measures to decrease disease transmission between bird populations, decrease disease transmission from birds to humans, and increase the overall health of backyard birds.
Asunto(s)
Anseriformes , Enfermedades de las Aves/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves/transmisión , Columbidae , Galliformes , Animales , Enfermedades de las Aves/clasificación , Enfermedades de las Aves/prevención & control , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colorado/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Vivienda para Animales , Oportunidad Relativa , Densidad de Población , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/clasificación , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/transmisión , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous literature pertaining to biochemical RIs of domestic chickens has primarily focused on commercial production flocks and not backyard birds. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish biochemistry RIs for privately-owned backyard chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) using reference laboratory equipment. METHODS: Samples were collected from 123 presumably healthy adult chickens between 2017 and 2019 from 22 different flocks in Colorado. Heparinized blood was obtained, and a biochemistry profile was evaluated, including sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphorous, uric acid, AST, CK, glucose, cholesterol, and total protein. Reference values were created according to current American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology recommendations. RESULTS: Differences in measurand intervals compared with previous literature were found for sodium, calcium, total protein, potassium, phosphorus, uric acid, and glucose. Hens were found to have higher median calcium (17.9 mg/dL vs 11.2 mg/dL [P = .0001]), total protein (5.2 g/dL vs 4.8 g/dL [P = .0046]), and potassium (3.80 mEq/L vs 3.48 mEq/L [P = .0267]) concentrations, as well as lower sodium (155 mEq/L vs 158 mEq/L [P = .0046]) concentrations, calculated osmolalities (310 mOsm/kg vs 314 mOsm/kg [P = .0249]), and AST (165 U/L vs 194 U/L [P = .0121]) activities, than roosters. Seasonal variation was found between summer and winter samples for median sodium (144 mEq/L vs 148 mEq/L [P = .0008]), chloride (111.8 mEq/L vs 113.5 mEq/L [P = .0033]) concentrations, calculated osmolalities (306 mOsm/kg vs 311 mOsm/kg [P = <.0001]), and AST (185 U/L vs 159 U/L [P = .0053]) and CK (1098 U/L vs 770 U/L [P = .0007]) activities. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents biochemical reference values for backyard chickens in Colorado that can be a basis for evaluations in similar settings.
Asunto(s)
Calcio , Pollos , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Cloruros , Ácido Úrico , Colorado , Potasio , Sodio , Fósforo , GlucosaRESUMEN
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in 2019 and has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide. Certain populations are at higher risk for infection, especially staff and residents at long-term care facilities (LTCF), due to the congregant living setting and high proportions of residents with many comorbidities. Prior to vaccine availability, these populations represented large fractions of total coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths in the United States. Due to the high-risk setting and outbreak potential, staff and residents were among the first groups to be vaccinated. To define the impact of prior infection on the response to vaccination, we measured antibody responses in a cohort of staff members at an LTCF, many of whom were previously infected by SARS-CoV-2. We found that neutralizing, receptor-binding domain (RBD)-binding, and nucleoprotein (NP)-binding antibody levels were significantly higher after the full vaccination course in individuals that were previously infected and that NP antibody levels could discriminate individuals with prior infection from vaccinated individuals. While an anticipated antibody titer increase was observed after a vaccine booster dose in naive individuals, a boost response was not observed in individuals with previous COVID-19 infection. We observed a strong relationship between neutralizing antibodies and RBD-binding antibodies postvaccination across all groups, whereas no relationship was observed between NP-binding and neutralizing antibodies. One individual with high levels of neutralizing and binding antibodies experienced a breakthrough infection (prior to the introduction of Omicron), demonstrating that the presence of antibodies is not always sufficient for complete protection against infection. These results highlight that a history of COVID-19 exposure significantly increases SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses following vaccination. IMPORTANCE Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, due to their communal nature, the high-risk profile of residents, and the vulnerability of residents to respiratory pathogens. In this study, we analyzed the role of prior natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in postvaccination antibody responses. The LTCF in our cohort experienced a large outbreak, with almost 40% of staff members becoming infected. We found that individuals that were infected prior to vaccination had higher levels of neutralizing and binding antibodies postvaccination. Importantly, the second vaccine dose significantly boosted antibody levels in those that were immunologically naive prior to vaccination, but not in those that had prior immunity. Regardless of the prevaccination immune status, the levels of binding and neutralizing antibodies were highly correlated. The presence of NP-binding antibodies could be used to identify individuals that were previously infected when prevaccination immune status was not known. Our results reveal that vaccination antibody responses differ depending on prior natural immunity.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Formación de Anticuerpos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 emerged in 2019 and rapidly surged into a global pandemic. The rates of concurrent infection with other respiratory pathogens and the effects of possible coinfections on the severity of COVID-19 cases and the length of viral infection are not well defined. In this retrospective study, nasopharyngeal swab samples collected in Colorado between March 2020 and May 2021 from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive individuals were tested for a panel of 21 additional respiratory pathogens, including 17 viral and 4 bacterial pathogens. We detected significant positive correlations between levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and infectious virus titers for both cohorts, as well as a positive correlation between viral RNA levels and disease severity scores for one cohort. We hypothesized that severe COVID-19 cases and longer SARS-CoV-2 infections may be associated with concurrent respiratory infections. Only one individual exhibited evidence of a concurrent infection- SARS -CoV-2 and human rhinovirus/enterovirus- leading us to conclude that viral respiratory coinfections were uncommon during this time and thus not responsible for the variations in disease severity and infection duration observed in the two cohorts examined. Mask wearing and other public health measures were imposed in Colorado during the time of collection and likely contributed to low rates of coinfection.
RESUMEN
Since 1996, the emergence of Asian-origin highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1 has spurred great concern for the global poultry industry. In the United States, there is concern over the potential of a foreign avian disease incursion into the country. Noncommercial poultry operations, such as upland game bird facilities in the United States, may serve as a potential source of avian disease introduction to other bird populations including the commercial poultry industry, backyard flocks, or wildlife. In order to evaluate how to prevent disease transmission from these facilities to other populations, we examined biosecurity practices and bird movement within the upland game bird industry in the United States. Persons that held a current permit to keep, breed, or release upland game birds were surveyed for information on biosecurity practices, flock and release environments, and bird movement parameters. Biosecurity practices vary greatly among permit holders. Many facilities allow for interaction between wild birds and pen-reared birds, and there is regular long-distance movement of live adult birds among facilities. Results suggest that upland game bird facilities should be targeted for biosecurity education and disease surveillance efforts.
Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Galliformes , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Bienestar del Animal , Animales , Recolección de Datos , Vivienda para Animales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Isolation and cultivation of wild-type viruses in model organism cells or tissues is standard practice in virology. Oftentimes, the virus host species is distantly related to the species from which the culture system was developed. Thus, virus culture in these tissues and cells basically constitutes a host jump, which can lead to genomic changes through genetic drift and/or adaptation to the culture system. We directly sequenced 70 avian influenza virus (Orthomyxoviridae) genomes from oropharyngeal/cloacal swabs collected from wild bird species and paired virus isolates propagated from the same samples following isolation in specific-pathogen-free embryonated chicken eggs. The data were analyzed using population genetic approaches including evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequencies and divergence with pooled-sequencing analyses, consensus sequence placement in neighbor-joining trees, and haplotype reconstruction and networks. We found that propagation of virus in eggs leads to skewed SNP mutation spectra with some SNPs going to fixation. Both synonymous and nonsynonmous SNP frequencies shifted. We found multiple consensus sequences that differed between the swabs and the isolates, with some sequences from the same sample falling into divergent genetic clusters. Twenty of 23 coinfections detected had different dominant subtypes following virus isolation, thus sequences from both the swab and isolate were needed to obtain full subtype data. Haplotype networks revealed haplotype frequency shifts and the appearance or loss of low-frequency haplotypes following isolation. The results from this study revealed that isolation of wild bird avian influenza viruses in chicken eggs leads to skewed populations that are different than the input populations. Consensus sequence changes from virus isolation can lead to flawed phylogenetic inferences, and subtype detection is biased. These results suggest that for genomic studies of wild bird influenza viruses the biological field should move away from chicken egg isolation towards directly sequencing the virus from host samples.
Asunto(s)
Pollos , Genoma , Virus de la Influenza A/fisiología , Gripe Aviar/virología , Óvulo/virología , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Animales , Embrión de Pollo , Pollos/genética , Cloaca/virología , Orofaringe/virologíaRESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 has had a disproportionate impact on nonhospital health care settings, such as long-term-care facilities (LTCFs). The communal nature of these facilities, paired with the high-risk profile of residents, has resulted in thousands of infections and deaths and a high case fatality rate. To detect presymptomatic infections and identify infected workers, we performed weekly surveillance testing of staff at two LTCFs, which revealed a large outbreak at one of the sites. We collected serum from staff members throughout the study and evaluated it for binding and neutralization to measure seroprevalence, seroconversion, and type and functionality of antibodies. At the site with very few incident infections, we detected that over 40% of the staff had preexisting SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, suggesting prior exposure. At the outbreak site, we saw rapid seroconversion following infection. Neutralizing antibody levels were stable for many weeks following infection, suggesting a durable, long-lived response. Receptor-binding domain antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were strongly correlated. The site with high seroprevalence among staff had two unique introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into the facility through seronegative infected staff during the period of study, but these did not result in workplace spread or outbreaks. Together, our results suggest that a high seroprevalence rate among staff can contribute to immunity within a workplace and protect against subsequent infection and spread within a facility. IMPORTANCE Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 due to their communal nature and high-risk profile of residents. LTCF staff have the ability to introduce SARS-CoV-2 into the facility, where it can spread, causing outbreaks. We tested staff weekly at two LTCFs and collected blood throughout the study to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. One site had a large outbreak and infected individuals rapidly generated antibodies after infection. At the other site, almost half the staff already had antibodies, suggesting prior infection. The majority of these antibodies bind to the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and are potently neutralizing and stable for many months. The non-outbreak site had two unique introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into the facility, but these did not result in workplace spread or outbreaks. Our results reveal that high seroprevalence among staff can contribute to immunity and protect against subsequent infection and spread within a facility.
Asunto(s)
Formación de Anticuerpos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Sitios de Unión de Anticuerpos , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Vigilancia Inmunológica , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in 2019 and has become a major global pathogen in an astonishingly short period of time. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has been notable due to its impacts on residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). LTCF residents tend to possess several risk factors for severe outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including advanced age and the presence of comorbidities. Indeed, residents of LTCFs represent approximately 40% of SARS-CoV-2 deaths in the United States. Few studies have focused on the prevalence and transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 among LTCF staff during the early months of the pandemic, prior to mandated surveillance testing. To assess the prevalence and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 among LTCF staff, characterize the extent of asymptomatic infections, and investigate the genomic epidemiology of the virus within these settings, we sampled staff for 8 to 11 weeks at six LTCFs with nasopharyngeal swabs from March through June of 2020. We determined the presence and levels of viral RNA and infectious virus and sequenced 54 nearly complete genomes. Our data revealed that over 50% of infections were asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic and that there was a strongly significant relationship between viral RNA (vRNA) and infectious virus, prolonged infections, and persistent vRNA (4+ weeks) in a subset of individuals, and declining incidence over time. Our data suggest that asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected LTCF staff contributed to virus persistence and transmission within the workplace during the early pandemic period. Genetic epidemiology data generated from samples collected during this period support that SARS-CoV-2 was commonly spread between staff within an LTCF and that multiple-introduction events were less common. IMPORTANCE Our work comprises unique data on the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics among staff working at LTCFs in the early months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic prior to mandated staff surveillance testing. During this time period, LTCF residents were largely sheltering-in-place. Given that staff were able to leave and return daily and could therefore be a continued source of imported or exported infection, we performed weekly SARS-CoV-2 PCR on nasal swab samples collected from this population. There are limited data from the early months of the pandemic comprising longitudinal surveillance of staff at LTCFs. Our data reveal the surprisingly high level of asymptomatic/presymptomatic infections within this cohort during the early months of the pandemic and show genetic epidemiological analyses that add novel insights into both the origin and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within LTCFs.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitales , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis de Secuencia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Cohortes , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Filogenia , Prevalencia , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2/clasificación , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Manejo de Especímenes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: Detailed analysis of infection rates paired with behavioral and employee-reported risk factors is vital to understanding how transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be exacerbated or mitigated in the workplace. Institutions of higher education are heterogeneous work units that supported continued in-person employment during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing a test site for occupational health evaluation. Objective: To evaluate the association between self-reported protective behaviors and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among essential in-person employees during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 13 to September 2, 2020, at an institution of higher education in Fort Collins, Colorado. Employees 18 years or older without symptoms of COVID-19 who identified as essential in-person workers during the first 6 months of the pandemic were included. Participants completed a survey, and blood and nasal swab samples were collected to assess active SARS-CoV-2 infection via quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and past infection by serologic testing. Exposure: Self-reported practice of protective behaviors against COVID-19 according to public health guidelines provided to employees. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of current SARS-CoV-2 infection detected by qRT-PCR or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection detected by an IgG SARS-CoV-2 testing platform. The frequency of protective behavior practices and essential workers' concerns regarding contracting COVID-19 and exposing others were measured based on survey responses. Results: Among 508 participants (305 [60.0%] women, 451 [88.8%] non-Hispanic White individuals; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [12.5] years), there were no qRT-PCR positive test results, and only 2 participants (0.4%) had seroreactive IgG antibodies. Handwashing and mask wearing were reported frequently both at work (480 [94.7%] and 496 [97.8%] participants, respectively) and outside work (465 [91.5%] and 481 [94.7%] participants, respectively). Social distancing was reported less frequently at work (403 [79.5%]) than outside work (465 [91.5%]) (P < .001). Participants were more highly motivated to avoid exposures because of concern about spreading the infection to others (419 [83.0%]) than for personal protection (319 [63.2%]) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of essential workers at an institution of higher education, when employees reported compliance with public health practices both at and outside work, they were able to operate safely in their work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Conducta Social , Universidades , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Colorado , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , SARS-CoV-2/crecimiento & desarrollo , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , AutoinformeRESUMEN
Detection of Leptospira interrogans is difficult as a result of intermittent leptospiruria and brief leptospiremia. Hence, diagnosis relies heavily on serologic testing, the reference method of which is the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). In horses, clinical leptospirosis has been associated with abortion, recurrent uveitis, and sporadic cases of hepatic and renal disease. Little information exists on the seroprevalence of antibodies to L. interrogans in equids in the United States; past nationwide studies suggest that the seroprevalence in some areas is as high as 77% (reciprocal titer ≥ 100). We tested sera from 124 apparently healthy horses previously submitted for equine infectious anemia (EIA) serology using MAT for 6 serovars-Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona. When using a reciprocal MAT titer cutoff of ≥ 100, 102 of 124 (82%) of the samples were positive for at least one serovar. Seropositivity was significantly associated with increasing age. Query of specimens from clinical cases submitted to the Colorado State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for MAT since 2010 indicated significantly greater seroprevalence (p = 0.015) of pathogenic serovar Pomona in clinical cases compared to sera submitted from healthy equids for routine EIA testing. Information from our diagnostic laboratory submission forms also suggests a correlation between uveitis or other ophthalmic problems and serovar Pomona.