Mature MUC5AC Expression in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predicts Treatment Response and Outcomes.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has recently gained prominence. We investigated the clinical significance of mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC), which exists in two major glycoforms, a less-glycosylated immature isoform (IM) and a heavily glycosylated mature isoform (MM), as a biomarker in resected PDA. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 100 resected PDAs to evaluate the expression of the IM and MM of MUC5AC using their respective monoclonal antibodies, CLH2 (NBP2-44455) and 45M1 (ab3649). MUC5AC localization (cytoplasmic, apical, and extra-cellular (EC)) was determined, and the H-scores were calculated. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 100 resected PDA patients, 43 received NAT, and 57 were treatment-naïve with upfront surgery (UpS). In the study population (n = 100), IM expression (H-scores for objective response vs. no response vs. UpS = 104 vs. 152 vs. 163, p = 0.01) and MM-MUC5AC detection rates (56% vs. 63% vs. 82%, p = 0.02) were significantly different. In the NAT group, MM-MUC5AC-negative patients had significantly better PFS according to the MVA (Hazard Ratio: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.059-0.766, p = 0.01). Similar results were noted in a FOLFIRINOX sub-group (n = 36). We established an association of MUC5AC expression with treatment response and outcomes.

Predictive Value of MUC5AC Signature in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Hypothesis Based on Preclinical Evidence.

Mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) glycoprotein plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis and drug sensitivity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), both individually and in combination with other mucins. Its function and localization are glycoform-specific. The immature isoform (detected by the CLH2 monoclonal antibody, or mab) is usually in the perinuclear (cytoplasmic) region, while the mature (45 M1, 2-11, Nd2) variants are in apical and extracellular regions. There is preclinical evidence suggesting that mature MUC5AC has prognostic and predictive (response to treatment) value. However, these findings were not validated in clinical studies. We propose a MUC5AC signature with three components of MUC5AC-localization, variant composition, and intensity-suggesting a reliable marker in combination of variants than with individual MUC5AC variants alone. We also postulate a theory to explain the occurrence of different MUC5AC variants in abnormal pancreatic lesions (benign, precancerous, and cancerous). We also analyzed the effect of mature MUC5AC on sensitivity to drugs often used in PDAC management, such as gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. We found preliminary evidence of its predictive value, but there is a need for large-scale studies to validate them.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of malignancies in transplant recipients.

Cancer immunotherapy, an area of active research, has thus far yielded several exciting breakthroughs in cancer treatment strategies. So far, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been the most promising method of cancer immunotherapy. CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 are the immune checkpoint molecules against which monoclonal antibodies act against and revolutionised the treatment of several malignancies. However, it is still unclear whether using these monoclonal antibodies in patients with malignancy and a history of transplant is as beneficial as in patients without a history of transplantation. The reason being, with the therapeutic benefit, also comes the inherent disadvantage of transplant rejection because of the activation of T-cells against donor antigens. So, transplant-related complications limit the usage of the checkpoint blockade therapy to treat malignancies. Here, we review the data published in this context and suggest optimal approaches to using the currently available repertoire of immunotherapies.

Response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy in advanced primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review.

Background: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC), which often lacks distinctive radiological features or specific clinical symptoms, is extremely rare. In this report, we describe a rare case of PHNEC that was successfully treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy. Case Description: This report describes the treatment of a 53-year-old male with PHNEC in China. The patient was admitted for persistent upper right quadrant abdominal pain. Dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both detected multiple masses, enlarged portal lymph nodes, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Histological and immunohistochemistry of the largest mass biopsy specimen from the right liver lobe confirmed the neuroendocrine tumor of the liver. The patient underwent HAIC with a modified fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) regimen. Meanwhile, the patient received camrelizumab (200 mg, intravenously, q3w) apatinib (250 mg, oral, daily) within 7 days after the start of HAIC. CT and MRI showed a marked decrease in the size of the largest mass of the liver and the portal lymph nodes, indicating a partial response of the tumor. Conclusions: PHNEC is a very rare tumor, and the treatment for its advanced type is controversial and remains to be standardized. HAIC combined with camrelizumab and targeted therapy may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with PHNEC.

Advances in understanding and management of high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a comprehensive review.

High-grade (HG) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PAN-NENs) are aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Yet, our understanding and treatment approaches for these tumors have rapidly evolved in the past decade, despite a lack of prospective and randomized trials. It is essential to differentiate grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) due to their different prognostic and treatment implications. The molecular landscape of HG PAN-NENs is complex, with mutations in key cancer-related genes, extensive genomic rearrangements, and chromosomal instability. Advanced studies have provided insights into the significant genetic heterogeneity of HG PAN-NENs and potential therapeutic targets. Several therapeutic strategies have emerged from molecular characterization studies. These include agents targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, DNA repair pathways, and epigenetic modifiers. Moreover, high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in some tumors indicates potential for immunotherapy. However, many challenges remain, with a deeper understanding of the genetic and epigenetic alterations in these tumors necessary to develop novel therapeutic strategies and improve patient outcomes. Treatment strategies for HG PAN-NENs vary. Looking to the future, many clinical trials are exploring novel therapies or combinations of known therapies to improve outcomes. It is evident that understanding the molecular landscape of PAN-NECs, alongside personalized therapeutic strategies, is crucial to developing effective treatment options and improving patient outcomes. In this discourse, our emphasis will be on the molecular landscape and available treatment strategies for HG PAN-NECs.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Their Cardiovascular Adverse Effects.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped and have become a well-established treatment modality for multiple advanced-stage malignancies. ICIs block the immune system regulatory checkpoints, namely CTLA-4 and PD-1/PDL1, which provokes excess immune response against self-antigens. Immune modulation with ICIs can result in diverse immune-related adverse events targeting organ systems. Several cases of ICI-related cardiotoxicity were reported, while the actual incidence was likely underestimated due to heterogeneous clinical presentation. These include, but are not limited to, myocarditis, pericarditis, atherosclerosis, and arrhythmia. EKG, Troponin, Echocardiogram (TTE), and Cardiac MRI (CMRI) are indispensable diagnostic tools to aid in the management of cardiac adverse effects. Herein, we review the ICI-mediated cardiovascular adverse events, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and reintroduction of ICIs post-cardiotoxicity.

Role of chemoradiation in gallbladder cancer-a single institution retrospective analysis.

Background: Gallbladder cancer is one of the highest fatal malignancy. We conducted a retrospective analysis to study the outcomes of gallbladder malignancy in an academic care setting. Methods: Data was collected retrospectively on patients treated at University of Alabama at Birmingham between January 2005 and June 2015 from the electronic medical record using a standardized data collection tool (Redcap). We evaluated for predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 93 patients in this study, 66.7% were female. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was given to 11% and adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) to 14%. On multivariate analysis, albumin >3.5 g/dL, uninvolved margins, absence of lymphovascular invasion, and peri-neural invasion were independent predictors of OS and PFS. The overall median survival time was 24.3 months with a 5-year survival rate at 23.7%. Surgery with CRT for the full cohort had a median OS of 54.4 vs. 15.6 months (P=0.0048) compared to surgery CT alone. The OS in stage 3-4 patients with surgery alone vs. surgery & CT was 5.5 vs. 28.7 months, respectively (P=0.0061). The PFS for the same group was 4.6 vs. 17.5 months (P=0.0052). Conclusions: The dismal survival rates of gallbladder cancer made adjuvant therapy (CT or CRT) critically important. Concurrent CRT needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials for potential improvement in clinical outcomes compared to currently approved standard of care, adjuvant CT alone.

Association between Primary Perioperative CEA Ratio, Tumor Site, and Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis, and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between CEA ratio, tumor location, and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. We analyzed 427 patients who underwent resection for CRC at the University of Kansas Medical Center. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 207 patients were classified as either high (≥0.5) or low (<0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were as follows: (1) OS stratified by CEA ratio; (2) OS stratified by tumor location; (3) OS stratified by tumor location among those with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates. The median age was 62 years (inter-quartile range 51-71), 55% were male, 41% were smokers, 71% had left-sided tumors, the median pre-operative CEA was 3.1 ng/mL (inter-quartile range (IQR) 1.5-9.7), and 57% had a CEA ratio ≥0.5. The OS rates were 65.1% and 86.3% in patients with high versus low CEA ratios, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.045). The OS rates were 64.4% and 77.3% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.5). Among patients with CEA levels greater than 5 at the time of recurrence, the OS rates were 42.9% and 43.4% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.7). There was a significantly higher survival among patients with low CEA ratios than among those with high CEA ratios. There was no difference in OS between left- versus right-sided tumors. Among patients with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. These findings warrant validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited.

Survival Outcomes of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasm (PanIN) versus Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) Associated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanINs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are common pancreatic adenocarcinoma precursor lesions. However, data regarding their respective associations with survival rate and prognosis are lacking. We retrospectively evaluated 72 pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumor resection patients at the University of Kansas Hospital between August 2009 and March 2019. Patients were divided into one of two groups, PanIN or IPMN, based on the results of the surgical pathology report. We compared baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS) between the two groups, as well as OS and PFS based on local or distant tumor recurrence for both groups combined. 52 patients had PanINs and 20 patients had IPMNs. Patients who had an IPMN precursor lesion had better median PFS and OS when compared to patients with PanIN precursor lesions. However, the location of tumor recurrence (local or distant) did not show a statistically significant difference in OS.

Therapeutic options for ampullary carcinomas. A review.

Ampullary Carcinoma arises from a histologically heterogeneous region where three different epithelia converge. Even though Ampullary Carcinoma has a superior prognosis compared to pancreatic and biliary ductal neoplasms, at least half of the patients turn up at an advanced stage that limits the treatment prospects. In addition to surgery for early-stage disease, several studies have shown that chemoradiotherapy confers additional benefits in the management of Ampullary Carcinoma. Analogously, chemotherapy plays a crucial role in treating advanced Ampullary Carcinoma with distant metastasis/recurrences. Although, stage of the disease, lymph node status, and histo-morphology are three critical prognostic variables, recently much attention is being placed on the genetic landscape of Ampullary Carcinoma. In this review, we have discussed various studies describing the role of chemoradiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of early and advanced stage Ampullary Carcinoma. Also, we have summarized the molecular landscape of Ampullary Carcinoma and the novel therapeutic strategies which could possibly target the genetic alterations involving the tumor cells.

Cisplatin- Versus Non-Cisplatin-based First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Previously Treated With Perioperative Cisplatin.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal choice of first-line chemotherapy for patients with relapse of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PCBC) is unclear. We investigated the outcomes with cisplatin rechallenge versus a non-cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent metastatic UC after PCBC in a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient-level data were collected for patients who had received various first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced UC after previous PCBC. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of the type of perioperative and first-line chemotherapy to independently affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after accounting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Data were available for 145 patients (12 centers). The mean age was 62 years; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was > 0 for 42.0% of the patients. Of the 145 patients, 63% had received cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The median time from previous chemotherapy (TFPC) was 6.2 months (range, 1-154 months). The median OS was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-27 months), and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5-7 months). A better ECOG PS and a longer TFPC (> 12 months vs. ≤ 12 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52; P < .001) was prognostic for OS and PFS. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13-3.06; P = .015), which appeared to be pronounced in those patients with a TFPC of ≤ 12 months. Retreatment with cisplatin in the first-line setting was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.38; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present retrospective analysis suggest that for patients who have undergone previous PCBC for UC, rechallenging with cisplatin might confer a poorer OS, especially for those with progression within < 1 year.