Role of cfDNA and ctDNA to improve the risk stratification and the disease follow-up in patients with endometrial cancer: towards the clinical application.

BACKGROUND: There has been a rise in endometrial cancer (EC) incidence leading to increased mortality. To counter this trend, improving the stratification of post-surgery recurrence risk and anticipating disease relapse and treatment resistance is essential. Liquid biopsy analyses offer a promising tool for these clinical challenges, though the best strategy for applying them in EC must be defined. This study was designed to determine the value of cfDNA/ctDNA monitoring in improving the clinical management of patients with localized and recurrent disease. METHODS: Plasma samples and uterine aspirates (UA) from 198 EC patients were collected at surgery and over time. The genetic landscape of UAs was characterized using targeted sequencing. Total cfDNA was analyzed for ctDNA presence based on the UA mutational profile. RESULTS: High cfDNA levels and detectable ctDNA at baseline correlated with poor prognosis for DFS (p-value < 0.0001; HR = 9.25) and DSS (p-value < 0.0001; HR = 11.20). This remained clinically significant when stratifying tumors by histopathological risk factors. Of note, cfDNA/ctDNA analyses discriminated patients with early post-surgery relapse and the ctDNA kinetics served to identify patients undergoing relapse before any clinical evidence emerged. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most comprehensive study on cfDNA/ctDNA characterization in EC, demonstrating its value in improving risk stratification and anticipating disease relapse in patients with localized disease. CtDNA kinetics assessment complements current strategies to monitor the disease evolution and the treatment response. Therefore, implementing cfDNA/ctDNA monitoring in clinical routines offers a unique opportunity to improve EC management. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The study demonstrates that high levels of cfDNA and detectable ctDNA at baseline are strong indicators of poor prognosis. This enables more accurate risk stratification beyond traditional histopathological factors, allowing clinicians to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive treatment and closer monitoring. Moreover, longitudinal analysis of cfDNA/ctDNA can detect disease recurrence months before clinical symptoms or imaging evidence appear. This early warning system offers a significant advantage in clinical practice, providing a window of opportunity for early intervention and potentially improving patient outcomes.

PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery. METHODS: This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638. FINDINGS: From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIB-IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality. INTERPRETATION: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis.