Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a Predictor of Outcomes during Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Systemic inflammation may be the common denominator between COPD and type 2 diabetes and may explain the correlation in both diseases' development and progress. The aim of this prospective observational study is to examine the prognostic value of glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c) and HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables (glycemic gap, stress hyperglycemia ratio και modified stress hyperglycemia ratio) in an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) as well as in COPD disease's morbidity and mortality during the following year. We evaluated patients hospitalized only for COPD exacerbations. Levels of HbA1c and HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables were recorded upon admission. The study outcomes included duration of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation and exacerbation outcome. All subjects were followed up for one year. A total of 156 patients were included in the study (74.4% men, age [mean ± SD] 72 ± 7 years). Patients (21.8%) had type 2 diabetes and 67.9% of patients were receiving ICS treatment. The median value of HbA1c was 5.9 (IQR: 5.4, 6.5). Necessity for mechanical ventilation was significantly higher for patients with lower values of HbA1c [median: 5.3 (IQR 5.02, 6.3) vs. 5.9 (IQR 5.5, 6.5), p = .038]. However, duration of hospitalization, death during hospitalization as well as the number of new exacerbation events, time to next exacerbation and mortality during the following year did not differ significantly. Moreover, none of the HbA1c-adjusted glycemic variables examined, demonstrated any statistical significance. In conclusion neither the preceding nor the present glycemic state exhibit a predictive value regarding short- or long-term outcomes of an AECOPD.

Targeted anti-IL-13 therapies in asthma: current data and future perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: The identification of patients with severe asthma who will benefit from a personalized management approach remains an unmet need. Interleukin-13 (IL-13) is a cytokine possessing a significant role in asthma pathogenesis and progression of disease. Humanised monoclonal antibodies against IL-13 and IL-13 and IL-4 receptors are mainly proposed as add-on therapy in patients with TH2-high inflammation with uncontrolled asthma despite maximum therapy. AREAS COVERED: The role of IL-13 in airway inflammation in severe asthma, the targeted anti-IL-13 therapies and biomarkers that predict response to anti-IL-13 treatment are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: New effective individualized therapies in severe asthma are urgently needed to block specific inflammatory pathways using monoclonal antibodies. Studies on anti-IL-13 therapies showed that asthmatic patients could benefit from this novel targeted therapy as far as lung function and exacerbation rate are concerned. TH2-high and especially periostin-high groups of asthmatics with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma seem to compose the group that could benefit from anti-IL-13 therapy. Targeting IL-13 alone may not be sufficient to achieve asthma control. Inhibition of IL-13 and IL-4 with mabs may be more encouraging and patients will probably have additional benefits from these therapeutic interventions because of IL-13/IL-4 overlapping actions in asthma pathophysiology.

Severe asthma: anti-IgE or anti-IL-5?

Severe asthma is a discrete clinical entity characterised by recurrent exacerbations, reduced quality of life and poor asthma control as ordinary treatment regimens remain inadequate. Difficulty in managing severe asthma derives partly from the multiple existing phenotypes and our inability to recognise them. Though the exact pathogenetic pathway of severe allergic asthma remains unclear, it is known that numerous inflammatory cells and cytokines are involved, and eosinophils represent a key inflammatory cell mediator. Anti-IgE (omalizumab) and anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) antibodies are biological agents that interfere in different steps of the Th2 inflammatory cascade and are licensed in severe asthma. Both exhibit a favourable clinical outcome as they reduce exacerbation rate and improve asthma control and quality of life, while mepolizumab also induces an oral steroid sparing effect. Nevertheless, it is still questionable which agent is more suitable in the management of severe allergic asthma since no comparable studies have been conducted. Omalizumab's established effectiveness in clinical practice over a long period is complemented by a beneficial effect on airway remodelling process mediated mainly through its impact on eosinophils and other parameters strongly related to eosinophilic inflammation. However, it is possible that mepolizumab through nearly depleting eosinophils could have a similar effect on airway remodelling. Moreover, to date, markers indicative of the patient population responding to each treatment are unavailable although baseline eosinophils and exacerbation rate in the previous year demonstrate a predictive value regarding anti-IL-5 therapy effectiveness. On the other hand, a better therapeutic response for omalizumab has been observed when low forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and increased IgE concentrations are present. Consequently, conclusions are not yet safe to be drawn based on existing knowledge, and additional research is necessary to unravel the remaining issues for the severe asthmatic population.