RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A freestanding children's hospital evaluated the impact of a patient safety program on serious safety events (SSEs) and hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). METHODS: The No Harm Patient Safety Program was developed throughout the organization using a multifaceted approach that included safety moments, leadership rounding, cause analysis changes, event reporting enhancements, error prevention training, leadership training, identifying priority HACs, Eye on Safety Campaign, and safety coaches. The organization set strategic goals for improvement of SSEs and priority HACs. RESULTS: The rate of SSEs decreased from 0.19 in 2014 to 0.09 in 2015. The rate significantly declined from 2015 to 2016 to a rate of 0.00, for a rate difference of -0.00009 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.00016, -0.00002; p = 0.012). The organization reached two years without an SSE in July 2017. The central line-associated bloodstream infection rate significantly declined from 2.8 per 1,000 line-days in 2015 to 1.6 in 2016, for a difference of -0.00118 (95% CI: -0.002270, -0.00008; p = 0.036). Surgical site infection rates declined from a 2015 rate of 3.8 infections per 100 procedures to a 2016 rate of 2.6 (p = 0.2962), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates declined from a 2015 rate of 2.7 per 1,000 catheter-days to a 2016 rate of 1.4 (p = 0.2770). CONCLUSION: The No Harm Patient Safety Program was interwoven into the organization's strategic mission and values, and key messaging was used to purposefully tie the many interventions being implemented back to it. These interventions were associated with improvements in patient safety outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos/organización & administración , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Cultura Organizacional , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/normas , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Compromiso LaboralRESUMEN
Since taking office, President Obama has urged Congress to move rapidly and advance a plan that is consistent with the eight principles he considers essential for improving the U.S. health care system. Three major policies associated with the current discussions surrounding health care reform--universal coverage, preventive care, and improving efficiency and quality--are analyzed. Overall, the Obama plan for health reform has the potential to improve health care access and quality for all Americans dramatically. The Obama reform holds many opportunities for nurses, especially for APRNs, FNPs, and BSNs. This is a crucial time for nurses to become active participants in our health care reform. Nursing input is needed at the individual, community, and federal levels.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Educación Continua en Enfermería , Eficiencia Organizacional , Política , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a quality improvement collaborative on quality and efficiency of pediatric discharges. METHODS: This was a multicenter quality improvement collaborative including 11 tertiary-care freestanding children's hospitals in the United States, conducted between November 1, 2011 and October 31, 2012. Sites selected interventions from a change package developed by an expert panel. Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted on patient populations selected by each site. Data on discharge-related care failures, family readiness for discharge, and 72-hour and 30-day readmissions were reported monthly by each site. Surveys of each site were also conducted to evaluate the use of various change strategies. RESULTS: Most sites addressed discharge planning, quality of discharge instructions, and providing postdischarge support by phone. There was a significant decrease in discharge-related care failures, from 34% in the first project quarter to 21% at the end of the collaborative (P < .05). There was also a significant improvement in family perception of readiness for discharge, from 85% of families reporting the highest rating to 91% (P < .05). There was no improvement in unplanned 72-hour (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = .29) and slight worsening of the 30-day readmission rate (4.5% vs 6.3%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Institutions that participated in the collaborative had lower rates of discharge-related care failures and improved family readiness for discharge. There was no significant improvement in unplanned readmissions. More studies are needed to evaluate which interventions are most effective and to assess feasibility in non-children's hospital settings.