Partitioning variance in cortical morphometry into genetic, environmental, and subject-specific components.

The relative contributions of genetic variation and experience in shaping the morphology of the adolescent brain are not fully understood. Using longitudinal data from 11,665 subjects in the ABCD Study, we fit vertex-wise variance components including family effects, genetic effects, and subject-level effects using a computationally efficient framework. Variance in cortical thickness and surface area is largely attributable to genetic influence, whereas sulcal depth is primarily explained by subject-level effects. Our results identify areas with heterogeneous distributions of heritability estimates that have not been seen in previous work using data from cortical regions. We discuss the biological importance of subject-specific variance and its implications for environmental influences on cortical development and maturation.

Leveraging the adolescent brain cognitive development study to improve behavioral prediction from neuroimaging in smaller replication samples.

Neuroimaging is a popular method to map brain structural and functional patterns to complex human traits. Recently published observations cast doubt upon these prospects, particularly for prediction of cognitive traits from structural and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We leverage baseline data from thousands of children in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study to inform the replication sample size required with univariate and multivariate methods across different imaging modalities to detect reproducible brain-behavior associations. We demonstrate that by applying multivariate methods to high-dimensional brain imaging data, we can capture lower dimensional patterns of structural and functional brain architecture that correlate robustly with cognitive phenotypes and are reproducible with only 41 individuals in the replication sample for working memory-related functional MRI, and ~ 100 subjects for structural and resting state MRI. Even with 100 random re-samplings of 100 subjects in discovery, prediction can be adequately powered with 66 subjects in replication for multivariate prediction of cognition with working memory task functional MRI. These results point to an important role for neuroimaging in translational neurodevelopmental research and showcase how findings in large samples can inform reproducible brain-behavior associations in small sample sizes that are at the heart of many research programs and grants.

FEMA: Fast and efficient mixed-effects algorithm for large sample whole-brain imaging data.

The linear mixed-effects model (LME) is a versatile approach to account for dependence among observations. Many large-scale neuroimaging datasets with complex designs have increased the need for LME; however LME has seldom been used in whole-brain imaging analyses due to its heavy computational requirements. In this paper, we introduce a fast and efficient mixed-effects algorithm (FEMA) that makes whole-brain vertex-wise, voxel-wise, and connectome-wide LME analyses in large samples possible. We validate FEMA with extensive simulations, showing that the estimates of the fixed effects are equivalent to standard maximum likelihood estimates but obtained with orders of magnitude improvement in computational speed. We demonstrate the applicability of FEMA by studying the cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of age on region-of-interest level and vertex-wise cortical thickness, as well as connectome-wide functional connectivity values derived from resting state functional MRI, using longitudinal imaging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study release 4.0. Our analyses reveal distinct spatial patterns for the annualized changes in vertex-wise cortical thickness and connectome-wide connectivity values in early adolescence, highlighting a critical time of brain maturation. The simulations and application to real data show that FEMA enables advanced investigation of the relationships between large numbers of neuroimaging metrics and variables of interest while considering complex study designs, including repeated measures and family structures, in a fast and efficient manner. The source code for FEMA is available via: https://github.com/cmig-research-group/cmig_tools/.

Youth Psychotic Experiences: Diagnostic Associations and Evaluation of the CAPE-16.

Background: Adolescent self-reported psychotic experiences are associated with mental illness and could help guide prevention strategies. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) was developed over 20 years ago. In a rapidly changing society, where new generations of adolescents are growing up in an increasingly digital world, it is crucial to ensure high reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Methods: In this observational validation study, we used unique transgenerational questionnaire and health registry data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort, a population-based pregnancy cohort. Adolescents, aged ~14 years, responded to the CAPE-16 (n = 18,835) and fathers to the CAPE-9 questionnaire (n = 28,793). We investigated the psychometric properties of CAPE-16 through factor analyses, measurement invariance testing across biological sex, response before/ during the COVID-19 pandemic, and generations (comparison with fathers), and examined associations with later psychiatric diagnoses. Outcomes: One third (33·4%) of adolescents reported lifetime psychotic experiences. We confirmed a three-factor structure (paranoia, bizarre thoughts, and hallucinations) of CAPE-16, and observed good scale reliability of the distress and frequency subscales (ω = ·86 and ·90). CAPE-16 measured psychotic experiences were invariant to biological sex and pandemic status. CAPE-9 was non-invariant across generations, with items related to understanding of the digital world (electrical influences) prone to bias. CAPE-16 sum scores were associated with a subsequent psychiatric diagnosis, particularly psychotic disorders (frequency: OR = 2·06; 97·5% CI = 1·70-2·46; distress: OR = 1·93; 97·5% CI = 1·63-2·26). Interpretation: CAPE-16 showed robust psychometric properties across sex and pandemic status, and sum scores were associated with subsequent psychiatric diagnoses, particularly psychotic disorders. These findings suggest that with certain adjustments, CAPE-16 could have value as a screening tool for adolescents in the modern, digital world. Funding: European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme, Research Council of Norway, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, NIMH, and the KG Jebsen Stiftelsen.