Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 31(4): 335-43, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23529210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To reach the French market, a new drug requires a marketing authorization (MA) and price and reimbursement agreements. These hurdles could delay access to new and promising drugs. Since 1992, French law authorizes the use of unlicensed drugs on an exceptional and temporary basis through a compassionate-use programme, known as Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU). This programme was implemented to improve early access to drugs under development or authorized abroad. However, it is suspected to be inflationary, bypassing public bodies in charge of health technology assessment (HTA) and of pricing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to observe the market access after the formal licensing of drugs that went through this compassionate-use programme. METHODS: We included all ATUs that received an MA between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2010. We first examined market access delays from these drugs using the standard administrative path. We positioned this result in relation to launch delays observed in France (for all outpatient drugs) and in other major European markets. Second, we assessed the bargaining power of a hospital purchaser after those drugs had obtained an MA by calculating the price growth rate after the approval. RESULTS: During the study period, 77 ATUs were formally licensed. The study concluded that, from the patient's perspective, licensing and public bodies' review time was shortened by a combined total of 36 months. The projected 11-month review time of public bodies may be longer than delays usually observed for outpatient drugs. Nonetheless, the study revealed significant benefits for French patient access based on comparable processing to launch time with those of other European countries with tight price control policies. In return, a 12 % premium, on average, is paid to pharmaceutical companies while drugs are under this status (sub-analysis on 56 drugs). CONCLUSIONS: In many instances, the ATU programme responds to a public health need by accelerating the availability of new drugs even though this study suggests an impact of the programme on the market access of these drugs for which the standard administrative path is longer than usual. In addition, pharmaceutical companies seem to market compassionate-use drugs with a presumed benefit/risk ratio at a price that guarantees a margin for future negotiation.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos de Uso Compasivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/provisión & distribución , Ensayos de Uso Compasivo/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Aprobación de Drogas/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Industria Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Francia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA