RESUMEN
Alirocumab improves outcomes in patients with a history of recent acute coronary syndrome, but treatment acutely at the time of myocardial infarction is untested. We present the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded pilot study of alirocumab treatment at the time of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). Twenty patients with type 1 NSTEMI and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy were randomized 1:1 to one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously or placebo within 24 hours of presentation. LDL-C and inflammatory biomarkers-including C-reactive protein-were obtained at baseline, 72 hours, and 14 days. Median (interquartile range) and number (%) were: age 59 (49, 65) years, 7 (35%) men, 16 (80%) black; baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C from baseline to 14 days by 64 mg/dL (-96, -47) compared with placebo [+1 mg/dL (-25, +16)] (primary endpoint). There were no significant between-group differences in C-reactive protein changes at any time point (all P > 0.2) or serious adverse events attributable to the study treatment. In conclusion, alirocumab administration at the time of NSTEMI significantly reduced LDL-C levels at 14 days, was safe, and had neutral effects on inflammatory biomarkers. Further studies are warranted to explore the effects on clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Regulación hacia Abajo , Dislipidemias/sangre , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Proyectos Piloto , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , VirginiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a well-established assessment with important insight into prognosis and therapeutic efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF). Prior studies have identified several clinical differences between Black or African American (B-AA) and Caucasian patients with HF. Differences in key CPX responses between these two groups require further investigation. METHODS: Using a database consisting of subjects with symptomatic HF who had undergone CPX for inclusion in various prospective randomized clinical trials, we identified 198 (n = 94 [47%] B-AA; n = 105 [53%] Caucasian) patients with a qualifying baseline CPX. Significant univariate predictors of peak oxygen uptake (VËo2peak) were included in a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: When compared with Caucasian patients, B-AA were younger (mean ± SD = 54.8 ± 10.0 vs 57.9 ± 9.6 yr, P = .03), had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (median [IQR] = 4.9 [2.3, 8.8] vs 1.9 [0.6, 5.5] mg/L, P < .0001), lower hemoglobin (13.0 ± 1.8 vs 13.8 ± 1.6 g/dL, P = .003), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40 [32, 51] vs 53 [43, 59]%, P < .00010). During CPX, B-AA patients also had lower VËo2peak (14.6 ± 3.9 vs 17.6 ± 4.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < .0001). No differences were observed between B-AA and Caucasian in the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VËe/VËco2) slope (P = .14). The difference in VËo2peak between B-AA and Caucasian was largely attenuated after adjusting for age, body mass index, CRP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, hemoglobin, LVEF, and peak HR (14.1: 95% CI, 13.2-14.9 vs 15.6: 95% CI, 14.4-16.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: Directly measured VËo2peak was significantly lower in B-AA than in Caucasians with HF. This is largely explained by differences in clinical characteristics, whereas no significant differences were observed in the VËe/VËco2 slope.