Acute pancreatitis in Turkey: Results of a nationwide multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common gastrointestinal disease requiring hospitalization, with significant mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of AP and physicians' compliance with international guidelines during its management. METHODS: All patients with AP who were hospitalized at 17 tertiary centers in Turkey between April and October 2022 were evaluated in a prospective cohort study. Patients with insufficient data, COVID-19 and those aged below 18 years were excluded. The definitions were based on the 2012 revised Atlanta criteria. RESULTS: The study included 2144 patients (median age:58, 52 % female). The most common etiologies were biliary (n = 1438, 67.1 %), idiopathic (n = 259, 12 %), hypertriglyceridemia (n = 128, 6 %) and alcohol (n = 90, 4.2 %). Disease severity was mild in 1567 (73.1 %), moderate in 521 (24.3 %), and severe in 58 (2.6 %) patients. Morphology was necrotizing in 4.7 % of the patients. The overall mortality rate was 1.6 %. PASS and BISAP had the highest accuracy in predicting severe pancreatitis on admission (AUC:0.85 and 0.81, respectively). CT was performed in 61 % of the patients, with the majority (90 %) being within 72 h after admission. Prophylactic NSAIDs were not administered in 44 % of the patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (n = 86). Antibiotics were administered to 53.7 % of the patients, and 38 % of those received them prophylactically. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study provides an extensive report on clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of AP in real-world practice. Mortality remains high in severe cases and physicians' adherence to guidelines during management of the disease needs improvement in some aspects.

Benign biliary strictures associated with acute biliary pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are limited data about the benign biliary strictures (BBS) which can develop during the clinical course of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) due to compression of the common bile duct (CBD) by edematous and inflamed pancreatic tissue. We aimed to determine the incidence of BBS due to ABP and its clinical course after endoscopic management. METHODS: The study was retrospectively conducted among patients with ABP who were admitted to a single tertiary reference center during 3 years. BBS-ABP was defined as distal narrowing of the CBD with proximal dilatation and delayed drainage of the contrast into the duodenum. Endoscopic treatment was performed by inserting a single 7F or 10F plastic stent which was exchanged every 3 months until stricture resolution. Patients were followed for 1 year after stricture resolution. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-one patients had ABP during the study period. Among them, 257 (35.6%) patients underwent ERCP and 26 patients (3.6%) had CBD stricture due to ABP. A 7 Fr plastic stent was inserted in 18 patients and 10 Fr in 8 patients. The stricture was completely resolved at 3 months in 66.7%, at 6 months 23.8% and at 9 months (9.5%) of the patients. There was no procedure-related complications other than asymptomatic stent migration in 4 (19%) patients. None of the patients had recurrent biliary stricture during the 1 year stent-free follow-up period. CONCLUSION: BBS-ABP is a frequently seen clinical entity. In most patients, the stricture improves within 3 months and temporary endoscopic stenting prevents the patients from the consequences of the obstruction during this period.

Pancreaticobiliary maljunction in Turkish patients: a multicenter case series.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) is a malformation in which the pancreatic and bile ducts join outside the duodenal wall. It is associated with various biliary and pancreatic diseases. In addition, patients with PBM carry a substantial lifetime risk of developing biliary or gallbladder carcinoma. We aimed to present a multicenter case series of PBM from Turkey. METHODS: This study was conducted in adult and pediatric PBM patients who were referred to three tertiary reference centers of Turkey for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between July 2007 and May 2020. The clinical presentations, types of PBM, ERCP findings, surgical histories, and the postoperative courses, including the development of biliary malignancies, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The study group included 47 (31 adult and 16 children) patients. Type D PBM was more frequent (13/41: 27.7%) than that reported in Eastern studies. Type A PBM was more common in the adults (51.6% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.05), whereas type C was more common in pediatric patients (31.3% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.05). Although fusiform anatomy was predominant in both of the groups, cystic dilatation was more common (25.8% vs. 12.5%) in adults and the common bile duct diameter was greater [22 mm (range 11-58) vs. 12 mm (range 5-33)] in adult patients compared to pediatric patients. Resective surgeries were more frequently done in pediatric patients (73.3% vs. 53.6%), whereas cholecystectomy was more frequently performed in adult patients (21.4% vs. 6.7%). CONCLUSION: Although our findings were compatible with Eastern studies, type D PBM (associated with pancreas divisum) was more frequent in our study population.

A case report of tigecycline induced acute pancreatitis in a renal transplant patient and review of the literature: Should we avoid tigecycline in patients on calcineurin inhibitors?

Tigecycline has been approved by the US (United States) Food and Drug Administration in a variety of complicated infections due to its broad-spectrum antibiotic activity. Following phase III trials, the product label was revised and acute pancreatitis was listed as an adverse effect. Its safety profile in special groups such as renal transplant patients is not exactly known. We report the first case of unintentional rechallenge of tigecycline induced pancreatitis in a renal transplant patient. Ten days following the renal transplantation, a 35-year-old patient presented to the clinic with acute rejection. He received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and pulse steroid treatments for rejection. Following the treatment, he developed perianal cellulitis and tigecycline was started. Nine days following initiation of tigecycline he received thrombectomy for his incidental cardiac thrombus. One day after thrombectomy, he developed acute pancreatitis (AP). Thrombectomy was suspected to be the cause of AP. During hospitalization for transplant rejection, tigecycline was re-started for a newly developed complicated abdominal infection. On the third day of the tigecycline re-treatment, he developed a second episode of AP. Following tigecycline withdrawal, his symptoms resolved and serum pancreatic enzymes returned to normal, thus AP was ultimately attributed to tigecycline. This lethal side effect should be kept in mind while treating severe infections in renal transplant recipients.

Comparison of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in the Prophylaxis of HBV Reactivation.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend starting antiviral prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments (IST). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for prophylaxis. METHODS: Patients, who were HBsAg and/or anti-HBc IgG positive and scheduled to receive IST for oncologic and hematologic diseases, were enrolled into the study. Those who were already receiving an antiviral treatment for HBV or had an associated HIV, hepatitis C, D were excluded. The remaining patients with a prophylaxis indication according to the AGA guideline were randomized to receive either ETV (0.5 mg/day) or TDF (245 mg/day). Prophylaxis was continued for 6-12 months after completion of IST. Patients were followed up for 1 year after completion of prophylaxis. The HBV reactivation rates and side effects of the drugs were compared. RESULTS: The study group included 120 patients. There was no significant difference between the demographic data, viral serologic parameters and reactivation risk profiles of the ETV (n = 60) and TDF (n = 60) groups. Forty-one patients in the ETV and 36 in the TDF group completed the antiviral prophylaxis, and no HBV reactivation was observed. HBV reactivation was observed in 4 of 37 patients (10.8%) in the ETV group and 5 of 35 (14.3%) patients in the TDF group (including one with flare) during the follow-up after completion of prophylaxis. Ten patients in the ETV group (16.7%) and 14 patients (23.3%) in the TDF group experienced side effects (p = 0.77). One patient in the TDF group had to switch to ETV due to severe itchy, maculopapular rash-like lesions. CONCLUSIONS: ETV and TDF had a similar efficacy in the prophylaxis of HBV reactivation in patients undergoing IST, with none of the patients experiencing reactivation.

Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although various methods are used in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, there is not a standard recommended approach. The choice depends on multiple factors such as location of the ulcer, clinical experience of the endoscopist, and local facilities of the clinic. We aimed to compare the efficacy of monopolar hemostatic forceps soft coagulation (MHFSC) and hemoclips (HCs) in the treatment of peptic ulcer-related upper GI bleeding. METHODS: The study group included patients who had GI bleeding due to Forrest 1a, 1b, and 2a gastric or duodenal ulcers within 1 year. Patients with bleeding diathesis, history of gastrectomy, pregnancy, or younger than age 18 years were excluded. The remaining were randomized to MHFSC and HC treatment groups and compared in terms of clinical and endoscopic features, initial hemostasis success rates, recurrent bleeding rates within the first 7 days, time to achieve hemostasis, length of hospitalization stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomized to MHFSC (n = 56) and HC (n = 56) groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to demographic features, medications, underlying chronic diseases, location, and Forrest classification of the ulcers. The initial hemostasis success rate was 98.2% (55/56) in the MHFSC group and 80.4% (45/56) in the HC group (P = .004). Recurrent bleeding was detected in 2 patients in the MHFSC group (3.6%) and 8 patients in the HC group (17.7%; P = .04). The duration of endoscopic procedures (302 ± 87.8 vs 568 ± 140.4 seconds) and the length of hospital stay (3.50 ± 1.03 vs 4.37 ± 1.86 days) were significantly shorter in the MHFSC group. There were no adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: MHFSC is more effective in achieving initial hemostasis compared with HCs in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding and provides a shorter procedure time and a lower recurrent bleeding rate.

Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent method increases the need for needle-knife precutting in patients with difficult biliary cannulations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cannulation of the major papilla can be problematic, and selective biliary cannulation may fail in up to 18% of cases. Various techniques, such as double-guidewire technique (DGWT), wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (WGC-PS), the precut endoscopic sphincterotomy (needle-knife precutting technique (NKP), and transpancreatic septostomy have been used to improve the success rate of biliary cannulation. We conducted a prospective, randomized study in order to compare the biliary cannulation success rates of DGWT and WGC-PS techniques in patients with inadvertent passage of guidewire to the pancreatic duct. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study and randomized to DGWT (n = 50) or WGC-PS (n = 50) groups. The primary outcome was successful selective cannulation, defined as deep cannulation with selective injection of radiographic contrast material into the common bile duct within 5 minutes by DGW or WGC-PS techniques without performing precut sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Successful selective cannulation was achieved in 45 patients in the DGWT group (90%) and in 27 patients in the WGC-PS group (54%) (P < .001). Five patients (10%) in the DGWT group and 23 (46%) in the WGC-PS group required NKP for biliary access (P < .001). The overall cannulation rate was 98% for DGWT and 98% for WGC-PS (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unintentional passage of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct during biliary cannulation attempts, the WGC-PS technique significantly increased the need for NKP compared with DGWT.

Rheumatologists' awareness of hepatitis B reactivation before immunosuppressive therapy.

HBV reactivation (HBVr) is a well-known complication of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness of rheumatologists about the risk of HBVr. A survey was sent via e-mail to 270 members of the Turkish Society for Rheumatology. It consisted of fourteen questions on their awareness of the major society guidelines, approach to hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening according to different IS regimens, decision process in screening patients for HBV, knowledge of antiviral treatments for HBV, follow-up strategies, experience and postgraduate training on HBVr. Forty-eight (17.8%) rheumatologists responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 93.8% reported that they screened all patients before IS treatment, while 6.2% screened patients with a high risk of HBV infection only. The screening rate was 95.8% (46/48) in patients undergoing high-risk IS treatment and 35.4% (17/48) in those undergoing low-risk treatment. All respondents screened for HBsAg, and 83.3% (40/48) screened for anti-HBc IgG and anti-HBs. Forty-four (91.7%) rheumatologists had previously initiated antiviral prophylaxis, and 14 (29.2%) had detected HBVr in at least one patient. Rheumatologists had a high awareness of the necessity for HBV screening before IS treatment. However, the screening rates were still lower than desired, especially in patients receiving IS treatments with moderate or low risk of reactivation.

A novel technique for the endoscopic treatment of complete biliary anastomosis obstructions after liver transplantation: through-the-scope magnetic compression anastomosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Magnetic compression anastomosis is a rescue technique for recanalization of complete biliary strictures. Here, we present magnetic compression anastomosis with novel through-the-scope magnets in patients with complete duct-to-duct anastomosis obstruction after liver transplantation. METHODS: The magnets were 2 and 2.4 mm in diameter, with a hole at the center for inserting a guidewire. One of the magnets was advanced through the scope up to the distal site of the stricture by using a 7F pusher. The other magnet was pushed percutaneously through the 10F sheath. The procedure was terminated when the magnets were approximated or properly aligned. Recanalization was followed by percutaneous cholangiography. Patients underwent multiple plastic stenting after recanalization was achieved. RESULTS: Nine patients with a stricture length of less than 1 cm, a stump in the donor bile ducts close to the stricture, and proper positioning of the bile duct stumps, underwent magnetic compression anastomosis. Seven patients had a live donor-related liver transplantation. The mean stricture time was 24.1 ± 17.1 months. The mean stricture length was 4.0 ± 1.2 mm. Recanalization was achieved in 7 patients (77%) after a mean recanalization time of 8.1 ± 4.7 days. There was no recurrence after 4.8 ± 3.8 months of stent-free follow-up. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The through-the-scope magnet procedure was effective in the recanalization of complete anastomotic biliary obstructions after liver transplantation in a selected group of patients with a short stricture length and an appropriate anatomy.

Endoscopic treatment of biliary stones in patients with liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Biliary complications develop in 10-40 % of patients following liver transplantation. Biliary strictures, leaks, and stone are the most common type of complications. In this study, we focused on the endoscopic treatment of biliary stones. METHODS: Among 142 patients with liver transplantation [22 deceased donor related (DDLT), 120 live donor related liver transplantation (LDLT)] who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between December 2013 and September 2015, 33 (11 with DDLT, 28 male, mean age 45 ± 13 years) had one or more biliary stones. ERCP was performed through papilla in all of the patients other than a patient with hepaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: Biliary stones were extracted in all 6 patients without anastomosis stricture (AS), 3 of 6 (50 %) patients with DDLT and AS, in 13 of 16 (81.5 %) patients with LDLT and AS, and in 3 of 5 (60 %) patients with non-anastomosis stricture (NAS). The total number of sessions required for the extraction of stones was less in patients with biliary stones without AS [1.5 (1-2)] compared to those with AS and DDLT [2 (1-6)] or LDLT [3 (1-5)]. Patients with NAS (n = 5) required a greater number of sessions [7 (1-10)]. CONCLUSIONS: Stone extraction is difficult in patients with NAS and requires a greater number of ERCP sessions. The treatment of biliary stones proximal to an AS in patients with DDLT or LRLT is possible in most cases.

Management of suspected common bile duct stone: diagnostic yield of current guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has recently published a guideline for suspected CBDS with the intention of reducing unnecessary ERCP and thereby complications. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the ASGE guideline. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent ERCP with suspected CBDS were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into high, intermediate and low risk groups based on predictors that have been suggested by the ASGE. Very strong predictors of the presence of ductal stones included: CBDS on transabdominal ultrasonography (US), clinical ascending cholangitis or total bilirubin (TBIL) >4 mg/dL). Strong predictors included dilated CBD >6 mm on US with gallbladder in situ and TBIL level of 1.8-4.0 mg/dL whereas moderate predictor included abnormal liver biochemical test other than bilirubin, age more than 55 years and clinical findings of biliary pancreatitis. RESULTS: Of 888 enrolled patients, 704 had CBDS demonstrated by ERCP and the remainder did not. All very strong and strong predictors were found to be significantly higher among patients who had CBDS. Detection of CBDS by ultrasonography and a dilated common biliary duct were observed to be independent risk factors associated with the existence of CBDS. The high risk group had a high (86.7%) positive predictive value (PPV), however, sensitivity and specificity were observed to be moderate (67.8% and 60.3% respectively). PPV was 67.9% in the intermediate risk group and the sensitivity and specificity were very low (31.9% and 42.3%). DISCUSSION: The probability of CBDS was observed to be high in the intermediate and high risk groups. However due to low sensitivity and specificity values, the ASGE guideline needs additional or different predictors.

Is Gastric Xanthelasma an Alarming Endoscopic Marker for Advanced Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia?

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical significance of gastric xanthelasmas is unknown. We conducted a case-control study in order to evaluate whether gastric xanthelasma is an indicator of advanced atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was conducted among 1400 patients who underwent elective upper endoscopy. Patients with gastric xanthelasma and atrophy and/or intestinal metaplasia constituted the study group (n = 55). The control group involved patients with only atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia (n = 50). Histopathologic findings of the groups including the distribution of atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia, operative link on gastritis assessment score, operative link on gastritis intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) score, and presence of dysplasia and malignancy were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed in order to establish the relation between the characteristics (size, number, and localization) of xanthelasmas, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS: Multifocal atrophic gastritis was significantly more common in patients with a gastric xanthelasma (41.8 vs. 26.0 %, p = 0.03). Patients with multiple xanthelasmas had a significantly higher rate of intestinal metaplasia (p = 0.02) and a higher OLGIM score (p = 0.02) compared to those with a single xanthelasma. Dysplasia was detected in 8 (14.5 %) patients with a xanthelasma and 4 (8.0 %) patients without a xanthelasma (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Gastric xanthelasma(s) is a warning endoscopic sign for the presence of multifocal atrophic gastritis and advanced intestinal metaplasia.

Endoscopic treatment of patients with bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy: factors predicting recurrence in the long term.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic treatment is effective in the treatment of patients with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. We aimed to investigate the long-term results of endoscopic treatment, factors predicting the recurrence of the stricture, and to determine the optimal endoscopic treatment. METHODS: The study was a retrospective cohort analysis and conducted at a tertiary referral center in patients with major bile duct injury (Strasberg E1-4 and E5 patients with main bile duct injury). Patients with minor injury (Luschka and cystic duct leakage), complete transection, and isolated aberrant bile duct injuries were excluded. RESULTS: The study group included 156 patients. The median follow-up period after stent removal was 6.5 years (range 1-16.5). Recurrence was seen in 18 patients (11 %) after a median duration of 9 months (range 2-96). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the most important factors predicting the success of endoscopic treatment were: Rome type of treatment (inserting increasing number of stents every 3-4 months) (odds ratio 23.8, 95 % CI 1.46-390.7, p = 0.026) instead of Amsterdam-type treatment (replacing two 10F biliary stents every 3-4 months) and dilation of the stricture diameter to at least 76 % of the common bile duct diameter at the end of stent treatment (odds ratio 25.9, 95 % CI 2.46-272.7, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment is an effective method in the treatment of patients with bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy. Inserting multiple stents as much as possible without leaving a scar in the bile ducts should be aimed.

Magnets in action: role of interventional radiologists in magnetic compression anastomosis procedures.

Obstructions encountered in biliary, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts are increasing in number due to successful percutaneous and endoscopic organ-saving procedures. Although functional recovery is established to an extent, failure of traversing an obstruction may end up necessitating invasive surgical procedures. Multidisciplinary collaboration may traverse the limitations of each individual approach, therefore creating the perfect intervention for the patient. Magnetic compression anastomosis is a minimally invasive procedure that can provide a great outcome in select cases with biliary, gastrointestinal, or urinary tract obstructions. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In this article, various applications of magnetic compression anastomosis are reviewed with illustrative cases of esophageal, biliary, colonic, and urinary obstructions that cannot be traversed with a wire. This method will expand the spectrum of interventions performed in the IR unit. KEY POINTS: Magnets can enable wire access beyond an impassable obstruction. Magnets can create anatomical and non-anatomical anastomosis at an occlusion. Magnetic compression anastomosis is a minimally invasive procedure that can provide great outcomes.

Self-expanding covered metallic stent treatment of esophagojejunostomy fistulas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of the self-expanding covered metallic stent (SECMS) therapy in the management of the postoperative anastomotic leaks that seen after total gastrectomy-esophagojejunostomy (EJ) operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast radiography and endoscopy revealed EJ fistulas in 14 patients. SECMSs were implanted both fluoroscopically and endoscopically to seal fistulas. Postoperative fistula diagnosis times, postoperative covered stent implantation times, primary success rates, clinical success rates, postinterventional oral feeding beginning times, reduction of the drainage from the surgical drains, procedure-related mortality-morbidity, and mortality related with factors other than the procedure were noted. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 100 %. Clinical success rate was 79 %. Reduction of the fluid from surgical drains was observed in all patients. There were no procedure-related mortality. Recurrent fistula was observed in two patients (14 %) at the third and fifth day after the intervention. In one patient (7 %), stent dislocation was observed at the 10th day after the intervention. Non procedure-related mortality was 21 %. No anastomotic stricture, no in-stent stenosis was observed during the follow up period(11.09 ± 3.21 months). CONCLUSION: From the above results we concluded that SECMS treatment for EJ fistulas is a safe, effective and technically easy procedure.

Fully Covered Metal Stents Safely Facilitate Extraction of Difficult Bile Duct Stones.

BACKGROUND: Ten to 15% of the common bile duct (CBD) stones require advanced endoscopic extraction techniques during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) for facilitating the extraction of difficult bile duct stones. METHODS: Patients who received FC-SEMS for the extraction of difficult CBD stones were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 included patients with extrahepatic stones above a distal CBD stricture, Group 2 included patients with intrahepatic stones above a hilar stricture, and Group 3 included patients with complex stone(s) and no biliary stricture. Complete stone clearance rate and complications of FC-SEMS treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: The study group included 33 procedures on 32 patients (mean age: 55±17, 56.3% male). FC-SEMS was placed as a primary treatment in 15 (45.5%) procedures. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 84.6% of the procedures in Group 1, 100% in Group 2, and 87.5% in Group 3 ( P =0.23). Overall, complete stone clearance was achieved in 30 of the 33 procedures (90.9%). None of the patients developed pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholangitis. Stent migration occurred in 4 procedures (12.1%), and all were clinically insignificant. CONCLUSION: FC-SEMS is effective and safe for facilitating treatment of difficult bile duct stones.

Endoscopic treatment of periampullary duodenal duplication cyts in an 18-month-old girl.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal duplication cysts (DDC) are rare congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract and periampullary localization with anatomical variants including biliary and pancreatic duct anomalies remains a surgical challenge. Endoscopic treatment of the periampullary DDC (PDDC) communicating with the pancreaticobiliary duct in an 18-month-old girl is presented to discuss the endoscopic treatment options in children. CASE: An 18-month-old girl with a normal prenatal ultrasound (US) was asymptomatic until complaining of abdominal pain and vomiting at 10-months of age. Abdominal US revealed a 1.8 × 2 cm cystic mass adjacent to the second part of the duodenum. The amylase and lipase levels were slightly increased while she was symptomatic. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) showed a thick cyst wall measuring 1.5 × 2 cm at the second part of the duodenum, consistent with DDC that was suspected to be communicating with the common bile duct. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy confirmed a bulging cyst in the duodenum lumen. The puncture and injection of the cyst with contrast material confirmed the communication of the duplication cyst with the common bile duct. The unroofing of the cyst was performed with endoscopic cautery. The biopsy obtained from the cystic mucosa revealed normal intestinal histology. Oral feeding was initiated six hours after the endoscopy. The patient has been followed for the last 8 months uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of PDDC with various anatomical variants can be considered an alternative to surgical excision in children.