Breast conservation surgery & oncoplasty in India - Current scenario.

Breast cancer incidence is on the rise in India as in rest of the world. While the advances in overall cancer care are at par, the surgical interventions have not been changing at the same pace in India, as in the rest of the developed world. Partly, this is due to the relatively more advanced state of cancer at detection and partly due to lack of awareness resulting in apprehension and slow acceptance of de-escalation of surgical interventions by the treating surgeons, and the beneficiaries, the patients. The article looks at the current scenario, available evidence on the practices and pitfalls with possible solutions for advancing surgical care of breast cancer in India.

Outcomes of Elective Major Cancer Surgery During COVID 19 at Tata Memorial Centre: Implications for Cancer Care Policy.

BACKGROUND: Overburdened systems and concerns of adverse outcomes have resulted in deferred cancer surgeries with devastating consequences. In this COVID pandemic, the decision to continue elective cancer surgeries, and their subsequent outcomes, are sparsely reported from hotspots. METHODS: A prospective database of the Department of Surgical Oncology was analysed from March 23rd to April 30th, 2020. FINDINGS: Four hundred ninety-four elective surgeries were performed (377 untested and 117 tested for Covid 19 before surgery). Median age was 48 years with 13% (n = 64) above the age of 60 years. Sixty-eight percent patients were American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade I. As per surgical complexity grading, 71 (14·4%) cases were lower grade (I-III) and 423 (85.6%) were higher grade complex surgeries (IV - VI).Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III complications were 5.6% (n = 28) and there were no postoperative deaths. Patients >60 years documented 9.3% major complications compared to 5.2% in <60 years (P = 0.169). The median hospital stay was 1 to 9 days across specialties.Postoperatively, 26 patients were tested for COVID 19 and 6 tested positive. They all had higher grade surgeries but none required escalated or intensive care treatment related to COVID infection. INTERPRETATION: A combination of scientific and administrative rationale contributed to favorable outcomes after major elective cancer surgeries. These results support the continuation of elective major cancer surgery in regions with Covid 19 trends similar to India.

Mandatory preoperative COVID-19 testing for cancer patients-Is it justified?

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has caused substantial disruptions in routine clinical care. Emerging data show that surgery in coronavirus disease (COVID)-positive cases can be associated with worsening of clinical outcomes and increased postoperative mortality. Hence, preoperative COVID-19 testing for all patients before elective surgery was implemented in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-two asymptomatic cancer patients were preoperatively tested for COVID-19 using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction technique with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabbing. All negative patients were operated within 72 hours, and positive patients were quarantined for a minimum 14 days before re-swabbing. RESULTS: In our cohort, 21 of 262 (8.0%) asymptomatic preoperative patients, who were otherwise fit for surgery, tested positive. After adequate quarantine and a negative follow-up test report, 12 of 21 (57%) had an operation. No major postoperative morbidity due to COVID-19 was noted during the immediate postoperative period before discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative COVID-19 testing was successful in identifying asymptomatic viral carriers. There was no incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 disease in the postoperative period, and there was no incidence of morbidity attributable to COVID-19. These data suggested a beneficial role for mandatory preoperative COVID-19 testing.

Understanding rural-urban differences in risk factors for breast cancer in an Indian population.

PURPOSE: Although cancer registry data indicate that there are large differences in breast cancer (BC) rates between rural and urban regions of India, the reasons for these differences are not well understood. METHODS: We conducted a hospital based case-control study (1,637 breast cancer cases; 1,515 visitor controls) in Mumbai, India, during the years 2009-2013. Extensive questionnaire data, anthropometry measurement and blood samples were collected on all participants. Using logistic regression models, we estimated risk based on odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for various reproductive and anthropometric measures, stratified by rural-urban status depending upon residence in first 20 years of life. RESULTS: Waist-to-hip ratio of ≥0.95 compared to ratio ≤0.84 was strongly associated with risk of BC in both rural and urban populations (ORurban = 4.10, 95 % CI 3.03-5.56; ORrural = 3.01, 95 % CI 1.85-4.90). First full-term pregnancy after the age of 25 compared to first full-term pregnancy below 20 years of age was associated with risk of BC in both urban and rural women (ORurban = 1.78, 95 % CI 1.32-2.41; ORrural = 2.24, 95 % CI 1.13-4.43). The prevalence of age at first full-term pregnancy was significantly lower in rural (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 19.39 years) versus urban women (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 22.62 years), whereas mean waist circumference was much higher in urban women (82.13 cm) compared to rural women (79.26 cm). We did not observe any association between breast feeding and risk of BC. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the prevalence of central adiposity and age at first full-term pregnancy between rural and urban women from India may explain some differences in breast cancer rates between these two populations.

A grid matrix-based Raman spectroscopic method to characterize different cell milieu in biopsied axillary sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients.

Raman spectroscopy which is based upon inelastic scattering of photons has a potential to emerge as a noninvasive bedside in vivo or ex vivo molecular diagnostic tool. There is a need to improve the sensitivity and predictability of Raman spectroscopy. We developed a grid matrix-based tissue mapping protocol to acquire cellular-specific spectra that also involved digital microscopy for localizing malignant and lymphocytic cells in sentinel lymph node biopsy sample. Biosignals acquired from specific cellular milieu were subjected to an advanced supervised analytical method, i.e., cross-correlation and peak-to-peak ratio in addition to PCA and PC-LDA. We observed decreased spectral intensity as well as shift in the spectral peaks of amides and lipid bands in the completely metastatic (cancer cells) lymph nodes with high cellular density. Spectral library of normal lymphocytes and metastatic cancer cells created using the cellular specific mapping technique can be utilized to create an automated smart diagnostic tool for bench side screening of sampled lymph nodes. Spectral library of normal lymphocytes and metastatic cancer cells created using the cellular specific mapping technique can be utilized to develop an automated smart diagnostic tool for bench side screening of sampled lymph nodes supported by ongoing global research in developing better technology and signal and big data processing algorithms.

Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of locoregional treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer at first presentation is unclear. Preclinical evidence suggests that such treatment might help the growth of metastatic disease, whereas many retrospective analyses in clinical cohorts have suggested a favourable effect of locoregional treatment in these patients. We aimed to compare the effect of locoregional treatment with no treatment on outcome in women with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited previously untreated patients (≤65 years of age with an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 1 year) presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer from Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive locoregional treatment directed at their primary breast tumour and axillary lymph nodes, or no locoregional treatment, by a computer-generated block randomisation sequence (block size of four). Randomisation was stratified by site of distant metastases, number of metastatic lesions, and hormone receptor status. Patients with resectable primary tumour in the breast that could be treated with endocrine therapy were randomly assigned upfront, whereas those with an unresectable primary tumour were planned for chemotherapy before randomisation. Of the patients who had chemotherapy before randomisation, we randomly assigned patients who had an objective tumour response after six to eight cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00193778. FINDINGS: Between Feb 7, 2005, and Jan 18, 2013, of the 716 women presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer, we randomly assigned 350 patients: 173 to locoregional treatment and 177 to no locoregional treatment. At data cut-off of Nov 1, 2013, median follow-up was 23 months (IQR 12·2-38·7) with 235 deaths (locoregional treatment n=118, no locoregional treatment n=117). Median overall survival was 19·2 months (95% CI 15·98-22·46) in the locoregional treatment group and 20·5 months (16·96-23·98) in the no-locoregional treatment group (HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·81-1·34; p=0·79), and the corresponding 2-year overall survival was 41·9% (95% CI 33·9-49·7) in the locoregional treatment group and 43·0% (35·2-50·8) in the no locoregional treatment group. The only adverse event noted was wound infection related to surgery in one patient in the locoregional treatment group. INTERPRETATION: There is no evidence to suggest that locoregional treatment of the primary tumour affects overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation who have responded to front-line chemotherapy, and this procedure should not be part of routine practice.

Patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant exemestane versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian suppression (TEXT and SOFT): a combined analysis of two phase 3 randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: The combined efficacy analysis of the TEXT and SOFT trials showed a significant disease-free survival benefit with exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared with tamoxifen plus OFS. We present patient-reported outcomes from these trials. METHODS: Between Nov 7, 2003, and April 7, 2011, 4717 premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer were enrolled in TEXT or SOFT to receive unmasked adjuvant treatment with 5 years of exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral ovarian irradiation were used to achieve OFS. Chemotherapy use was optional. Randomisation with permuted blocks was done with the International Breast Cancer Study Group's internet-based system and was stratified by chemotherapy use and status of lymph nodes. Patients completed a quality of life (QoL) form comprising several global and symptom indicators at baseline, every 6 months for 24 months, and then every year during years 3 to 6. Differences in the change of QoL from baseline between the two treatments were tested at 6 months, 24 months, and 60 months with mixed-models for repeated measures for each trial with and without chemotherapy and overall. The analysis was by intention to treat. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 5·7 years (IQR 3·7-6·9); treatment and follow-up of patients continue. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, as NCT00066703 (TEXT) and NCT00066690 (SOFT). FINDINGS: Patients on tamoxifen plus OFS were more affected by hot flushes and sweats over 5 years than were those on exemestane plus OFS, although these symptoms improved. Patients on exemestane plus OFS reported more vaginal dryness, greater loss of sexual interest, and difficulties becoming aroused than did patients on tamoxifen plus OFS; these differences persisted over time. An increase in bone or joint pain was more pronounced, particularly in the short term, in patients on exemestane plus OFS than patients on tamoxifen plus OFS. Changes in global QoL indicators from baseline were small and similar between treatments over the 5 years. INTERPRETATION: Overall, from a QoL perspective, there is no strong indication to favour either exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. The distinct effects of the two treatments on the burden of endocrine symptoms need to be addressed with patients individually. FUNDING: Pfizer, International Breast Cancer Study Group, and US National Cancer Institute.

Regional variation in identified cancer care needs of early-career oncologists in China, India, and Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Cancer incidence and mortality is increasing in the developing world. Inequities between low-, middle-, and high-income countries affect disease burden and the infrastructure needs in response to cancer. We surveyed early-career oncologists attending workshops in clinical research in three countries with emerging economies about their perception of the evolving cancer burden. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was distributed at clinical trial concept development workshops held in Beijing, Lahore, Karachi, and Mumbai at major hospitals to acquire information regarding home-country health conditions and needs. RESULTS: A total of 100 respondents participated in the workshops held at major hospitals in the region (India = 29, China = 25, Pakistan = 42, and other = 4). Expected consensus on many issues (e.g., emergence of cancer as a significant health issue) was balanced with significant variation in priorities, opportunities, and challenges. Chinese respondents prioritized improvements in cancer-specific care and palliative care, Indian respondents favored improved cancer detection and advancing research in cancer care, and Pakistani respondents prioritized awareness of cancer and improvements in disease detection and cancer care research. For all, the most frequently cited opportunity was help in improving professional cancer education and training. CONCLUSION: Predominantly early-career oncologists attending clinical research workshops (in China, India, and Pakistan) identified needs for increasing clinical cancer research, professional education, and public awareness of cancer. Decision makers supporting efforts to reduce the burden of cancer worldwide will need to factor the specific needs and aspirations of health care providers in their country in prioritizing health policies and budgets.

Towards equitable AI in oncology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) stands at the threshold of revolutionizing clinical oncology, with considerable potential to improve early cancer detection and risk assessment, and to enable more accurate personalized treatment recommendations. However, a notable imbalance exists in the distribution of the benefits of AI, which disproportionately favour those living in specific geographical locations and in specific populations. In this Perspective, we discuss the need to foster the development of equitable AI tools that are both accurate in and accessible to a diverse range of patient populations, including those in low-income to middle-income countries. We also discuss some of the challenges and potential solutions in attaining equitable AI, including addressing the historically limited representation of diverse populations in existing clinical datasets and the use of inadequate clinical validation methods. Additionally, we focus on extant sources of inequity including the type of model approach (such as deep learning, and feature engineering-based methods), the implications of dataset curation strategies, the need for rigorous validation across a variety of populations and settings, and the risk of introducing contextual bias that comes with developing tools predominantly in high-income countries.

A Questionnaire Survey of Current Practice in the Management of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer.

Nita S. NairBackground Radiotherapy (RT) is an important modality in the management of breast cancers (BC). Large randomized trials have suggested that prophylactic regional nodal irradiation inclusive of internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLN) reduces BC-related mortality. However, the adoption of IMLN-RT has been variable due to relative benefits and toxicity concerns. Methods A survey was emailed to radiation oncologists (ROs) across the country wherein they were asked about their practice regarding IMLN-RT in BC. Results We received 128 responses, which included radiation oncologists across both private institutions (PIs) and government institutions (GIs). Fifty-six (43.8%) routinely offer prophylactic(p) IMLN-RT and an additional 15 (11.71%) suggested they would have offered it in the absence of logistic constraints. Almost all, 121 (94.5%) radiate the IMLN in case of radiologically positive lymph nodes (LNs). Fifty-six ROs (43.8%) offered prophylactic IMLN-RT in node-negative disease. Among those who did not offer IMLN-RT, most (84.72%) felt the clinical evidence was equivocal. Of the 56 who offered pIMLN-RT, 34/56 (60.71%) offered to locally advanced tumors, 20/56 (35.71%) offered to all inner and central tumors (ICQT), 29/56 (51.78%) to > 4 axillary LN-positive and 9/56 (16.07%) to any axillary LN-positive. The majority, i.e., 36/56 (64.28%) radiated upper three intercostal spaces, 9 (16.07%) radiated upper five intercostal spaces, and 6 (10.9%) decided based on tumor location, while 5 (9%) irradiated one space below the involved space. Overall, simulation-based planning was undertaken in 99% of PIs as opposed to 89% of GIs ( p = 0.03). The majority of ROs, i.e., 92 (72.4%) preferred IMRT to IMLN-RT. In addition, the surgical approach to IMLN was practiced by surgeons at 18 (14%) centers, of which 13 (72.22%) operated the IMLN when radiologically evident. The IMLN dissection was preferentially performed for second and third intercostal spaces as suggested in 10 (55.55%) responses, while 8 (44.44%) performed thoracoscopic dissection of the IMLN chain. The distribution of prophylactic, definitive IMLN-RT, and IMLN dissection did not differ significantly between GI and PI ( p = NS). Conclusion pIMLN-RT is still not the standard protocol in most centers citing equivocal evidence in the literature. Logistics, though different in GIs and PIs, did not impact the decision of pIMLN-RT. Further efforts would be required to standardize practice in IMLN across India.

Out-of-pocket payment and financial risk protection for breast cancer treatment: a prospective study from India.

Background: Available data on cost of cancer treatment, out-of-pocket payment and reimbursement are limited in India. We estimated the treatment costs, out-of-pocket payment, and reimbursement in a cohort of breast cancer patients who sought treatment at a publicly funded tertiary cancer care hospital in India. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2022 at Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai. Data on expenditure during each visit of treatment was collected by a team of trained medical social workers. The primary outcome variables were total cost (TC) of treatment, out-of-pocket payment (OOP), and reimbursement. TC included cost incurred by breast cancer patients during treatment at TMC. OOP was defined as the total cost incurred at TMC less of reimbursement. Reimbursement was any form of financial assistance (cashless or repayment), including social health insurance, private health insurance, employee health schemes, and assistance from charitable trusts, received by the patients for breast cancer treatment. Findings: Of the 500 patients included in the study, 45 discontinued treatment (due to financial or other reasons) and 26 died during treatment. The mean TC of breast cancer treatment was ₹258,095/US$3531 (95% CI: 238,225, 277,934). Direct medical cost (MC) accounted for 56.3% of the TC. Systemic therapy costs (₹50,869/US$696) were higher than radiotherapy (₹33,483/US$458) and surgery costs (₹25,075/US$343). About 74.4% patients availed some form of financial assistance at TMC; 8% patients received full reimbursement. The mean OOP for breast cancer treatment was ₹186,461/US$2551 (95% CI: 167,666, 205,257), accounting for 72.2% of the TC. Social health insurance (SHI) had a reasonable coverage (33.1%), followed by charitable trusts (29.6%), employee health insurance (5.1%), private health insurance (4.4%) and 25.6% had no reimbursement. But SHI covered only 40.1% of the TC of treatment compared to private health insurance that covered as much as 57.1% of it. Both TC and OOP were higher for patients who were younger, belonged to rural areas, had a comorbidity, were diagnosed at an advanced stage, and were from outside Maharashtra. Interpretation: In India, the cost and OOP for breast cancer treatment are high and reimbursement for the treatment flows from multiple sources. Though many of the patients receive some form of reimbursement, it is insufficient to prevent high OOP. Hence both wider insurance coverage as well as higher cap of the insurance packages in the health insurance schemes is suggested. Allowing for the automatic inclusion of cancer treatment in SHI can mitigate the financial burden of cancer patients in India. Funding: This work was funded by an extramural grant from the Women's Cancer Initiative and the Nag Foundation and an intramural grant from the International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai.

Surgical Tumor Resection Deregulates Hallmarks of Cancer in Resected Tissue and the Surrounding Microenvironment.

Surgery exposes tumor tissue to severe hypoxia and mechanical stress leading to rapid gene expression changes in the tumor and its microenvironment, which remain poorly characterized. We biopsied tumor and adjacent normal tissues from patients with breast (n = 81) and head/neck squamous cancers (HNSC; n = 10) at the beginning (A), during (B), and end of surgery (C). Tumor/normal RNA from 46/81 patients with breast cancer was subjected to mRNA-Seq using Illumina short-read technology, and from nine patients with HNSC to whole-transcriptome microarray with Illumina BeadArray. Pathways and genes involved in 7 of 10 known cancer hallmarks, namely, tumor-promoting inflammation (TNF-A, NFK-B, IL18 pathways), activation of invasion and migration (various extracellular matrix-related pathways, cell migration), sustained proliferative signaling (K-Ras Signaling), evasion of growth suppressors (P53 signaling, regulation of cell death), deregulating cellular energetics (response to lipid, secreted factors, and adipogenesis), inducing angiogenesis (hypoxia signaling, myogenesis), and avoiding immune destruction (CTLA4 and PDL1) were significantly deregulated during surgical resection (time points A vs. B vs. C). These findings were validated using NanoString assays in independent pre/intra/post-operative breast cancer samples from 48 patients. In a comparison of gene expression data from biopsy (analogous to time point A) with surgical resection samples (analogous to time point C) from The Cancer Genome Atlas study, the top deregulated genes were the same as identified in our analysis, in five of the seven studied cancer types. This study suggests that surgical extirpation deregulates the hallmarks of cancer in primary tumors and adjacent normal tissue across different cancers. IMPLICATIONS: Surgery deregulates hallmarks of cancer in human tissue.

Determinants of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A single-institution experience.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is routinely used in all cases of locally advanced breast cancer and some cases of early breast cancer. We previously reported a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 8.3%. With the increasing use of taxanes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed NACT, we conducted this study to understand the current pCR rate and its determinants. Methods: A prospective database of breast cancer patients who underwent NACT followed by surgery between January and December 2017 was evaluated. Results: Of the 664 patients, 87.7% were cT3/T4, 91.6% were grade III, and 89.8% were node-positive at presentation (54.4% cN1, 35.4% cN2). The median age was 47 years; median pre-NACT clinical tumor size was 5.5 cm. Molecular subclassification was 30.3% hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2-, 18.4% HR+HER2+, 14.9% HR-HER2+, and 31.6% triple negative (TN). Both anthracyclines and taxanes were given preoperatively in 31.2% patients whereas 58.5% of HER2 positive patients received HER2-targeted NACT. The overall pCR rate was 22.4% (149/664), 9.3% in HR+HER2-, 15.6% in HR+HER2+, 35.4% in HR-HER2+, and 33.4% in TN. On univariate analysis, duration of NACT (P < 0.001), cN stage at presentation (P = 0.022), HR status (P < 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) were associated with pCR. On logistic regression, HR negative status (Odds ratio [OR] 3.314, P < 0.001), longer duration of NACT (OR 2.332, P < 0.001), cN2 stage (OR 0.57, P = 0.012), and HER2 negativity (OR 1.583, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with pCR. Conclusion: Response to chemotherapy depends on molecular subtype and duration of NACT. A low rate of pCR in the HR+ subgroup of patients warrants reconsideration of neoadjuvant strategies.

CONcurrent ChEmotherapy and RadioTherapy in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer (CONCERT): a phase 2 study.

Purpose: This phase 2 study evaluated the safety of adjuvant chemoradiation (CTRT) for breast cancer. Methods: From April 2019 to 2020, 60 patients with stage II-III invasive breast cancer planned for adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) were accrued. Local ± regional (excluding the internal mammary nodal region) RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions ± boost) was started with the third cycle of an adjuvant taxane in a 3-weekly schedule or with the eighth cycle in a weekly schedule. Results: Thirty-six patients received 3-weekly paclitaxel regimen and 24 received weekly paclitaxel regimen. The commonly used technique was three-dimensional conformal RT which was employed in 58% of patients. Regional RT, including the medial supraclavicular region, was done in 42 patients (70%). No dose-limiting (grade 3 or 4) toxicity was documented and all patients completed CTRT without any treatment interruption. The median ejection fraction pre and post CTRT 6 months was 60% (p = 0.177). The median value of cardiac enzyme (Troponin T ng/L) decreased from 37 to 20 (p = 0.009) post CTRT 6 months. Of the 54 patients who underwent the pulmonary function tests, there was no significant difference in various parameters like functional vital capacity (FVC) (2.29 versus 2.2 L, p = 0.375), forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) (1.86; 1.82; p = 0.365), FEV1/FVC (81.5; 81.43; p = 0.9) and diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (88.3; 87.6; p = 0.62). At a median follow-up of 34 months, the 3-year actuarial rate of disease-free survival and overall survival was 75% and 98.3%, respectively. Quality of life scores (QOL) improved after treatment for most of the domains comparable to the pre-RT scores. Conclusion: Taxane-based adjuvant CTRT is a safe option and results in minimal toxicity and excellent compliance. It has favourable impact on cardio-pulmonary profile and QOL scores.

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using EQ-5D-5L: Value Set Derived for Indian Breast Cancer Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report quality of life of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from India in a large cohort using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. METHODS: The study used longitudinal data of 500 breast cancer and 200 non-cancer subjects registered at our centre, during June 2019 and March 2022. The EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS instruments were used to measure and compare utility scores among cancer and non-cancer subjects. Descriptive statistics were analyzed and Tobit regression model were used to confirm the predictors of the utility score. RESULTS: The cancer subjects had a mean EQ-ED-5L utility score of 0.8703 (SD=0.121), 0.8745 (SD=0.094) and 0.8902 (SD=0.107) at the time of baseline, completion and follow up surveys respectively.  EQ-5D-5L values had significantly worsened after diagnosis of cancer as compared to the non-cancer cohort (0.87 vs. 0.93, p value 0.000). EQ-5D-5L utility scores as per stage for the cancer cohort were 0.88, 0.86 and 0.83 respectively for stage I-II, III and IV. Similarly, the EQ-VAS scores for stage I-II, III and IV were 74.9, 72.6 and 73.2 respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed strong association of age, religion and income with the utility-values. CONCLUSION: This is the first longitudinal study reporting the utility scores derived from a large cohort of breast cancer patients demonstrating lower utility scores compared to non-cancer cohort. The utility scores also improve post treatment completion for cancer patients and decrease with higher stage at diagnosis. This information will be useful for future health economic research in India pertaining to breast cancer.

Validation of PREDICT Version 2.2 in a Retrospective Cohort of Indian Women With Operable Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Online prediction models that use known prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC) are routinely used to assist in decisions for adjuvant therapy. PREDICT Version 2.2 (P2.2) is one such online tool, which uses tumor size, lymph node involvement, grade, age, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and Ki67. We performed an external validation in a retrospective cohort of patients treated at a tertiary center in India. METHODS: Women with operable BC between 2008 and 2016 with nonmetastatic, T1-T2 invasive, and HER2 receptor-negative BC and with available 5-year overall survival (OS) data were selected. Median predicted 5-year OS rates were used to calculate predicted events for the whole cohort and subgroups. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the tool. RESULTS: Of 11,760 cases registered between 2008 and 2016, 2,783 (23.66%) eligible patients with a median age of 50 (26-70) years and a median pT size of 2.5 (0.1-5) cm, 2,037 (73.19%) with grade 3 tumors, 1,172 (42.11%) with node-positive disease, 817 (29.35%) with triple-negative breast cancer, and 1,966 (70.64%) with HR-positive BC were included in the analysis. The observed 5-year OS and predicted 5-year OS in the whole cohort were 94.8% and 90.00%, respectively, with an absolute difference of 4.8% (95% CI, 3.417 to 6.198, P < .001). The observed 5-year OS and predicted 5-year OS were also different in various subgroups. CONCLUSION: PREDICT version 2.2 overestimated the number of deaths, with lower predicted 5-year OS compared with the observed value, in this retrospective Indian cohort. The reasons for this discrepancy could be differing biologic characteristics and possible selection bias in our cohort. We recommend a prospective validation of PREDICT in Indian patients and advocate caution in its use until such validation is achieved.

Prospective Study of Incidence and Impact of Comorbidities on Breast Cancer Survival from India.

PURPOSE: To report comorbidity burden in newly-diagnosed treatment-naïve breast cancer patients and its effect on survival. METHODS: Prospective observational study in which demographic, comorbidity and outcome data from a consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed and treated between September 2019 to September 2021 were collected. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was calculated for all and proportion of each comorbidity was determined at diagnosis (baseline), at conclusion and six-months post-treatment. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done for impact of various demographic and disease-related factors on the incidence of comorbidities as well as on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Out of five hundred patients who consented for the study, 416 patients completed planned treatment and only 206 patients had physical follow-up due to COVID-19 pandemic. Incidence of comorbidity at the three time-points was 24%, 32% and 26% respectively. The difference was significant compared to baseline at both the time-points (p<0.05). Hypertension and diabetes were the most common types (incidence 15%-21% and 12-18% respectively) of comorbidities. Advancing age, post-menopauusal status and not being married were significant factors for presence of comorbidities. Median follow-up was 27 months (95% CI 26.25-28.55 months). Presence of multiple comorbidities was a poor prognostic factor for both PFS (2-yr PFS 85% vs 77%) and OS (2-yr OS 89% vs 79%) (both p=0.04) but no such correlation for CCI score. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer treatment impacted incidence of comorbidities. Presence of multiple comorbidities had an adverse impact on survival. Hence, further research on treatment optimization is required in patients with substantial comorbidities.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Lymph Nodes in Women Undergoing Axillary Sampling for Treatment of Breast Cancer: Single Institution Audit.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node (LN) positivity is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Almost 30% clinically node negative (cN0) early breast cancers have positive nodes on pathology, wherein an axillary dissection is done as a second stage surgery. Intra operative frozen section (FS) potentially avoids redo surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective audit for the false negative rate of intraoperative FS, from 2014 to 2018. All cN0 women undergoing upfront surgery, who underwent low axillary sampling (LAS) with FS were included. RESULTS: Of 22,854 breast cancer cases, 2230 underwent LAS, of which 877 were node positive. Intraoperative FS was negative in 1423/2230 (63.81%) cases, of which 71/1423 (4.98%) were false negative, and came positive on final histopathology report (HPR). These 71 women had a median of 5 nodes (mean 4.85) dissected on FS (range 1-12) with a median 1 (mean 1.3) node positive (range 1-6) on HPR. The sensitivity of FS was 91.89% (95% CI, 89.89-93.62), with a negative predictive value of 95.01% (95% CI, 93.84-95.97), accuracy of 96.73% (95% CI, 95.90-97.43) and false negative rate 4.98%. On logistic regression analysis, micrometastasis (Odds ratio (OR) 7.76, 95% CI, 3.49-17.25, P < .001) lobular histology (OR 2.50, 95% CI, 1.007-6.223, P = .04) and nodes dissected (OR 1.18, 95% CI, 1.07-1.30, P = .001) were associated with higher false negative FS, and extra nodal extension (OR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.18-0.57, P ≤ .001) with lower false negative FS. CONCLUSION: The high concordance between intraoperative FS and definitive histology, suggests it's routine use for Sentinel lymph node/LAS LN can help avoid a second surgery.

Retrospective audit of the yield of internal mammary lymph node dissection and literature review in the management of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of lymph node basins is prognostic and therapeutic for axillary lymph nodes (ALN) as well as internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) in breast cancer. IMLNs can be the first echelon node for the inner/central quadrants of the breast. We evaluated the yield of IMLN dissection (IMLND) mainly in patients with inner and central tumors. METHODS: IMLND was performed in 199 patients between 2000 and 2018, 127 of whom had tumors in the inner/ central quadrants. Clinico-pathological data were retrieved from Electronic Medical Records (EMR). RESULTS: The median age was 50 (range: 24-81). Primary surgery was performed in 82 (41.2%), while 117 (58.8%) were operated post-chemotherapy. Overall, 124/199 (62.3%) had nodes identified in the specimen, more often in primary (61/82, 74.4%) than post-chemotherapy settings (63/117, 53.8%) (P = 0.003). A median of 1 (average: 1.24, range: 0-7) lymph nodes was dissected, and 1 (average: 1.5, range: 1-4) was involved. IMLN was positive in 46/199 (23.1%) patients, not significantly different in primary (21/82, 25.6%) versus post-chemotherapy (25/117, 21.4%) settings (P = 0.545). IMLN was involved in 44.8% of patients with ≥4 involved ALN and 8.2% with uninvolved ALN (P < 0.001). In the absence of ALN involvement and <2cm pT size, 9% of patients had positive IMLN in inner/central quadrant tumors. In univariate analysis, ALN positivity (P < 0.001), pT size (P = 0.023), and grade (P = 0.041) in primary and ALN involvement (P = 0.011) in post-chemotherapy patients were associated with IMLN involvement. On logistic regression, tumor size (OR: 13.914, P = 0.017) and ALN involvement (OR: 11.400, P = 0.005) in primary surgery and ALN involvement (OR: 7.294, P = 0.003) in post-chemotherapy patients correlated with IMLN involvement. CONCLUSIONS: In inner/central quadrant tumors, IMLN is more likely involved with high ALN burden and tumor size >2 cm, whereas those with ≤2cm inner/central quadrant tumors and negative ALN have <10% probability of IMLN involvement.