PRAME expression in cutaneous melanoma does not correlate with disease-specific survival.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemistry-based protein biomarkers can provide useful prognostic information in cutaneous melanoma. The independent prognostic value of Ki-67 has been studied with variable results. PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is a useful new ancillary tool for distinguishing cutaneous nevi from melanoma; however, its prognostic value has not been well studied. We evaluated PRAME as a prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma, compared to Ki-67. METHODS: We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of PRAME and Ki-67 in 165 melanocytic lesions, including 92 primary melanomas, 19 metastatic melanomas, and 54 melanocytic nevi using tissue microarrays. PRAME immunostaining was scored based on the percentage of positive nuclei: 0 <1%, 1+ 1%-25%, 2+ 26%-50%, 3+ 51%-75%, and 4+ >75%. The percentage of Ki-67-positive tumor nuclei was used to calculate the proliferation index. RESULTS: PRAME and Ki-67 both showed significantly increased expression in melanomas compared to nevi (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in PRAME expression in primary versus metastatic melanomas. By contrast, the Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in metastatic melanoma than in primary melanoma (p = 0.013). Increased Ki-67 index correlated with ulceration (p < 0.001), increased Breslow depth (p = 0.001), and higher mitotic rate (p < 0.0001), whereas increased PRAME expression correlated with higher mitotic rate (p = 0.047) and Ki-67 index (p = 0.007). Increased Ki-67 index correlated with worse disease-specific survival in patients with primary melanoma (p < 0.001), but PRAME expression did not show prognostic significance in disease-specific survival (p = 0.63). In a multivariable analysis of patients with primary melanoma, tumor Breslow depth, ulceration, mitotic rate, and Ki-67 index were each independent predictors of disease-specific survival (p = 0.006, 0.02, 0.001, and 0.04, respectively); however, PRAME expression was not predictive of disease-specific survival (p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Ki-67 is an independent prognostic marker; although increased PRAME expression correlates with the Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic rate, PRAME is not an independent prognostic marker for cutaneous melanoma. PRAME and Ki-67 are useful ancillary tools for distinguishing benign from malignant melanocytic lesions.

PRAME expression in melanocytic lesions of the nail.

BACKGROUND: Subungual melanoma can be diagnostically challenging. We evaluated the potential of PReferentially expressed Antigen for MElanoma (PRAME) immunoreactivity for differentiating benign from malignant nail melanocytic lesions. METHODS: Sixty cases were identified (10 invasive melanomas, 8 melanomas in situ, 14 nevi, 12 cases of lentigo, and 16 of melanocytic activation). Percentage of PRAME-positive melanocytes was evaluated as follows: 0 no staining, 1+ 1%-25%, 2+ 26%-50%, 3+ 51%-75%, and 4+ >75%. A combined score of both percentage and intensity was also evaluated. RESULTS: The difference in PRAME expression between malignant and benign lesions was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The degree of PRAME expression significantly correlated with patients' age and clinical size. When based on percentage score, 61.1% of melanomas showed a 4+ score, 16.7% showed a 3+ score, 11.1% showed a 1+ score, and 11.1% was negative; 69.0% of the benign lesions was negative, 23.8% showed a 1+ score, 4.8% showed a 2+ score, and 2.4% showed a 4+ score. When the cutoff value for malignancy decreased from 4+ to 3+, the sensitivity increased from 61.1% to 77.8%, while specificity remained 97.6%. Combined score results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: PRAME is a relatively sensitive and highly specific marker in differentiating benign from malignant nail melanocytic lesions. However, correlation with morphology is imperative.

Molecular analysis of NUT-positive poromas and porocarcinomas identifies novel break points of YAP1::NUTM1 fusions.

BACKGROUND: Poromas, and their malignant counterparts, porocarcinomas, harbor recurrent translocations involving YAP1-MAML2, YAP1-NUTM1, and infrequently WWTR1-NUTM1; YAP1-NUTM1 being the most common in porocarcinomas. NUT immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used to identify NUTM1-translocated tumors. This study sought to investigate potential novel NUTM1-fusion partners among NUT IHC-positive poromas and porocarcinomas. METHODS: Thirteen NUT IHC-positive poroid tumors (four poromas and nine porocarcinomas) were identified within a multi-institutional international cohort. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) assessed for NUTM1 fusion partners. RESULTS: NGS detected a NUTM1 fusion in 12 of 13 cases: YAP1-NUTM1 (11/12 cases) and WWTR1-NUTM1 (1/12 cases). Two of the cases (2/12) with NUTM1 fusion were not called by the NGS algorithm but had at least one read-spanning YAP1-NUTM1 break point upon manual review. A NUTM1 fusion was not identified in one case; however, the sample had low RNA quality. The following fusion events were identified: YAP1 exon 4::NUTM1 exon 3 in six cases, YAP1 exon 6::NUTM1 exon 2 in one case, YAP1 exon 3::NUTM1 exon 3 in three cases, WWTR1 exon 3::NUTM1 exon 3 in one case, and YAP1 exon 8::NUTM1 exon 3 fusion in one case. CONCLUSION: While no novel NUTM1 fusion partners were identified within our cohort, 12 of 13 cases had discoverable NUTM1 fusions; YAP1-NUTM1 fusion was detected in 11 cases (92%) and WWTR1-NUTM1 in 1 case (8%). These data corroborate findings from other recent investigations and further substantiate the utility of NUT IHC in diagnosing a subset of poroid neoplasms. In addition, two of our cases harbored fusions of YAP1 exon 6 to NUTM1 exon 3 and YAP1 exon 8 to NUTM1 exon 2, which have not been reported before in poroid neoplasms and indicate novel break points of YAP1.

Comparative performance of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) and routine immunohistochemical markers of neuroendocrine differentiation in the diagnosis of endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma.

Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma (EMPSGC) is a rare cutaneous adnexal malignancy with predilection for the eyelids of older adults. It must be distinguished from metastatic adenocarcinomas of extracutaneous origin and from benign adnexal proliferations on partial samples when a solid growth component and mucin production are not evident. Thus, demonstration of neuroendocrine differentiation can help to ensure a correct diagnosis. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a novel neuroendocrine marker that has recently shown greater sensitivity than synaptophysin (SYN) and chromogranin (CHR) in the diagnosis of various neuroendocrine neoplasms. We compared the performance of these three markers across 10 examples of EMPSGC. All EMPSGCs expressed INSM1. Eight of ten were also immunoreactive for SYN; however, INSM1 staining was generally more intense and stained a greater proportion of the tumor cells. CHR staining was weak and focal in most cases. INSM1 staining was present in hidrocystoma-like components of cystic EMPSGC. These findings suggest that INSM1 may be more sensitive than SYN and CHR and thus valuable for establishing a diagnosis of EMPSGC.

Comparison of adipophilin and recently introduced PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma immunohistochemistry in the assessment of sebaceous neoplasms: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: We and others have noticed consistent staining of sebaceous glands with PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME). We aimed to determine whether PRAME was as sensitive, specific, and interpretable as adipophilin for distinguishing sebaceous neoplasms (SNs) from other neoplasms. METHODS: Twenty SNs and 32 control cases were stained for PRAME and adipophilin. Extent of staining was scored as follows: 0, no staining; 1, <5% positivity; 2, 5% to 50% positivity; and 3, >50% positivity. Intensity was scored as negative, weak, moderate, or strong. A composite score was determined by adding the scores for extent and intensity. RESULTS: PRAME had positive composite scores in all 20 SNs in the more differentiated areas, whereas adipophilin had positive composite scores in 19/20 cases. PRAME showed positivity in the basaloid cells in 15/16 cases, whereas adipophilin was positive in 14. Among controls, PRAME and adipophilin had positive composite scores in 3/32 cases and 6/32 cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PRAME and adipophilin are comparable in terms of distribution and intensity for staining sebocytes. In the basaloid cells, PRAME expression is often more diffuse and easier to detect than adipophilin. In comparing the SNs to the controls, PRAME was more sensitive and more specific than adipophilin. PRAME could be used as an additional marker of sebaceous differentiation in everyday practice.

Dermal melanocytic tumor with CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion: Report of two additional cases with review of the literature of an emerging entity.

"Cutaneous melanocytic tumor with CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion" (CMTCT) is a newly described, potentially novel entity that typically presents as a dermal nodule on the head and neck, extremities, and trunk of adults. Histopathologically, it is reported as a nodular or multinodular tumor composed of epithelioid and spindle cells that are variably immunoreactive for S100-protein, SOX10, and MITF along with more specific melanocytic markers such as MelanA and HMB45. With only 11 cases reported in the English literature so far, the neoplasm appears to behave in a relatively indolent fashion. Nevertheless, in one case, local recurrence and synchronous distant metastasis were evident after 13 years. Additional cases with longer follow-up are essential to determine the neoplasm's biologic behavior with more accuracy. Herein, two cases of CMTCT, one arising on the lower back of a 65-year-old female and the other on the arm of a 33-year-old female in addition to a comprehensive literature review are reported.

A case of YAP1 and NUTM1 rearranged porocarcinoma with corresponding immunohistochemical expression: Review of recent advances in poroma and porocarcinoma pathogenesis with potential diagnostic utility.

Porocarcinoma is a rare malignant adnexal tumor with predilection for the lower extremities and the head and neck region of older adults. This entity may arise de novo or in association with a benign poroma. Porocarcinoma's non-specific clinical appearance, immunohistochemical profile, and divergent differentiation may occasionally be diagnostically challenging. Recently, highly recurrent YAP1 and NUTM1 gene rearrangements have been described in cases of poroma and porocarcinoma. In this report, we present a case of porocarcinoma with squamous differentiation in an 81-year-old woman which harbored rearrangement of the YAP1 and NUTM1 loci and was diffusely immunoreactive for NUTM1. We discuss the recent advancements in the pathogenesis of poromas and porocarcinomas with emphasis on the clinical utility of the NUTM1 antibody.

Hyaline Inclusion Acanthoma.

ABSTRACT: Eosinophilic hyaline inclusions (EHIs) or globules have been reported in various cutaneous tumors including vascular lesions, myoepithelial neoplasms, and basal cell carcinoma. In basal cell carcinoma, the presence of intracytoplasmic inclusions is reportedly associated with myoepithelial differentiation. In this regard, EHI has not been conclusively documented in a cutaneous lesion of genuine squamous cell lineage without aberrant differentiation. In the current case, a biopsy from the right thigh of a 71-year-old male patient demonstrated a relatively well-demarcated intraepidermal squamous lesion featured an admixture of predominantly enlarged keratinocytes harboring distinct eccentric intracytoplasmic EHI and a smaller population of keratinocytes displaying pale cytoplasm. Cytologic atypia, mitotic activity, and inflammatory cells were not identified. The intracytoplasmic EHI stained red with Masson's trichrome and were negative with periodic-acid Schiff with and without diastase. Immunologically, the lesion was strongly and diffusely positive for various cytokeratins but negative for ubiquitin and myoepithelial markers. Only cytokeratin AE1 revealed a differential staining pattern as the suprabasal lesional cells displayed significantly stronger immunoreactivity in comparison with the adjacent normal keratinocytes. Polymerase chain reaction for low-risk and high-risk human papillomavirus was negative. Molecular studies did not reveal any mutations commonly encountered in seborrheic or lichenoid keratoses. As an analogous lesion has not previously reported in the literature, the term hyaline inclusion acanthoma is proposed for this peculiar lesion.

Adding Perplexity to Rarity: Diffuse S100-Protein and SOX10 Expression in a Molecularly Confirmed PAX7-Positive Primary Cutaneous Ewing Sarcoma.

ABSTRACT: Primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a very rare neoplasm that shares similar morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features with its osseous counterpart. Herein, we present an extraordinarily rare case of PAX7-positive cutaneous EWS in a 9-year-old girl that was also diffusely positive for SOX10 and S100-protein. Next generation sequencing detected the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion supporting the diagnosis, which was further validated by break-apart EWSR1 fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diffuse S100-protein and SOX10 expression has been reported only in a handful of cases of EWS and may pose significant diagnostic challenges for dermatopathologists. PAX7 is a recently introduced marker, which is highly sensitive for EWS and can potentially have discriminatory power in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous undifferentiated round blue cell tumors.

Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 Fusion: Review of the Literature of a Potentially Novel Entity.

"Cutaneous melanocytic tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion" (CMTCT) is a recently described entity belonging to the family of superficial tumors displaying melanocytic differentiation. Thirteen cases have been reported so far, on the head and neck, extremities, and trunk of adults of all ages (12 cases) and one in an 11-year-old child. Histopathologically, it is a nodular or multilobulated tumor composed of spindle and epithelioid cells arranged in nests, fascicles, or bundles that are surrounded by thin collagenous septa. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor shows variable immunoreactivity for S100-protein, SOX10, and MITF, as well as specific melanocytic markers such as MelanA and HMB-45. The neoplasm's biologic behavior remains uncertain since the reported cases are limited and the follow-up is short (median 12 months). However, local recurrence and synchronous distant metastasis after 13 years of initial resection has been described in one case. Herein, we present a comprehensive literature review of CMTCT hoping to raise awareness among the dermatopathologists of this potentially novel entity.

Cross-reactivity of NRASQ61R antibody in a subset of Spitz nevi with 11p gain: a potential confounding factor in the era of pathway-based diagnostic approach.

The most recent World Health Organization classification for skin tumors (2018) categorizes melanomas and their precursor lesions, benign or intermediate, into nine pathways based not only on their clinical and histomorphologic characteristics but also on their molecular profile and genetic fingerprint. In an index case of a partially sampled atypical spitzoid lesion, which proved to be an 11p-amplified Spitz nevus with HRASQ61R mutation, we observed cross-reactivity with the NRASQ61R antibody (clone SP174). Overall, we assessed the status of HRAS and NRAS genes and their immunoreaction to NRASQ61R antibody in 16 cases of 11p-amplified Spitz nevi/atypical Spitz tumors. We also assessed the immunoexpression of NRASQ61R antibody in various malignancies with proven BRAFV600E, NRASQ61R, L or K, KRASQ61R and HRASQ61R, and HRASQ61R mutations and ALK+ Spitz lesions. Finally, we assessed the expression of PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry in our 11p Spitz cohort. Three of 16 cases (3/16) harbored the HRASQ61R mutation and exhibited diffuse immunoreaction with the NRASQ61R antibody. All the cases in our cohort were negative for the NRASQ61R mutation. All NRASQ61R-, KRASQ61R-, and HRASQ61R-mutated neoplasms were positive for the antibody, further supporting the cross-reactivity between the RAS proteins. All the cases of our cohort were essentially negative for PRAME immunohistochemistry. In the era of pathway-based approach in the diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms, the cross-reactivity between the NRASQ61R- and HRASQ61R-mutated proteins can lead to a diagnostic pitfall in the assessment of lesions with spitzoid characteristics.