Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ear Nose Throat J ; : 1455613241261563, 2024 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855824

RESUMEN

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that is refractory to maximal medical and surgical therapy should be evaluated for other primary conditions. Cystic fibrosis (CF), primary immunodeficiency (PID), and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) are potential risk factors for refractory CRS. These conditions present with variable disease severity and diagnosis may be delayed into adulthood. We report a case of a mother-daughter pair with CRS refractory to maximal medical management. The patients were further evaluated and found to have features consistent with CF, PID, and PCD. All 3 are rare disorders and thought to cause CRS in isolation. Patients with refractory CRS should be further evaluated to identify alternative diagnoses and ensure proper management. Refractory CRS may be multifactorial, with different risk factors simultaneously contributing to its persistence.

2.
Laryngoscope ; 134(7): 3054-3059, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314858

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and nature of adverse events related to type 2 biologic use in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), including dupilumab and mepolizumab. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of real-world patient data. Patients were included if they have a diagnosis of CRSwNP, have undergone at least one endoscopic sinus surgery, and have taken at least two doses of dupilumab or mepolizumab between January 1, 2016, and July 1, 2023. Data collected include clinicodemographic information and past medical/surgical history. The primary outcomes are the incidence and types of adverse events. Adjusted odds ratio was calculated to compare the biologics using logistic regression. Risk factors for developing adverse events were investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients on dupilumab and 51 patients on mepolizumab were included. Thirty-nine (45%) and 10 (20%) patients respectively encountered adverse events, which differed from phase 3 trial data. The adjusted odds ratio for adverse event rates between these two treatment groups was 3.8 (95% CI, 1.5-10.5). The most common adverse events for dupilumab were arthralgia (16%), rash (14%), and conjunctivitis or xerophthalmia (10%). The main adverse events for mepolizumab were headache (6%) and fatigue (6%). Seven dupilumab and three mepolizumab patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. The average duration of treatment was 22.5 (range: 1-77) months for mepolizumab and 15.9 (range: 1-35) months for dupilumab. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab and mepolizumab have distinct adverse event profiles. This study contributes to informing clinicians' decisions regarding the use of type 2 biologics in CRSwNP patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3054-3059, 2024.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Crónica , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Incidencia , Rinosinusitis
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the airway microbiota is thought to contribute to airway inflammation in both chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma. However, the relationship between the upper and lower airway microbiome remains unclear. METHODS: Sinus and lung brushes were collected from 29 CRS participants undergoing sinus surgery. DNA was extracted and submitted for 16s rRNA microbiome sequencing. Alpha and beta diversity metrics, taxonomic composition, and differences between individual taxa were compared for paired sinus and bronchial samples. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 29 participants had sufficient samples for analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age was 51.59 (14.57) years, and 10 (44%) patients were female. Twelve (52%) patients had comorbid asthma. Sinus brushes had significantly higher alpha diversity indexes (Shannon and Faith) compared to bronchial brushes (p < 0.001). Beta diversity metrics were significantly different between the sinus and bronchial samples. Principal coordinate analysis showed no clustering of paired nasal and bronchial samples. Sinus brushes had significantly more Lawsonella, Corynebacterium, and Staphylococcus compared to bronchia brushes, while the latter were enriched in Tropheryma and Sphingomonas, among others (false discovery rate [FDR]-adjusted p < 0.01). Finally, CRS patients with comorbid asthma had significantly higher Pseudomonas and Peptoniphilus in sinus brushes and lower Prevotella in bronchial brushes when compared to non-asthmatics (FDR-adjusted p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The sinus and bronchial bacterial microbiomes differ in important ways. Our study suggests that migration of bacteria from the sinus into the lower airways is unlikely in patients with CRS.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616557

RESUMEN

KEY POINTS: SinoNasal Microbiota Transfer (SNMT) was safe with immediate benefit in all recipients, with sustained improvement in two of three recipients for up to 180 days. The addition of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy worsened chronic rhinosinusitis. These promising SNMT results warrant further study of safety and efficacy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA