Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Substance Use Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial Including Quantitative and Qualitative Health and Economic Outcomes: Formation informatisée pour la thérapie cognitivo-comportementale pour les troubles liés à l'usage de substances : un essai randomisé contrôlé y compris les résultats quantitatifs et qualitatifs en matière de santé et d'économie.

OBJECTIVES: Heavy alcohol and drug use is reported by a substantial number of Canadians; yet, only a minority of those experiencing substance use difficulties access specialized services. Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT4CBT) offers a low-cost method to deliver accessible and high-quality CBT for substance use difficulties. To date, CBT4CBT has primarily been evaluated in terms of quantitative outcomes within substance use disorder (SUD) samples in the United States. A comparison between CBT4CBT versus standard care for SUDs in a Canadian sample is critical to evaluate its potential for health services in Canada. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of CBT4CBT versus standard care for SUD. METHODS: Adults seeking outpatient treatment for SUD (N = 50) were randomly assigned to receive either CBT4CBT or treatment-as-usual (TAU) for 8 weeks. Measures of substance use and associated harms and quality of life were completed before and after treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Qualitative interviews were administered after treatment and at follow-up, and healthcare utilization and costs were extracted for the entire study period. RESULTS: Participants exhibited improvements on the primary outcome as well as several secondary outcomes; however, there were no differences between groups. A cost-effectiveness analysis found lower healthcare costs in CBT4CBT versus TAU in a subsample analysis, but more days of substance use in CBT4CBT. Qualitative analyses highlighted the benefits and challenges of CBT4CBT. DISCUSSION: Findings supported an overall improvement in clinical outcomes. Further investigation is warranted to identify opportunities for implementation of CBT4CBT in tertiary care settings.Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03767907.

Evaluating a digital intervention targeting substance use difficultiesPlain Language SummaryWhy was the study done?Heavy alcohol and drug use is frequent in the Canadian population, although very few people have access to treatment. The digital intervention, Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT4CBT), may provide a low-cost, high-quality, and easily accessible method of treatment for substance use difficulties. Limited research on this digital intervention has been conducted in Canadian populations, and few studies thus far have evaluated participants' subjective experience using the intervention, along with the cost on the Canadian healthcare system.What did the researchers do?The research team recruited participants and provided access to either CBT4CBT or to standard care at a mental health hospital for 8 weeks. Participants were asked questions about their substance use and related consequences, quality of life, and thoughts on the treatment they received. Information regarding healthcare use and the cost to the healthcare system was also gathered.What did the researchers find?Participants in both groups improved with regards to their substance use, some related consequences, and psychological quality of life. Participants provided insight on the benefits and challenges of both types of treatment. It was also found that the CBT4CBT intervention was less costly.What do these findings mean?These findings support that adults receiving CBT4CBT and standard care both improved to a similar degree in this sample. Participant feedback may inform future studies of how best to implement this intervention in clinical studies. Future studies with larger samples are needed to further examine whether CBT4CBT can increase access to supports and be beneficial in the Canadian healthcare system.

Associations between rumination, depression, and distress tolerance during CBT treatment for depression in a tertiary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Rumination is strongly associated with depressive symptom severity and course. However, changes in rumination during outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and their links to baseline features such as distress tolerance and clinical outcomes, have received limited attention. METHODS: 278 outpatients with depression received group or individual CBT. Measures of rumination, distress tolerance, and depression symptom severity were assessed at baseline and periodically during treatment. Mixed effect and regression-based models evaluated changes over time, and associations between rumination, distress tolerance and depression severity. RESULTS: Depression and rumination decreased throughout acute treatment. Rumination reduction was concurrently associated with depressive symptom reduction. Lower levels of rumination at each time point prospectively predicted lower depressive symptoms at the next time point. Distress tolerance measured at baseline was positively associated with depression symptom severity; the indirect effect on post-treatment depression symptoms via rumination measured mid-treatment was nonsignificant when rumination at baseline was accounted for. Changes in and associations between depression and rumination were replicated in sensitivity analyses; although changes in depression and rumination were smaller in magnitude in patients receiving treatment during COVID-19. LIMITATIONS: Additional assessment points would permit a more nuanced assessment of the role rumination may play in mediating the associations between distress tolerance and depression severity. Additional investigation of treatments in community settings may also further our understanding of variability in rumination during depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides unique real-world support for variability in rumination as a key indicator of change over the course of CBT for depression.

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Digital health resources are being increasingly used to support women with substance use concerns. Although empirical research has demonstrated that these resources have promise, the available evidence for their benefit in women requires further investigation. Evidence supports the capacity of interventions that are sex-, gender-, and trauma-informed to improve treatment access and outcomes and to reduce health system challenges and disparities. Indeed, both sex- and gender-specific approaches are critical to improve health and gender equity. Violence and trauma are frequent among those with substance use concerns, but they disproportionately affect those who identify as female or women, further underscoring the need for trauma-informed care as well. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy or effectiveness of online or mobile interventions for risky or harmful substance use in adults who identify as female or women, or who report a history of trauma. METHODS: This scoping review is based on an academic search in MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL, as well as a grey literature search in US and Canadian government and funding agency websites. Of the 7807 records identified, 465 remained following title and abstract screening. Of these, 159 met all eligibility criteria and were reviewed and synthesized. RESULTS: The 159 records reflected 141 distinct studies and 125 distinct interventions. Investigations and the interventions evaluated predominantly focused on alcohol use or general substance use. Evaluated digital health resources included multisession and brief-session interventions, with a wide range of therapeutic elements. Multisession online and mobile interventions exhibited beneficial effects in 86.1% (105/122) of studies. Single-session interventions similarly demonstrated beneficial effects in 64.2% (43/67) of study conditions. Most investigations did not assess gender identity or conduct sex- or gender-based analyses. Only 13 investigations that included trauma were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall promise of digital health interventions for substance use concerns, direct or quantitative evidence on the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in females or women specifically is weak.

A multidimensional investigation of anxiety sensitivity and depression outcomes in cognitive-behavioral group therapy.

We examined how anxiety sensitivity - the fear of symptoms of anxiety due to their perceived harmful effects - and gender are associated with treatment trajectory and outcomes in a large outpatient sample (N = 278) who received 14-weeks of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT) for depression. Three dimensions of anxiety sensitivity (cognitive, physical, and social concerns) and depression were assessed at pre-treatment, and the latter was assessed weekly during treatment. Latent growth curve models supported a link between cognitive concerns (fears of losing control over thoughts) and greater improvement in depression near the end of treatment (i.e., weeks 10-14); gender did not moderate trajectory. Gender (i.e., identifying as a woman) and greater physical concerns (fears of physical consequences of arousal symptoms) were associated with completion of < 8 sessions. Results suggest that those with more cognitive concerns might require greater time in treatment and/or benefit most from the focus on maladaptive assumptions and core beliefs in later CBGT sessions. Future research, including investigation of intervening variables, may elucidate the mechanisms through which greater physical concerns and gender are associated with treatment non-completion. Results supported differential associations of anxiety sensitivity dimensions with depression treatment outcomes, though further research attention is needed.