Time to surgery and rehabilitation resources affect outcomes in orthogeriatric units.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pathways of care and clinical results for patients admitted for hip fracture (HF) in 3 orthogeriatric co-managed care centers in order to estimate the effect of system factors on mortality and functional outcome. DESIGN: Prospective inception multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Three tertiary Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 806 patients consecutively admitted with HF. MEASUREMENTS: 1-Year mortality, the loss of 1 or more functional abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs), and the recovery/maintenance of independent ambulation at 6 months from the fracture. RESULTS: On the whole sample, 71.1% of patients survived 1 year from the fracture. In one hospital the risk of 1-year mortality was significantly higher even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, prefracture functional status and cognitive impairment (odd ratio (OR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.18, p=0.01). This was principally explained by a longer time to surgery (5.2 days ± 3.2 vs 2.7 ± 2.3 and 2.7 ± 2.2, p<0.001). The three hospitals also differed in the rate of subjects losing the ability in ADLs after 6 months from the fracture (54.2%, 61%, 43.5%, p=0.016), while no statistical differences were found in the recovery of independent ambulation. On the basis of multivariate models, a lower access to post-acute rehabilitation could account for lower outcome in functional status. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that system factors such as time to surgery and rehabilitation resources can affect functional recovery and 1-year mortality in orthogeriatric units and they could explain different outcomes when comparing care models.

Older people with hip fracture and IADL disability require earlier surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures represent a major challenge for physicians as well as society as a whole. Both poor functional status and delay to surgery are well known risk factors for negative outcomes. We hypothesized that the timing of the operation is more important for frail older people than older people without functional limitations before fracture. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study on 806 consecutive patients, 75 years of age or older, admitted with a fragility hip fracture to three hospitals in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). All three hospitals had a comanaged care model, and the patients were under the shared responsibility of an orthopedic surgeon and a geriatrician. RESULTS: Functional status assessed as instrumental activities of daily living was an important predictor of survival after 1 year from fracture. After adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratios per 1 point score of increase from 0 to 8 was 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.42, p = .000). Time to surgery increased 1-year mortality in patients with a low instrumental activities of daily living score (hazard ratios per day of surgical delay 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.22, p < .001) and intermediate instrumental activities of daily living score (hazard ratios 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.34, p < .001) but was an insignificant risk factor in functionally independent patients (hazard ratios 1.05 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.41, p = .706). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery delay is an independent factor for mortality in older patients after hip fracture but only for the frail older people with prefracture functional impairment. If our results are confirmed, a more intensive approach should be adopted for older people with hip fractures who have disabilities.