Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur Respir J ; 44(4): 994-1001, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25034571

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of lung cancer in never-smokers and to ascertain if environmental tobacco smoke modifies the effect of residential radon. We designed a multicentre hospital-based case-control study in a radon-prone area (Galicia, Spain). All participants were never-smokers. Cases had an anatomopathologically confirmed primary lung cancer and controls were recruited from individuals undergoing minor, non-oncological surgery. Residential radon was measured using alpha track detectors. We included 521 individuals, 192 cases and 329 controls, 21% were males. We observed an odds ratio of 2.42 (95% CI 1.45-4.06) for individuals exposed to ≥200 Bq·m(-3) compared with those exposed to <100 Bq·m(-3). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure at home increased lung cancer risk in individuals with radon exposure>200 Bq·m(-3). Individuals exposed to environmental tobacco smoke and to radon concentrations>200 Bq·m(-3) had higher lung cancer risk than those exposed to lower radon concentrations and exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Residential radon increases lung cancer risk in never-smokers. An association between residential radon exposure and environmental tobacco smoke on the risk of lung cancer might exist.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Radón/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , España
2.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1226939, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37601652

RESUMEN

Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of the ERBITAX scheme (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, and then 250 mg/m2 weekly) as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who are medically unfit for cisplatin-based (PT) chemotherapy. Materials and methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study involved 16 centers in Spain. Inclusion criteria were to have started receiving ERBITAX regimen from January 2012 to December 2018; histologically confirmed SCCHN including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx; age ≥18 years; and platinum (PT) chemotherapy ineligibility due to performance status, comorbidities, high accumulated dose of PT, or PT refractoriness. Results: A total of 531 patients from 16 hospitals in Spain were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, 82.7% were male, and 83.5% were current/former smokers. Patients were ineligible to receive PT due to ECOG 2 (50.3%), comorbidities (32%), PT cumulative dose ≥ 225 mg/m2 (10.5%), or PT refractoriness (7.2%). Response rate was 37.7%. Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.6). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.2), median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.0) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.8-10.3), respectively. Patients treated with immunotherapy after ERBITAX had better OS with a median of 29.8 months compared to 13.8 months for those who received other treatments. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were acne-like rash in 36 patients (6.8%) and oral mucositis in 8 patients (1.5%). Five (0.9%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Conclusion: This study confirms the real-world efficacy and tolerability of ERBITAX as first-line treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN when PT is not feasible. Immunotherapy after treatment with ERBITAX showed remarkable promising survival, despite potential selection bias.

3.
Cancer Lett ; 487: 21-26, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32454144

RESUMEN

We aimed to evaluate lung cancer survival in never-smokers, both overall and specifically by sex, exposure to residential-radon, age, histological type, and diagnostic stage. We included lung cancer cases diagnosed in a multicentre, hospital-based, case-control-study of never-smoker patients, diagnosed from January-2011 to March-2015 (Lung Cancer Research In Never Smokers study). 369 never-smokers (79% women; median age 71 years; 80% adenocarcinoma; 66% stage IV) were included. Median overall survival, and at one, 3 and 5 years of diagnosis was 18.3 months, 61%, 32% and 22%, respectively. Higher median survival rates were obtained for: younger age, adenocarcinoma, actionable mutations, and earlier-stage at diagnosis. Higher indoor radon showed a higher risk of death in multivariate analysis. Median lung cancer survival in never-smokers seems higher than that in ever-smokers. Patients with actionable mutations have a significantly higher survival. Higher indoor-radon exposure has a negative effect on survival.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Radón/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Fumar/efectos adversos
4.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 91(8): 605-10, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25968558

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess if there is a relationship between residential radon and lung cancer histological types and patients' age at diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter hospital-based case-control study with eight participating hospitals. We included 216 never-smoking cases with primary lung cancer and 329 never-smoking controls. Controls were frequency matched with cases on age and sex distribution. Of them, 198 cases (91.7%) and 275 controls (83.5%) had residential radon measurements. RESULTS: Lung cancer risk reached statistical significance only for adenocarcinoma (Odds ratio [OR] 2.19; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.33), for other histologies the results were marginally significant. Residential radon level was higher for patients diagnosed before 50 and 60 years old than for older lung cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: Residential radon in never smokers seems to be a risk factor for all lung cancer histologies. Individuals diagnosed at a younger age have a higher residential radon concentration, suggesting an accumulative effect on lung cancer appearance.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación Radiactiva del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radón/análisis , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Fumar/epidemiología , España/epidemiología
6.
Chemother Res Pract ; 2010: 426973, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22482051

RESUMEN

Vesical clear cell adenocarcinoma is an uncommon tumour. The description of nearly all published cases focuses on histological issues, providing few clinical particulars and limited followup. The treatment choice is resection. No publications have been found regarding systemic treatments for advanced disease. We present a case of metastatic clear cell adenocarcinoma of the bladder treated with chemotherapy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA