RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common, complex syndrome associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Patients with HFpEF have a high prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, which are closely related to the underlying mechanisms of the disease. Lifestyle modification with weight loss and physical activity can improve risk factors and functional outcomes in HFpEF. We sought to observe daily physical activity and determine whether utilizing an activity tracker can enhance functional status in HFpEF patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of 57 patients with HFpEF from 2021 to 2023 at a single academic medical center who utilized a Fitbit to record one year of daily step activity. The patients were evaluated in the ambulatory setting for an initial visit and subsequently at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months to gather vitals, labs, physical exam, and functional measurements, including the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12). Associations between variables were assessed using Pearson's r correlation using Stata 18.0. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients who completed the study, the mean age was 68.1 ± 10.2 years, with 67% of patients identifying as female. The average BMI was 36.4 ± 8.6 kg/m2. Across each time interval, the median numbers of steps per day were 4,113 (2,517-6,520) (1-3 months), 4,583 (2,532-6,326) (4-6 months), and 3,957 (2,942-5,982) (7-12 months). There was no statistically significant variation in daily step count (p=0.06). We observed a statistically significant increase of 66 (6-200) feet in the 6MWT (p= 0.002) from baseline (1,175 (910-1,400)) to 12 months (1,321 (1,000-1,550)). The daily step count was highly correlated with the 6MWT across all time points (1-3 months: r= .70, p< .001; 4-6 months: r= .61, p< .001; 7-12 months: r= .69, p< .001). The total KCCQ-12 scores increased by 6.8 (-4.2-19.8) points (p=0.005) from baseline (60.1 (41.7-73.4)) to 12 months (69.8 (50-84.4)). Among the sub-categories of the questionnaire, we observed a positive correlation between physical limitation scores and daily step count (1-3 months: r= .47, p=.001; 4-6 months: r= .63, p< .001; 7-12 months: r= .56, p= .001). Of interest, one patient who was taking over 15,000 daily steps scored their physical limitation 10-20 points lower than those taking less than half the steps and had one of the lowest quality of life scores in the cohort, reflecting the subjective nature of heart failure (HF) symptoms. CONCLUSION: Fitbit technology offers a convenient means to monitor real-time physical activity in patients with HFpEF. Utilizing a Fitbit to record daily step activity enhances health-related quality of life in this population. In contrast to the improved average total KCCQ-12 score, we did not observe a clinically significant increase in the 6MWT over the course of the year. Our findings establish the utility of daily step count as a valuable surrogate for six-minute walk distance.
RESUMEN
Background Since the initial description in the 1980s, our understanding of the diversity of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has continued to evolve. In this study, we report the characteristics of patients seen in an academic medical center for PAH from August 2020 through November 2021 and contrast those with nationally reported data from the United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry (USPHSR). Study Design Investigators at the University of Utah Pulmonary Hypertension Program prospectively enrolled adult patients diagnosed with WHO Group 1 PAH, who were evaluated between August 2020 and November 2021 in a program-specific registry. Patient exposure and health histories were collected through structured interviews and questionnaires, along with clinical data and medication use. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in the University of Utah Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (UUPHR). Results Of the 242 enrolled patients, the most common etiology was associated PAH (APAH), accounting for 71.1% of the population. The second largest etiology was idiopathic PAH (IPAH) at 26.4%. The remaining patients were distributed between familial PAH (FPAH), pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD), and others. Of the total population classified as APAH, 39% of cases were noted as secondary to connective tissue disease (CTD) and 33% as toxin-induced. These represented 28% and 24% of the total population, respectively. Conclusions In this US-based accredited academic medical center, the etiology of PAH in our patient population contrasts with national registry data. In the UUPHR, APAH, specifically CTD-PAH and toxin-associated PAH, accounts for the majority of patients with PAH. This contrasts with IPAH, which nationally is the most reported cause of PAH. Differences in our population may reflect the regional variation of the referral site, but it is noteworthy for its contrast with historically reported phenotypes.
RESUMEN
Background: New oral prostacyclin therapies and prostacyclin agonists have become available for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, methods for transitioning between oral, inhaled, and parenteral formulations are not well-established, except in the form of case reports and case series. Collectively, these emphasize the lack of a standardized process and approach in transitioning patients between PAH prostanoid therapies. In this case series, we report our experience at an accredited Pulmonary Hypertension center in transitioning between various oral, inhaled, and parenteral prostanoids to offer additional guidance on safe transitions in therapy. Methods: All cases of prostanoid transitions at an accredited Pulmonary Hypertension center from March 2018 to September 2019 were included in this report. The transition approach for each case was developed through a review of the literature, extrapolation of available pharmacokinetic data, and collaboration between pharmacists and clinicians. Results: This case series describes the transition of 3 patients from selexipag to parenteral treprostinil; 1 patient transitioning from parenteral treprostinil to selexipag; 1 patient transitioning from oral treprostinil to parenteral treprostinil; and 1 patient transitioning from inhaled treprostinil to selexipag. Four of the 6 patients presented here were transitioned to an alternate prostanoid on account of clinical worsening, while the remaining 2 patients transitioned due to intolerance of parenteral therapy and poor medication adherence. This case series includes patients with various etiologies of PAH including idiopathic PAH, methamphetamine-associated PAH, and scleroderma-associated PAH. All patients successfully completed each transition without serious adverse events. Conclusions: With the increasing utilization and availability of prostanoids, there is a critical need for a standardized approach in transitioning safely between different formulations without compromising treatment efficacy. In this case series, we present our clinical experiences, guided by available pharmacokinetic data, in transitioning between various prostanoid formulations.