Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 25(6): 688-696, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31524716

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a severe complication resulting from an acute and sustained increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Although prospective double-blinded, randomized trials, and evidence-based analysis are lacking there is new evidence that still demonstrates high morbidity and mortality in critically ill populations because of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in the 21st century. The objective of this review is to alert the health professional about this important diagnosis and to highlight the latest updates proposed by the World Abdominal Compartment Society. RECENT FINDINGS: The present article reviews the clinical conditions of ACS and IAH and the latest updates from pathophysiology to the new management flowchart resulting from the implantation of point-of-care ultrasound in the monitoring and assistance of medical treatment of IAH/ACS. SUMMARY: The present review emphasizes the importance of IAH in daily clinical practice and brings new WSACS updates on monitoring and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Intraabdominal/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos
2.
BMC Emerg Med ; 14: 22, 2014 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25361609

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The analysis of patterns of trauma deaths may improve the evaluation of a trauma system and identify areas that may benefit from more resources. The objective of this study was to analyze the epidemiology of trauma deaths in a Brazilian university hospital in order to assess the profile of these fatalities over a 16-year period. METHOD: Retrospective study of time series using database records. The research subjects were in-hospital deaths from external causes during the years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010. The following variables were analyzed: cause of injury, trauma scores, time and cause of death. RESULTS: 467 cases were studied, being 325 patients (69.6%) admitted with signs of life and 142 (30.4%) considered dead on arrival. The mean age was 35.35 ± 18.03 years. 85.4% were males. Blunt trauma occurred in 73.0% of cases and penetrating mechanism in 27.0%. There was a significant increase (p < 0.001) in deaths from motorcycle crashes over the years, which went from 7.3% in 1995 to 31.5% in 2010. In contrast, there was a significant decrease (p = 0.030) in firearm-injury victims; from 21.0% in 1995 to 9.6% in 2010. About 60% of deaths occurred less than 24 hours after admission. The main causes of death were lesions of the central nervous system (56.3% of the total), followed by hemorrhagic shock (18.1%) and sepsis/multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (17.1%). The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of patients with signs of life was 26.41 ± 9.00, 71.3% of whom had ISS >25. The mean Revised Trauma Score (RTS) was 5.24 ± 2.05. Only 25.8% of the deaths had TRISS <0.50. CONCLUSION: There was a shift in the profile of causes of death from trauma in this university teaching hospital, with a large decrease in penetrating injuries and a higher incidence of deaths of motorcycle riders.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales Universitarios , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motocicletas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/etiología , Heridas Penetrantes/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
BJS Open ; 7(5)2023 09 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen is an innovation that greatly improved surgical understanding of damage control, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, viscera and enteric fistula care, and abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an evidence-informed, expert, comprehensive narrative review of the open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery. METHODS: A group of 12 international trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery experts were invited to review current literature and important concepts surrounding the open abdomen. RESULTS: The open abdomen may be classified using validated systems developed by a working group in 2009 and modified by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome-The Abdominal Compartment Society in 2013. It may be indicated in major trauma, intra-abdominal sepsis, vascular surgical emergencies, and severe acute pancreatitis; to facilitate second look laparotomy or avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome; and when the abdominal wall cannot be safely closed. Temporary abdominal closure and staged abdominal reconstruction methods include a mesh/sheet, transabdominal wall dynamic fascial traction, negative pressure wound therapy, and hybrid negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial traction. This last method likely has the highest primary fascial closure rates. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is currently an experimental strategy developed to improve primary fascial closure rates and reduce complications in those with an open abdomen. Primary fascial closure rates may be improved by early return to the operating room; limiting use of crystalloid fluids during the surgical interval; and preventing and/or treating intra-abdominal hypertension, enteric fistulae, and intra-abdominal collections after surgery. The majority of failures of primary fascial closure and enteroatmospheric fistula formation may be prevented using effective temporary abdominal closure techniques, providing appropriate resuscitation fluids and nutritional support, and closing the abdomen as early as possible. CONCLUSION: Subsequent stages of the innovation of the open abdomen will likely involve the design and conduct of prospective studies to evaluate appropriate indications for its use and effectiveness and safety of the above components of open abdomen management.


Asunto(s)
Fístula , Hipertensión Intraabdominal , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Enfermedad Aguda , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Peritoneo
4.
Life (Basel) ; 12(9)2022 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36143427

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General pathophysiological mechanisms regarding associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) are evident, but specific effects of type, amount, and timing of fluids are less clear. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to summarize current knowledge on associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and fluid management in patients at risk of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We performed a structured literature search from 1950 until May 2021 to identify evidence of associations between fluid management and intra-abdominal pressure not limited to any specific study or patient population. Findings were summarized based on the following information: general concepts of fluid management, physiology of fluid movement in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension, and data on associations between fluid administration and IAH. RESULTS: We identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 38 prospective observational studies, 29 retrospective studies, 18 case reports in adults, two observational studies and 10 case reports in children, and three animal studies that addressed associations between fluid administration and IAH. Associations between fluid resuscitation and IAH were confirmed in most studies. Fluid resuscitation contributes to the development of IAH. However, patients with IAH receive more fluids to manage the effect of IAH on other organ systems, thereby causing a vicious cycle. Timing and approach to de-resuscitation are of utmost importance, but clear indicators to guide this decision-making process are lacking. In selected cases, only surgical decompression of the abdomen can stop deterioration and prevent further morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence confirms an association between fluid resuscitation and secondary IAH, but optimal fluid management strategies for patients with IAH remain controversial.

5.
J Trauma ; 70(6): 1371-80, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21817974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic dysfunction and can triage patients better than routine trauma criteria or vital signs. However, there is questionable specificity and no consensus measurement technique. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether factors that alter autonomic function affect the specificity of HRV for assessing traumatic injury. METHODS: We evaluated 216 hemodynamically stable adults (3:1 M:F; 97:3 blunt:penetrating; age 49 years ± 1 year, mean ± standard error) undergoing computed axial tomography (CT) scan to rule out traumatic brain injury (TBI). All were prospectively instrumented with a Mars Holter system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). HRV was determined offline using time domain (standard deviation of normal-normal intervals, root-mean-square successive difference) and frequency domain (very low frequency [VLF], LF, wideband frequency, high frequency [HF], low to HF index ratio) calculations from 15-minute electrocardiogram and correlated with routine vital signs, mortality, TBI, morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and comorbidities. Significance (p ≤ 0.05) was determined using nonparametric analysis, Student's t test, analysis of variance, or multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: VLF alone predicted survival, severity of TBI, intensive care unit LOS, and hospital LOS (all p < 0.05). Beta-blockers or diabetes had no effect, whereas age, sedation, mechanical ventilation, spinal cord injury, and intoxication influenced one or more of the variables with age being the most powerful confounder (all p < 0.05). Except for the Glasgow Coma Scale, no other routine trauma or hemodynamic criteria correlated with any of these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased VLF is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in hemodynamically stable trauma patients. Other time and other frequency domain variables correlated with some, but not all, outcomes. All were heavily influenced by factors that alter autonomic function, especially patient age.


Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Triaje
6.
J Trauma ; 71(5): 1415-21, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21768900

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that the bispectral index (BIS) is reliable relative to clinical judgment for estimating sedation level during daily propofol spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) in trauma patients. METHODS: This was a prospective observational trial with waiver of consent conducted in the intensive care unit of Level I trauma center in 94 mechanically ventilated trauma patients sedated with propofol alone or in combination with midazolam. BIS, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), electromyography, and heart rate variability, as a test of autonomic function, were measured for 45 minutes during daily SATs. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, linear regression, and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: The BIS wave form coincided almost exactly with propofol on/off. Steady-state BIS correlated with RASS (p < 0.0001) and with propofol dose (p < 0.0001), but the strengths of association were relatively low (all r(2) < 0.5). BIS wave form was not altered by age, heart rate, or heart rate variability and was similar with propofol alone or propofol plus midazolam, but the presence of brain injury or the use of paralytics shifted the curve downward (both p < 0.001). The overall test characteristics for BIS versus RASS without neuromuscular blockade were sensitivity: 90% versus 77% (p = 0.034); specificity: 90% versus 75% (p = 0.021); positive predictive value: 90% versus 76% (p = 0.021), and negative predictive value: 90% versus 76% (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In the first trial in trauma patients and largest trial in any surgical population, the (1) BIS was reliable and has advantages over RASS of being continuous and objective, at least during a propofol SAT; (2) BIS interpretation remains somewhat subjective in patients receiving paralytic agents or with traumatic brain injury.


Asunto(s)
Sedación Consciente/métodos , Monitores de Conciencia , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Varianza , Atracurio/administración & dosificación , Electroencefalografía , Electromiografía , Femenino , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Centros Traumatológicos
7.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 48: e20202783, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470370

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: extremity tourniquet (TQ) use has increased in the civilian setting; the beneficial results observed in the military has influenced acceptance by EMS and bystanders. This review aimed to analyze extremity TQ types used in the civilian setting, injury site, indications, and complications. METHODS: a systematic review was conducted based on original articles published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane following PRISMA guidelines from 2010 to 2019. Data extraction focused on extremity TQ use for hemorrhage control in the civilian setting, demographic data, study type and duration, mechanism of injury, indications for use, injury site, TQ type, TQ time, and complications. RESULTS: of the 1384 articles identified, 14 were selected for review with a total of 3912 civilian victims with extremity hemorrhage and 3522 extremity TQ placements analyzed. The majority of TQs were applied to male (79%) patients, with blunt or penetrating trauma. Among the indications for TQ use were hemorrhagic shock, suspicion of vascular injuries, continued bleeding, and partial or complete traumatic amputations. Upper extremity application was the most common TQ application site (56%), nearly all applied to a single extremity (99%), and only 0,6% required both upper and lower extremity applications. 80% of the applied TQs were commercial devices, and 20% improvised. CONCLUSIONS: TQ use in the civilian setting is associated with trauma-related injuries. Most are single-site TQs applied for the most part to male adults with upper extremity injury. Commercial TQs are more commonly employed, time in an urban setting is under 1 hour, with few complications described.


Asunto(s)
Exsanguinación/prevención & control , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Torniquetes/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adulto , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Exsanguinación/etiología , Exsanguinación/mortalidad , Extremidades/lesiones , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad
8.
J Crit Care ; 64: 165-172, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33906106

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess whether the combination of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, intra-abdominal pressure ≥ 12 mmHg) and hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg) in patients receiving invasive ventilation is an independent risk factor for 90- and 28-day mortality as well as ICU- and ventilation-free days. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients who had blood gas analyses performed and intra-abdominal pressure measured, were included from a prospective cohort. Subgroups were defined by the absence (Group 1) or the presence of either IAH (Group 2) or HRF (Group 3) or both (Group 4). Mixed-effects regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-day mortality increased from 16% (Group 1, n = 50) to 30% (Group 2, n = 20) and 27% (Group 3, n = 100) to 49% (Group 4, n = 142), log-rank test p < 0.001. The combination of IAH and HRF was associated with increased 90- and 28-day mortality as well as with fewer ICU- and ventilation-free days. The association with 90-day mortality was no longer present after adjustment for independent variables. However, the association with 28-day mortality, ICU- and ventilation-free days persisted after adjusting for independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: In our sub-analysis, the combination of IAH and HRF was not independently associated with 90-day mortality but independently increased the odds of 28-day mortality, and reduced the number of ICU- and ventilation-free days.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Intraabdominal , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Humanos , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
J Craniofac Surg ; 21(4): 1002-8, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20613572

RESUMEN

Facial trauma related to combat injury is of increasing prevalence and complex in nature when associated with the multiply injured trauma victim. Although rarely life-threatening, the treating physician must be aware of the presence of facial trauma and its associated injuries to seamlessly treat the combat casualty in accordance to the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol while maintaining the armed forces' ultimate goals of returning "the greatest possible number of soldiers to combat and the preservation of life, limb and eyesight in those who must be evacuated." To this end, the treating physician must maintain a high index of suspicion for injury and have various maneuvers available to handle immediate threats to life, limb, or sight. This article will review the proper emergency department assessment and management of prevalent injuries associated with war-related facial trauma.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos Faciales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Faciales/terapia , Medicina Militar/métodos , Guerra , Humanos , Triaje
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 21(4): 982-6, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20613574

RESUMEN

Since the beginning of the program in 2002, 84 Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) have rotated through the Army Trauma Training Center (ATTC) at the University of Miami/Ryder Trauma Center including all those deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. The purpose of this study was to provide the latest updates of our experience with FSTs at the ATTC. Before deployment, each FST participates in a 2-week training rotation at the ATTC. The rotation is divided into 3 phases. Phase 1 is to refresh FST knowledge regarding the initial evaluation and management of the trauma patient. Phase 2 is the clinical phase and is conducted entirely at the Ryder Trauma Center. The training rotation culminates in phase 3, the Capstone exercise. During the Capstone portion of their training, the entire 20-person FST remains at the Ryder Trauma Center and is primarily responsible for the evaluation and resuscitation of all patients arriving over a 24-hour period. Subject awareness concerning their role within the team improved from 71% to 95%, indicating that functioning as a team in the context of the mass casualty training exercise along with clinical codes was beneficial. The clinical component of the rotation was considered by 47% to be the most valuable aspect of the training. Our experience strongly suggests that a multimodality approach is beneficial for preparing a team of individuals with minimal combat (or trauma) experience for the rigors of medical care and triage on the battlefield. The data provided by participants rotating through the ATTC show that through clinical exposure and simulation over a 2-week period, FST performance is optimized by defining provider roles and improving communication. The mass casualty training exercise is a vital component of predeployment training that participants feel is valuable in preparing them for the challenges that lay ahead.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/educación , Medicina Militar/educación , Personal Militar/educación , Traumatología/educación , Humanos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Triaje/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
11.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 47: e20202576, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32491028

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization recognized in March 2020 the existence of a pandemic for the new coronavirus that appeared in China, in late 2019, and whose disease was named COVID-19. In this context, the SBAIT (Brazilian Society of Integrated Care for Traumatized Patients) conducted a survey with 219 trauma and emergency surgeons regarding the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the role of the surgeon in this pandemic by means of an electronic survey. It was observed that surgeons have been acting under inadequate conditions, with a lack of basic supplies as well as more specific equipment such as N95 masks and facial shields for the care of potential victims who may be contaminated. The latter increases the risk of contamination of professionals, resulting in potential losses in the working teams. Immediate measures must be taken to guarantee access to safety equipment throughout the country, since all trauma victims and/or patients with emergency surgical conditions must be treated as potential carriers of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Traumatología/normas , Brasil , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 47: e20202576, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428069

RESUMEN

The World Health Organization recognized in March 2020 the existence of a pandemic for the new coronavirus that appeared in China, in late 2019, and whose disease was named COVID-19. In this context, the SBAIT (Brazilian Society of Integrated Care for Traumatized Patients) conducted a survey with 219 trauma and emergency surgeons regarding the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the role of the surgeon in this pandemic by means of an electronic survey. It was observed that surgeons have been acting under inadequate conditions, with a lack of basic supplies as well as more specific equipment such as N95 masks and facial shields for the care of potential victims who may be contaminated. The latter increases the risk of contamination of professionals, resulting in potential losses in the working teams. Immediate measures must be taken to guarantee access to safety equipment throughout the country, since all trauma victims and/or patients with emergency surgical conditions must be treated as potential carriers of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol del Médico , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
J Trauma ; 67(3): 436-40, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19741382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prehospital triage of patients with trauma is routinely challenging, but more so in mass casualty situations and military operations. The purpose of this study was to prospectively test whether heart rate variability (HRV) could be used as a triage tool during helicopter transport of civilian patients with trauma. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent, 75 patients with trauma requiring prehospital helicopter transport to our level I center (from December 2007 to November 2008) were prospectively instrumented with a 2-Channel SEER Light recorder (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). HRV was analyzed with a Mars Holter monitor system and proprietary software. SDNN (standard deviation [SD] of the normal-to-normal R-R interval), as an index of HRV, was correlated with prehospital trauma triage criteria, base deficit, seriousness of injury, operative interventions, outcome, and other data extracted from the patients' medical records. There were no interventions or medical decisions based on HRV. Data were excluded only if there was measurement artifact or technical problems with the recordings. RESULTS: The demographics were mean age 47 years, 63% men, 88% blunt, 25% traumatic brain injury, 9% mortality. Prehospital SDNN predicted patients with base excess < or = -6, those defined as seriously injured and benefiting from trauma center care, as well as patients requiring a life-saving procedure in the operating room. No other available data, including prehospital en-route vital signs, predicted any of these. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80%, 75%, 33%, 96%, respectively, with and an overall accuracy of 76% for predicting a life-saving intervention in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that prehospital HRV (specifically SDNN) predicts base excess and operating room life-saving opportunities. HRV triages and discriminates severely injured patients better than routine trauma criteria or en-route prehospital vital signs. HRV may be a useful civilian or military triage tool to avoid unnecessary helicopter evacuation for minimally injured patients. A prospective, randomized trial in a larger patient population is indicated.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Triaje/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
14.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 86(3): 392-396, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531332

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The operative management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. Our hypothesis is that a simplified operative approach could lead to better outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an international multicenter study, involving 13 centers. We performed a retrospective review from January 2007 to December of 2016. Data on demographics, mechanism of trauma, blood loss, operative time, and associated injured organs were collected. Outcomes included postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis, leak, need for unplanned surgery, length of stay, renal failure, and mortality. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture tool to store the data. Poisson regression using a backward selection method was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: We collected data of 372 patients with duodenal injuries. Although the duodenal trauma was complex (median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 18 [interquartile range, 2-3]; Abbreviated Injury Scale, 3.5 [3-4]; American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade, 3 [2-3]), primary repair alone was the most common type of operative management (80%, n = 299). Overall mortality was 24%. On univariate analysis, mortality was associated with male gender, lower admission systolic blood pressure, need for transfusion before operative repair, higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operative time, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, higher ISS, and associated pancreatic injury. Poisson regression showed higher ISS, associated pancreatic injury, postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, the need for preoperative transfusion, and male gender remained significant predictors of mortality. Duodenal suture line leak was statistically significantly lower, and patients had primary repair over every American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of injury. CONCLUSIONS: The need for transfusion prior to the operating room, associated pancreatic injuries, and postoperative renal failure are predictors of mortality for patients with duodenal injuries. Primary repair alone is a common and safe operative repair even for complex injuries when feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Duodeno/lesiones , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Páncreas/lesiones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma
15.
Injury ; 50(1): 160-166, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30274755

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: No definitive data describing associations between cases of Open Abdomen (OA) and Entero-atmospheric fistulae (EAF) exist. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the Panamerican Trauma Society (PTS) thus analyzed the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA) to assess this question. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the IROA. RESULTS: Among 649 adult patients with OA 58 (8.9%) developed EAF. Indications for OA were peritonitis (51.2%) and traumatic-injury (16.8%). The most frequently utilized temporary abdominal closure techniques were Commercial-NPWT (46.8%) and Bogotà-bag (21.9%). Mean OA days were 7.9 ± 18.22. Overall mortality rate was 29.7%, with EAF having no impact on mortality. Multivariate analysis associated cancer (p = 0.018), days of OA (p = 0.003) and time to provision-of-nutrition (p = 0.016) with EAF occurrence. CONCLUSION: Entero-atmospheric fistulas are influenced by the duration of open abdomen treatment and by the nutritional status of the patient. Peritonitis, intestinal anastomosis, negative pressure and oral or enteral nutrition were not risk factors for EAF during OA treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/mortalidad , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 17, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29636790

RESUMEN

Background: Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) is a worldwide challenge with increasing incidence. Open abdomen management with enhanced clearance of fluid and biomediators from the peritoneum is a potential therapy requiring prospective evaluation. Given the complexity of powering multi-center trials, it is essential to recruit an inception cohort sick enough to benefit from the intervention; otherwise, no effect of a potentially beneficial therapy may be apparent. An evaluation of abilities of recognized predictive systems to recognize SCIAS patients was conducted using an existing intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) database. Methods: All consecutive adult patients with a diffuse secondary peritonitis between 2012 and 2013 were collected from a quaternary care hospital in Finland, excluding appendicitis/cholecystitis. From this retrospectively collected database, a target population (93) of those with either ICU admission or mortality were selected. The performance metrics of the Third Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock based on both SOFA and quick SOFA, the World Society of Emergency Surgery Sepsis Severity Score (WSESSSS), the APACHE II score, Manheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and the Calgary Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction (CPIRO) score were all tested for their discriminant ability to identify this subgroup with SCIAS and to predict mortality. Results: Predictive systems with an area under-the-receiving-operating characteristic (AUC) curve > 0.8 included SOFA, Sepsis-3 definitions, APACHE II, WSESSSS, and CPIRO scores with the overall best for CPIRO. The highest identification rates were SOFA score ≥ 2 (78.4%), followed by the WSESSSS score ≥ 8 (73.1%), SOFA ≥ 3 (75.2%), and APACHE II ≥ 14 (68.8%) identification. Combining the Sepsis-3 septic-shock definition and WSESSS ≥ 8 increased detection to 80%. Including CPIRO score ≥ 3 increased this to 82.8% (Sensitivity-SN; 83% Specificity-SP; 74%. Comparatively, SOFA ≥ 4 and WSESSSS ≥ 8 with or without septic-shock had 83.9% detection (SN; 84%, SP; 75%, 25% mortality). Conclusions: No one scoring system behaves perfectly, and all are largely dominated by organ dysfunction. Utilizing combinations of SOFA, CPIRO, and WSESSSS scores in addition to the Sepsis-3 septic shock definition appears to offer the widest "inclusion-criteria" to recognize patients with a high chance of mortality and ICU admission. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095; Registered on May 22, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Paciente , Peritonitis/clasificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Sepsis/clasificación , APACHE , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/diagnóstico
18.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 26, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29977328

RESUMEN

Background: Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. Principles of treatment include early antibiotic administration and operative source control. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with active negative peritoneal pressure therapy (ANPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and ameliorate the systemic damage from SCIAS. Although there is now a biologic rationale for such an intervention as well as non-standardized and erratic clinical utilization, this remains a novel therapy with potential side effects and clinical equipoise. Methods: The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) study will constitute a prospective randomized controlled trial that will randomly allocate eligible surgical patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or use of the OA with application of an ANPTT dressing. Patients will be eligible if they have free uncontained intra-peritoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR a Predisposition-Infection-Response-Organ Dysfunction Score ≥ 3 or a World-Society-of-Emergency-Surgery-Sepsis-Severity-Score ≥ 8. The primary outcome will be 90-day survival. Secondary outcomes will be logistical, physiologic, safety, bio-mediators, microbiological, quality of life, and health-care costs. Secondary outcomes will include days free of ICU, ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and hospital at 30 days from the index laparotomy. Physiologic secondary outcomes will include changes in intensive care unit illness severity scores after laparotomy. Bio-mediator outcomes for participating centers will involve measurement of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10, procalcitonin, activated protein C (APC), high-mobility group box protein-1, complement factors, and mitochondrial DNA. Economic outcomes will comprise standard costing for utilization of health-care resources. Discussion: Although facial closure after SCIAS is considered the current standard of care, many reports are suggesting that OA management may improve outcomes in these patients. This trial will be powered to demonstrate a mortality difference in this highly lethal and morbid condition to ensure critically ill patients are receiving the best care possible and not being harmed by inappropriate therapies based on opinion only. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03163095.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Laparotomía/métodos , Sepsis/cirugía , APACHE , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Interleucina-10/análisis , Interleucina-10/sangre , Interleucina-6/análisis , Interleucina-6/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/análisis , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Proteína C/análisis , Sepsis/mortalidad
19.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 7, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29434652

RESUMEN

Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle leading to severe physiologic derangements and multiorgan failure unless interrupted by abdominal (surgical or other) decompression. Further, in some clinical situations, the abdomen cannot be closed due to the visceral edema, the inability to control the compelling source of infection or the necessity to re-explore (as a "planned second-look" laparotomy) or complete previously initiated damage control procedures or in cases of abdominal wall disruption. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients has been proposed to be effective in preventing or treating deranged physiology in patients with severe injuries or critical illness when no other perceived options exist. Its use, however, remains controversial as it is resource consuming and represents a non-anatomic situation with the potential for severe adverse effects. Its use, therefore, should only be considered in patients who would most benefit from it. Abdominal fascia-to-fascia closure should be done as soon as the patient can physiologically tolerate it. All precautions to minimize complications should be implemented.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/normas , Guías como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/métodos , Abdomen/irrigación sanguínea , Abdomen/fisiopatología , Cavidad Abdominal/irrigación sanguínea , Cavidad Abdominal/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/prevención & control , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/normas , Resucitación/métodos
20.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 5, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416554

RESUMEN

Iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation (ICP) is a severe complication that can occur during both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Although 45-60% of ICPs are diagnosed by the endoscopist while performing the colonoscopy, many ICPs are not immediately recognized but are instead suspected on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms that occur after the endoscopic procedure. There are three main therapeutic options for ICPs: endoscopic repair, conservative therapy, and surgery. The therapeutic approach must vary based on the setting of the diagnosis (intra- or post-colonoscopy), the type of ICP, the characteristics and general status of the patient, the operator's level of experience, and surgical device availability. Although ICPs have been the focus of numerous publications, no guidelines have been created to standardize the management of ICPs. The aim of this article is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for the management of ICP, which are intended to be used as a tool to promote global standards of care in case of ICP. These guidelines are not meant to substitute providers' clinical judgment for individual patients, and they may need to be modified based on the medical team's level of experience and the availability of local resources.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Guías como Asunto , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colon/lesiones , Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía/economía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA