Effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral cane use on gait in people with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral cane use on spatiotemporal gait parameters and peak vertical ground force in overweight or obese adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: An academic tertiary Veterans Affairs Healthcare Center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight overweight or obese subjects with symptomatic knee OA who had not used a cane for the past 30 days. METHODS: Spatiotemporal gait data were obtained with an optical motion capture system while subjects walked without a cane, with a cane contralateral to the more painful lower limb, or with a cane ipsilateral to the more painful lower limb at self-selected speeds. An in-shoe dynamic pressure distribution system was used to measure the vertical ground reaction force. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Spatiotemporal measures of gait and peak vertical ground reaction force on both lower limbs were recorded for each walking condition: no cane, contralateral cane, and ipsilateral cane. RESULTS: Walking with a cane either contralateral or ipsilateral to the more symptomatic limb led to significant reductions in gait velocity (14%-16%), cadence (12%-14%), and peak vertical ground reaction force (normalized for body weight; 11%-12%) on the more painful lower limb compared with walking unaided (P < .05). There were no significant differences in the peak vertical ground reaction force on either lower limbs when comparing walking with a cane contralateral to the more painful limb or walking with a cane ipsilateral to the more painful limb. Subjects also experienced a significant decrease in gait velocity with contralateral or ipsilateral cane use compared with walking without a cane; the lower walking speed was due to a decrease in cadence. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the prescription of a single-point cane to offload a lower limb with painful knee OA by holding the cane either ipsilateral or contralateral to the more painful lower limb.

Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

The objectives of this study were to describe the psychometric properties of the Cane Cognitive Mediator Scale (CCMS) and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the feasibility of applying these instruments as screening tools to identify patients with the propensity to use a cane. Data from a randomized crossover trial were analyzed for 53 older adults with knee OA. Perceptions on using a cane were measured at baseline using the CCMS and PIADS. The CCMS was repeated 1 wk later. At 6 mo, subjects rated their intention to use a cane. The findings indicated that 1 wk test-retest reliability was acceptable for the CCMS Attitudes and Subjective Norms subscales (r = 0.48 to 0.93) and low for the CCMS Perceived Behavioral Control subscale (r = 0.15). Internal consistency reliability was good for each CCMS and PIADS subscale. The CCMS Subjective Norms subscale demonstrated acceptable predictive validity across all subgroups (r = 0.53 to 0.88). The PIADS Adaptability subscale demonstrated acceptable predictive validity for the 45 to 64 yr-old age group (r = 0.54). The findings indicate that the CCMS Subjective Norms subscale exhibits good psychometric properties and has potential application as a screening tool.

Clinical and spatiotemporal gait effects of canes in hip osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of cane use on spatiotemporal gait parameters, pain, and function in adults with hip osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: An academic tertiary Veterans Affairs Healthcare Center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen adults with symptomatic hip OA and 13 healthy adults. METHODS: We undertook gait analysis in all subjects with an optoelectronic camera system. Pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip OA were assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Baseline spatiotemporal measures of unaided gait were obtained for healthy subjects. Baseline and 4-week spatiotemporal gait parameters were assessed for hip OA subjects while they walked with and without a cane. Participants with hip OA completed the WOMAC at baseline and after 4 weeks of cane use. RESULTS: At baseline when walking unaided, the subjects with hip OA (age range 60-75 years) had a significantly slower gait velocity, shorter affected limb stride length, and longer double-stance time compared with healthy control subjects. When walking with a cane, they had a reduction in gait velocity (P < .05) caused by a decrease in cadence (P < .05) compared with walking unaided. After 4 weeks of cane use, the participants with hip OA demonstrated significant improvements in gait velocity (P < .05) and double-stance time (P < .05) when walking with a cane in comparison with baseline data. There was no improvement in pain and function after 4 weeks of cane use, a period in which only approximately 60% of the hip OA subjects used the cane 6 or more times per week. CONCLUSIONS: Initial use of a cane led to decreased gait velocity and cadence in people with hip OA compared with walking unaided. This difference in gait velocity diminished after they practiced walking with the cane. Inconsistent use of the cane may have contributed to the lack of improvement in the subjects' hip OA pain and function.

Motor learning of a gait pattern to reduce forefoot plantar pressures in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of visual feedback in the reduction of plantar pressures through teaching a "new" gait pattern to diabetic peripheral neuropathy subjects. Immediate, next day, and 1-week retention were studied to determine if motor pattern changes could occur. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: VA Urban Healthcare System. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine community-dwelling older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy volunteered. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into feedback and no-feedback groups. All subjects received instruction and 2 days of practice and returned for a 1-week retention test. Instruction to pull the leg forward from the hip to initiate swing rather than push off the ground with the foot while walking was given to all subjects. The feedback group received visual feedback regarding peak plantar pressures after each practice trial. The no-feedback group received no feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak plantar pressures in the forefoot region for immediate retention (retention 1), next day retention (retention 2), and long-term retention (1-week retention). RESULTS: Peak plantar pressures were significantly (P < .01) reduced from baseline to retention 2 testing at the first metatarsal area in the feedback group. The feedback group walked significantly (P < .01) slower at retention 1 and 1-week testing compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were unable to use a "new" strategy gait pattern to reduce peak plantar pressures long term (1 week). The use of visual feedback following the trial did not assist in the learning of a new walking pattern.