Method of Blood Pressure Measurement in Neonates and Infants: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the recommended blood pressure (BP) measurement methods in neonates after systematically analyzing the literature regarding proper BP cuff size and measurement location and method. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from 1946 to 2017 on BP in neonates <3 months of age (PROSPERO ID CRD42018092886). Study data were extracted and analyzed with separate analysis of Bland-Altman studies comparing measurement methods. RESULTS: Of 3587 nonduplicate publications identified, 34 were appropriate for inclusion in the analysis. Four studies evaluating BP cuff size support a recommendation for a cuff width to arm circumference ratio of approximately 0.5. Studies investigating measurement location identified the upper arm as the most accurate and least variable location for oscillometric BP measurement. Analysis of studies using Bland-Altman methods for comparison of intra-arterial to oscillometric BP measurement show that the 2 methods correlate best for mean arterial pressure, whereas systolic BP by the oscillometric method tends to overestimate intra-arterial systolic BP. Compared with intra-arterial methods, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure by oscillometric methods are less accurate and precise, especially in neonates with a mean arterial pressure <30 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Proper BP measurement is critical in neonates with naturally lower BP and attention to BP cuff size, location, and method of measurement are essential. With decreasing use of intra-arterial catheters for long-term BP monitoring in neonates, further studies are urgently needed to validate and develop oscillometric methodology with enhanced accuracy.

Drug-induced cardiac abnormalities in premature infants and neonates.

The Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC) is a transparent, public-private partnership that was established in 2005 as a Critical Path Program and formalized in 2006 under a Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Food and Drug Administration and Duke University. Our continuing goal is to advance paradigms for more efficient regulatory science related to the cardiovascular safety of new therapeutics, both in the United States and globally, particularly where such safety questions add burden to innovative research and development. This White Paper provides a summary of discussions by a cardiovascular committee cosponsored by the CSRC and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that initially met in December 2014, and periodically convened at FDA's White Oak headquarters from March 2015 to September 2016. The committee focused on the lack of information concerning the cardiac effects of medications in the premature infant and neonate population compared with that of the older pediatric and adult populations. Key objectives of this paper are as follows: Provide an overview of human developmental cardiac electrophysiology, as well as the electrophysiology of premature infants and neonates; summarize all published juvenile animal models relevant to drug-induced cardiac toxicity; provide a consolidated source for all reported drug-induced cardiac toxicities by therapeutic area as a resource for neonatologists; present drugs that have a known cardiac effect in an adult population, but no reported toxicity in the premature infant and neonate populations; and summarize what is not currently known about drug-induced cardiac toxicity in premature infants and neonates, and what could be done to address this lack of knowledge. This paper presents the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent the views or policies of the FDA or Health Canada.

Neonatal blood pressure by birth weight, gestational age, and postnatal age: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure is a vital hemodynamic marker during the neonatal period. However, normative values are often derived from small observational studies. Understanding the normative range would help to identify ideal thresholds for intervention to treat hypotension or hypertension. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess observed blood pressure values in neonates who have not received any blood-pressure modifying treatments from birth to three months postnatal age and whether these vary according to birth weight, gestational age and postnatal age. METHODS: This was a systematic review. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from 1946 to 2017 on blood pressure in neonates from birth to 3 months of age (PROSPERO ID CRD42018092886). Unpublished data were included where appropriate. RESULTS: Of 3,587 non-duplicate publications identified, 30 were included (one unpublished study). Twelve studies contained data grouped by birth weight, while 23 contained data grouped by gestational age. Study and clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses thus results are presented by subgroup. A consistent blood pressure rise was associated with increasing birth weight, gestational age, and postnatal age. In addition, blood pressure seemed to rise more rapidly in the most preterm and low birth weight neonates. CONCLUSION: Despite blood pressure increasing with birth weight, gestational age, and postnatal age, there was marked blood pressure variability observed throughout. To better define hypotension and hypertension, future studies should develop consistent approaches for factors related to blood pressure variability, including the method and timing of measurement as well as statistical control of relevant patient characteristics.

Effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of rivoceranib in healthy subjects.

Rivoceranib is a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 being developed for the treatment of solid tumor. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of food on bioavailability as well as single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PKs) of 81 and 201 mg doses of rivoceranib. The study was conducted as a two-part study. In Part 1 (single ascending dose (SAD), open-label, crossover study design), 2 oral doses of rivoceranib (81 mg or 201 mg) were given to all healthy subjects with a minimum 3-day washout period between dosing. Part 2 was a multiple ascending dose (MAD), open-label, crossover design where subjects were divided based on 81 and 201 mg doses. Both doses were administered with and without food in a crossover manner for the SAD and MAD parts. 24 healthy subjects completed Part 1 and 20 subjects completed Part 2. For the 81 mg dose in the SAD and MAD parts of the study, their food effect was not observed. For the 201 mg dose in both parts, food appeared to increase bioavailability by 20%-30% in Part 1, and 30%-40% in Part 2. Median tmax value was delayed when rivoceranib was administered with food at each dose level in both parts of the study. Dose proportionality was confirmed only for the AUC0-∞  value from Part 1-fasted cohort but inconclusive for Cmax  and AUC parameters under other dosing regimens. In conclusion, rivoceranib when taken with food delays tmax appears to increase bioavailability at 201 mg dose.

Absence of ethnic difference on single-dose pharmacokinetics of rivoceranib between healthy male Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese subjects.

Rivoceranib (known in China as apatinib) is a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor which inhibits angiogenesis in solid tumors. The aim of study was to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic (PK) differences between the Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese populations. An open-label, single-dose, parallel-design PK study of rivoceranib was conducted in Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese subjects. A total of 18 healthy males were recruited to each group (54 total), and 201 mg rivoceranib tablets (as 250 mg rivoceranib mesylate) were administered orally to subjects. Plasma samples were collected, and rivoceranib plasma concentration was determined using LC-MS/MS. For PK analysis, non-compartmental and compartmental analyses were performed. Intrinsic factors (CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 genotype) were also examined. Non-compartmental analysis showed no significant difference in AUC0-t , AUC0-∞ , Cmax , tmax , and t1/2 . Apparent clearance and volume of distribution were different across the three populations; however, the extent of this difference does not require dose modification. For compartmental modeling, a two-compartment model was used to fit the plasma concentrations. No significant difference was observed in absorption, elimination, and intercompartmental transfer rate constants among the three groups. The present study shows no major ethnic PK differences between Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese populations.

Pharmacokinetics of the Melanocortin Type 1 Receptor Agonist PL8177 After Subcutaneous Administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: PL8177 is a selective melanocortin 1 receptor agonist in development for the treatment of various immunologic and inflammatory conditions. Here we describe the pharmacokinetics of PL8177 after subcutaneous (sc) delivery in animals and humans. METHODS: Mice, rats, and dogs were administered sc PL8177 at single doses of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg (mice); 1.0, 5.0, and 25.0 mg/kg/day (rats); or 1.5, 8.0, and 40.0 mg/day (dogs). Blood was collected over 24 h (mice) or 28 days (rats and dogs). Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple sc doses were also examined in human volunteers. Two dose levels were tested in two dosing cohorts of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/day for 7 days. Blood samples were collected through Day 1 and on Days 2 to 6 at peak and trough times based on analysis of the first two single-dose cohorts. RESULTS: In mice, 3 mg/kg PL8177 resulted in an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC∞) of 1727 ng·h/mL, a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 2440 ng/mL, an elimination half-life (t½) of 0.5 h, and a time to maximum concentration (tmax) of 0.25 h. Results for the 1-mg/kg dose were generally proportional. In rats, mean tmax values were independent of dose and ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 h for single and multiple dosing. Cmax values ranged from 516 to 695 ng/mL (1-mg/kg dose) and from 666 to 1180 ng/mL (25-mg/kg dose). In dogs, mean tmax values ranged from 0.4 to 1.3 h for single and multiple dosing. Values for tmax decreased with increasing dose and mean plasma Cmax increased less than dose proportionally (96-129 ng·h/mL [1.5 mg], 275-615 ng·h/mL [8.0 mg], and 633-1280 ng·h/mL [40.0 mg]). In humans, PL8177 was observed in the plasma within 15 min after a single dose and persisted for up to 48 h at higher doses. The tmax was 30-45 min (single dose) and 15-45 min (multiple doses). In multiple-dose studies, maximum steady-state plasma concentration (Cmax,ss) and AUC∞ increased with dose. Geometric mean Cmax,ss values were 20.1 ng/mL (1.0 mg) and 57.2 ng/mL (3.0 mg). AUC∞ values were 54.3 ng·h/mL (1.0 mg) and 199 ng·h/mL (3.0 mg). Unchanged PL8177 excreted in the urine was ≤ 1%, and accumulation was minimal. CONCLUSION: PL8177 administration resulted in a consistent pharmacokinetic profile. The measured exposure levels resulted in pharmacologically active PL8177 concentrations at the targeted MC1R. Rapid absorption was seen in healthy volunteers, and multiple-dose administration over 7 days resulted in pharmacokinetic characteristics similar to those observed after single-dose administration. Results support the continued development of PL8177 to treat immunologic and inflammatory conditions.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Dose Proportionality of Diazepam After Intranasal Administration of NRL-1 to Healthy Volunteers.

NRL-1 is a novel intranasal formulation of diazepam that is being evaluated as rescue medication in patients with epilepsy who experience bouts of increased seizure activity despite stable regimens of antiepileptic drugs. This phase 1, open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy adult volunteers consisted of 3 single-dose periods (5, 10, and 20 mg) followed by a 2-dose period (2 × 10 mg) with a minimum 28-day washout between treatments. Blood samples were taken at prespecified time points after intranasal dosing, and bioanalytic analysis of diazepam and nordiazepam was conducted using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, and dose proportionality (peak concentration [Cmax ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0-∞ ]) was evaluated based on a power model within a 90%CI of 0.84 to 1.16. Comparisons were also conducted between single 10-mg dose and multidose (2 × 10 mg) treatments. NRL-1 administration resulted in rapid diazepam absorption (median time to peak concentration 1.4-1.5 hours). Plasma concentration-time profiles showed similar patterns of exposure that appeared to be dose dependent, with Cmax of 85.6, 133.6, and 235.3 ng/mL for the 5-, 10-, and 20-mg doses, respectively, although the lower 90%CI for Cmax and AUC0-∞ exceeded dose proportionality criteria. The coefficient of variation ranged from 59% to 67% for Cmax and 48% to 56% for AUC parameters. Dose-normalized AUC0-∞ values were comparable between the 2 × 10-mg and single 10-mg doses. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those expected for diazepam, with transient somnolence the most frequent adverse event (94.4%). These results support NRL-1 as a potential therapy for managing seizure emergencies.

Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments of concurrent administration of risperidone and donepezil.

Treatment of Alzheimer's disease sometimes uses combinations of drugs because dementia is frequently associated with behavioral symptoms. Risperidone and donepezil are both metabolized through cytochrome P450 2D6 and 3A4, raising the possibility of drug interactions with combination therapy. The objective of this study was to determine whether significant drug interactions occur with concomitant administration of donepezil and risperidone. In an open-label, three-way crossover study, 24 healthy men were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg of risperidone twice daily, 5 mg of donepezil once daily, or both drugs for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 21-day washout period. The treatment ratios of AUC and associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for risperidone active moiety, defined as risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone (ratio = 110.2%; 90% CI = 103.7-117.2), and for donepezil (ratio = 97.1%; 90% CI = 90.0-103.6) were within the 80% to 125% of bioequivalence range. The treatment ratios of Cmax and associated 90% CIs for risperidone active moiety (ratio = 114.6%; 90% CI = 107.0-122.8) and for donepezil (ratio = 96.1%; 90% CI = 90.0-102.6) were also within the bioequivalence range. Therefore, no significant pharmacokinetic differences occurred in either risperidone active moiety or donepezil when given alone or in combination. Adverse events (predominantly headache, nervousness, and somnolence) were minor and comparable for all treatment groups. The results indicate that no clinically meaningful drug interactions occurred between risperidone 1 mg daily and donepezil 5 mg daily at steady state, and therefore no dosage adjustment is required when both drugs are combined with the dosage regimen studied. Additional investigations are warranted to determine the potential for interactions in elderly patients with dementia who may eliminate risperidone and donepezil more slowly and thus be more vulnerable to clinical drug interactions than the young healthy subjects examined in this study.