RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite politically charged media coverage and legislation surrounding gender affirming care (GAC), many organizations have released position statements to provide scientifically backed clinical practice standards, combat misinformation, and inform medicolegal policies. The purpose of this study is to objectively assess the availability and the content of the official position statements of relevant medical professional organizations regarding GAC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A list of U.S. medical professional organizations with likely involvement in GAC based on medical or surgical specialties was compiled. METHODS: For included organizations, we evaluated the availability, content, and publication year of positions on GAC through October 2023. When available, formal positions were categorized as supportive or unsupportive. RESULTS: A total of 314 professional medical organizations were screened for our study based on specialty, relevance to GAC, and issuance of patient guidelines or position statements. Inclusion criteria were met by 55 organizations. Most organizations (35, 63.6%) had formal position statements on GAC. Support for GAC was described in 97.1% (n=34). Further, 94.2% (n=33) of available statements explicitly addressed GAC in individuals less than 18 years old and were largely supportive (96.9%, n=32). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional analysis demonstrates that a majority of multidisciplinary professional medical organizations with relevance to GAC have issued formal position statements on the topic. Available positions were overwhelmingly supportive of individualized access to gender-affirming therapies in adult and adolescent populations. However, silence from some organizations continues to represent a modifiable disparity in the provision of GAC.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review findings related to phantom genital sensation, emphasizing phantom sensation in the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population. We discuss prevalence, presentation and potential implications for sensory outcomes in genital gender-affirming surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a high prevalence of phantom genital sensations in the TGD population. The prevalence varies by body part, approaching 50% in the most frequently reported transgender phantom - the phantom penis. Unlike genital phantoms that occur after trauma or surgery which are often painful, transgender phantoms are typically neutral and often erogenous in experience. Phantom sensation in the TGD population can be an affirming experience and important part of sexual well being and embodiment. SUMMARY: Recent studies have begun to characterize the prevalence and presentations of phantom genital sensations in TGD people, informing our evolving understanding of the sensory experiences of the transgender and gender diverse population. Targeting integration of these centrally-mediated phantom genital sensations with the peripherally generated sensation from genital stimulation may represent one potential avenue to improve sensation and embodiment following genital gender-affirming surgical procedures. Additionally, emerging techniques in modern peripheral nerve surgery targeting phantom pain may offer potential treatment options for painful phantom sensation seen after cases of genital surgery or trauma.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/efectos adversos , Personas Transgénero/psicología , Prevalencia , Transexualidad/cirugía , Transexualidad/psicología , Transexualidad/fisiopatología , Miembro Fantasma/epidemiología , Miembro Fantasma/etiología , Miembro Fantasma/fisiopatología , SensaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Some patients pursuing gender-affirming mastectomy prefer to forgo autologous nipple and areolar reconstruction, instead choosing a "no nipple" option. The objective of this study is to evaluate the motives and influences contributing to this decision. METHODS: A retrospective survey-based study of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy over a 4.6-year period was conducted. All patients were offered nipple and areolar reconstruction. A survey was distributed to those who elected to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction exploring the factors influencing that choice and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients underwent gender-affirming mastectomy and 13% chose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction. The survey response rate was 72%. Most respondents identified as nonbinary (48%) or transmasculine (42%). Body image, defined in the context of this study as an improvement in body image satisfaction due to achievement of a more gender-congruent appearance, was the most highly cited and most heavily weighted decision-making factor. Concerns about nipple graft outcomes were frequently cited as important but carried less weight. There were no differences between transmasculine and nonbinary patients in terms of motivations for choosing this surgical option. Fifty-eight percent of respondents pursued or planned to pursue chest tattoos, whereas 42% preferred no further chest modifications. Patient satisfaction was high postoperatively (98%), and 82% of respondents would choose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction again even if surgical outcomes of free nipple grafts were improved. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming mastectomy without nipple and areolar reconstruction was requested by 13% of patients presenting for gender-affirming chest surgery over the study period and had high postoperative satisfaction among patients who chose this option. This modification of gender-affirming mastectomy is a variation that surgical teams should be aware of. Many reasons to forgo nipple preservation were cited, most of which related to body image. Secondary factors were easier recovery and/or concern about outcomes of free nipple grafts. Many patients wished information about this surgical option was more widely available.
Asunto(s)
Mamoplastia , Mastectomía , Pezones , Satisfacción del Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pezones/cirugía , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomía/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conducta de Elección , Imagen CorporalRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: It is frequently quoted in mainstream media that the clitoris has "8000 nerve endings." However, no study has yet quantified the number of nerve fibers (axons) innervating the human clitoris. The dorsal nerves of the clitoris (DNCs) are the primary source of sensation and somatic clitoral innervation. Therefore, reporting the number of axons in the DNCs is an important step in our understanding of clitoral innervation and sexual response with implications for many fields of medical practice. The purpose of this study is to quantify the mean number of axons in the human DNCs and to report the approximate mean number of nerve fibers that innervate the human glans clitoris. METHODS: DNC samples were obtained from 7 transmasculine patients undergoing gender-affirming phalloplasty surgery. At the time of nerve coaptation, a small excess of the DNC (5 mm) was collected for analysis at the proximal level of the clitoral body, just distal of the emergence of the DNCs from underneath the pubic symphysis. Samples were placed into 3% glutaraldehyde fixative, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and serially dehydrated in ethanol and toluene. Samples were then embedded in araldite, sectioned on an ultramicrotome into 1-µm cross sections, and counterstained with 1% toluidine blue. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 1000x magnification with a Leitz Laborlux S microscope and image analysis software (Clemex Vision Professional) to obtain an axon counts. Descriptive statistics were performed to yield a mean and standard deviation of the number of axons in the DNCs. Assuming anatomic symmetry between bilateral DNCs, mean total number of somatic nerve fibers innervating the human glans clitoris was obtained by doubling the mean count of the DNCs. RESULTS: Seven sample DNCs were collected. Of those, 5 were analyzed as 2 did not have sufficient nerve tissue present. The mean number of nerve fibers in the human DNCs was 5140 (SD = 218.4). The mean number of myelinated nerve fibers innervating the human clitoris was 10,281 (SD = 436.8). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report the number of axons in the human DNC, at a mean 5140. Given the bilateral nature of clitoral innervation and symmetry of anatomic structures, the approximate mean number of myelinated axons that innervate the human glans clitoris is 10,280. When the uncaptured unmyelinated fibers and contributions from the cavernosal innervation are accounted for, it is clear that far Moree than 8000 axons innervate the human clitoris.
Asunto(s)
Clítoris , Tejido Nervioso , Femenino , Humanos , Fibras Nerviosas , Sensación , Conducta SexualRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Breast cancer can affect anyone; therefore, it affects people of all gender identities. Reconstructive options after breast cancer must then address the needs of all people. Our institution is unique in its provision of both high-level comprehensive breast and gender affirmation care. In our practice, patients have expressed gender diverse identities during their breast cancer reconstructive journey. In these cases, goals have deviated from traditional breast restoration, gravitating toward gender-affirming mastectomy, or results often seen with "top surgery." We present a framework for the administration of breast cancer care and discussions of reconstruction from a lens of gender inclusivity. Breast cancer is a diagnosis that has been gendered, resulting in the erasure and exclusion of reconstructive needs for people affected by breast cancer that are not cisgender women. This is illustrated through the case of a nonbinary individual seen in breast cancer clinic for multifocal ductal carcinoma in situ. Our standard review of options of "going flat," implant-based reconstruction, and autologous reconstruction led to initial confusion given their early exploration of gender identity co-occurring with a new diagnosis of breast cancer. These scenarios can be challenging when viewed solely from the perspective of a breast reconstructive surgeon or a gender-affirming surgeon alone. Both perspectives are often needed. Our gender-affirming and breast reconstructive teams have discussed methods to identify patients who require more robust discussion of gender identity and reconstructive options in the setting of breast cancer, such as chest masculinization. By adding gender-affirming surgeons to the list of providers available to counsel breast cancer patients, we may be able to better provide early education on all reconstructive options and appropriately address the needs of transgender and gender diverse people affected by breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Mastectomía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Identidad de GéneroRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite high rates of online misinformation, transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients frequently utilize online resources to identify suitable providers of gender-affirming surgical care. AIM: The objective of this study was to analyze the webpages of United States academic plastic surgery programs for the types of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) procedures offered and to determine how this correlates with the presence of an institutional transgender health program and geographic region in order to identify potential gaps for improvement. METHODS: Online institutional webpages of 82 accredited academic plastic surgery programs were analyzed for the presence of the following: GAS services, specification of type of GAS by facial, chest, body and genital surgery, and presence of a concomitant institutional transgender health program. This data was analyzed for correlations with geographic region and assessed for any significant associations. OUTCOMES: Frequencies of GAS services, specification of the type of GAS by facial, chest, body and genital surgery, presence of a concomitant institutional transgender health program, and statistical correlations between these items are the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 43 of 82 (52%) academic institutions offered GAS. Whether an institution offered GAS varied significantly with the presence of an institutional transgender health program (P < .001) but not with geographic region (P = .329). Whether institutions that offer GAS specified which anatomic category of GAS procedures were offered varied significantly with the presence of an institutional transgender health program (P < .001) but not with geographic region (P = .235). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This identifies gaps for improved transparency in the practice of communication around GAS for both physicians and academic medical institutions. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This is the first study analyzing the quality, content, and accessibility of online information pertaining to GAS in academic institutions. The primary limitation of this study is the nature and accuracy of online information, as current data may be outdated and not reflect actuality. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis of online information, many gaps currently exist in information pertaining to GAS in academic settings, and with a clear and expanding need, increased representation and online availability of information regarding all GAS procedure types, as well as coordination with comprehensive transgender healthcare programs, is ideal. Aryanpour Z, Nguyen CT, Blunck CK, et al., Comprehensiveness of Online Information in Gender-Affirming Surgery: Current Trends and Future Directions in Academic Plastic Surgery. J Sex Med 2022;19:846-851.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Cirugía Plástica , Personas Transgénero , Transexualidad , Identidad de Género , Humanos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Transexualidad/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss perineal and robotic approaches to gender-affirming vaginoplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: The Davydov peritoneal vaginoplasty has its origins in neovaginal reconstruction for vaginal agenesis. It has been adapted as a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure and provides an alternative to perineal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Both techniques represent variations of penile inversion vaginoplasty with successful outcomes and overall low rates of major complications reported in the literature. However, there are differing advantages and considerations to each approach. A perineal approach has been the gold standard to gender-affirming vaginoplasty for many decades. Robotic peritoneal gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) is an emerging alternative, with potential advantages including less reliance on extragenital skin grafts in individuals with minimal genital tissue, especially among patients presenting with pubertal suppression, and safer dissection in revision vaginoplasty for stenosis of the proximal neovaginal canal. Additional risks of RPGAV include those associated with robotic abdominal surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pene/cirugía , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Common peroneal neuropathy is a peripheral neuropathy of multifactorial etiology often left undiagnosed until foot drop manifests and electrodiagnostic abnormalities are detected. However, reliance on such striking symptoms and electrodiagnostic findings for diagnosis stands in contrast to other commonly treated neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndrome. Poor recognition of common peroneal neuropathy without foot drop or the presence of foot drop with normal electrodiagnostic studies thus often results in delayed or no surgical treatment. Our cases document 2 patients presenting with complete foot drop who had immediate resolution after decompression. The first patient presented with normal electrodiagnostic studies representing an isolated Sunderland Zero nerve ischemia. The second patient presented with severe electrodiagnostic studies but also had an immediate improvement in their foot drop representing a Sunderland VI mixed nerve injury with a significant contribution from an ongoing Sunderland Zero ischemic conduction block. In support of recent case series, these patients demonstrate that common peroneal neuropathy can present across a broad diagnostic spectrum of sensory and motor symptoms, including with normal electrodiagnostic studies. Four clinical subtypes of common peroneal neuropathy are presented, and surgical decompression may thus be indicated for these patients that lack the more conventional symptoms of common peroneal neuropathy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Neuropatías Peroneas , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Conducción Nerviosa , Nervio Peroneo/cirugía , Neuropatías Peroneas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Peroneas/etiología , Neuropatías Peroneas/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Humanos , Masculino , Antebrazo/cirugía , Faloplastia , Pene/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Cirujanos , Personas Transgénero , Identidad de Género , HumanosRESUMEN
Symptomatic neuromas of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) can cause debilitating pain. Traditional surgical management options have demonstrated inconsistent outcomes prompting a search for alternatives. Recent reports have emerged on the use of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) for neuromas of the SRN using donors that are well established in hand surgery, such as the brachioradialis (BR) or extensor capri radialis longus or brevis. Use of the brachioradialis or extensor capri radialis longus motor targets can require surgery at or above the level of the antecubital fossa, and denervation of these muscle groups may be undesirable in cases of complex upper extremity injury where these donors may be needed for tendon or nerve transfer. The supinator is an expendable and often overlooked donor nerve that has not been assessed as a target for TMR of the SRN. In this case series, three patients with SRN neuromas whose conservative management failed and who did not have an SRN lesion amenable to reconstruction were managed with TMR to the nerves to supinator. At latest follow-up (9-22 months), no patients had deficits in supination or evident donor site morbidity. Two patients reported complete resolution of their SRN neuroma pain, and one patient reported partial improvement. This case series reports early results of TMR of the SRN using nerves to supinator in cases of SRN neuromas not amenable to reconstruction, demonstrating technical feasibility, improvements in neuroma pain, and no discernible donor morbidity.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To present 2 clitoroplasty techniques-the preputial skin and urethral flap-and describe our rationale for using each technique to construct the clitoro-urethral complex in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. METHODS: For uncircumcised patients or circumcised patients with greater than 2 cm of inner preputial skin and at least 8 cm of shaft skin proximal to the circumcision scar, we use the preputial skin clitoroplasty, a modification of the Ghent style clitoroplasty. The entire corona is used after medial glans and urethral mucosa is excised. The corona is brought together 1 cm from midline to create the visible ovoid clitoris; the remaining coronal tissue remains lateral to the clitoris for erogenous sensation as clitoral corpora. The clitoris is anchored to the proximal tunica, positioned at the level of the adductor longus tendon. The folded neurovascular bundle is fixed in the suprapubic area. The ventral urethral is spatulated and urethral flap approximated to the clitoris. Preputial skin is sutured proximally as tension allows. The clitoro-urethral complex is inset into an opening created in the penile skin flap. For patients with less skin, we use the urethral flap clitoroplasty. More corpus spongiosum is used, as the urethra creates the clitoral hood; this is described in the literature and attributed to Pierre Brassard. The clitoris is inset following a dorsal urethrotomy, with a small collar of preputial skin sewn to the spongiosum and urethral mucosa. The urethra is transected about 1 cm distally. The ventral urethra is then spatulated and the urethroplasty completed. RESULTS: We prefer the preputial skin flap technique for its' greater coronal tissue volume for erogenous sensation and better esthetics, in our opinion. Circumcised patients should have at least 2 cm of skin distal to the circumcision scar. To avoid using skin graft for the introitus-a risk for introital stenosis-shaft skin proximal to the circumcision line should be at least 8 cm. CONCLUSION: We present 2 technical options for clitoroplasty and construction of the clitoro-urethral complex in gender-affirming vaginoplasty.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Uretra , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Uretra/cirugía , Cicatriz , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Pene/cirugíaRESUMEN
Gender-affirming phalloplasty involves flap tubularization, placing unique stresses on the vascularity of the flap. Tubularization renders the flap susceptible to postoperative edema that can lead to excessive turgor that, if left untreated, can compromise perfusion and threaten the viability of the phallic reconstruction. This phenomenon has not been formally described in our literature. We aim to define this entity, described here as "Excessive Phallic Turgor" (EPT), and to outline its incidence, frequency of its underlying etiologies, and sequelae. We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer performed from December 2016 to May 2023. All patients requiring emergent intervention (bedside suture release, reoperation, or both) due to excessive phallic swelling and impending flap compromise were considered to have EPT. Variables compared between groups included underlying etiology (categorized as congestion, hematoma or swelling), patient demographics, flap type and size, management, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes. Over the study period, 147 phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer for shaft creation were performed. Of those, 15% developed EPT. Age, BMI, flap length, flap circumference, flap surface area, single vs multistage operation, flap tubularization (shaft-only vs tube-within-tube), and flap donor site were not significantly different between the cohort that developed EPT and that which did not. Development of EPT was associated with higher rates of phallic hematoma, surgical site infection, shaft fistula requiring repair, and longer inpatient stays. When EPT develops, prompt diagnosis and alleviation of intraphallic pressure are paramount for mitigating short- and long-term morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Humanos , Masculino , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/efectos adversos , Faloplastia , Uretra/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Hematoma/cirugía , Pene/cirugíaRESUMEN
Gender-affirming vaginoplasty (GAV) comprises the construction of a vulva and a neovaginal canal. Although technical nuances of vulvar construction vary between surgeons, vulvar construction is always performed using the homologous penile and scrotal tissues to construct the corresponding vulvar structures. Therefore, the main differentiating factor across gender-affirming vaginoplasty techniques is the tissue that is utilized to construct the neovaginal canal. These tissue types vary markedly in their availability, histology, and ease of harvest and have different advantages and disadvantages to their use as neovaginal lining. In this narrative review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the tissue types and associated operative approaches used for construction of the neovagina in GAV. Tissue choice is guided by several factors, such as histological similarity to natal vaginal mucosa, tissue availability, lubrication potential, additional donor site morbidity, and the specific goals of each patient. Skin is used to construct the neovagina in most cases with a combination of pedicled penile skin flaps and scrotal and extra-genital skin grafts. However, skin alternatives such as peritoneum and intestine are increasing in use. Peritoneum and intestine are emerging as options for primary vaginoplasty in cases of limited genital skin or revision vaginoplasty procedures. The increasing number of gender-affirming vaginoplasty procedures performed and the changing patient demographics from factors such as pubertal suppression have resulted in rapidly evolving indications for the use of these differing vaginoplasty techniques. This review sheds light on the use of less frequently utilized tissue types described for construction of the neovaginal canal, including mucosal tissues such as urethral and buccal mucosa, the tunica vaginalis, and dermal matrix allografts and xenografts. Although the body of evidence for each vaginoplasty technique is growing, there is a need for large prospective comparison studies of outcomes between these techniques and the tissue types used to line the neovaginal canal to better define indications and limitations.
RESUMEN
Background and Objective: The vulva is the external portion of a gender-affirming vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty procedure-the "visible" result of surgery. The vulvar appearance can play a major role in how individuals feel about their surgical results and new genital anatomy. Therefore, optimizing the aesthetics of the vulva is an important component of surgical care. Although there is no one "ideal" vulvar appearance, aesthetics are optimal when each major sub-unit of the vulva is reconstructed to create a proportional and cohesive vulvar unit. In this article we perform a narrative review of the literature and discuss clinical approaches to improve aesthetic satisfaction such as patient education, re-defining the "ideal" vulva, aesthetic surgery tenets and technical strategies based on our collective experience of over 630 gender-affirming vulvar constructions. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was completed accessing PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar using search terms "Vaginoplasty OR Vulvoplasty". Articles were removed if not pertaining to gender affirmation surgery, were not in English language, were not accessible or did not discuss aesthetics in the body of the text. Key Content and Findings: A total of 1,042 articles were identified from initial search criteria. Of those, 905 were excluded as they did not involve gender affirmation as an indication. An additional 112 papers were excluded as they were not accessible, not in English, focused on non-vulvar outcomes or did not comment on vulvar aesthetics. Ultimately 25 articles were included for narrative review; 21 of these included technical descriptions of vulva and 13 had direct aesthetic discussion. The anatomy and aesthetics of the transfeminine vulva are reviewed according to the previously described principle of anatomic vulvar sub-units: the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra and the introitus. Conclusions: Ultimately, creating the optimal vulva for each individual patient will demand flexible surgical decisions based on individual anatomy and available tissues. This narrative review provides an overview of current approaches to aesthetics in gender-affirming vulvar construction and technical insights based on our institutional experience of performing over 630 gender-affirming vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty procedures.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term changes in health outcomes in people with cervical-level spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent upper extremity (UE) reconstruction via either novel nerve transfer (NT) or traditional tendon transfer (TT) surgery with individuals who did not undergo UE surgical reconstruction. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative cohort pilot study. PARTICIPANTS: 34 participants with cervical SCI met the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older, greater than 6 months post-injury, and mid-cervical level SCI American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B or C. SETTING: Two tertiary academic hospitals and their affiliated veterans' hospitals. METHODS: Health outcomes were assessed using two previously validated measures, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Demographic, surgical, and survey data were collected at the initial evaluation and one month postoperatively/post-baseline. RESULTS: 34 participants with cervical SCI were recruited across three cohorts: no surgery (n = 16), NT (n = 10), and TT (n = 8). The TT group had a decline in SCIM and SF-36 scores whereas the NT and no surgery groups experienced little change in independence or health status in the immediate perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and rehabilitation providers must recognize differences in the perioperative needs of people with cervical SCI who chose to have restorative UE surgery. Future work should focus on further investigation of health outcomes, change in function, and improving preoperative counseling and cross-disciplinary management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to skin management in cases of gender-affirming vaginoplasty in the setting of penoscrotal hypoplasia. Gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty is a procedure that has traditionally relied upon the use of local genital tissues to both construct the vulva and line the neovaginal canal. Improved and earlier access to pubertal suppression has resulted in an increasing number of individuals presenting for vaginoplasty with penoscrotal hypoplasia and significantly less skin available to accomplish the goals of vaginoplasty. Robotic-assisted gender-affirming peritoneal flap vaginoplasty is one solution that has emerged to help address the challenge of limited skin and provide an alternative source of neovaginal lining. Although this technique provides valuable peritoneal tissue that is used to line a large portion of the neovaginal canal, external vulvar construction remains a challenge. Amid a growing number of cases of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression, there is a need for resources that illustrate strategies to deal with these challenging scenarios. In this video the authors demonstrate their approach to vulvar construction in the setting of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression. METHODS: This video demonstrates an approach to skin management during robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in the setting of limited genital skin secondary to pubertal suppression at Tanner stage 2. RESULTS: Penile inversion vaginoplasty typically relies upon the penile skin tube reaching and reconstructing the introitus, and forming the distal aspect of the neovaginal canal. However, in most cases of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression, there will not be enough length of penile skin to reach or construct the introitus. In these cases, the inverted penile skin tube is also often also too narrow in caliber to accommodate passage of a dilator for neovaginal dilation. These clinical scenarios are challenging and often require construction of the introitus with skin graft, complete splitting of the ventral penile skin tube and optimization of remaining skin to form other critical vulvar structures (labia minora and clitoral hood). CONCLUSION: As individuals with penoscrotal hypoplasia continue to present for gender-affirming vaginoplasty procedures, it is important to adjust traditional approaches to vulvar construction and optimize strategies to manage cases with limited genital skin. In this video the authors present their approach to skin management and vulvar construction in gender-affirming vaginoplasty with penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Femenino , Humanos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/efectos adversos , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Vulva/cirugía , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Vagina/cirugíaRESUMEN
SUMMARY: One goal of an ideal phallic reconstruction is achieving tactile and erogenous sensation. Traditionally, the most common flap used in phalloplasty has been the radial forearm flap, where the medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves are coapted to meet this goal. The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the lesser-known posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (PABC) as an alternative or additional nerve for coaptation that innervates a majority of the shaft, where sensation is most desired. The presence, anatomical location, and territory of innervation of the antebrachial cutaneous nerves were assessed in a series of 12 consecutive in vivo radial forearm phalloplasties. A literature review was conducted to establish which nerves have traditionally been used for sensory reinnervation of the phallus. The PABC was the first nerve encountered on the radial border of the flap lying on the fascia in the interval between the brachioradialis and extensor carpi radials longus. The posterior and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves innervated the phallic shaft, whereas the anterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve innervated the phallic urethra. There were no articles in our review that used PABC for nerve coaptation in radial forearm phalloplasty. The skin innervated by the PABC represents a significant portion of the phallic shaft when using the standard template for radial forearm phalloplasty. Despite this, its use is not described in the literature. The authors introduce the PABC as an alternative or additional nerve for coaptation in radial forearm phalloplasty.
Asunto(s)
Antebrazo , Faloplastia , Humanos , Antebrazo/cirugía , Antebrazo/inervación , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Nervio Radial/cirugíaRESUMEN
A key component of success of a nerve transfer is the innervation density, which is directly affected by the donor nerve axonal density and donor-to-recipient (D:R) axon ratio. Optimal D:R axon ratio for a nerve transfer is quoted at 0.7:1 or greater. In phalloplasty surgery, there are currently minimal data available to help inform selection of donor and recipient nerves, including unavailability of axon counts. Methods: Five transmasculine people who underwent gender-affirming radial forearm phalloplasty had nerve specimens processed with histomorphometric evaluation to determine axon counts and approximate donor-to-recipient axon ratios. Results: Mean axon counts for recipient nerves were 6957 ± 1098 [the lateral antebrachial (LABC)], 1866 ± 590 [medial antebrachial (MABC)], and 1712 ± 121 [posterior antebrachial cutaneous (PABC)]. Mean axon counts for donor nerves were 2301 ± 551 [ilioinguinal (IL)] and 5140 ± 218 [dorsal nerve of the clitoris (DNC)]. D:R axon ratios using mean axon counts were DNC:LABC 0.739 (0.61-1.03), DNC:MABC 2.754 (1.83-5.91), DNC:PABC 3.002 (2.71-3.53), IL:LABC 0.331 (0.24-0.46), IL:MABC 1.233 (0.86-1.17), and IL:PABC 1.344 (0.85-1.82). Conclusions: The DNC is the more powerful donor nerve with greater than two times the axon count of the IL. The IL nerve may be under-powered to re-innervate the LABC based on an axon ratio consistently less than 0.7:1. All other mean D:R are more than 0.7:1. DNC axon counts may be excessive for re-innervation of the MABC or PABC alone with D:R of more than 2.5:1, potentially increasing risk of neuroma formation at the coaptation site.
RESUMEN
Background: The rate of opioid prescribing after low-risk surgical procedures has increased over the past decade, and surgeons are responsible for prescribing approximately one-third of all opioid medications. There is additional supporting evidence that patients only consume about half of the opioids prescribed to them after outpatient plastic surgery. Currently, there is no literature to provide surgeons with reference ranges for how much opioid medication will adequately provide analgesia for patients after undergoing bilateral breast augmentation (BBA) surgery. Objective: To quantify the amount of opioid medication required to adequately control pain for patients after undergoing BBA and use these data to provide recommendations on opioid prescribing practices. Methods: Cross-sectional prospective data were obtained through a take-home medication and pain tracking questionnaire for 56 patients after they underwent either subpectoral or subglandular BBA. Patients documented their pain scores on a 0 to 10 analogue scale and documented the type and amount of pain medication they took for a 7-day period. Results: Our study demonstrated that patients in the subglandular BBA group required an average of either 25 ± 1.2 Tylenol #3 or 19.3 ± 2.3 Tramacet tablets, and the subpectoral group required 27.7 ± 1.7 Tylenol #3 or 25.6 ± 0.9 Tramacet tablets over a 7-day period. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 surgical groups. Conclusion: We propose a reference range of medication required on average for patients undergoing BBA to obtain adequate pain control in the initial postoperative period that falls within the most recent Canadian guidelines for safe opioid prescribing practices.
Contexte: La fréquence de prescription des opioïdes après des procédures chirurgicales à faible risque a augmenté au cours de la dernière décennie et les chirurgiens sont responsables de la prescription d'environ un tiers de tous les médicaments opioïdes. Des données probantes supplémentaires indiquent que les patients ne consomment qu'environ la moitié des opioïdes qui leur ont été prescrits après une chirurgie plastique en chirurgie de jour. Aucune publication ne procure, à ce jour, des plages de référence aux chirurgiens pour leur indiquer combien d'opioïdes fournira aux patients une analgésie adéquate après avoir subi une chirurgie bilatérale d'augmentation mammaire. Objectif: Quantifier les médicaments opioïdes requis pour contrôler efficacement la douleur chez les patients ayant subi une chirurgie bilatérale d'augmentation mammaire et utiliser ces données pour fournir des recommandations sur les pratiques de prescription des opioïdes. Méthodes: Des données prospectives transversales ont été obtenues au moyen d'un questionnaire à remplir à domicile de suivi des médicaments et de la douleur auprès de 56 patientes venant de subir une chirurgie d'augmentation mammaire sous-pectorale ou sous-glandulaire. Les patientes ont documenté leurs scores de douleur sur une échelle analogique de 0 à 10, ainsi que le type et la quantité de médicament antidouleurs pris pendant une période de 7 jours. Résultats: Notre étude a démontré que les patientes du groupe augmentation mammaire sous glandulaire a nécessité une moyenne de 25 ± 1,2 comprimés de Tylénol #3 ou 19,3 ± 2,3 comprimés de Tramacet; les patientes du groupe sous-pectoral ont nécessité 27,7 ± 1,7 comprimés de Tylénol #3 ou 25,6 ± 0,9 comprimés de Tramacet comprimés sur une période de sept jours. Il n'y a pas eu de différence statistiquement significative entre les deux groupes chirurgicaux. Conclusion: Nous proposons une plage de référence pour les médicaments nécessaires en moyenne pour les patientes subissant une chirurgie d'augmentation mammaire pour contrôler correctement la douleur au cours de la période postopératoire initiale; cette plage de référence correspond aux plus récentes lignes directrices canadiennes sur les pratiques de prescription sécuritaire des opioïdes.