Core values of employed general practitioners in Germany - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: "Core values" help to guide practice of health care delivery. The core values of general practice are described in the European definition of general practice by WONCA, e.g. a holistic, comprehensive and continuous care. They may be associated with the idea that the general practitioner is the owner of the practice rather than an employee. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the core values of employed GPs in their professional setting and their practical manifestation. METHODS: From April to May 2021, we conducted 17 semi-structured telephone-interviews with employed GPs in two districts in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: We identified twelve core values, including values relevant to patient care and values relevant to the lives of employed GPs. Values with high relevance were job satisfaction, the professional distance from patients, collaboration and collegial exchange, comprehensive care, adequate consultation time and availability to patients. Values with heterogeneous relevance were continuity of care, waiting times and medical autonomy. The value "availability" of employed GPs to patients was associated with both patient care and personal life. The limited availability of employed GPs was accompanied by tensions between these two trends and other values. CONCLUSION: The values of employed GPs are partly consistent with the current WONCA definition of general practice. There were also indications of new values. The increase in the proportion of employed GPs implies a need to reflect on the core values of general practice, taking into account factors on the part of employed GPs, patients, and practice organisation.

Resilience of the primary healthcare system: perspectives of German stakeholders at primary care interfaces during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Worldwide, the primary care sector played a key role in coping with the challenges of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: The aim of this study was to explore the resilience of the German primary healthcare system during the second wave of the pandemic from the perspective of identified interface stakeholders, i.e., representatives of hospitals, district offices, and medical associations. Qualitative data from interviews and focus groups were analyzed according to a resilience framework. Results: The main findings include a gap in knowledge transfer, unstructured allocation of responsibilities, and a resulting unregulated flow of patients. Social brokers supported care coordination and knowledge transfer. The response to the capacity to cope with uncertainties was slow and chaotic at the system level and heterogeneous at the individual level. Building on previous relationships fostered functioning communication, while competition in primary care was identified as a barrier to resilience. Conclusion: Implications for further research and for strengthening the resilience of primary care can be derived based on this study.

FoPraNet-BW: An Infrastructure for Clinical Studies in Practice-Based Research Networks in the German Health System.

General practice-based research networks have become an integral tool to gain medical knowledge from primary care in many countries. For this purpose, a scalable IT-infrastructure is presented considering the limiting peculiarities in the German health system and enabling GPs to participate in clinical studies based on their patient population. The infrastructure consists of a central study management server and local clients for each practice. It adopts to the currently limited digital connectivity of GP practices, data protection regulations for clinical data and the needs of the medical staff to manage a clinical study. The infrastructure is in production at the four university hospitals in the state of Baden-Württemberg. Until now three clinical studies with over 70 GPs and 350 Participants are successfully conducted or have been finished. Further clinical studies are in the planning stages.

Sex-related differences in self-efficacy of patients with heart failure: a pooled cross-sectional study of the German Competence Network Heart Failure.

AIM: To assess the level of self-efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF), and identify differences between important subgroups including sex, and to identify the determinants of high self-efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a pooled cross-sectional analysis of 2,030 patients from four prospective studies conducted within the German Competence Network Heart Failure. We used the Self-efficacy Subscale and the Overall Summary Score (OSS) of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) to assess self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. The cut-off of 75 score points was used for the dichotomization into high (≥75) vs low (<75) self-efficacy. Depressive symptoms were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). A total of 1,615 patients with HF provided complete self-efficacy scores: mean age 66.6±12.3 years, 431 (27%) women. Mean self-efficacy was 67.5±24.9, with 907 patients (56.2%) showing high self-efficacy and 708 patients (43.8%) showing low self-efficacy. Men had higher self-efficacy scores than women (68.7±24.5 vs. 64.2±26.0; p=0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified KCCQ-OSS (OR per 5-point increase 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.12), female sex (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.56-0.94), depressive symptoms (OR per 3-point increase in PHQ-9 0.90, 95%CI 0.83-0.98), and acute HF (0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.62) as important predictors of high self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: In patients with HF, women seemed to exhibit lower self-efficacy than men. Health-related quality of life and psychological well-being were dominant determinants of self-efficacy. Future studies should investigate the role of self-efficacy as a therapeutic target for tailored and sex-specific nursing interventions.