The Incidence and Severity of Oral Mucositis among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Systematic Review.

Oral mucositis (OM) is a debilitating early adverse effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The intensity of the conditioning regimen correlates with the incidence and severity of OM, but no studies have analyzed this relationship among various conditioning regimens. We performed a systematic review on the incidence and outcomes of OM in allogeneic HSCT patients and analyzed this association. A comprehensive search of several databases (Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane CRCT, Cochrane DSR, Scopus) from 1990 to 2014 for studies of OM in allogeneic HSCT patients was conducted. Professional societies' meeting abstracts were also searched. Grade of OM was analyzed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) or National Cancer Institutes (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales. Severe mucositis was defined as either grades 2 to 4 or grades 3 and 4, depending on the studies' definition of severity. Cohorts were analyzed based on regimen intensity; ie, reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (including nonmyeloablative) and myeloablative (MA). Random effect (RE) and standard logistic models weighted by the number of patients in each cohort were used for comparisons. A total of 624 studies were generated from the search. Of the 395 patients in 8 eligible MA regimen studies, 73.2% experienced any OM, whereas in 245 patients in the 6 eligible RIC regimen studies, 86.5% experienced any OM (chi-square P < .0001; RE, P = .05). Severe (grades 2 to 4) OM occurred among 79.7% of the WHO/NCI-graded MA patients and 71.5% of RIC patients (chi-square, P = .0421; RE, P < .01). In comparing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, only 55.4% of patients receiving nonmethotrexate regimens experienced OM; this was lower (chi-square, P < .0001; RE, P = .06) than that found among patients who received methotrexate (83.4%), either standard or reduced dose. Besides NCI and WHO grading scales, other scales included in the studies were Oral Mucositis Index, the Southwest Oncology Group Criteria, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis on OM in allogeneic HSCT patients with respect to conditioning regimens, and we observed that RIC regimens led to a high incidence of OM similar to that of MA regimens. Clinical trials on treatment of OM are lacking, emphasizing the essential need for prospective studies in this arena. A significant variance in the criteria for grading OM underscores the importance of establishing a standard grading system for OM measurement in future allogeneic HSCT clinical trials.

A phase 1 trial of eltrombopag in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation after total body irradiation.

Stem cell transplantation can be associated with significant periods of thrombocytopenia, necessitating platelet transfusions and contributing to the risk of bleeding. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been shown to enhance platelet counts in other clinical settings, and so a phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose of once-daily eltrombopag in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation with conditioning regimens containing total body irradiation ≥400 cGy. Eltrombopag was examined at dosage levels of 75, 150, 225, and 300 mg given orally once daily for 27 days, starting at 24 to 48 hours post-transplantation. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over a 24-hour period after the first dose of eltrombopag, as well as during the second week of treatment (steady-state). Nineteen patients were enrolled, 15 of whom completed protocol treatments. Three patients completed each dose level up to 225 mg, and 6 completed treatment at the highest dose of 300 mg. Four patients were replaced because drug compliance was <75% of planned doses. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in this heterogeneous post-transplantation patient population. Common adverse events were related to standard stem cell transplantation. One episode of pulmonary embolus occurred 9 days after discontinuation of eltrombopag, and the only other thromboembolic episode was a grade 2 catheter-related clot. We conclude that up to 27 days of once-daily dosing of eltrombopag after stem cell transplantation is well tolerated.

Autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma with secondary CNS involvement.

Pre-existing central nervous system (CNS) involvement may influence referral for autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The outcomes of 151 adult patients with NHL with prior secondary CNS involvement (CNS(+) ) receiving an AHCT were compared to 4688 patients without prior CNS lymphoma (CNS(-) ). There were significant baseline differences between the cohorts. CNS(+) patients were more likely to be younger, have lower performance scores, higher age-adjusted international prognostic index scores, more advanced disease stage at diagnosis, more aggressive histology, more sites of extranodal disease, and a shorter interval between diagnosis and AHCT. However, no statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups by analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years. A matched pair comparison of the CNS(+) group with a subset of CNS(-) patients matched on propensity score also showed no differences in outcomes. Patients with active CNS lymphoma at the time of AHCT (n = 55) had a higher relapse rate and diminished PFS and OS compared with patients whose CNS lymphoma was in remission (n = 96) at the time of AHCT. CNS(+) patients can achieve excellent long-term outcomes with AHCT. Active CNS lymphoma at transplant confers a worse prognosis.

Allogeneic transplantation for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) have a poor prognosis with conventional therapy. Encouraging results are reported after allogeneic transplantation. We analyzed outcomes in 868 persons with t-AML (n = 545) or t-MDS (n = 323) receiving allogeneic transplants from 1990 to 2004. A myeloablative regimen was used for conditioning in 77%. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) and relapse were 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-44) and 27% (24-30) at 1 year and 48% (44-51) and 31% (28-34) at 5 years, respectively. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% (95% CI, 29-36) and 37% (34-41) at 1 year and 21% (18-24) and 22% (19-26) at 5 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, 4 risk factors had adverse impacts on DFS and OS: (1) age older than 35 years; (2) poor-risk cytogenetics; (3) t-AML not in remission or advanced t-MDS; and (4) donor other than an HLA-identical sibling or a partially or well-matched unrelated donor. Five-year survival for subjects with none, 1, 2, 3, or 4 of these risk factors was 50% (95% CI, 38-61), 26% (20-31), 21% (16-26), 10% (5-15), and 4% (0-16), respectively (P < .001). These data permit a more precise prediction of outcome and identify subjects most likely to benefit from allogeneic transplantation.

Use of eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in post-transplantation thrombocytopenia.

Persistent thrombocytopenia after stem cell transplantation can lead to increased morbidity and mortality [1,2]. The underlying causes are often multifactorial in this patient population [3,4]. In autologous transplantation, thrombocytopenia is usually a result of poor engraftment or a sign of impending disease relapse. In allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the etiology is often more complex with engraftment deficits, medication effects, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and other immunologic processes potentially contributing. Eltrombopag is an orally available nonpeptide thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist which interacts with the transmembrane domain of the receptor on bone marrow megakaryocytes and upstream progenitor/stem cells. It has been studied in patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [5] and in patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to hepatitis C infection [6]. Unlike the case with recombinant human TPO, its use has not been associated with anti-platelet antibody production [7]. We report two cases of post-transplantation thrombocytopenia, one allogeneic and one autologous, where eltrombopag was given to treat prolonged thrombocytopenia. The use of eltrombopag in these two cases was effective in elevating platelet counts to levels that eliminated the need for platelet transfusions.

A Phase I trial: dose escalation of melphalan in the "BEAM" regimen using amifostine cytoprotection.

With the eventual goal of reducing relapse and thus improving overall survival in selected lymphoma patients, a Phase I study was performed using the cytoprotectant amifostine to permit safe dose-augmentation of melphalan in the carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, cytarabine (arabinosylcytosine), and melphalan (BEAM) regimen before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Between 30 July 2003 and 25 November 2008, a total of 32 lymphoma patients were entered, of which 28 were evaluable. We found the melphalan dose in BEAM could be safely escalated to at least 260 mg/m², a substantial increase from the usual dose of 140 mg/m² in BEAM while the trial was terminated early due to poor accrual, no maximal tolerated dose or dose-limiting toxicity was found. A Phase II trial is planned.

New cancer therapies. Are haematopoietic cell transplants a dead duck?

Recent therapy advances for haematological cancers including new drugs and targeted and immune therapies raise the question whether there is a future for haematopoietic cell transplants. Although encouraging, the survival improvements achieved with these new modalities in persons who might otherwise receive a transplant are modest. Furthermore, these modalities are likely to be complementary, not competitive. For example, randomised trials in multiple myeloma, the most common transplants, indicate an ongoing role for transplant despite new anti-myeloma drugs. Targeted therapies in myeloid cancers are estimated to be effective in only about 10 percent of persons with these cancers. The potential impact of current immune therapies on transplant activity is also limited because: (1) they predominately target B-cell rather than myeloid cancers; (2) many successful immune therapy recipients subsequently receive a transplant; (3) considerable data indicate much of the efficacy of allotransplants results from allogeneic rather than cancer-specific immunity not expected to operate with current immune therapies; and (4) they are at an early development stage with unknown long-term safety and efficacy. These data suggest an ongoing role for haematopoietic cell transplants in diverse haematological and genetic disorders.

Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection followed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: high CR and VGPR rates do not translate into improved survival.

The most common preparative regimen for autologous transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma (MM) consists of melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL 200). Higher doses of melphalan 220-260 mg/m2, although relatively well tolerated, have not shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Several approaches have been pursued in the past to improve CR rates, including poly-chemotherapy preparative regimens, tandem ASCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy. Since there is a steep dose-response effect for intravenous melphalan, we evaluated an alternative single ASCT strategy using higher-dose melphalan at 280 mg/m2 (MEL 280) with amifostine as a cytoprotectant as the maximum tolerated dose determined in an earlier phase I dose escalation trial. We report the final long-term outcomes of MM patients who underwent conditioning with MEL 280 with amifostine cytoprotection followed by ASCT. Although the complete response rate was quite high in the era pre-dating the routine use of novel therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents) (49%), the progression-free survival was a disappointing 22 months. The implications of this dichotomy between the excellent depth of ASCT response and progression-free survival are discussed.

Outpatient administration of BEAM conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma is safe, feasible, and cost-effective.

High-dose BEAM chemotherapy (BCNU, etoposide, Ara-C, and melphalan) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is frequently used as consolidative therapy for patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The BEAM regimen has traditionally been administered over 6 days in the hospital, with patients remaining hospitalized until hematologic recovery and clinical stability. In an effort to reduce the length of hospitalization for these patients, our institution has transitioned from inpatient (IP) to outpatient (OP) administration of BEAM conditioning. Here, we report the results of an analysis of the feasibility, cost, complications, and outcomes for the initial group of patients who received OP BEAM compared to a prior cohort of patients who received IP BEAM. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable for the two cohorts, as were engraftment kinetics. Length of hospital stay was reduced by 6 days for the OP cohort (P < 0.001), resulting in a cost savings of more than $17,000 per patient. Fewer complications occurred in the OP cohort, including severe enteritis (P = 0.01), organ toxicities (P = 0.01), and infections (P = 0.04). Overall survival rate up to 3 years posttransplant was better for the OP cohort (P = 0.02), likely due to differences in posttransplant therapies. We conclude that OP administration of BEAM conditioning is safe and may offer significant advantages, including decreased length of hospitalization, reduced costs, decreased risks for severe toxicities and infectious complications, and likely improvement in patient satisfaction and quality of life.

The potential of amifostine in high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Amifostine treatment may allow chemotherapy dose increases beyond those permitted by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In a recent study in patients with solid tumors receiving a high-dose regimen of etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin plus autologous stem cell transplantation, amifostine pretreatment was associated with significant reductions in time to neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment, fewer days of neutropenic fever, less need for salvage antibiotic therapy. Also, there were significant reductions in grade 3 or 4 stomatitis/diarrhea, and delayed nausea/vomiting. A phase I/II study in patients with refractory/high-risk malignancies indicated that a 140% increase of high-dose melphalan (up to 280 mg/m2) can be safely used with amifostine and autologous stem cell transplantation with manageable mucosal toxicity and a reduced incidence of regimen-related toxicity. Preliminary findings in another phase II study indicate that melphalan 280 mg/m2 can also be safely used with amifostine/stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients with myeloma. Additional studies are ongoing or planned to examine the potential hematoprotective and hematostimulating effects of amifostine in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Use of the anti-idiotype breast cancer vaccine 11D10 in conjunction with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The results of cytotoxic therapy, including dose-intensive therapy requiring autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), have been disappointing in patients with metastatic breast cancer, as almost all patients eventually experience disease progression. There has been a renewed interest in immunotherapeutic strategies in this disease, including evaluation of several breast cancer vaccines. In the current study, we describe the results of a program in which the anti-idiotype breast cancer vaccine 11D10 (TriAb) was administered before and after ASCT in patients with metastatic breast cancer chemosensitive to previous conventional therapy. The toxicity of this approach was acceptable, and idiotype-specific humoral and T-cell proliferative responses were observed in the majority of patients within a few weeks post-ASCT. The actuarial 3-year overall survival rate was 48% (95% CI, 32%-64%), while the progression-free survival rate was 32% (95% CI, 19%-45%). Multivariate analysis identified achievement of a strong antibody and cellular immune response to the vaccine as the only significant prognostic factors for outcome. The ability to reliably produce robust immune responses after ASCT is encouraging. Further studies are required to determine if the immune response mediates an antitumor benefit in these patients.

Tandem transplantation in multiple myeloma.

The use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support in the past decade has changed the outlook for patients with multiple myeloma. In newly diagnosed patients, complete remission rates of 25% to 50% can be achieved, with median disease-free and overall survivals exceeding 3 and 5 years, respectively. Despite these results, autologous transplantation has not changed the ultimately fatal outcome of the disease, as there is no substantial evidence of "cure" in most published studies. An additional high-dose chemotherapy course (with tandem transplants) appears to improve progression-free survival, although the effect is not discernible until 3 to 5 years posttransplant. The recent reports of tandem autologous transplant for maximum cytoreduction followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant for eradication of minimal residual disease appears promising and deserve further investigation. A central issue of tandem transplants, whether they involve autologous or allogeneic transplants, revolves around defining the subsets of patients who will benefit from the procedure. Good-risk patients (defined by normal cytogenetics and low beta-2-microglobulin levels), especially those who achieve a complete or near-complete response after the first transplant, appear to benefit the most from a second cycle. High-risk patients (defined by chromosomal abnormalities usually involving chromosomes 11 and 13 and high beta-2--microglobulin levels) whose median survival after tandem transplant is less than 2 years should be offered novel therapeutic interventions such as tandem "auto/allo" transplants. Until the efficacy and safety of this procedure is fully established, it should be limited to high-risk patients.

A phase I study using bortezomib with weekly idarubicin for treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

We report the results of a phase I study with four dose levels of bortezomib in combination with idarubicin. Eligible patients were newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) age ≥60 years, or any adult with relapsed AML. Bortezomib was given twice weekly at 0.8, 1.0, or 1.2 mg/m(2) with once weekly idarubicin 10 mg/m(2) for four weeks. Twenty patients were treated: 13 newly diagnosed (median age 68, range 61-83) and 7 relapsed (median age 58, range 40-77). Prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was documented in 10/13 (77%) newly diagnosed and 1/7 (14%) relapsed patients; the three newly diagnosed patients without prior MDS had dyspoietic morphology. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the initial dose level (bortezomib 0.8 mg/m(2) and idarubicin 10 mg/m(2)); idarubicin was reduced to 8 mg/m(2) without observing subsequent dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose in this study was bortezomib 1.2 mg/m(2) and idarubicin 8 mg/m(2). Common adverse events included: neutropenic fever, infections, constitutional symptoms, and gastrointestinal symptoms. No subjects experienced neurotoxicity. Most patients demonstrated hematologic response as evidenced by decreased circulating blasts. Four patients (20%) achieved complete remission. There was one treatment-related death. The combination of bortezomib and idarubicin in this mostly poor-risk, older AML group was well tolerated and did not result in high mortality. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00382954.

The hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index and survival after extracorporeal photopheresis, pentostatin, and reduced dose total body irradiation conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Hematopoietic-cell-transplantation-specific-comorbidity-index (HCT-CI) has been reported as a predictor of survival in allogeneic-transplant recipients; however its validity has recently been challenged. We evaluated the association of HCT-CI with survival of transplant recipients who underwent reduced-intensity-conditioning (RIC) with photopheresis, pentostatin, and total-body-irradiation. Median age of 103 patients selected was 55 years. Most patients (58.3%) had high (≥ 3) HCT-CI. Median OS was 298 days. Age, disease-type, disease-status, HCT-CI correlated with survival on bivariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only HCT-CI was significantly associated with OS (low HCT-CI HR=0.29, CI 0.091-0.886; intermediate HCT-CI HR=0.41, CI 0.226-0.752). Our findings suggest HCT-CI as an independent predictor of survival in the setting of RIC transplants.

A phase I study of decitabine and rapamycin in relapsed/refractory AML.

A phase I study utilizing decitabine (DAC) followed by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, rapamycin, in patients with relapsed/refractory adult AML was undertaken to assess safety and feasibility. Patients received DAC 20mg/m(2) intravenously daily for 5 days followed by rapamycin from day 6 to day 25 at doses of 2 mg, 4 mg, and 6 mg/day in a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Twelve patients completed treatment for safety evaluation. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, and except for grade 3 mucositis in 4 patients, no other significant unexpected non-hematologic toxicities have occurred indicating safety of this regimen. This trial is registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT00861874.