Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
P R Health Sci J ; 34(3): 142-7, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26356738

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer is the fifth most common cancer among women in Puerto Rico (PR). Information about which obstetricians and gynecologists in PR are following current cervical cytology guidelines is not available. Our two objectives were to determine whether current guidelines for abnormal cervical cytology management were being followed adequately by OB-GYN residents and faculty at 3 university hospitals and, in addition, to evaluate the knowledge of the current guidelines that is possessed by these individuals. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review (records from January 2009 through December 2010) of patients with abnormal cervical cytology results (n=166) to evaluate the management they were given and a cross-sectional survey of OB-GYN residents (n=34) and faculty (n=46) to evaluate their knowledge of cervical cytology guidelines were both performed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six medical records were reviewed. The level of management for 45% of the patients was found to have been optimal."Thirty-three percent were lost to follow-up. Eleven percent of the patients were managed sub optimally and the management of 12% of the patients was considered to have been poor. The survey showed that the faculty were less updated with regard to current guidelines for the management of cervical cytology than were the residents. Study limitations were the lack of electronic medical records in the hospital--which makes access to patient information more difficult--and the low response rate of the faculty. CONCLUSION: OB-GYN physicians and residents were not consistent with their management, according to current guidelines, of cervical cytological abnormalities. The high-risk nature of the patients and their poor adherence to treatment (loss to follow-up) may have been the cause of this inconsistency. Meetings aimed at addressing the lack of compliance by local OB-GYN physicians with the guidelines for cervical cancer screening have been Better screening strategies are also needed if we are to improve patient compliance in our population.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios/normas , Humanos , Registros Médicos , Puerto Rico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA