RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) are associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality rates, making them a significant clinical challenge. Studying BMs can aid in improving early detection and monitoring. Systematic comparisons of anatomical distributions of BM from different primary cancers, however, remain largely unavailable. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that anatomical BM distributions differ based on primary cancer type, we analyze the spatial coordinates of BMs for five different primary cancer types along principal component (PC) axes. The dataset includes 3949 intracranial metastases, labeled by primary cancer types and with six features. We employ PC coordinates to highlight the distinctions between various cancer types. We utilized different Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (RF, SVM, TabNet DL) models to establish the relationship between primary cancer diagnosis, spatial coordinates of BMs, age, and target volume. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that PC1 aligns most with the Y axis, followed by the Z axis, and has minimal correlation with the X axis. Based on PC1 versus PC2 plots, we identified notable differences in anatomical spreading patterns between Breast and Lung cancer, as well as Breast and Renal cancer. In contrast, Renal and Lung cancer, as well as Lung and Melanoma, showed similar patterns. Our ML and DL results demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing BM distribution for different primary cancers, with the SVM algorithm achieving 97% accuracy using a polynomial kernel and TabNet achieving 96%. The RF algorithm ranked PC1 as the most important discriminating feature. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results support accurate multiclass ML classification regarding brain metastases distribution.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Aprendizaje Profundo , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Algoritmos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 505 patients (254 [50.3%] males; median [interquartile range] age, 34 [15] years) from 14 centers. The median clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was 52 (interquartile range, 61) and 47 (interquartile range, 52) months, respectively. At last follow-up, favorable outcome was achieved by 268 (53.1%) patients (5-year probability, 50% [95% CI, 45%-55%]) and obliteration by 300 (59.4%) patients (5-year probability, 56% [95% CI, 51%-61%]). Twenty-eight patients (5.6%) experienced post-SRS hemorrhage with an annual incidence rate of 1.38 per 100 patient-years. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes were evident in 28 (5.6%) patients, with most occurring in the first 3 years. Larger nidus volumes (between 2 and 4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]; P=0.005; >4 cm3, subdistribution hazard, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.7]; P<0.001) and brainstem/basal ganglia involvement (subdistribution hazard, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.45-0.81]; P<0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/radioterapia , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgery is the preferred treatment for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Good tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes were described in selected Koos IV VS after single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but outcomes in elderly patients have never been specifically studied. The aim of this study is to report clinical and radiological outcomes after single-session SRS for Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old. METHOD: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients ≥ 65 years old, treated with primary, single-session SRS for a Koos IV VS, and at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients with life-threatening or incapacitating symptoms were excluded. Tumor control rate, hearing, trigeminal, and facial nerve function were studied at last follow-up. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty patients (median age of 71.0 (IQR 9.0) years old with a median tumor volume of 8.3 cc (IQR 4.4)) were included. The median prescription dose was 12.0 Gy (IQR 1.4). The local tumor control rate was 96.0% and 86.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Early tumor expansion occurred in 6.7% and was symptomatic in 40% of cases. A serviceable hearing was present in 16.1% prior to SRS and in 7.4% at a last follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 55.8). The actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rate was 69.3% and 50.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Facial nerve function preservation or improvement rates at 5 and 10 years were 98.7% and 91.0%, respectively. At last follow-up, the trigeminal nerve function was improved in 14.0%, stable in 80.7%, and worsened in 5.3% of the patients. ARE were noted in 12.7%. New hydrocephalus was seen in 8.0% of patients. CONCLUSION: SRS can be a safe alternative to surgery for selected Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old. Further follow-up is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Anciano , Niño , Neuroma Acústico/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroma Acústico/radioterapia , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radiocirugia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Glioma remains incurable and a life limiting disease with an urgent need for effective therapies. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) involves systemic delivery of non-toxic chemical agents (sonosensitizers) that accumulate in tumor cells or environment and are subsequently activated by exposure to low-frequency ultrasound to become cytotoxic agents. Herein, we discuss proposed mechanisms of action of SDT and provide recommendation for future research and clinical applications of SDT for gliomas. METHODS: Review of literature of SDT in glioma cell cultures and animal models published in Pubmed/MEDLINE before January, 2021. RESULTS: Different porphyrin and xanthene derivatives have proven to be effective sonosensitizers. Generation of reactive oxygen species and free radicals from water pyrolysis or sonosensitizers, or physical destabilization of cell membrane, have been identified as mechanisms of SDT leading to cell death. Numerous studies across glioma cell lines using various sonosensitizers and ultrasound parameters have documented tumoricidal effects of SDT. Studies in small animal glioma xenograft models have also consistently documented that SDT is associated with improved tumor control and longer survival of animals treated with SDT while avoiding damage of surrounding brain. There are no clinical trials completed to date regarding safety and efficacy of SDT in patients harboring gliomas, but some are beginning. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-clinical studies cell cultures and animal models indicate that SDT is a promising treatment approach for gliomas. Further studies should define optimal sonication parameters and sonosensitizers for gliomas. Clinical trials of SDT in patients harboring gliomas and other malignant brain tumors are currently underway.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Terapia por Ultrasonido , Animales , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Línea Celular Tumoral , Glioma/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. RESULTS: The combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression.
Asunto(s)
Meningioma , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo , Espera Vigilante , Humanos , Meningioma/patología , Meningioma/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/patología , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/radioterapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy of asymptomatic, convexity meningiomas, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of patients with asymptomatic convexity meningiomas. METHODS: Data of SRS-treated patients from 14 participating centers and patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, convexity-located meningioma were compared. Local tumor control rate and development of new neurologic deficits were evaluated in the active surveillance and in the SRS-treated cohorts. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohorts, there were 99 SRS-treated patients and 140 patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, convexity meningioma. Following propensity score matching for age, there were 98 patients in each cohort. In the matched cohorts, tumor control was achieved in 99% of SRS-treated, and in 69.4% of conservatively managed patients (p < 0.001). New neurological deficits occurred in 2.0% of patients in each of the matched cohorts (p = 1.00). Increasing age was predictive of tumor growth [(OR 1.1; 95% CI (1.04 - 1.2), (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first reports to suggest that SRS is a low risk and effective treatment strategy for asymptomatic incidentally discovered convexity meningiomas. In this study, tumor control was achieved in significantly more patients after radiosurgery compared to those managed with active surveillance. SRS may be offered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic convexity meningioma and should be recommended when meningioma growth is noted on follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Radiocirugia , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiología , Meningioma/patología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Espera VigilanteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgery is the treatment of choice for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been suggested as an alternative to resection in selected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of SRS in Koos grade IV patients ≤ 45 years old has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of Koos grade IV in young patient managed with a single-session SRS. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter analysis included SRS-treated patients, ≤ 45 years old presenting with non-life threatening or incapacitating symptoms due to a Koos Grade IV VS and with follow-up ≥ 12 months. Tumor control and neurological outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: 176 patients [median age of 36.0 (IQR 9) and median tumor volume of 9.3 cm3 (IQR 4.7)] were included. The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (IQR 0.5). Median follow-up period was 37.5 (IQR 53.5) months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 90.9% and 86.7%. Early tumor enlargement occurred in 10.9% of cases and was associated with tumor progression at the last follow-up. The probability of serviceable hearing preservation at 5- and 10-years was 56.8% and 45.2%, respectively. The probability of improvement or preservation of facial nerve function was 95.7% at 5 and 10-years. Adverse radiation effects were noted in 19.9%. New-onset hydrocephalus occurred in 4.0%. CONCLUSION: Single-session SRS is a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection in selected patients ≤ 45 years old particularly those with medical co-morbidities and those who decline resection. Longer term follow up is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/radioterapia , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Neuroma Acústico/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Audición/efectos de la radiación , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective, single-institution study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes of patients managed with repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) after prior SRS. METHODS: The authors evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of consecutive patients treated with repeat single-session SRS for a residual brain AVM from 1989 to 2021. RESULTS: In total, 170 patients underwent repeat SRS for AVM (90 [52.9%] females; median [interquartile range] age at the first SRS procedure 28 [21.5] years; median [interquartile range] age at the second SRS procedure 32 [22.5] years). After repeat SRS, the actuarial 3-, 5-, and 10-year AVM obliteration rates were 37.6%, 57.3%, and 80.9%, respectively. Higher obliteration rates were associated with margin dose ≥ 19 Gy (p = 0.001). After the second SRS procedure, hemorrhage occurred in 8.2% of patients and was lethal in 1 patient. The risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage were age < 18 years (p = 0.03) and residual AVM diameter > 20 mm (p = 0.004). Lower obliteration rates were noted in patients with residual AVM diameter > 20 mm (p = 0.04) and those < 18 years of age (p = 0.04). Asymptomatic, symptomatic, and permanent radiation-induced changes (RICs) after the second SRS procedure occurred in 25.9%, 8.8%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and were associated with RIC after the first SRS procedure (p = 0.006). There was 1 case of a radiation-induced meningioma 12 years after SRS. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SRS is a reasonable therapeutic option, in particular for patients with residual AVM. Repeat SRS was associated with more favorable outcomes in adult patients and those with residual AVM smaller than 20 mm in maximum diameter. To increase the rate of residual AVM obliteration, a prescription dose ≥ 19 Gy should ideally be used for repeat SRS.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/radioterapia , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Masculino , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical removal has been performed as the first line treatment for symptomatic or enlarging hypoglossal schwannomas (HS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally invasive approach that may afford long-term tumor control for patients with HS particularly those who refuse or are unfit for surgery. This study evaluates outcomes after SRS performed for both newly diagnosed and residual tumors after incomplete resection. METHODS: This retrospective, multi-institutional study involved patients treated with adjuvant or primary SRS for HS. The study end-points included local tumor response, clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications. All the patients had Gamma Knife SRS. RESULTS: The cohort included 12 patients (five females), median age at SRS 49.5 years (range, 37-76)]. The median tumor target volume was 5.9 cm3 (range, 0.7-27.23). At median imaging follow-up of 37 months (range, 6-153), tumor control was achieved in 11 patients. Tumor enlargement that was managed with surgical resection was noted at the 6-month follow-up in one patient. At median clinical follow-up of 30.5 months (range, 6-157), stability, or improvement of all pre-SRS signs and symptoms was noted in nine patients. Two patients experienced worsening of at least one pre-existing symptoms or sign. New-onset trapezius weakness was noted in one patient and tongue atrophy in two patients. CONCLUSION: Single-fraction SRS appears to be a safe and effective upfront and adjuvant treatment option for HS. SRS may be recommended as an alternative to surgery for patients presenting with HS or as an adjuvant treatment following subtotal resection and at HS recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Nervios Craneales , Neurilemoma , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de los Nervios Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Nervios Craneales/radioterapia , Neoplasias de los Nervios Craneales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neurilemoma/radioterapia , Neurilemoma/cirugía , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of asymptomatic, petroclival meningiomas remains incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas. METHODS: This retrospective, international, multicenter study involved patients treated with SRS for an asymptomatic, petroclival region meningioma. Study endpoints included local tumor control rate, procedural complications, and the emergence of new neurological deficits. RESULTS: There were 72 patients (22 males, mean age 59.53 years (SD ± 11.9)) with an asymptomatic meningioma located in the petroclival region who were treated with upfront SRS. Mean margin dose and maximum dose were 13.26 (SD ± 2.72) Gy and 26.14 (SD ± 6.75) Gy respectively. Median radiological and clinical follow-up periods post-SRS were 52.5 (IQR 61.75) and 47.5 months (IQR 69.75) respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in all patients. SRS-related complications occurred in 6 (8.33%) patients, with 3 of them (4.17%) exhibiting new neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront SRS for asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas affords excellent local tumor control and does so with a relatively low risk of SRS-related complications. SRS can be considered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic petroclival region meningioma. If active surveillance is initially chosen, SRS should be recommended when growth is noted during radiological follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Radiocirugia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Meningioma/radioterapia , Meningioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status is recommended used for diagnosis and prognostication of glioblastoma patients. We studied efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with recurrent IDH-wt glioblastoma. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with SRS for IDH-wt glioblastoma were pooled for this retrospective observational international multi-institutional study from institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. RESULTS: Sixty patients (median age 61 years) underwent SRS (median dose 15 Gy and median treatment volume: 7.01 cm3) for IDH-wt glioblastoma. All patients had histories of surgery and chemotherapy with temozolomide, and 98% underwent fractionated radiation therapy. MGMT status was available for 42 patients, of which half of patients had MGMT mutant glioblastomas. During median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 6 months, 52% of patients experienced tumor progression. Median post-SRS progression free survival was 4 months. SRS prescription dose of > 14 Gy predicted longer progression free survival [HR 0.357 95% (0.164-0.777) p = 0.009]. Fifty-percent of patients died during post-SRS clinical follow-up that ranged from 1 to 33 months. SRS treatment volume of > 5 cc emerged as an independent predictor of shorter post-SRS overall survival [HR 2.802 95% CI (1.219-6.444) p = 0.02]. Adverse radiation events (ARE) suggestive of radiation necrosis were diagnosed in 6/55 (10%) patients and were managed conservatively in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SRS prescription dose of > 14 Gy is associated with longer progression free survival while tumor volume of > 5 cc is associated with shorter overall survival after SRS for IDH-wt glioblastomas. AREs are rare and are typically managed conservatively.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and cerebrovascular accident in a series of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent or residual pituitary adenoma. METHODS: All patients treated with single fraction SRS in our institution for recurrent or residual non-functioning-, growth hormone- and ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas were retrospectively identified and reviewed. A comprehensive literature review to identify studies reporting on ICA steno-occlusive disease following SRS for pituitary adenomas and compare the risks of carotid stenosis and ischemic stroke in the SRS treated group to the general population figures. RESULTS: 528 patients [312 women and 216 men; median age at SRS 46 years old (range 12-80 years)] treated with SRS at our institution met study inclusion criteria. Mean clinical and radiologic follow-ups were 68.87 (SD ± 43.29) and 55.99 months (SD ± 38.03), respectively, and there were no clinically evident cerebral ischemic events noted. Asymptomatic, post-SRS, ICA stenosis occurred in two patients. A total of eight patients with ICA steno-occlusive disease following pituitary adenoma radiosurgery have been reported. Two of them suffered from ischemic stroke with however excellent recovery. CONCLUSION: As compared to the general population, SRS for pituitary adenomas does not seem to confer appreciable increased risk for ICA steno-occlusive disease and ischemic stroke. However, post-SRS radiation vessel injuries do occur and physicians should be aware about this rare event. Prompt identification and management according to current guidelines are essential to prevent ischemic strokes.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Estenosis Carotídea , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Radiocirugia , Adenoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/etiología , Niño , Constricción Patológica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Optimal management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas is controversial. We evaluated the safety and efficiency of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients managed with GKRS for asymptomatic, skull base meningiomas from 1997 to 2019. Patient clinico-radiologic data, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were analyzed. Favorable outcome was defined as lack of procedure-related mortality or permanent neurologic morbidity and radiologic evidence of tumor control. Tumor progression and regression were defined as an increase or decrease of > 20% in volume from baseline to the last neuroimaging study respectively. Tumor volumes within ± 20% of baseline volume were considered stable. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (30 women), median age 68 years old (range 42-83 months) were managed with a single-session GKRS for 40 asymptomatic, skull base meningiomas. At a median clinical follow-up of 58.5 months (range 14-150 months), no mortality associated with the procedure or the treated tumor was noted. Permanent neurologic morbidity was 2.75%. There was a statistically significant decrease in mean tumor volume (p < 0.001) from 4.04 cc (SD 3.09 cc) prior to radiosurgery to 2.73 cc (SD 2.24 cc) at last follow-up. Higher margin dose was associated with tumor regression at last follow-up (HR = 1.351; 95%CI [1.094-1.669]; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared to natural history studies, GKRS affords long-standing tumor control and neurologic preservation in the vast majority of patients treated for asymptomatic, skull base meningiomas. Further study is necessary to identify the optimal management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Meningioma/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patología , Meningioma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging, usually requiring multidisciplinary care. We evaluated the long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for craniopharyngiomas. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients managed with GKRS for a craniopharyngioma during the period of 1989 to 2019. Patient clinical and radiologic data, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients (24 males; mean patient age at GKRS = 30.82 years [SD ± 20.45 years]) were treated with GKRS for craniopharyngioma. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 84.1% and 80.1%, respectively. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 48.1%, and, at 10 years, it was 29.8%. Risk factors for post-GKRS clinical deterioration were increasing number of isocenters used (p = 0.04 (HR1.32, CI 1-1.73)), increasing margin dose [p = 0.02 (HR1.52, CI 1.31-1.84)], and maximum dose > 35 Gy [p = 0.002 (HR1.35, CI 1.11-1.63)]. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) appears a safe and effective management option in selected craniopharyngioma patients. Increasing margin dose and maximum dose > 35 Gy are associated with an increased risk for post-SRS neurologic deficit. Further, well-designed studies are necessary to determine the optimal timing and SRS parameters and to identify which patients with craniopharyngioma will benefit the most from SRS.
Asunto(s)
Craneofaringioma , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Radiocirugia , Craneofaringioma/radioterapia , Craneofaringioma/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Resection of clinoid meningiomas can be associated with significant morbidity. Experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for clinoid meningiomas remains limited. We studied the safety and effectiveness of SRS for clinoid meningiomas. METHODS: From twelve institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients treated with SRS for radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed WHO grade I clinoid meningiomas. RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients (median age: 56 years) underwent SRS for clinoid meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.02 cm3, and 87% of tumors were immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus. The median tumor prescription dose was 12 Gy, and the median maximal dose to the anterior optic apparatus was 8.5 Gy. During a median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 51.1 months, 7% of patients experienced tumor progression. Greater margin SRS dose (HR = 0.700, p = 0.007) and pre-SRS radiotherapy (HR = 0.004, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of better tumor control. During median visual follow-up of 48 months, visual function declined in 8% of patients. Pre-SRS visual deficit (HR = 2.938, p = 0.048) and maximal radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy (HR = 11.297, p = 0.02) independently predicted greater risk of post-SRS visual decline. Four patients experienced new post-SRS cranial nerve V neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: SRS allows durable control of clinoid meningiomas and visual preservation in the majority of patients. Greater radiosurgical prescription dose is associated with better tumor control. Radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy and visual impairment before the SRS increase risk of visual deterioration.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Radiocirugia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/radioterapia , Meningioma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a safe and effective treatment option for hypothalamic hamartomas (HH), but there is no consensus opinion on its timing, dosage, and follow-up. The aim of this study was to define the safety, efficacy, outcome, and complication profile of GKRS in this patient population. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study involved 39 patients with the mean age of 16 ± 14.84 years. Early seizures resulted in an earlier age of diagnosis in 97% of patients. At baseline, no endocrine abnormalities were seen in 75% of patients while 18.9% showed precocious puberty (PP). The median target volume was 0.55 cc (0.1-10.00 cc), and a median margin dose of 16 Gy (8.1-20.0 Gy) was delivered in a single session. All patients were evaluated for clinical, endocrinological, and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5 (0.1-15) years. The median target volume of the cohort was 0.55 (0.35-1.77) cc. The largest HH was of 10 cc. 24/39 (61.5%) were small HH (Regis I-III). At presentation, 94.8% patients suffered from seizures (87.18% with gelastic seizures). 7/39 patients (17.9%) were presented with both PP and epilepsy. Only one (2.6%) patient presented with PP alone. 29 patients had more than 3-year follow-up. All received ≥16 Gy targeting complete HH. 28% of patients showed regression in HH volume. Patients with Regis grade I-III and longer follow-up (>75 months) showed gradual improvement in seizures. 16/29 patients (55.2%) achieved good seizure control (Engel I/II) while 13 (44.8%) were in Engel III/IV status. Nine patients needed adjuvant treatment because of poor seizure control. Eight patients suffered from transient increase in seizures. One patient developed poikilothermia, and 2 patients developed new onset hormonal deficiency. CONCLUSION: GKRS is a safe and effective modality for treatment of HH with significant improvement in seizure control with minimal disruption of endocrine profile. It provides an excellent safety, efficacy, and complication profile, especially for small HH. Latency of results and its adjuvant nature remain the areas of research and breakthroughs among contemporary treatment options.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are the second most common vascular anomaly affecting the CNS in children. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proposed as an alternative to microsurgery in the management of selected cases in adults, there is a paucity of studies focusing on pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to present the outcomes and associated risks of SRS in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included pediatric patients treated with single-session SRS for CCMs. The annual hemorrhage rate (AHR) was calculated before and after SRS in hemorrhagic lesions. The Engel classification was used to describe post-SRS epileptic control. Adverse radiation effects (AREs) and the occurrence of new neurological deficits were recorded. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients (median age 15.1 [IQR 5.6] years) harboring 62 CCMs. Forty-two (84%) and 22 (44%) patients had a history of hemorrhage or epilepsy prior to SRS, respectively. The AHR from diagnosis to SRS excluding the first hemorrhage was 7.19 per 100 CCM-years, dropping to 3.15 per 100 CCM-years after treatment. The cumulative risk of first hemorrhage after SRS was 7.4% (95% CI 0%-14.3%) at 5 years and 23.6% (95% CI 0%-42.2%) at 10 years. Eight hemorrhagic events involving 6 CCMs in 6 patients were recorded in the post-SRS follow-up period; 4 patients presented with transient symptoms and 4 with permanent symptoms. Of the 22 patients with pre-SRS seizures, 11 were seizure free at the last follow-up (Engel class I), 6 experienced improvement (Engel class II or III), 5 had no improvement (Engel class IVA or IVB), and 1 experienced worsening (Engel class IVC). Radiographic AREs were documented in 14.5% (9/62) of CCMs, with 4 being symptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Single-session SRS reduces the CCM hemorrhage rate in the pediatric population and provides adequate seizure control.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Radiocirugia , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central/cirugía , Convulsiones/cirugía , Epilepsia/cirugía , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/radioterapia , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/cirugía , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that biologically effective dose (BED) is an important correlate of pain relief and sensory dysfunction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The goal of this study was to determine if BED is superior to prescription dose in predicting outcomes in TN patients undergoing GKRS as a first procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 871 patients with type 1 TN from 13 GKRS centers. Patient demographics, pain characteristics, treatment parameters, and outcomes were reviewed. BED was compared with prescription dose and other dosimetric factors for their predictive value. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 60% were female. Nearly 70% of patients experienced pain in the V2 and/or V3 dermatomes, predominantly on the right side (60%). Most patients had modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grade IV or V pain (89.2%) and were taking 1 or 2 pain medications (74.1%). The median prescription dose was 80 Gy (range 62.5-95 Gy). The proximal trigeminal nerve was targeted in 77.9% of cases, and the median follow-up was 21 months (range 6-156 months). Initial pain relief (modified BNI Pain Intensity Scale grades I-IIIa) was noted in 81.8% of evaluable patients at a median of 30 days. Of 709 patients who achieved initial pain relief, 42.3% experienced at least one pain recurrence after GKRS at a median of 44 months, with 49.0% of these patients undergoing a second procedure. New-onset facial numbness occurred in 25.3% of patients after a median of 8 months. Age ≥ 63 years was associated with a higher probability of both initial pain relief and maintaining pain relief. A distal target location was associated with a higher probability of initial and long-term pain relief, but also a higher incidence of sensory dysfunction. BED ≥ 2100 Gy2.47 was predictive of pain relief at 30 days and 1 year for the distal target, whereas physical dose ≥ 85 Gy was significant for the proximal target, but the restricted range of BED values in this subgroup could be a confounding factor. A maximum brainstem point dose ≥ 29.5 Gy was associated with a higher probability of bothersome facial numbness. CONCLUSIONS: BED and physical dose were both predictive of pain relief and could be used as treatment planning goals for distal and proximal targets, respectively, while considering maximum brainstem point dose < 29.5 Gy as a potential constraint for bothersome numbness.
Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Neuralgia del Trigémino , Humanos , Neuralgia del Trigémino/radioterapia , Neuralgia del Trigémino/cirugía , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the long-term outcomes and associated risks related to repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in pediatric patients. METHODS: Under the auspices of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, this retrospective multicenter study analyzed pediatric patients who underwent repeat, single-session SRS between 1987 and 2022. The primary outcome variable was a favorable outcome, defined as nidus obliteration without hemorrhage or neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes included rates and probabilities of hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and cyst or tumor formation. RESULTS: The cohort included 83 pediatric patients. The median patient age was 11 years at initial SRS and 15 years at repeat SRS. Fifty-seven children (68.7%) were managed exclusively using SRS, and 42 (50.6%) experienced hemorrhage prior to SRS. Median AVM diameter and volume were substantially different between the first (25 mm and 4.5 cm3, respectively) and second (16.5 mm and 1.6 cm3, respectively) SRS, while prescription dose and isodose line remained similar. At the 5-year follow-up evaluation from the second SRS, nidus obliteration was achieved in 42 patients (50.6%), with favorable outcome in 37 (44.6%). The median time to nidus obliteration and hemorrhage was 35.5 and 38.5 months, respectively. The yearly cumulative probability of favorable outcome increased from 2.5% (95% CI 0.5%-7.8%) at 1 year to 44% (95% CI 32%-55%) at 5 years. The probability of achieving obliteration followed a similar pattern and reached 51% (95% CI 38%-62%) at 5 years. The 5-year risk of hemorrhage during the latency period after the second SRS reached 8% (95% CI 3.2%-16%). Radiographically, 25 children (30.1%) had RICs, but only 5 (6%) were symptomatic. Delayed cyst formation occurred in 7.2% of patients, with a median onset of 47 months. No radiation-induced neoplasia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed nidus obliteration in most pediatric patients who underwent repeat SRS for persistent AVMs. The risks of symptomatic RICs and latency period hemorrhage were quite low. These findings suggest that repeat radiosurgery should be considered when treating pediatric patients with residual AVM after prior SRS. Further study is needed to define the role of repeat SRS more fully in this population.