Alveolar epithelial cells of lung fibrosis patients are susceptible to severe virus-induced injury.

Patients with pulmonary fibrosis (PF) often experience exacerbations of their disease, characterised by a rapid, severe deterioration in lung function that is associated with high mortality. Whilst the pathobiology of such exacerbations is poorly understood, virus infection is a trigger. The present study investigated virus-induced injury responses of alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells (AECs and BECs, respectively) from patients with PF and age-matched controls (Ctrls). Air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures of AECs, comprising type I and II pneumocytes or BECs were inoculated with influenza A virus (H1N1) at 0.1 multiplicity of infection (MOI). Levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-36γ and IL-1ß were elevated in cultures of AECs from PF patients (PF-AECs, n = 8-11), being markedly higher than Ctrl-AECs (n = 5-6), 48 h post inoculation (pi) (P<0.05); despite no difference in H1N1 RNA copy numbers 24 h pi. Furthermore, the virus-induced inflammatory responses of PF-AECs were greater than BECs (from either PF patients or controls), even though viral loads in the BECs were overall 2- to 3-fold higher than AECs. Baseline levels of the senescence and DNA damage markers, nuclear p21, p16 and H2AXγ were also significantly higher in PF-AECs than Ctrl-AECs and further elevated post-infection. Senescence induction using etoposide augmented virus-induced injuries in AECs (but not viral load), whereas selected senotherapeutics (rapamycin and mitoTEMPO) were protective. The present study provides evidence that senescence increases the susceptibility of AECs from PF patients to severe virus-induced injury and suggests targeting senescence may provide an alternative option to prevent or treat the exacerbations that worsen the underlying disease.

Oscillometry in Stable Single and Double Lung Allograft Recipients Transplanted for Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of a Multi-Center Australian Study.

Peak spirometry after single lung transplantation (SLTx) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is lower than after double lung transplantation (DLTx), however the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear. We aim to assess respiratory mechanics in SLTx and DLTx for ILD using oscillometry. Spirometry and oscillometry (tremoflo® C-100) were performed in stable SLTx and DLTx recipients in a multi-center study. Resistance (R5, R5-19) and reactance (X5) were compared between LTx recipient groups, matched by age and gender. A model of respiratory impedance using ILD and DLTx data was performed. In total, 45 stable LTx recipients were recruited (SLTx n = 23, DLTx n = 22; males: 87.0% vs. 77.3%; median age 63.0 vs. 63.0 years). Spirometry was significantly lower after SLTx compared with DLTx: %-predicted mean (SD) FEV1 [70.0 (14.5) vs. 93.5 (26.0)%]; FVC [70.5 (16.8) vs. 90.7 (12.8)%], p < 0.01. R5 and R5-19 were similar between groups (p = 0.94 and p = 0.11, respectively) yet X5 was significantly worse after SLTx: median (IQR) X5 [-1.88 (-2.89 to -1.39) vs. -1.22 (-1.87 to -0.86)] cmH2O.s/L], p < 0.01. R5 and X5 measurements from the model were congruent with measurements in SLTx recipients. The similarities in resistance, yet differences in spirometry and reactance between both transplant groups suggest the important contribution of elastic properties to the pathophysiology. Oscillometry may provide further insight into the physiological changes occurring post-LTx.

Systematic Reporting of Eosinophils in Transbronchial Biopsies After Lung Transplantation Defines a Distinct Inflammatory Response.

BACKGROUND: Descriptions of eosinophils in transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) pathology reports after lung transplantation (LTx) are associated with poor long-term outcomes. The absence of routine reporting and standardization precludes accurate assessment of this histologic predictor. A systematic reporting scheme for the presence of TBBx eosinophils after LTx was implemented. This report aims to assess this scheme by describing the presence, pattern, and gradation of TBBx eosinophils and clinical associations. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of all TBBx reports was performed including all patients presenting for a surveillance or diagnostic TBBx between January 2020 and June 2023. Each TBBx was systematically reported in a blinded manner. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to measure the association between concurrent clinical and histologic features, and the presence of TBBx eosinophils. RESULTS: A total of 410 TBBx reports from 201 patients were systematically reported. In 43.8% recipients, any TBBx eosinophils were detected and in 17.1% recipients, higher-grade eosinophils (≥3 per high power field) were present. Adjusted analysis showed that retransplantation, A- and B-grade cellular rejection, positive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) bacterial microbiology, and elevated blood eosinophil count were independently associated with the presence of any TBBx eosinophils. Diagnostic "for-cause" procedures were independently associated with higher quantities of TBBx eosinophils. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reporting demonstrates that TBBx eosinophils are a distinct inflammatory response associated with rejection, infection, and peripheral eosinophilia. Although these findings require multicenter external validation, standardized reporting for TBBx eosinophils may assist in identifying recipients at risk of poor outcomes and provides a platform for mechanistic research into their role after lung transplantation.