Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 278(1): 10-16, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825500

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the full spectrum of pediatric firearm injury in the United States by describing fatal and nonfatal injury data epidemiology, vulnerable populations, and temporal trends. BACKGROUND: Firearm injury is the leading cause of death in children and adolescents in the United States. Nonfatal injury is critical to fully define the problem, yet accurate data at the national level are lacking. METHODS: A cross-sectional study combining national firearm injury data from the Centers for Disease Control (fatal) and the National Trauma Data Bank (nonfatal) between 2008 and 2019 for ages 0 to 17 years. Data were analyzed using descriptive and χ 2 comparisons and linear regression. RESULTS: Approximately 5000 children and adolescents are injured or killed by firearms each year. Nonfatal injuries are twice as common as fatal injuries. Assault accounts for the majority of injuries and deaths (67%), unintentional 15%, and self-harm 14%. Black youth suffer disproportionally higher injuries overall (crude rate: 49.43/million vs White, non-Hispanic: 15.76/million), but self-harm is highest in White youth. Children <12 years are most affected by nonfatal unintentional injuries, 12 to 14 years by suicide, and 15 to 17 years by assault. Nonfatal unintentional and assault injuries, homicides, and suicides have all increased significantly ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds critical and contemporary data regarding the full spectrum and recent trends of pediatric firearm injury in the United States and identifies vulnerable populations to inform injury prevention intervention and policy. Reliable national surveillance for nonfatal pediatric firearm injury is vital to accurately define and tackle this growing public health crisis.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Suicidio , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población
2.
Prev Med ; 121: 40-46, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742870

RESUMEN

To examine the impact of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) trajectories during midlife and older adulthood with subsequent fall risk in later life. Cross-temporal analyses were conducted in 15,792 participants (27% black, 55% women) aged 45 to 64 years enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. MVPA was collected at Exams 1 (1987-89), 3 (1993-95) and 5 (2011-13) using the ARIC/Baecke questionnaire. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify the MVPA trajectory groups. Reported falls outcomes were collected in 2013-14, 2015-16, and 2016-17. Generalized Linear Models were used to estimate associations of baseline predictors with trajectory class membership, as well as associations of trajectory classes with any falling (adjusted incident relative risks, aIRR) and with number of falls (adjusted relative rates, aRR). Four primary trajectory classes emerged, reflecting longitudinal patterns of maintained high (48%), maintained low (22%), increasing (14%) and decreasing (15%) MVPA. After adjustment for covariates, the decreasing MVPA trajectory group had a 14% higher risk of reporting any falling compared to the maintained high MVPA group [aIRR = 1.14 (1.01, 1.28)]. When compared to the maintained high MVPA group, the maintained low and decreasing group had a 28% [aRR = 1.28 (1.14, 1.44)] and 27% [aRR = 1.27 (1.17, 1.38)] higher rate in the reported number of falls, respectively. Findings support public health campaigns targeting habitual MVPA or exercise for fall prevention and suggest that interventions should be initiated in midlife; a time when individuals may be more able and willing to change behavior.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 186(2): 173-183, 2017 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459945

RESUMEN

Working long hours has been associated with adverse health outcomes. However, a definition of long work hours relative to adverse health risk has not been established. Repeated measures of work hours among approximately 2,000 participants from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (1986-2011), conducted in the United States, were retrospectively analyzed to derive statistically optimized cutpoints of long work hours that best predicted three health outcomes. Work-hours cutpoints were assessed for model fit, calibration, and discrimination separately for the outcomes of poor self-reported general health, incident cardiovascular disease, and incident cancer. For each outcome, the work-hours threshold that best predicted increased risk was 52 hours per week or more for a minimum of 10 years. Workers exposed at this level had a higher risk of poor self-reported general health (relative risk (RR) = 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06, 1.53), cardiovascular disease (RR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.24, 1.63), and cancer (RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.17) compared with those working 35-51 hours per week for the same duration. This study provides the first health risk-based definition of long work hours. Further examination of the predictive power of this cutpoint on other health outcomes and in other study populations is needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Escolaridad , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Neoplasias/etiología , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Poisson , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Autoinforme , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(1): 58-68, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27747911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The logging industry is recognized as one of the most dangerous professions in the U.S., but little is known about safety management practices on remote logging sites. METHODS: A total of six focus group sessions were held among logging supervisors and front line crew members in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas (N = 27 participants). RESULTS: Participants perceived that logging was a dangerous profession, but its risks had been mitigated in several ways, most notably through mechanization of timber harvesting. Log trucking-related incidents were widely identified as the primary source of risk for injury and death on logging work sites. Human error, in general, and being out of the machinery on the work site were highlighted as additional sources of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Participants indicated high levels of personal motivation to work in a safe manner but tended to underestimate workplace hazards and expressed widely varying levels of co-worker trust. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:58-68, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Agricultura Forestal , Salud Laboral , Seguridad , Adulto , Arkansas , Comunicación , Grupos Focales , Agricultura Forestal/instrumentación , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Louisiana , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Vehículos a Motor , Percepción , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores de Riesgo , Texas , Confianza
5.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(12): 1105-1111, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27424568

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relationship between hours worked per week and self-reported general health (SRGH) has not been assessed in Latin American immigrant and native workers across host countries. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the association between long work hours (LWH) (i.e., >51 hr per week) and poor SRGH using data from 2,626 workers in the United States (immigrants = 10.4%) and 8,306 workers in Spain (immigrants = 4.1%). RESULTS: Both countries' natives working >51 hr per week had increased odds of reporting poor SRGH compared to those working fewer hours (U.S.: OR = 1.59; 95%CI = 1.01-2.49; Spain: OR = 2.17; 95%CI = 1.71-2.75); when stratified by sex, increased odds also were observed among immigrant female workers in Spain (OR = 3.47; 95%CI = 1.15-10.5). CONCLUSIONS: LWH were associated with differential health outcomes in populations of native and Latin American immigrant workers in the United States and Spain, which may reflect social or occupational inequalities in general or resulting from the 2008 financial crisis. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:1105-1111, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etnología , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , América Latina/etnología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Factores Sexuales , España , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(10): 853-65, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27409575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Under-reporting of type II (patient/visitor-on-worker) violence by workers has been attributed to a lack of essential event details needed to inform prevention strategies. METHODS: Mixed methods including surveys and focus groups were used to examine patterns of reporting type II violent events among ∼11,000 workers at six U.S. hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 2,098 workers who experienced a type II violent event, 75% indicated they reported. Reporting patterns were disparate including reports to managers, co-workers, security, and patients' medical records-with only 9% reporting into occupational injury/safety reporting systems. Workers were unclear about when and where to report, and relied on their own "threshold" of when to report based on event circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contradict prior findings that workers significantly under-report violent events. Coordinated surveillance efforts across departments are needed to capture workers' reports, including the use of a designated violence reporting system that is supported by reporting policies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:853-865, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Pacientes , Texas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Visitas a Pacientes
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 59(2): 137-49, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26681357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the prevalence of work-related physical activities, sedentary behaviors, and emotional stressors among pregnant women is limited, and the extent to which these exposures vary by maternal characteristics remains unclear. METHODS: Data on mothers of 6,817 infants without major birth defects, with estimated delivery during 1997 through 2009 who worked during pregnancy were obtained from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Information on multiple domains of occupational exposures was gathered by linking mother's primary job to the Occupational Information Network Version 9.0. RESULTS: The most frequent estimated physical activity associated with jobs during pregnancy was standing. Of 6,337 mothers, 31.0% reported jobs associated with standing for ≥75% of their time. There was significant variability in estimated occupational exposures by maternal age, race/ethnicity, and educational level. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings augment existing literature on occupational physical activities, sedentary behaviors, emotional stressors, and occupational health disparities during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Exposición Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Actividad Motora , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Postura , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sedentaria , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(12): 1278-87, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26351265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital sitters provide continuous observation of patients at risk of harming themselves or others. Little is known about sitters' occupational safety and well-being, including experiences with patient/visitor-perpetrated violence (type II). METHODS: Data from surveys, focus groups, individual interviews at six U.S. hospitals were used to characterize the prevalence of and circumstance surrounding type II violence against sitters, as well as broader issues related to sitter use. RESULTS: Sitter respondents had a high 12-month prevalence of physical assault, physical threat, and verbal abuse compared to other workers in the hospital setting. Sitters and other staff indicated the need for clarification of sitters' roles regarding patient care and sitter well-being (e.g., calling for assistance, taking lunch/restroom breaks), training of sitters in personal safety and de-escalation, methods to communicate patient/visitor behaviors, and unit-level support. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of type II violence against hospital sitters is concerning. Policies surrounding sitters' roles and violence prevention training are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Servicios Técnicos en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas , Visitas a Pacientes , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Laboral/psicología
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(11): 1194-204, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An elevated risk of patient/visitor perpetrated violence (type II) against hospital nurses and physicians have been reported, while little is known about type II violence among other hospital workers, and circumstances surrounding these events. METHODS: Hospital workers (n = 11,000) in different geographic areas were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. RESULTS: Twelve-month prevalence of type II violence was 39%; 2,098 of 5,385 workers experienced 1,180 physical assaults, 2,260 physical threats, and 5,576 incidents of verbal abuse. Direct care providers were at significant risk, as well as some workers that do not provide direct care. Perpetrator circumstances attributed to violent events included altered mental status, behavioral issues, pain/medication withdrawal, dissatisfaction with care. Fear for safety was common among worker victims (38%). Only 19% of events were reported into official reporting systems. CONCLUSIONS: This pervasive occupational safety issue is of great concern and likely extends to patients for whom these workers care for.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso Físico/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Miedo , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Seguridad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas/epidemiología , Violencia Laboral/clasificación , Adulto Joven
11.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 95(2): 236-43, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23973443

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between the frequency of Internet use and depression among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: SCI Model Systems. PARTICIPANTS: People with SCI (N=4618) who were interviewed between 2004 and 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency of Internet use and the severity of depressive symptoms were measured simultaneously by interview. Internet use was reported as daily, weekly, monthly, or none. The depressive symptoms were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), with 2 published criteria being used to screen for depressive disorder. The diagnostic method places more weight on nonsomatic items (ie, items 1, 2, and 9), and the cut-off method that determines depression by a (PHQ-9) score ≥10 places more weight on somatic factors. The average scores of somatic and nonsomatic items represented the severity of somatic and nonsomatic symptoms, respectively. RESULTS: Our multivariate logistic regression model indicated that daily Internet users were less likely to have depressive symptoms (odds ratio=.77; 95% confidence interval, .64-.93), if the diagnostic method was used. The linear multivariate regression analysis indicated that daily and weekly Internet usage were associated with fewer nonsomatic symptoms; no significant association was observed between daily or weekly Internet usage and somatic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: People with SCI who used the Internet daily were less likely to have depressive symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(6): 627-39, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24526348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While violence can adversely affect mental health of victims, repercussions of violence against workers is not as well characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We explored relationships between workplace violent events perpetrated by patients or visitors (Type II) against hospital employees and the employee use of psychotropic medications or mental health services using a data system that linked violent events with health claims. RESULTS: Significant associations were observed between reported Type II workplace violent events and employee prescription claims for anti-depressants and anxiolytics combined (RR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.01-2.33) and anti-depressants alone (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.10-2.48). No significant association between reported violent events and health claims for treatment of depression or anxiety was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Type II violence experienced by hospital workers may lead to increased use of psychotropic drugs, particularly anti-depressants but also anxiolytics. Our results suggest an important role of employee assistance programs in mitigating the psychological consequences of workplace violent events.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/terapia , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Hospitales , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Violencia Laboral/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Respir Res ; 13: 24, 2012 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specific occupations are associated with adverse respiratory health. Inhalation exposures encountered in these jobs may place workers at risk of new-onset respiratory disease. METHODS: We analyzed data from 8,967 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, a longitudinal cohort study. Participants included in this analysis were free of chronic cough and phlegm, wheezing, asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and other chronic lung conditions at the baseline examination, when they were aged 45-64 years. Using data collected in the baseline and first follow-up examination, we evaluated associations between occupation and the three-year incidence of cough, phlegm, wheezing, and airway obstruction and changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) measured by spirometry. All associations were adjusted for age, cigarettes per day, race, smoking status, and study center. RESULTS: During the approximately three-year follow-up, the percentage of participants developing chronic cough was 3%; chronic phlegm, 3%; wheezing, 3%; and airway obstruction, defined as FEV1 < lower limit of normal (LLN) and FEV1/FVC < LLN, 2%. The average annual declines in FEV1 and FVC were 56 mL and 66 mL, respectively, among men and 40 mL and 52 mL, respectively, among women. Relative to a referent category of managerial and administrative support occupations, elevated risks of new-onset chronic cough and chronic phlegm were observed for mechanics and repairers (chronic cough: RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.21; chronic phlegm: RR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.23, 3.57) and cleaning and building service workers (chronic cough: RR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.01, 3.37; chronic phlegm: RR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.27, 4.08). Despite the elevated risk of new-onset symptoms, employment in cleaning and building services was associated with attenuated lung function decline, particularly among men, who averaged annual declines in FEV1 and FVC of 14 mL and 23 mL, respectively, less than the declines observed in the referent population. CONCLUSIONS: Employment in mechanic and repair jobs and cleaning and building service occupations are associated with increased incidence of respiratory symptoms. Specific occupations affect the respiratory health of adults without pre-existing respiratory health symptoms and conditions, though long-term health consequences of inhalation exposures in these jobs remain largely unexplored.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Ocupaciones , Asma/epidemiología , Aterosclerosis/epidemiología , Bronquitis Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Tos/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Prev Med Rep ; 28: 101859, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35711287

RESUMEN

This cross-sectional study of older adults ≥ 65 years describes daily and hourly patterns of accelerometer-derived steps, sedentary, and physical activity behaviors and examines differences by day of the week and sociodemographic and health-related factors to identify time-use patterns. Data were from 459 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants (60% female; mean ± SD age = 78.3 ± 4.6 years; 20% Black) who wore a hip accelerometer ≥ 4 of 7 days, for ≥ 10 h/day in 2016. We used linear mixed models to examine daily patterns of steps, sedentary, low light, high light, and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA). Differences by sex, median age (

15.
Lancet Public Health ; 7(3): e219-e228, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35247352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although 10 000 steps per day is widely promoted to have health benefits, there is little evidence to support this recommendation. We aimed to determine the association between number of steps per day and stepping rate with all-cause mortality. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we identified studies investigating the effect of daily step count on all-cause mortality in adults (aged ≥18 years), via a previously published systematic review and expert knowledge of the field. We asked participating study investigators to process their participant-level data following a standardised protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality collected from death certificates and country registries. We analysed the dose-response association of steps per day and stepping rate with all-cause mortality. We did Cox proportional hazards regression analyses using study-specific quartiles of steps per day and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with inverse-variance weighted random effects models. FINDINGS: We identified 15 studies, of which seven were published and eight were unpublished, with study start dates between 1999 and 2018. The total sample included 47 471 adults, among whom there were 3013 deaths (10·1 per 1000 participant-years) over a median follow-up of 7·1 years ([IQR 4·3-9·9]; total sum of follow-up across studies was 297 837 person-years). Quartile median steps per day were 3553 for quartile 1, 5801 for quartile 2, 7842 for quartile 3, and 10 901 for quartile 4. Compared with the lowest quartile, the adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 0·60 (95% CI 0·51-0·71) for quartile 2, 0·55 (0·49-0·62) for quartile 3, and 0·47 (0·39-0·57) for quartile 4. Restricted cubic splines showed progressively decreasing risk of mortality among adults aged 60 years and older with increasing number of steps per day until 6000-8000 steps per day and among adults younger than 60 years until 8000-10 000 steps per day. Adjusting for number of steps per day, comparing quartile 1 with quartile 4, the association between higher stepping rates and mortality was attenuated but remained significant for a peak of 30 min (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·56-0·83]) and a peak of 60 min (0·67 [0·50-0·90]), but not significant for time (min per day) spent walking at 40 steps per min or faster (1·12 [0·96-1·32]) and 100 steps per min or faster (0·86 [0·58-1·28]). INTERPRETATION: Taking more steps per day was associated with a progressively lower risk of all-cause mortality, up to a level that varied by age. The findings from this meta-analysis can be used to inform step guidelines for public health promotion of physical activity. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Caminata , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 54(12): 946-54, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22068725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Work focused on understanding implementation and adoption of interventions designed to prevent patient-handling injuries in the hospital setting is lacking in the injury literature and may be more insightful than more traditional evaluation measures. METHODS: Data from focus groups with health care workers were used to describe barriers and promoters of the adoption of patient lift equipment and a shift to a "minimal-manual lift environment" at two affiliated hospitals. RESULTS: Several factors influencing the adoption of the lift equipment and patient-handling policy were noted: time, knowledge/ability, staffing, patient characteristics, and organizational and cultural aspects of work. The adoption process was complex, and considerable variability by hospital and across units was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of qualitative data can enhance the understanding of factors that influence implementation and adoption of interventions designed to prevent patient-handling injuries among health care workers.


Asunto(s)
Cultura , Hospitales Comunitarios , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Cultura Organizacional , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Competencia Clínica , Diseño de Equipo , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Política Organizacional , Investigación Cualitativa , Administración de la Seguridad , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
17.
Am J Ind Med ; 54(8): 571-8, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21472746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nail gun use is ubiquitous in wood frame construction. Accessibility and decreasing costs have extended associated occupational hazards to consumers. Compelling evidence documents decreased injury risk among trained users and those with tools with sequential triggers. To prevent inadvertent discharge of nails, this safer trigger requires the nose be depressed before the trigger is pulled to fire. The sequential trigger is not required by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) nor are there any guidelines for training. METHODS: We collected data from personnel at 217 points of sale/rental of framing nail guns in four areas of the country. RESULTS: Sales personnel had little understanding of risks associated with use of framing nail guns. Individuals who had used the tool and those working in construction outlets were more likely to be knowledgeable; even so, less than half understood differences in trigger/actuation systems. CONCLUSIONS: Consumers, including contractors purchasing for workers, cannot count on receiving accurate information from sales personnel regarding risks associated with use of these tools. The attitudes and limited knowledge of some sales personnel regarding these potentially deadly tools likely contributes to a culture accepting of injury. The findings demonstrate how influences on the culture of construction are not limited to workers, employers, or the places construction gets done.


Asunto(s)
Comercio , Materiales de Construcción , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Competencia Profesional , Comunicación , Humanos , Equipos de Seguridad , Estados Unidos
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 54(12): 935-45, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22068724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventions to reduce patient-handling injuries in the hospital setting are often evaluated based on their effect on outcomes such as injury rates. Measuring intervention adoption could address how and why observed trends in the outcome occurred. METHODS: Unit-level data related to adoption of patient lift equipment were systematically collected at several points in time over 5 years on nursing units at two hospitals, including hours of lift equipment use, equipment accessibility, and supply purchases and availability. RESULTS: Various measures of adoption highlighted the adoption process' gradual nature and variability by hospital and between units. No single measure adequately assessed adoption. Certain measures appear well-correlated. CONCLUSION: Future evaluation of primary preventive efforts designed to prevent patient-handling injuries would be strengthened by objective data on intermediate measures that reflect intervention implementation and adoption.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Hospitales Comunitarios , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Salud Laboral , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/instrumentación , Política Organizacional , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Estadística como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Lugar de Trabajo
19.
J Reprod Med ; 56(1-2): 17-24, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21366122

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine, in light of vague professional guidelines, current obstetrical recommendations for pregnant women engaging in occupational activities. STUDY DESIGN: A survey mailed to obstetricians/gynecologists in Texas ascertained data about occupational activity information collected from patients in the prenatal period and recommended activities to avoid, including activities addressed in the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 961 obstetricians 427 (46.6%) responded to the survey, with 384 used for these analyses. A large proportion (96.3%) asked women about employment status, while fewer (46.2%) asked about occupational activities (e.g., lifting). Obstetricians were more likely to recommend that women avoid lifting >20 lb (68.6%) and ladder climbing (87.9%), while fewer recommended avoiding night/shift work (15.5%), standing >4 hours/day (26.0%) and bending/twisting at the waist (34.0%) (third trimester), with an increase in recommending limitations on activities as pregnancy progressed. Obstetricians reporting having patients in physically demanding jobs and those with more years of experience were more likely to recommend avoiding these activities. Respondents agreed with the AMA guidelines, except 62.2% disagreed that women should minimize bending at the waist while lifting. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need for professional organizations to develop new or to revise existing guidelines. Rigorous studies that examine adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with exposure to occupational activities are needed to inform guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Actividad Motora , Obstetricia , Ocupaciones , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Elevación/efectos adversos , Fenómenos Mecánicos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo
20.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 17(1): 17-23, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21344815

RESUMEN

We sought to describe risk factors for latex glove allergy symptoms among health care workers by combining data from an active clinical surveillance program and a comprehensive occupational health surveillance system. A total of 4,584 employers completed a latex allergy questionnaire. Six percent (n = 276) of subjects reported symptoms consistent with latex allergy. Years of latex glove use was a significant risk factor for latex allergy symptoms even after controlling for the effects of atopy, gender, age, race, fruit, and other allergies. Nurses, medical or lab technicians, physician's assistants, other clinical professionals, and housekeepers had the highest prevalence of latex glove allergy symptoms. Forty subjects (0.87%) who were confirmed as having latex sensitization. Sensitizsation may have been underestimated due to use of specific IgE antibody, less sensitive than skin-prick testing, and tiered design leading to laboratory assessment on a subset of the cohort. This surveillance program identified risk factors for latex allergy symptoms. Our findings provide a basis for tailoring future prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Empleos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/epidemiología , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales , Factores de Riesgo , Vigilancia de Guardia , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA