Cross-sectional study of pigmented lesions of the head and neck in adults aged 40 years and above.

The diagnosis of junctional and lentiginous naevi on sun-damaged skin of the head and neck in adults has been questioned in the literature, with the implication that these lesions should be classified as melanoma in situ. This could result in the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of non-malignant lesions. We conducted a cross-sectional study of the histopathological diagnosis of pigmented lesions biopsied from the head and neck of adults ≥40 years of age that were submitted to a large, Queensland-based pathology centre over seven months. Out of 543 lesions assessed, 293 (54.0%) were flat and 250 (46.0%) were raised. Flat naevi consisted of junctional/lentiginous and compound naevi, either with or without dysplasia. Collectively, flat naevi had a prevalence slightly less than that of melanoma (15.0% versus 19.0% among flat lesions, respectively, and 8.1% versus 11.2% among all lesions, respectively). The mean age of biopsy for all junctional/lentiginous naevi was significantly greater than that of all compound naevi (65.0 years versus 52.2 years; P = 0.001). Junctional/lentiginous naevi were significantly more associated with the neck than intradermal naevi (P < 0.001). In conclusion, benign, flat naevi account for a significant proportion of head and neck lesions in adults ≥40 years of age, and their location alone should not outweigh their histopathology when reaching a diagnosis.

Prospective study of pigmented lesions managed by shave excision with no deep margin transection of melanomas.

Shave excision is a simple and cost-effective technique for the removal of suitable skin lesions. We performed a prospective study over six months, collecting data from pigmented lesions that were treated with shave excision by dermatologists. Only shave excisions with the intent to remove the lesion in toto were included. A total of 349 lesions were included in this study, 50 (14%) of these were melanomas and no melanoma diagnosed had deep margin involvement, while 13 (26%) had lateral margin involvement.

Recurrence Rate of Small Melanoma In Situ on Low-Risk Sites Excised With 5-mm Excisional Margin.

Importance: The incidence of melanoma in situ (MIS) has increased significantly over the past decades, and traditional guidelines for treatment of MIS have been excision with a 5-mm clinical margin; however, current Australian and other guidelines now recommend 5- to 10-mm margins. This changed recommendation was largely driven by the outcomes of studies using Mohs micrographic surgery, and recent studies using Mohs micrographic surgery are advocating for even wider excisions up to 18 mm for clearance. Objective: To assess the rate of recurrence of MIS excised with a 5-mm margin. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series studied all MIS lesions from a single private dermatology clinic between January 1, 2011, and November 30, 2018. The criteria for inclusion were a documented 5-mm excisional margin on operation report and more than 5 years of site-specific follow-up after wide local excision. Lesions were excluded if the excisional margin was more than 5 mm or undocumented, there was less than 5 years of follow-up, or they required more than 1 wide local excision. Data analysis was performed January 30 to February 25, 2024. Intervention: Wide local excision with 5-mm margin. Results: A total of 351 MISs were identified from 292 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [11.8] years; 162 females [55.5%]). Superficial spreading melanoma was the most common subtype diagnosed (177 lesions [50.4%]), followed by lentigo maligna (107 lesions [30.5%]) and lentiginous MIS (67 lesions [19.1%]). The trunk was the most common location of lesions (168 lesions [47.9%]), followed by upper limb (96 lesions [27.4%]) and lower limb (59 lesions [16.8%]). Scalp was the least common location (2 lesions [0.6%]). Most of the lesions were small, with 274 lesions (78.1%) having a length less than 10 mm and 312 lesions (88.9%) having a width less than 10 mm. A total of 348 lesions (99.1%) did not have clinical recurrence after excision with a 5-mm clinical margin following then current guidelines. A total of 3 lesions (0.9%) experienced local recurrence with no metastatic spread. Conclusions and Relevance: This case series found that excision with a 5-mm margin for MIS of smaller size (<10 mm) on low-risk body sites had a low rate of recurrence. Conservative 5-mm excisional margin is likely to be suitable for small MIS on lower-risk body sites.

Pathologically oriented descriptive study of male genital circumcisions across medical and surgical specialties.

BACKGROUND: Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed procedure by clinicians, yet its role and indication in clinical practice lacks consensus and remains unclear. We sought to evaluate a collection of male circumcisions to determine the range of indications, histopathological diagnoses, and type of clinicians associated with circumcision. METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive cohort study of male patients who received a circumcision reported by one major dermatopathology laboratory between January 2017 and December 2018. Data were extracted from the histological report of the pathologist for each case. Patient age, type of clinician, clinical notes, and histopathological diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: "/> A total of 406 circumcisions were identified. The median age for circumcision was 36 (IQR 16-61). Boys less than 18 years of age made up 24% (98/406). Histological diagnoses included normal (43/406, 11%), nonspecific inflammation (82/406, 20%), inflammatory conditions (264/406, 65%), infections (9/406, 2.2%), benign neoplasms (5/406, 1.0%), and scar tissue (3/406, 0.7%). The most common diagnosis was balanitis xerotica obliterans (226/406, 56%). Rarely, genital infections and neoplastic lesions were identified. Circumcisions were performed by urologists (289/406, 71.2%), general practitioners (76/406, 18.7%), general surgeons (32/406, 8%), pediatric surgeons (5/406, 1%), and dermatologists (4/406, 1%). The main indications for circumcision were phimosis (110/202, 54%), suspected lichen sclerosus (28/202, 14%), and balanitis (15/202, 7%). CONCLUSION: Circumcision was performed for a broad range of genital dermatoses across various medical and surgical specialties. Few studies have described these observations. We discuss the common pathological conditions leading to circumcision and its role in diagnosis and treatment.

Genital premalignant and malignant diseases: a retrospective study of male genital skin biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Genital skin malignancies are a rare entity encountered by clinicians that may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Lack of familiarity or expertise in this area among clinicians can delay appropriate management of these conditions and may result in disease progression. METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive cohort study of male patients who received a genital skin biopsy reported by one major dermatopathology laboratory between January 2017 and December 2018 with a histological diagnosis of a premalignant or malignant condition. Patient age, type of clinician, clinical notes, genital site, type of biopsy performed, and histopathological diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1525 male genital skin biopsies available for analysis, 5% (74/1525) were premalignant or malignant diseases. These included penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) (42/74, 57%), followed by invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (11/74, 15%), Bowenoid papulosis (BP) (9/74, 12%), basal cell carcinoma (8/74, 11%), malignant melanoma (2/74, 2.7%), extramammary Paget's (1/74, 1.4%), and metastatic cutaneous deposits (1/74, 1.4%). PeIN and BP most commonly affected the penile shaft ([18/42] 43% and [4/9] 44%, respectively), invasive SCCs most commonly affected the glans penis (4/11, 36%), and all BCCs (8/8, 100%) were located on the scrotum. Invasive SCCs were most biopsied by urologists, BP was most biopsied by dermatologists, and PeINs and BCCs were most biopsied by general practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of genital malignancy types were found in males. A greater understanding of male genital premalignant and malignant conditions may help guide education and further research in this area.

Reninoma: an uncommon cause of Renin-mediated hypertension.

Reninoma (juxtaglomerular cell tumor) is a rare cause of renin-mediated hypertension. Reninomas are usually diagnosed in adolescents and young adults with occasional reports in younger children. Patients typically present with a long history of headaches leading to a diagnosis of severe hypertension that responds well to antihypertensive treatment targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The clue to clinical diagnosis is the presence of hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis on the first blood sample drawn before any treatment is instituted. Elevated blood levels of renin and aldosterone confirm the clinical suspicion of renin-mediated hypertension. Diagnostic imaging is employed to identify the source of excessive renin production. While renal ultrasound can miss reninoma, contrast CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys are diagnostic modalities of choice leading to the correct diagnosis. Renal vein renin sampling with lateralization might help to identify the site of excessive renin production. Nephron-sparing surgery is curative with maintenance of normal blood pressure after discontinuation of antihypertensive medications in the majority of patients. In this paper, we present the case of reninoma in an adolescent girl emphasizing clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and medical and surgical treatment of this rare tumor. We also discuss important points in the management of children presenting with renin-mediated hypertension.