Asunto(s)
Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Enfermedades del Bazo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus intermedius , Humanos , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/etiología , Enfermedades del Bazo/complicaciones , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicaciones , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Trombótica/diagnóstico , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Trombótica/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Humanos , Recuento de Plaquetas , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Evaluación de Síntomas , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1-22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2-20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8-24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5-22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10-22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 - 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9-4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8-24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89-22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5-24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8-22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 - 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.