Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJU Int ; 117(4): 686-96, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26471473

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immunocytochemical detection of ERG protein in exfoliated cells as a means of identifying patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples (30 mL) were collected after digital rectal examination (DRE) from 159 patients with an elevated age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or an abnormal DRE who underwent prostate biopsy. In all cases, exfoliated urinary cells from half of the urine sample underwent immunocytochemical assessment for ERG protein expression. Exfoliated cells in the remaining half underwent assessment of TMPRSS2:ERG status using either nested reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR (151 cases) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; eight cases). Corresponding tissue samples were evaluated using FISH to determine chromosomal gene fusion tissue status and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine ERG protein expression. Results were correlated with clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of urinary ERG immunocytochemistry (ICC) for PCa were 22.7 and 100%, respectively. ERG ICC results correlated with advanced tumour grade, stage and higher serum PSA. In comparison, urine TMPRSS2:ERG transcript analysis had 27% sensitivity and 98% specificity for PCa detection. On tissue IHC, ERG staining was highly specific for PCa. In all, 52% of cancers harboured foci of ERG staining; however, only 46% of cancers that were found to have ERG overexpression were positive on urine ICC. The ERG ICC results showed strong concordance with urinary RT-PCR and FISH, and tissue IHC and FISH. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that cytological gene fusion detection using ICC is feasible and identifies patients with adverse disease markers. ERG ICC was highly specific, but this technique was less sensitive than RT-PCR.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Transactivadores/metabolismo , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/orina , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Regulador Transcripcional ERG
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA