Use of subepithelial connective tissue graft as a biological barrier: a human clinical and histologic case report.

The aim of the present study was to develop a method to study the healing process after gingival grafting and to observe the histologic results after use of the modified edentulous ridge expansion technique. A 47-year-old nonsmoking woman with a noncontributory past medical history affected by edentulism associated with a horizontal alveolar ridge defect was referred to the authors for surgical correction of the deficit to improve implant support and the final esthetics of an implant-borne prosthesis. At the 4-month follow-up visit, a biopsy was performed by a punch technique in the same sites of healing abutment connection. The tissue was elevated from the attached gingival. Clinically, the grafted tissues seemed to be attached to the bone surfaces. The histologic findings revealed dense grafted tissues, providing long-term stability to the area. No ligament or bone, characteristic for periodontal regeneration, were observed. The presence of thick attached keratinized tissue around implants may constitute a protective factor against marginal inflammation or trauma.

The three-dimensional reconstruction of the jaw with "bone slat technique" in conjunction with third molar removal.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of the management of both horizontal and vertical defects of alveolar crest using the bone slat technique approach in conjunction with third molar removal prior to implant placement in the aesthetic area. METHODS: We present a 20-year-old female patient who lost a maxillary lateral incisor. The objective of treatment was to replace the lateral incisor with an implant-supported crown restoration without interfering with the integrity and topography of the adjacent gingival tissues. Because the future implant site showed horizontal and vertical bone defect the Authors decided to perform bone regeneration. The need for such bone augmentation in the younger patient often coincides with the timing for third molar removal. By combining third molar extraction with bone harvest and alveolar grafting, the patient undergoes only one surgical approach. The bone height (9.5 mm) and width (5.7 mm) were measured at the point of interest (tooth 12) both before and after implant placement in the reconstructed panoramic and parasagittal views by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan. RESULTS: The final results demonstrated an increase in length of 5 mm after bone slat technique (from 9.5 mm to 13.5 mm) and an increase in width of 1 mm (from 5.7 mm to 6.7 mm). ISQ measurements were recorded at the time of implant placement (the mean was: 68.5) and immediately after individualized screw-retained provisional crown (the mean was: 77). CONCLUSIONS: This technique is reliable and aesthetic and functional results appear to be stable and respect this requisite: simple and fast graft harvesting and low risk of morbidity especially in conjunction with third molar removal.