RESUMEN
Housing insecurity is associated with co-occurring depression and pain interfering with daily activities. Network analysis of depressive symptoms along with associated risk or protective exposures may identify potential targets for intervention in patients with co-occurring bodily pain. In a community-based sample of adults (n = 408) living in precarious housing or homelessness in Vancouver, Canada, depressive symptoms were measured by the Beck Depression Inventory; bodily pain and impact were assessed with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Network and bootstrap permutation analyses were used to compare depressive symptoms endorsed by Low versus Moderate-to-Severe (Mod + Pain) groups. Multilayer networks estimated the effects of risk and protective factors. The overall sample was comprised of 78% men, mean age 40.7 years, with 53% opioid use disorder and 14% major depressive disorder. The Mod + Pain group was characterized by multiple types of pain, more persistent pain, more severe depressive symptoms and a higher rate of suicidal ideation. Global network connectivity did not differ between the two pain groups. Suicidal ideation was a network hub only in the Mod + Pain group, with high centrality and a direct association with exposure to lifetime trauma. Antidepressant medications had limited impact on suicidal ideation. Guilt and increased feelings of failure represented symptoms from two other communities of network nodes, and completed the shortest pathway from trauma exposure through suicidal ideation, to the non-prescribed opioid exposure node. Interventions targeting these risk factors and symptoms could affect the progression of depression among precariously housed patients.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Vivienda , Ideación Suicida , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People living in precarious housing or homelessness have higher than expected rates of psychotic disorders, persistent psychotic symptoms, and premature mortality. Psychotic symptoms can be modeled as a complex dynamic system, allowing assessment of roles for risk factors in symptom development, persistence, and contribution to premature mortality. METHOD: The severity of delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, suspiciousness, and unusual thought content was rated monthly over 5 years in a community sample of precariously housed/homeless adults (n = 375) in Vancouver, Canada. Multilevel vector auto-regression analysis was used to construct temporal, contemporaneous, and between-person symptom networks. Network measures were compared between participants with (n = 219) or without (n = 156) history of psychotic disorder using bootstrap and permutation analyses. Relationships between network connectivity and risk factors including homelessness, trauma, and substance dependence were estimated by multiple linear regression. The contribution of network measures to premature mortality was estimated by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Delusions and unusual thought content were central symptoms in the multilevel network. Each psychotic symptom was positively reinforcing over time, an effect most pronounced in participants with a history of psychotic disorder. Global connectivity was similar between those with and without such a history. Greater connectivity between symptoms was associated with methamphetamine dependence and past trauma exposure. Auto-regressive connectivity was associated with premature mortality in participants under age 55. CONCLUSIONS: Past and current experiences contribute to the severity and dynamic relationships between psychotic symptoms. Interrupting the self-perpetuating severity of psychotic symptoms in a vulnerable group of people could contribute to reducing premature mortality.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vivienda , AlucinacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although clozapine is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, more than 30% of patients remain unresponsive to clozapine monotherapy and may benefit from augmentation strategies. Fluvoxamine augmentation of clozapine may be beneficial in treatment resistance because of pharmacokinetic interactions, allowing for lower clozapine dosages with higher clozapine serum levels and an increased clozapine-to-norclozapine ratio, which can modify adverse effects. An augmentation strategy using higher fluvoxamine doses may also improve persistent negative, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms through fluvoxamine's serotonergic activity. METHODS: Through chart review, we identified 4 cases of patients with treatment-resistant psychosis who underwent high-dose fluvoxamine augmentation of clozapine to target residual negative symptoms, refractory psychosis, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. FINDINGS: This augmentation strategy continued in 2 patients after discharge who showed clinical improvement without significant adverse effects. Two patients experienced adverse effects that led to the fluvoxamine discontinuation. Despite the fact that fluvoxamine augmentation led to symptom improvement in only 2 patients, all patients achieved high serum clozapine levels. Hematologic parameters were monitored in all patients, and no abnormalities were observed. No severe adverse effects of clozapine were experienced. CONCLUSIONS: Although high variability of responses and adverse effects were observed during fluvoxamine augmentation to clozapine, this strategy was successful in increasing clozapine serum levels. Through fluvoxamine's serotonergic effects, this strategy may confer benefit to residual negative, obsessive, and anxiety symptoms. Limitations of this case series include the retrospective nature, absence of controls, diversity of diagnoses, multiple interventions in each patient, and lack of masked raters.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Fluvoxamina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fluvoxamina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicóticos/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: opioid use, which includes both prescribed and non-prescribed drugs, is relatively common amongst marginalized populations. Past research has shown that among those who use non-prescribed or diverted opioids recreationally, many were first exposed to the drug as prescribed pain medication. Objective: to better understand the relationship between pain and opioid use in tenants of precarious housing. Methods: in the present study, 440 individuals from a cohort living in homeless or precariously housed conditions in a neighborhood with high rates of poverty and drug use were interviewed for their bodily pain and opioid use. We examined the relationship between bodily pain levels, assessed using the Maudsley Addiction Profile questionnaire, and prescribed, non-prescribed and combined self-reported opioid use in the prior 28 days assessed using the Timeline Followback and Doctor-Prescribed Medication Timeline Followback questionnaires. Results: Analysis of the results indicated that sex (female), age (younger) and early exposure to opioids (≤ age 18) predicted current opioid use, but there was no association between current bodily pain levels and opioid use. Conclusions: these unexpected findings indicate the complex nature of the relationship between pain and opioid use in this population.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/epidemiología , PrescripcionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The "trimorbidity" of substance use disorder and mental and physical illness is associated with living in precarious housing or homelessness. The extent to which substance use increases risk of psychosis and both contribute to mortality needs investigation in longitudinal studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A community-based sample of 437 adults (330 men, mean [SD] age 40.6 [11.2] years) living in Vancouver, Canada, completed baseline assessments between November 2008 and October 2015. Follow-up was monthly for a median 6.3 years (interquartile range 3.1-8.6). Use of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, methamphetamine, and opioids was assessed by interview and urine drug screen; severity of psychosis was also assessed. Mortality (up to November 15, 2018) was assessed from coroner's reports and hospital records. Using data from monthly visits (mean 9.8, SD 3.6) over the first year after study entry, mixed-effects logistic regression analysis examined relationships between risk factors and psychotic features. A past history of psychotic disorder was common (60.9%). Nonprescribed substance use included tobacco (89.0%), alcohol (77.5%), cocaine (73.2%), cannabis (72.8%), opioids (51.0%), and methamphetamine (46.5%). During the same year, 79.3% of participants reported psychotic features at least once. Greater risk was associated with number of days using methamphetamine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.24, p = 0.001), alcohol (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, p = 0.04), and cannabis (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14, p = 0.008), adjusted for demographic factors and history of past psychotic disorder. Greater exposure to concurrent month trauma was associated with increased odds of psychosis (adjusted model aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19-2.00, p = 0.001). There was no evidence for interactions or reverse associations between psychotic features and time-varying risk factors. During 2,481 total person years of observation, 79 participants died (18.1%). Causes of death were physical illness (40.5%), accidental overdose (35.4%), trauma (5.1%), suicide (1.3%), and unknown (17.7%). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model indicated baseline alcohol dependence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.83, 95% CI 1.09-3.07, p = 0.02), and evidence of hepatic fibrosis (aHR 1.81, 95% CI 1.08-3.03, p = 0.02) were risk factors for mortality. Among those under age 55 years, a history of a psychotic disorder was a risk factor for mortality (aHR 2.38, 95% CI 1.03-5.51, p = 0.04, adjusted for alcohol dependence at baseline, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], and hepatic fibrosis). The primary study limitation concerns generalizability: conclusions from a community-based, diagnostically heterogeneous sample may not apply to specific diagnostic groups in a clinical setting. Because one-third of participants grew up in foster care or were adopted, useful family history information was not obtainable. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found methamphetamine, alcohol, and cannabis use were associated with higher risk for psychotic features, as were a past history of psychotic disorder, and experiencing traumatic events. We found that alcohol dependence, hepatic fibrosis, and, only among participants <55 years of age, history of a psychotic disorder were associated with greater risk for mortality. Modifiable risk factors in people living in precarious housing or homelessness can be a focus for interventions.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad , Adulto , Alcoholismo/mortalidad , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metanfetamina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon to find obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in patients treated with clozapine. These symptoms are attributed to anti-serotonergic effects of clozapine. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of reported cases of clozapine-associated OCS to better understand the nature and management of these symptoms. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched with no publication year or language restrictions. Studies reporting cases of clozapine-associated OCS, either de novo or exacerbation of preexisting OCS, were included. The final search date was July 11, 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies, involving 107 cases (75 de novo, 32 exacerbated OCS), were included. Clozapine triggered moderate-severe OCS at varying doses (100-900 mg/day) and treatment durations (median 6 months, interquartile range 2-24 months). Higher severity was significantly associated with preexisting OCS, poorer insight into OCS, and active psychosis at the time of OCS. Common strategies to treat clozapine-associated OCS included adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine, or aripiprazole, often accompanied by clozapine dose reduction. The rate of response to antidepressants was 49% (29/59), where younger age, shorter duration of underlying illness, shorter cloza-pine treatment duration, better insight into OCS, and presence of taboo thoughts were significantly associated with antidepressant response. Subsequent clozapine dose reduction was effective in many non-responders, where aripiprazole was simultaneously added in 50% (8/16). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine can trigger severe OCS. Adding aripiprazole with/without clozapine dose reduction may be a good alternative to antidepressants for managing clozapine-associated OCS. Clinicians should be more vigilant about these adverse effects and administer appropriate treatments.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Aripiprazol , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/inducido químicamente , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cannabis is commonly used for its medical properties. In particular, cannabis is purported to have beneficial effects on a wide range of neuropsychiatric conditions. Studies assessing mental health in cannabis dispensary users typically evaluate symptoms using self-report check lists, which provide limited information about symptom severity, and whether subjects meet criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis. There is, therefore, a need for studies which assess mental health in dispensary users with standardized and well validated scientific instruments, such as those used in clinical drug trials. METHODS: One hundred medical cannabis users were recruited from a community dispensary. All subjects completed a structured clinical interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Subjects also completed the Perceived Stress Scale-10, PROMIS Fatigue Scale, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Brief Pain Inventory. Details about cannabis use were also recorded. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of mental illness in this cohort was high, and a large proportion of subjects endorsed psychological symptoms. The proportion of subjects who met criteria for classification of a current psychiatric disorder was low for mood disorders, but high for anxiety disorders and substance abuse/dependence. Cannabis use differed between the main psychiatric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that rates of mental illness may be high in medical cannabis dispensary users. Use of structured clinical assessments combined with standardized symptom severity questionnaires provide a feasible way to provide a more rigorous and detailed evaluation of conditions and symptoms in this population.
Asunto(s)
Uso de la Marihuana/psicología , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Paliperidone palmitate is a second generation antipsychotic, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in the form of the long-acting injectable (LAI) products INVEGA SUSTENNA® (once monthly injection) and INVEGA TRINZA® (once every 3 months injection). Paliperidone palmitate dissolves slowly after deep intramuscular injection before being hydrolyzed to paliperidone and absorbed into the systemic circulation. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the INVEGA SUSTENNA® formulation is biphasic, comprised of an initial relatively fast zero-order input, which allows rapid attainment of therapeutic concentrations without oral supplementation; and a subsequent maintained second-stage, first-order input, allowing for once monthly administration. Changes to the manufacturing processes can substantially alter the release characteristics of paliperidone palmitate LAI and consequently its PK profile. As an example, larger or smaller particle sizes of paliperidone palmitate can result in a delayed or accelerated release of paliperidone into the systemic circulation, respectively. Such changes are clinically relevant, as transient excursions above therapeutic plasma concentrations can be associated with an increased risk of adverse effects, including tachycardia, hypotension, QT prolongation, and extrapyramidal symptoms. Conversely, a delay in attaining therapeutic plasma concentrations of paliperidone on initiation of treatment, or a return to low plasma concentrations before the end of a dosing interval during repeated dosing, increases the risk of relapse. Given the integral relationship of the PK profile to the product's clinical effects, it is important to have bioequivalence standards that reflect the complexity of the paliperidone palmitate LAI PK profile if one is to consider therapeutic equivalence based on simple bioequivalence testing. Although both the EMA and U.S. FDA have product-specific guidelines to determine bioequivalence, their requirements differ substantially. In Canada, no LAI product-specific bioequivalence guidance exists for multiphasic medication delivery systems, and the recently revised Comparative Bioavailability Standards: Formulations Used for Systemic Effects guidance applies only to oral and non-injectable formulations. We recommend that new Canadian standards be developed for multiphasic and biphasic intramuscular / subcutaneous (IM/SC) products, including paliperidone palmitate LAI products, because, similar to modified-release oral dosage forms, a different PK profile in modified-release IM/SC products can result in clinically meaningful differences in safety, efficacy, and tolerability. To ensure bioequivalence for both newly initiated and switch patients, this paper proposes bioequivalence standards that could be adopted in Canada that include two studies, a multiple-dose cross-over study, and a single-dose study with partial AUC metrics.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Palmitato de Paliperidona/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Canadá , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Suspensiones/administración & dosificación , Suspensiones/farmacocinética , Suspensiones/uso terapéutico , Equivalencia TerapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are one of the most prescribed classes of medications. A number of case reports have linked these drugs to extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs), but no large epidemiologic study to date has examined this association. We sought to quantify the association of EPSs with different antidepressants by undertaking a large pharmacoepidemiologic study. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using a large health claims database in the United States from June 2006 to December 2015. Subjects with a diagnosis of primary Parkinson disease and those who received prescriptions of levodopa, ropinirole, pramipexole, domperidone, metoclopramide, entacapone, benztropine, selegiline, rasagiline, diphenhydramine, trihexyphenidyl, typical and atypical antipsychotics, and tricyclic antidepressants were excluded. Cases were followed to the first billing code for an extrapyramidal event or last date of enrollment in the cohort. For each case, 10 control subjects were matched by follow-up time, calendar time, and age through density-based sampling. Rate ratios were computed using conditional logistic regression adjusting for other covariates. RESULTS: We identified 3,838 subjects with EPSs compared with 38,380 age-matched control subjects. Rate ratios with respect to EPSs were as follows: duloxetine, 5.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.29-7.53); mirtazapine, 3.78 (95% CI, 1.71-8.32); citalopram, 3.47 (95% CI, 2.68-4.50); escitalopram, 3.23 (95% CI, 2.44-4.26); paroxetine, 3.07 (95% CI, 2.15-4.40); sertraline, 2.57 (95% CI, 2.02-3.28); venlafaxine, 2.37 (95% CI, 1.71-3.29); bupropion, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.67-3.21); and fluoxetine, 2.03 (95% CI, 1.48-2.78). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrates a harmful association between the incidence of Parkinson disease or associated EPSs and use of the antidepressants duloxetine, mirtazapine, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, bupropion, and fluoxetine.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/epidemiología , Bupropión/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Citalopram/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Mianserina/efectos adversos , Mianserina/análogos & derivados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mirtazapina , Paroxetina/efectos adversos , Farmacoepidemiología , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning regarding the potential risk of gambling disorder, but large epidemiologic studies are lacking. METHODS: We used a large health claims database from the United States and conducted a nested case-control study. Cases were defined as subjects newly diagnosed with gambling disorder or impulse control disorder. For each case, 10 controls were selected and matched to cases by age and follow-up time and calendar time. Adjusted rate ratios were computed with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: There are 355 cases of gambling disorder and 3550 controls along with 4341 cases of impulse control disorder and 43,410 corresponding controls. After adjusting for confounders, users of aripiprazole demonstrated an increased risk of pathologic gambling (rate ratio [RR], 5.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-15.38) and impulse control disorder (RR, 7.71; 95% CI, 5.81-10.34). The risk was also elevated for pramipexole or ropinirole for both gambling disorder and impulse control disorder (RR, 7.61; 95% CI, 2.75-21.07; RR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.31-4.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms an association between aripiprazole, pramipexole, or ropinirole and impulse control disorder and gambling disorder.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Benzotiazoles/efectos adversos , Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta/inducido químicamente , Agonistas de Dopamina/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Indoles/efectos adversos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastornos Disruptivos, del Control de Impulso y de la Conducta/epidemiología , Femenino , Juego de Azar/inducido químicamente , Juego de Azar/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PramipexolRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between antipsychotic-associated antagonism of alpha2-adrenergic receptors and resting heart rate in individuals with schizophrenia. METHODS: Thirty-one inpatients treated with antipsychotics were included in this exploratory analysis. Antipsychotic doses were converted to haloperidol equivalents for alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonism. Resting heart rate was measured with the patient in the seated upright posture. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding variables, the relationship between alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonism and resting heart rate demonstrated a positive linear effect (P = 0.002) as well as a nonlinear effect that accounted for an additional 14% of the variability in resting heart rate (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The observed inverted-U relationship between alpha2-adrenergic receptor antagonism and resting heart rate can possibly be attributed to an altered response of beta1-adrenergic receptors to increased norepinephrine release. Further investigations are required to confirm this exploratory finding, taking into account additional variables that include other receptors which either directly or indirectly influence heart rate. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01392885.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/farmacología , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Psicóticos/fisiopatología , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
With sufficient drug exposure, some individuals develop transient psychotic symptoms referred to as 'substance-induced psychosis' (SIP), which closely resemble the symptoms observed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The comparability in psychotic presentation between SIP and the schizophrenias suggests that similar underlying neural deficits may contribute to the emergence of psychosis across these disorders. Only a small number of studies have investigated structural alterations in SIP, and all have been limited to volumetric imaging methods, with none controlling for the effects of chronic drug exposure. To investigate white matter abnormalities associated with SIP, diffusion tensor imaging was employed in a group of individuals with cocaine-associated psychosis (CAP; n = 24) and a cocaine-dependent non-psychotic (CDN) group (n = 43). Tract-based spatial statistics was used to investigate group differences in white matter diffusion parameters. The CAP group showed significantly lower fractional anisotropy values than the CDN group (p < 0.05) in voxels within white matter tracts of fronto-temporal, fronto-thalamic and interhemispheric pathways. The greatest differences in white matter integrity were present in the corpus callosum, corona radiata, bilateral superior longitudinal fasciculi and bilateral inferior longitudinal fasciculi. Additionally, the CAP group had voxels of significantly higher radial diffusivity in a subset of the previously mentioned pathways. These results are the first description of white matter integrity abnormalities in a SIP sample and indicate that differences in these pathways may be a shared factor in the expression of different forms of psychosis.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/patología , Psicosis Inducidas por Sustancias/complicaciones , Sustancia Blanca/patología , Adulto , Mapeo Encefálico/métodos , Imagen de Difusión Tensora/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Psicosis Inducidas por Sustancias/patología , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Hotel Study was initiated in Vancouver's Downtown East Side (DTES) neighborhood to investigate multimorbidity in homeless or marginally housed people. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of existing, illness-specific treatment strategies and assessed the effectiveness of health care delivery for multimorbid illnesses. METHOD: For context, we mapped the housing locations of patients presenting for 552,062 visits to the catchment hospital emergency department (2005-2013). Aggregate data on 22,519 apprehensions of mentally ill people were provided by the Vancouver Police Department (2009-2015). The primary strategy was a longitudinal cohort study of 375 people living in the DTES (2008-2015). We analysed mortality and evaluated the clinical and health service delivery effectiveness for infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus, opioid dependence, and psychosis. RESULTS: Mapping confirmed the association between poverty and greater number of emergency visits related to substance use and mental illness. The annual change in police apprehensions did not differ between the DTES and other policing districts. During 1581 person-years of cohort observation, the standardized mortality ratio was 8.43 (95% confidence interval, 6.19 to 11.50). Physician visits were common (84.3% of participants over 6 months). Clinical treatment effectiveness was highest for HIV/AIDS, intermediate for opioid dependence, and lowest for psychosis. Health service delivery mechanisms provided examples of poor access, poor treatment adherence, and little effect on multimorbid illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical effectiveness was variable, and illness-specific service delivery appeared to have little effect on multimorbidity. New models of care may need to be implemented.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Multimorbilidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Policia/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Adulto , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/mortalidad , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/mortalidad , Hepatitis C/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapiaRESUMEN
Aripiprazole is a unique atypical antipsychotic with partial agonist activity on the dopamine-2 (D2) receptor. This unique pharmacological profile of aripiprazole was thought to lead to a lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs). However, recent case reports have alluded to an increase in the risk of EPS in aripiprazole users compared with nonusers of the drug. No epidemiologic studies to date have quantified this risk. We conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic study composed of a nested case-control study using a large health claims database (IMS Health) in the United States. In the nested case-control analysis, there were 5242 cases of EPS with 50,532 corresponding controls in the entire cohort. The odds ratio (OR) for EPS among those with any prescription of aripiprazole was 5.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.03-9.57). The OR was lower among those taking 2 to 3 prescriptions (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.07-7.85) but increased in those receiving greater than 4 prescriptions (OR, 8.64; 95% CI, 2.63-28.38). All risk periods were compared with those of subjects who had not used aripiprazole or other antipsychotics. For the secondary outcome of dyskinesia, the risk for aripiprazole was 8.50 (95% CI, 8.53-2.27-31.97) compared with that of nonusers. In conclusion, we found an increase in the risk of EPS and dyskinesias among users of aripiprazole.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/farmacocinética , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Psicóticos/metabolismo , Esquizofrenia/metabolismoRESUMEN
Paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable is a second-generation antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia. According to the product monograph, the monthly maintenance dose of paliperidone palmitate can be given in either the deltoid or gluteal muscle. Unfortunately, many clinicians may misinterpret these directions to mean that these intramuscular sites are interchangeable, and thus therapeutically equivalent. Currently, the literature on this topic is sparse, but the published pharmacokinetic studies and Food and Drug Administration submission data on paliperidone palmitate show discrepancies in the elimination half-life, peak plasma concentration, and absorption rate that are dependent on the site of injection. The degree of shifts in pharmacokinetic parameters suggests that paliperidone palmitate injections via the deltoid and gluteal muscle are not bioequivalent and therefore are not therapeutically equivalent. Thus, using the same maintenance dosing regimen at both sites or switching between sites of injection may result in unforeseen consequences in patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Nalgas , Músculo Deltoides/efectos de los fármacos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/metabolismo , Músculo Deltoides/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Palmitato de Paliperidona/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Groups of nonrefractory patients with schizophrenia, taking antipsychotics other than clozapine, show distinct trajectories of treatment response over time. Whether similar patterns of response occur with clozapine-treated patients remains uncertain. METHOD: We used a cluster analysis approach for longitudinal data (k-means longitudinal) to analyze individual patient data from 2 pivotal studies of clozapine, compared with chlorpromazine. Trajectories and symptom severity were examined in a younger, less chronic, mixed-sample (study 16, n=100) and in treatment-refractory (study 30, n=257) patients. RESULTS: Early-good and delayed-partial trajectory groups were observed, with the early-good trajectory group comprised of 73/100 (73.0%) from the mixed patient study, and 147/257 (57.2%) refractory patients. In the mixed patient sample, the distribution of clozapine and chlorpromazine treatments did not differ between the early-good and delayed-partial trajectory groups; in refractory patients proportionately more clozapine treatment was present in the early-good (87/147, 59.2%), compared with the delayed-partial (35/110, 31.8%), trajectory group. In the early-good trajectory group, improvement in mean symptom severity was 63% in mixed-study patients. Clozapine resistance appeared to be present in 10/50 (20.0%) mixed-study patients, and in 35/122 (28.9%) refractory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early-good and delayed-partial response trajectories are seen in clozapine studies. The advantage of clozapine over chlorpromazine is seen most clearly in previous refractory patients, within the early-good trajectory group. Good and partial or poor responders to clozapine may merit further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/farmacología , Clorpromazina/farmacología , Clozapina/farmacología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , HumanosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents at the time of admission and discharge from a tertiary care inpatient psychiatric facility. This retrospective analysis included all patients 18 years and younger, who were admitted and discharged from a child and adolescent tertiary care inpatient psychiatric facility between May 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Data for medications at admission were obtained using a province-wide network that links all pharmacies in British Columbia, Canada to a central set of data systems, whereas data for medications at discharge were obtained using the Department of Pharmacy's (British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) inpatient computer database. Apart from antipsychotics, overall drug use included antidepressants, mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, stimulants, and sleep medications. Referral and discharge diagnoses were also examined. During the study period, 335 patients were admitted and discharged from the tertiary care inpatient psychiatric facility. Significantly, more patients were prescribed with an antipsychotic at the time of discharge from hospital compared with that of the time when they were admitted to hospital (51.6% vs 30.7%; P < 0.0001). Antidepressants were most often coprescribed with an antipsychotic at admission and discharge (32.0% vs 42.2%, respectively) followed by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications (22.3% vs 24.9% at admission and discharge, respectively) and anticonvulsants (19.4% vs 19.1% at admission and discharge, respectively). Whether the significant increase in antipsychotic use seen from the time of admission to discharge is solely attributed to clinical worsening or other variables requires further investigation.