Targeted suppression of human IBD-associated gut microbiota commensals by phage consortia for treatment of intestinal inflammation.

Human gut commensals are increasingly suggested to impact non-communicable diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), yet their targeted suppression remains a daunting unmet challenge. In four geographically distinct IBD cohorts (n = 537), we identify a clade of Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) strains, featuring a unique antibiotics resistance and mobilome signature, to be strongly associated with disease exacerbation and severity. Transfer of clinical IBD-associated Kp strains into colitis-prone, germ-free, and colonized mice enhances intestinal inflammation. Stepwise generation of a lytic five-phage combination, targeting sensitive and resistant IBD-associated Kp clade members through distinct mechanisms, enables effective Kp suppression in colitis-prone mice, driving an attenuated inflammation and disease severity. Proof-of-concept assessment of Kp-targeting phages in an artificial human gut and in healthy volunteers demonstrates gastric acid-dependent phage resilience, safety, and viability in the lower gut. Collectively, we demonstrate the feasibility of orally administered combination phage therapy in avoiding resistance, while effectively inhibiting non-communicable disease-contributing pathobionts.

Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sulopenem is a thiopenem antibiotic being developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections. The availability of both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations will facilitate earlier hospital discharge. METHODS: Hospitalized adults with pyuria, bacteriuria, and signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) were randomized to 5 days of IV sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid or 5 days of IV ertapenem followed by oral ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin-clavulanate, depending on uropathogen susceptibility. The primary end point was overall combined clinical and microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit (day 21). RESULTS: Of 1392 treated patients, 444 and 440 treated with sulopenem and ertapenem, respectively, had a positive baseline urine culture and were eligible for the primary efficacy analyses. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing organisms were identified in 26.6% of patients and fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible pathogens in 38.6%. For the primary end point, noninferiority of sulopenem to the comparator regimen was not demonstrated, 67.8% vs 73.9% (difference, -6.1%; 95% confidence interval, -12.0 to -.1%). The difference was driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the subgroup of ertapenem-treated patients who stepped down to ciprofloxacin. No substantial difference in overall response was observed at any other time point. Both IV and oral formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated and compared favorably to the comparator. CONCLUSIONS: Sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid was not noninferior to ertapenem followed by oral step-down therapy for the treatment of cUTIs, driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in those who received ciprofloxacin. Both formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03357614.

Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There are limited treatment options for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) caused by resistant pathogens. Sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid (sulopenem) is an oral thiopenem antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant pathogens that cause uUTIs. METHODS: Patients with uUTI were randomized to 5 days of sulopenem or 3 days of ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was overall success, defined as both clinical and microbiologic response at day 12. In patients with ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible baseline pathogens, sulopenem was compared for superiority over ciprofloxacin; in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, the agents were compared for noninferiority. Using prespecified hierarchical statistical testing, the primary endpoint was tested in the combined population if either superiority or noninferiority was declared in the nonsusceptible or susceptible population, respectively. RESULTS: In the nonsusceptible population, sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin, 62.6% vs 36.0% (difference, 26.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1 to 7.4; P <.001). In the susceptible population, sulopenem was not noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 66.8% vs 78.6% (difference, -11.8%; 95% CI, -18.0 to 5.6). The difference was driven by a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) post-treatment in patients on sulopenem. In the combined analysis, sulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 65.6% vs 67.9% (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -7.9 to 3.3). Diarrhea occurred more frequently with sulopenem (12.4% vs 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Sulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uUTIs. Sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin in patients with uUTIs due to ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible pathogens. Sulopenem was not noninferior in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, driven largely by a lower rate of ASB in those who received ciprofloxacin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03354598.

Sulopenem Disk Development, Quality Control Range, and MIC to Disk Result Correlation for Enterobacterales Isolates.

Sulopenem disk masses of 2, 5, 10, and 20 µg were evaluated by susceptibility testing isolates by broth microdilution and disk diffusion. A 2-µg disk was chosen, and error-rate bounding analysis in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline M23 was conducted using a proposed sulopenem susceptible/intermediate/resistant (S/I/R) interpretive criterion of ≤0.5/1/≥2 µg/mL. Among the evaluated Enterobacterales (n = 2,856), very few interpretive errors were observed (no very major errors and only one major error). An eight-laboratory quality control (QC) study was performed using the 2-µg disk, and 99.0% (470/475) of results were within a 7-mm range of 24 to 30 mm. Results were similar by disk lot and media, and no outlier sites were observed. A sulopenem 2-µg disk QC range for Escherichia coli 29522 of 24 to 30 mm was established by the CLSI. A 2-µg sulopenem disk performs accurately and reproducibly for testing of Enterobacterales.

In vitro activity of sulopenem and comparator agents against Enterobacterales and anaerobic clinical isolates collected during the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

OBJECTIVES: Physicians must leverage several factors when making antibiotic therapy decisions, including route of administration and duration of therapy. Oral administration provides several potential advantages including increased accessibility, prevention of hospitalizations and earlier discharges. Sulopenem-a broad-spectrum, synthetic penem ß-lactam agent-uniquely possesses both oral and IV formulations along with noted stability among antimicrobial-resistant subsets. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of sulopenem and comparator agents against contemporary Enterobacterales and anaerobic clinical isolates predominantly from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. METHODS: A contemporary collection of 1647 Enterobacterales and 559 anaerobic isolates was assembled from medical centres in Europe and the USA. Isolates were susceptibility tested using the CLSI reference methods: broth microdilution for Enterobacterales and agar dilution for anaerobes. RESULTS: Sulopenem demonstrated potent in vitro antimicrobial activity (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.25 mg/L) against Enterobacterales isolates regardless of infection type, inhibiting 99.2% of isolates at ≤1 mg/L. This activity was conserved against resistant phenotypes including ESBL-phenotype Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L) and ESBL-phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 0.06/1 mg/L). Sulopenem maintained activity against ciprofloxacin-, nitrofurantoin- and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-non-susceptible subsets (MIC50/90, 0.03-0.06/0.12-0.5 mg/L). Against anaerobic isolates, sulopenem (98.9% inhibited at ≤4 mg/L) and meropenem [98.4% susceptible (CLSI)] were the most active compounds tested. CONCLUSIONS: The potent in vitro activity of sulopenem against this large collection of recent Enterobacterales and anaerobic clinical isolates from multiple infection types supports its further clinical evaluation in the treatment of intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections.

Epithelial Lining Fluid and Plasma Concentrations of Dalbavancin in Healthy Adults after a Single 1,500-Milligram Infusion.

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with a prolonged half-life. A phase 1 study assessed dalbavancin levels in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in 35 healthy adults using ELF bronchial microsampling up to 168 h after administration of 1,500 mg dalbavancin. The penetration of dalbavancin into ELF was 36%. ELF levels of dalbavancin exceeded the MIC90s of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus for ≥7 days.

In Vitro Activity of Sulopenem, an Oral Penem, against Urinary Isolates of Escherichia coli.

The in vitro activity of sulopenem was assessed against a collection from 2014 to 2016 of 539 urinary isolates of Escherichia coli from Canadian patients by using CLSI-defined broth microdilution methodology. A concentration of sulopenem 0.03 µg/ml inhibited both 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of isolates tested; sulopenem MICs ranged from 0.015 to 0.25 µg/ml. The in vitro activity of sulopenem was unaffected by nonsusceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and/or ciprofloxacin, multidrug-resistant phenotypes, extended-spectrum ß-lactamases, or AmpC ß-lactamases.

Once-weekly dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection.

BACKGROUND: Dalbavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic agent that is active against gram-positive pathogens, has a long plasma half-life, allowing for once-weekly dosing. DISCOVER 1 and DISCOVER 2 were identically designed noninferiority trials of dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive dalbavancin intravenously on days 1 and 8 or vancomycin intravenously for at least 3 days with the option to switch to oral linezolid to complete 10 to 14 days of therapy. The primary end point, early clinical response, required the cessation of spread of infection-related erythema and the absence of fever at 48 to 72 hours. Secondary end points at the end of therapy included clinical status and investigator's assessment of outcome. RESULTS: Analysis of the primary end point showed noninferiority of dalbavancin in both DISCOVER 1 and DISCOVER 2. In the pooled analysis, 525 of 659 patients (79.7%) in the dalbavancin group and 521 of 653 (79.8%) in the vancomycin-linezolid group had an early clinical response indicating treatment success (weighted difference, -0.1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval, -4.5 to 4.2). The outcomes were similar in the analyses by study and the pooled analyses of clinical status at the end of therapy and the investigator's assessment of outcome. For patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, clinical success was seen in 90.6% of the patients treated with dalbavancin and 93.8% of those treated with vancomycin-linezolid. Adverse events and study days with an adverse event were less frequent in the dalbavancin group than in the vancomycin-linezolid group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in either group were nausea, diarrhea, and pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly intravenous dalbavancin was not inferior to twice-daily intravenous vancomycin followed by oral linezolid for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. (Funded by Durata Therapeutics; DISCOVER 1 and DISCOVER 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01339091 and NCT01431339.).

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Dose Versus Weekly Dalbavancin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection.

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and therapy can be a burden to the healthcare system. New antibiotics that simplify treatment and avoid hospitalization are needed. This study compared the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous infusion of 1500 mg of dalbavancin to the 2-dose regimen. METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind trial in patients aged >18 years with ABSSSIs. Patients were randomized to dalbavancin 1500 mg either as a single intravenous (IV) infusion or 1000 mg IV on day 1 followed 1 week later by 500 mg IV. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in the area of erythema at 48-72 hours in the intent-to-treat population. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in the outcomes was greater than -10%. Clinical outcome was also assessed at days 14 and 28. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar on each regimen, although there were more patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at baseline on the 2-dose regimen (36/210 [17.1%] vs 61/220 [27.7%]). Dalbavancin delivered as a single dose was noninferior to a 2-dose regimen (81.4% vs 84.2%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -8.5% to 2.8%]). Clinical outcomes were also similar at day 14 (84.0% vs 84.8%), day 28 (84.5% vs 85.1%), and day 14 in clinically evaluable patients with MRSA in a baseline culture (92.9% vs 95.3%) in the single- and 2-dose regimens, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.1% of the single-dose patients and 19.9% on the 2-dose regimen. CONCLUSIONS: A single 1500-mg infusion of dalbavancin is noninferior to a 2-dose regimen, has a similar safety profile, and removes logistical constraints related to delivery of the second dose. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02127970.

Efficacy of dalbavancin in the treatment of MRSA rat sternal osteomyelitis with mediastinitis.

OBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin, a semi-synthetic lipoglycopeptide, is characterized by a long plasma half-life, which allows weekly dosing. Dalbavancin may be a good treatment option for patients with deep sternal wound infections owing to its improved pharmacokinetic profile and antibacterial activity compared with currently used antibiotics. Here we evaluated the efficacy of 7 or 14 days of treatment with dalbavancin, compared with vancomycin and with saline, in reducing sternal bone MRSA counts in a rat Staphylococcus aureus deep sternal wound infection model. METHODS: A mid-sternal wound was surgically induced in anaesthetized rats. A clinical strain of MRSA was injected into the sternum to establish infection. Rats were treated intraperitoneally for 7 or 14 days with dalbavancin, vancomycin or saline. The number of cfu per gram of sternum or spleen tissue was determined using viable counts. The antibacterial efficacy was determined by the reduction in bacterial counts per gram of sternum or spleen tissue in each treatment group. RESULTS: Treatment with dalbavancin was superior to treatment with saline for 7 days (0.75 log reduction in bone cfu) or 14 days (>3 log reduction in bone cfu) and similar to treatment with vancomycin. Additionally, dalbavancin was also effective in reducing systemic dissemination of MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin is effective in the treatment of MRSA rat sternal osteomyelitis.

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a Global Surveillance Program.

In over a decade (2002 to 2012) of Staphylococcus aureus surveillance testing on 62,195 isolates, dalbavancin was demonstrated to be active against isolates that were either susceptible or nonsusceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, or tigecycline. Nearly all (99.8%) multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were inhibited by dalbavancin at ≤0.12 µg/ml (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 µg/ml), the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) breakpoint. Overall, only 0.35% of the monitored S. aureus isolates had a dalbavancin MIC of either 0.25 or 0.5 µg/ml (i.e., were nonsusceptible).

Extended-duration dosing and distribution of dalbavancin into bone and articular tissue.

Dalbavancin is an intravenous lipoglycopeptide with activity against Gram-positive pathogens and an MIC90 for Staphylococcus aureus of 0.06 µg/ml. With a terminal half-life of >14 days, dosing regimens with infrequent parenteral administration become available to treat infectious diseases such as osteomyelitis and endocarditis that otherwise require daily dosing for many weeks. In order to support a rationale for these novel regimens, the pharmacokinetics over an extended dosing interval and the distribution of dalbavancin into bone and articular tissue were studied in two phase I trials and pharmacokinetic modeling was performed. Intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of dalbavancin on day 1 followed by 500 mg weekly for seven additional weeks was well tolerated and did not demonstrate evidence of drug accumulation. In a separate study, dalbavancin concentrations in cortical bone 12 h after infusion of a single 1,000-mg intravenous infusion were 6.3 µg/g and 2 weeks later were 4.1 µg/g. A two-dose, once-weekly regimen that would provide tissue exposure over the dalbavancin MIC for Staphylococcus aureus for 8 weeks, maximizing the initial exposure to treatment while minimizing the frequency of intravenous therapy, is proposed.

Use of vancomycin as a surrogate for dalbavancin in vitro susceptibility testing: results from the DISCOVER studies.

BACKGROUND: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopepetide antibiotic with activity against gram positive pathogens recently approved for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Pending the introduction of antimicrobial susceptibility tests, we examined the utility of vancomycin inhibitory concentrations to predict dalbavancin susceptibility in a panel of isolates obtained from phase 3 registration studies. FINDINGS: 99.6% of Staphylococcus aureus and 99.0% of beta-hemolytic streptococci which are susceptible to vancomycin will have an MIC at or below the US FDA susceptibility breakpoint for dalbavancin. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin should be considered as a surrogate for in vitro dalbavancin susceptibility testing.

A comparison of microbiology and demographics among patients with healthcare-associated, hospital-acquired, and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a retrospective analysis of 1184 patients from a large, international study.

BACKGROUND: Acceptance of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) as an entity and the associated risk of infection by potentially multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter have been debated. We therefore compared patients with HCAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) enrolled in a trial comparing linezolid with vancomycin for treatment of pneumonia. METHODS: The analysis included all patients who received study drug. HCAP was defined as pneumonia occurring < 48 hours into hospitalization and acquired in a long-term care, subacute, or intermediate health care facility; following recent hospitalization; or after chronic dialysis. RESULTS: Data from 1184 patients (HCAP = 199, HAP = 379, VAP = 606) were analyzed. Compared with HAP and VAP patients, those with HCAP were older, had slightly higher severity scores, and were more likely to have comorbidities. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common gram-negative organism isolated in all pneumonia classes [HCAP, 22/199 (11.1%); HAP, 28/379 (7.4%); VAP, 57/606 (9.4%); p = 0.311]. Acinetobacter spp. were also found with similar frequencies across pneumonia groups. To address potential enrollment bias toward patients with MRSA pneumonia, we grouped patients by presence or absence of MRSA and found little difference in frequencies of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of pneumonia patients, the frequencies of MDR gram-negative pathogens were similar among patients with HCAP, HAP, or VAP. Our data support inclusion of HCAP within nosocomial pneumonia guidelines and the recommendation that empiric antibiotic regimens for HCAP should be similar to those for HAP and VAP.

Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy on Outcomes of Outpatient Urinary Tract Infection Due to Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales.

Resistance to oral antibiotics commonly used to treat outpatient urinary tract infections (UTIs) is increasing, but the implications of empirical treatment of resistant pathogens are not well described. Using an electronic records database, we reviewed the outcomes of patients >18 years of age who developed an outpatient UTI and had an outpatient urine culture result showing a member of the order Enterobacterales along with prescription data for an oral antibiotic filled on the day before, day of, or day after the culture was collected. Linear probability models were used to estimate partial effects of select clinical and demographic variables on the composite outcome. In all, 4,792 patients had 5,587 oral antibiotic prescriptions. Of 5,395 evaluable episodes, 22% of patients received an antibiotic to which the pathogen was resistant in vitro, and those patients were almost twice as likely to require a second prescription (34% versus 19%) or be hospitalized (15% versus 8%) within 28 days of the initial prescription fill compared to patients who received an antibiotic to which the pathogen was susceptible. Approximately 1% of Enterobacterales isolates were resistant to all commonly available classes of oral antibiotics. A greater risk of treatment failure was seen in patients over 60 years of age, patients with diabetes mellitus, men, and those treated with an antibiotic when prior culture identified an organism resistant to that class. The increasing resistance among members of Enterobacterales responsible for outpatient UTIs is limiting the effectiveness of empirical treatment with existing antibiotics, and consequently, outpatients with UTI are more likely to require additional courses of therapy or be hospitalized. IMPORTANCE Resistance rates for bacteria that cause urinary tract infections (UTIs) have increased dramatically. Regional rates of resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics now exceed 20%, which is the threshold at which the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends therapy be guided by culture. Our goals were to describe outcomes for outpatients with UTIs caused by bacteria resistant to empirically chosen antibiotics and to create a simple stratification schema for clinicians to identify UTI patients at increased risk of treatment failure due to antibiotic mismatch. These data are relevant to clinicians, given how common uncomplicated UTIs are, and highlight the need for clinicians to understand local resistance rates and the importance of culture-guided treatment, especially in vulnerable patients. These findings also showed that 1% of bacteria were resistant to all major classes of oral antibiotics, underscoring the need for new antibiotics to treat patients with UTIs due to resistant bacteria.

Outcomes in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Treated with Dalbavancin in Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Dalbavancin is a long-acting, bactericidal, lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in adults, with potent activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Here we describe the clearance and clinical outcomes of patients with S. aureus bacteremia in five clinical trials of skin and skin structure infections or catheter-related bloodstream infections that evaluated the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin. METHODS: Patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia identified in blood cultures drawn at baseline (before study drug) with at least one follow-up blood culture are described from four phase 3 trials in skin and skin structure infections and one phase 2 catheter-related infection study. Dalbavancin was administered as a single-dose (1500 mg intravenous [IV]) or a two-dose regimen (1000 mg IV on day 1, 500 mg IV on day 8). Comparators included vancomycin IV or linezolid IV/oral for 10-14 days. RESULTS: All 39 patients (100%) who received dalbavancin, including 8 patients on the single-dose regimen, had clearance of bacteremia versus 19/20 patients (95%) treated with comparators (vancomycin or linezolid). At end of treatment, 33/36 dalbavancin-treated patients (92%) achieved clinical success versus 18/23 patients (78%) treated with comparators. CONCLUSIONS: All 39 patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia treated with dalbavancin (single- or two-dose regimen) and with follow-up blood cultures had clearance of their bloodstream infection. Clinical response rates were similar to daily comparator therapy for 10-14 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DISCOVER 1, NCT01339091; DISCOVER 2, NCT01431339; DUR001-303, NCT02127970; VER001-9; VER001-4, NCT00057369.

Safety of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI): Nephrotoxicity Rates Compared with Vancomycin: A Post Hoc Analysis of Three Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved as a single- and two-dose regimen for adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) caused by susceptible gram-positive organisms. We present nephrotoxicity rates for patients with ABSSSI who received dalbavancin in three pivotal clinical trials and compare the rates with vancomycin. METHODS: In a phase 3b clinical trial (DUR001-303), patients were randomized to dalbavancin single-dose (1500 mg intravenous [IV]) or two-dose regimen (1000 mg IV on day 1, 500 mg IV on day 8). In two phase 3 clinical trials (DISCOVER 1 and DISCOVER 2), patients were randomized to dalbavancin (two-dose regimen) or vancomycin 1 g (or 15 mg/kg) IV every 12 h for at least 3 days with an option to switch to orally administered linezolid 600 mg every 12 h for 10-14 days. Patients on dalbavancin with a creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min not on regular dialysis received a reduced dose of 1000 mg (single-dose arm) or 750 mg IV on day 1, 375 mg IV on day 8 (two-dose arm). Nephrotoxicity was defined as a 50% increase from baseline serum creatinine (SCr) or an absolute increase in SCr of 0.5 mg/dL at any time point. P values were obtained using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: In dalbavancin-treated patients, rates of nephrotoxicity were low. The safety population with available creatinine values included 1325/1347 patients on any regimen of dalbavancin, and 54/651 patients who received vancomycin intravenously for at least 10 days and were not switched to orally administered linezolid. Patients on any regimen of dalbavancin had a lower rate of nephrotoxicity compared with patients receiving vancomycin intravenously for at least 10 days (3.7% vs 9.3%, respectively; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrotoxicity rates were lower in patients on dalbavancin relative to vancomycin for at least 10 days. On the basis of this experience, dalbavancin may be less nephrotoxic than intravenously administered vancomycin.

Necrotizing Fasciitis Within 72 hours After Presentation with Skin and Skin Structure Infection.

INTRODUCTION: A small percentage of patients with skin infections later develop necrotizing fasciitis (NF). Diagnostic testing is needed to identify patients with skin infections at low risk of NF who could be discharged from the emergency department (ED) after antibiotic initiation. Elevated lactate has been associated with NF; existing estimates of the frequency of NF are based on retrospective reviews, and cases often lack testing for lactate. We present the incidence of patients with skin infections who developed NF and their baseline lactates. METHODS: In four phase-3 trials, 2883 adults with complicated or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections were randomized to dalbavancin or comparator, with early and late follow-up visits through Day 28. We prospectively collected baseline plasma lactates in one trial to assess an association with NF. RESULTS: NF was diagnosed in 3/2883 patients (0.1%); all three survived. In the study with prospectively collected baseline lactates (n = 622), 15/622 (2.4%) had a lactate ≥4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), including 3/622 (0.5%) with a lactate ≥7 mmol/L. NF was not seen in patients with a lactate <4 mmol/L; NF was seen in 1/15 (6.7%) with a lactate ≥4 mmol/L, including 1/3 (33.3%) with lactate ≥7 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: NF incidence within 72 hours of antibiotic initiation in patients with complicated or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections was extremely low (0.1%) and occurred in 6.7% with a lactate ≥4 mmol/L. Lactate <4 mmol/L can be used to identify patients at low risk of NF who could be safely discharged from the ED after antibiotic initiation.