Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fed Pract ; 37(12): 570-574, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33424216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radium-223 (Ra-223) radioisotope has been reported to increase median survival in bone metastatic prostate carcinoma. The addition of Ra-223 to abiraterone was associated with an increased risk of bone fractures. There has been no comprehensive data for using Ra-223 in veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange (AO+). METHODS: We present a retrospective study of veterans with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who received standard doses of Ra-223 and other sequential therapies at US Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System in Pennsylvania from January 2014 to January 2019. Veterans were divided into 2 groups: those who were exposed to Agent Orange (AO+) and those who had no exposure (AO-). Time to study was calculated from the initiation of Ra-223. Time to skeletal-related events (SRE), progression of prostate specific antigen (PSA), bone metastasis, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were calculated in months using unpaired t test with 2-tailed P values. Median survival was calculated by Kaplan Meier R log-rank test. RESULTS: There were 34 veterans with bone metastatic CRPC: 17 veterans (50%) were AO+ and 17 veterans (50%) were AO-. The mean age of diagnosis of AO+ veterans was 62 years and 69 years (P = .005) for AO- veterans (the mean Gleason score 8.2 and 8.0, respectively [P = .71]). The median number of Ra-223 cycles was 6 (60%). Ten veterans received Ra-223 as first line (29%) and 24 veterans received Ra-223 later (71%). There were 12 SREs with median survival of 15 months. There was no difference in mean time to SRE between AO+ (8 veterans, 10.6 months) and AO- (4 veterans, 10.3 months) (P = .93). The mean time to PSA progression for AO+ was 5.4 months and AO- was 6.8 months (P = .28). Mean time to bone progression for AO+ was 7.6 months and AO- was 10.1 months (P = .16). Mean time to ALP progression for AO+ and AO- was 6.3 months and 8.7 months, respectively (P = .05). Twenty veterans (58%) had died. Median survival for Ra-223 first was 32 months and for Ra-223 later was 15 months (P = .14; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.3). Median survival for AO+ and AO- veterans was 12 months and 18 months, respectively (P = .15; HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.77-5.0). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference between AO+ and AO- veterans in terms of time to SRE, PSA, bone and ALP progression, even though there was a trend of shorter duration in AO+ veterans. There was no median survival difference between Ra-223 first vs Ra-223 later as well as between AO+ and AO- but there is a trend of worse survival in AO+ veterans.

2.
Case Rep Hematol ; 2019: 4075960, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31001436

RESUMEN

Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare complication of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) defined by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the central nervous system (CNS). Patients present with a range of neurologic symptoms of variable severity. Diagnosis requires a low threshold of suspicion and is considered in WM patients with unexplained neurologic symptoms. It can occur in the presence of quiescent serum markers of WM. Direct CNS tissue biopsy should be pursued if feasible and remains the gold standard for diagnosis. No standard of care treatment exists, but expert guidelines suggest intravenous chemotherapy in standard dose or high-dose regimens or use of oral ibrutinib. Consideration is also made for intravenous rituximab, intrathecal therapies, and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patient factors and tolerability should drive decisions regarding treatment choice in this arena, given a lack of data for standard frontline therapy.

3.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 22(8): 712-717, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27179015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in up to 5% of patients exposed to unfractionated heparin for 5 or more days. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents for the treatment of HIT. The purpose of this study is to determine whether fondaparinux is an appropriate first-line alternative anticoagulant in patients with suspected or confirmed HIT. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted by identifying all patients who received a DTI or fondaparinux during a 5 year period, August 2009-August 2014. Patients were included if they had a HIT panel/serotonin-release assay analysis (regardless of the result) and were initiated on a DTI or fondaparinux for alternative anticoagulation. The primary outcome was new, recurrent, or progressive thromboembolic event. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events, platelet count recovery, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 1022 patients were evaluated, and 47 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twelve patients were HIT positive and 35 were HIT negative. Seven (14.9%) of the 47 patients experienced a new thrombosis, none of whom were on fondaparinux only (FONDA). There were 4 new minor bleeds, with 1 bleed as a result of being on fondaparinux. FONDA treatment resulted in a slightly shorter median duration of hospital stay compared to the DTI-only group and the DTI followed by fondaparinux group. There is a potential for cost savings with fondaparinux due to the ease of administration and availability to be given in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective review, fondaparinux appeared similarly efficacious and safe compared to DTIs for the treatment of suspected HIT.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Heparina/efectos adversos , Polisacáridos/uso terapéutico , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fondaparinux , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisacáridos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Front Oncol ; 5: 185, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26347852

RESUMEN

The adrenal gland is a common site of cancer metastasis. Surgery remains a mainstay of treatment for solitary adrenal metastasis. For patients who cannot undergo surgery, radiation is an alternative option. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an ablative treatment option allowing larger doses to be delivered over a shorter period of time. In this study, we report on our experience with the use of SBRT to treat adrenal metastases using CyberKnife technology. We retrospectively reviewed the Winthrop University radiation oncology data base to identify 14 patients for whom SBRT was administered to treat malignant adrenal disease. Of the factors examined, the biological equivalent dose (BED) of radiation delivered was found to be the most important predictor of local adrenal tumor control. We conclude that CyberKnife-based SBRT is a safe, non-invasive modality that has broadened the therapeutic options for the treatment of isolated adrenal metastases.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA