Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in Nonagenarians: A 10-Year Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Nonagenarians have been underrepresented in stroke trials that established endovascular treatment as the standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Evidence remains inconclusive regarding the efficacy of thrombectomy in this population. OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with thrombectomy in nonagenarians with stroke, and to identify predictors of mortality. We further investigated the effects of first-pass reperfusion and the addition of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on achieving better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected for consecutively treated patients at three affiliated comprehensive stroke centers from 2010 to 2021. We included patients ≥90 years-old with AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion. Bivariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and χ2 and Fisher's exact tests, respectively, for nominal and ordinal variables. RESULTS: Thirty-two nonagenarians underwent thrombectomy, of whom 25 (81%) had prestroke mRS ≤2. Thrombectomies were performed using stents (2, 6.7%), aspiration (8, 26.7%), or a combination of both (20, 66.7%). Successful recanalization was achieved in 97%. Procedural complications occurred in 2 (6.3%) and intracranial hemorrhage in 3 (9.4%). Sixteen patients (50%) were discharged home or to rehabilitation, 9 (28.2%) to nursing home or hospice, and 7 (21.9%) died during hospitalization. Only 2 (6%) patients had mRS ≤2 at discharge. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified, and neither first-pass reperfusion nor the addition of IVT correlated with improvement in clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although thrombectomy is safe for nonagenarian stroke and can achieve excellent recanalization, high mortality and poor functional status remain high given the advanced age and frailty of this population.

Compliance With Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Individual Participant Data Statement for Meta-Analyses Published for Stroke Studies.

Background and Purpose: Individual-participant data meta-analyses (IPD-MA) are powerful evidence synthesis studies which are considered the gold-standard of MA. The quality of reporting in these studies is guided by the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD) guidelines. The growing number of IPD-MA published for stroke studies calls for an assessment of the compliance of these studies with the PRISMA-IPD statement. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for MA in stroke published between January 1, 2016, and March 30, 2020, in journals with impact factor >2. Literature reviews, scoping reviews, and aggregate MA were excluded. The final articles were scored using the 31-item PRISMA-IPD checklist. Results were depicted using descriptive statistics. Compliance with each item in PRISM-IPD guideline was recorded. The study was defined as compliant to IPD analyses if it satisfied all IPD specific items. Results: From an initial set of 321 articles, 31 met the final eligibility for data extraction. Only 4 (13%) described the use of PRISMA-IPD guidelines in their methodology, while 8/31 (26%) used the old PRISMA guidelines and 19/31 (61%) followed none. Regardless of mention of using IPD specific guidelines, 42% (n=13) of studies were compliant with all 4 IPD specific domains. The poorest areas of compliance were bias assessment within (32%) and across (39%) studies, reporting protocol and registration (42%), and reporting of IPD integrity (48%). The median journal impact factor was similar between the compliant (median, 8.1 [interquartile range, 5.4­39.9]) and noncompliant (median, 6 [interquartile range, 4.5­16.2]) groups (P=0.24). Similarly, the journal, country of correspondence, number of authors, number of studies included in MA, study sample size, and funding source were statistically similar between the groups. Conclusions: For the published IPD-MA stroke studies, the compliance with PRISMA-IPD statement and compliance with 4 IPD specific items was suboptimal. The journal, author, and study-related factors were not associated with compliance. Additional scrutiny measures to ensure adherence to mandated guidelines might increase the compliance. Several avenues to improve compliance and ensure optimal adherence are discussed.

Does preoperative embolization improve outcomes of meningioma resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current evidence regarding the benefit of preoperative embolization (POE) of meningiomas is inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety profile of the procedure and to compare outcomes in embolized versus non-embolized meningiomas. PubMed was queried for studies after January 1990 reporting outcomes of POE. Pertinent variables were extracted and synthesized from eligible articles. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled 95% CI effect sizes. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Harbord's and Begg's tests. Meta-analyses were used to assess estimated blood loss and operative duration (mean difference; MD), gross-total resection (odds ratio; OR), and postsurgical complications and postsurgical mortality (risk difference; RD). Thirty-four studies encompassing 1782 preoperatively embolized meningiomas were captured. The pooled immediate complication rate following embolization was 4.3% (34 studies, n = 1782). Although heterogeneity was moderate to high (I2 = 35-86%), meta-analyses showed no statistically significant differences in estimated blood loss (8 studies, n = 1050, MD = 13.9 cc, 95% CI = -101.3 to 129.1), operative duration (11 studies, n = 1887, MD = 2.4 min, 95% CI = -35.5 to 30.8), gross-total resection (6 studies, n = 1608, OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.8-1.5), postsurgical complications (12 studies, n = 2060, RD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.07), and postsurgical mortality (12 studies, n = 2060, RD = 0.01, 95% CI = 0-0.01). Although POE is relatively safe, no clear benefit was observed in operative and postoperative outcomes. However, results must be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity and selection bias between studies. Well-controlled future investigations are needed to define the patient population most likely to benefit from the procedure.

Knobloch Syndrome, a Rare Cause of Occipital Encephalocele and Seizures: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Knobloch syndrome (KS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder associated with multiple ocular and cranial abnormalities. Occult occipital skull defect or encephalocele should raise suspicion of this disease. It is never reported in neurosurgical literature, possibly due to a lack of clinician familiarity, leading to underdiagnosis and inadequate management. Our patient also had seizures, which is a sporadic presentation of this syndrome. CASE DESCRIPTION: Here, we report a clinico-radiologic finding of a 7-year-old boy who presented with seizures, cataracts, and an occipital bone defect along with bilateral subependymal heterotopias and polymicrogyria. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the importance of consideration of this syndrome in children with a midline occipital bone defect with or without encephalocele and seizures. Early recognition of this presentation is critical for obtaining access to appropriate genetic counseling and subsequent monitoring and prevention of complications by surgical intervention.

Perceptions of Indian neurosurgeons about medicolegal issues and malpractice suits.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the rising trend of medicolegal challenges in India, there is an absolute dearth of literature from India on this issue. The authors conducted a survey, to their knowledge a first of its kind, to assess the perceptions of Indian neurosurgeons about the medicolegal challenges faced in everyday practice. METHODS: An anonymous online survey performed using Google Forms was widely circulated among neurosurgeons practicing in India via email and social media platforms. The questionnaire consisted of 38 questions covering the various aspects of medicolegal issues involved in neurosurgery practice. RESULTS: A total of 221 survey responses were received, out of which 214 responses were included in the final analysis, barring 7 responders who had no work experience in India. The respondents were categorized according to their working arrangements and work experience. Out of all of the respondents, 20 (9.3%) had ≥ 1 malpractice suits filed against them. More than 90% of the respondents believed that malpractice suits are on the rise in India. Almost half of the respondents believed the advent of teleconsultation is further compounding the risk of malpractice suits, and 66.4% of respondents felt that they were inadequately trained during residency to deal with medicolegal issues. Most respondents (88.8%) felt that neurosurgeons working in the government sector had lesser chances of facing litigations in comparison to those working in the private sector. The practice of obtaining video proof of consent was more commonly reported by respondents working in freelancing and private settings (45.1%) and those with multiple affiliations (61.3%) compared to respondents practicing in government settings (22.8%) (p < 0.001). Neurosurgeons working in the private sector were more likely to alter management and refer sick patients to higher-volume treatment centers to avoid malpractice suits than their government counterparts (p = 0.043 and 0.006, respectively). The practices pertaining to legal preparedness were also found to be significantly higher among the respondents from the private sector (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights the apprehensions of neurosurgeons in India with regard to rising malpractice suits and the subsequent increase of defensive neurosurgical practices, especially in the private sector. A stronger legal framework for providing for quick redress of patient complaints, while deterring frivolous malpractice suits, can go a long way to allay these fears. There is a dire need for systematic training of neurosurgeons regarding legal preparedness, which should begin during residency.

Management of Postoperative Discitis with Debridement and Novel Technique of Local Antibiotic Instillation: Functional Outcomes from a Resource-Limited Setting.

BACKGROUND: Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have substantial treatment abandonment and non-adherence with outpatient oral medications. This work sought to investigate outcomes of postoperative discitis treated with debridement and a novel technique focused on reducing outpatient antibiotic requirement in an LMIC setting. METHODS: This study, conducted and reported following STROBE guidelines, reviewed outcomes of all patients with postoperative discitis who had been debrided by 1 neurosurgeon in a resource-limited setting during 2008-2020. Patients had undergone single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 discectomy elsewhere, later developing magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed discitis. After non-response or deterioration following intravenous antibiotics, patients underwent early debridement, followed by in-patient antibiotic instillation into disc space for 2 weeks via drain. Study outcomes were modified Kirkaldy-Willis Grade, Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score, all assessed at 1 year. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included, 10 male and 2 female, with median age of 46 (IQR 3.5) years. Debridement was done after median 82.5 (IQR 35) days and took median time of 105 (IQR 17.5) minutes. VAS scores (mean ± SD) decreased from 9.25 ± 0.75 preoperatively to 0.67 ± 0.89 1 year postoperatively (mean difference 8.58, 95% CI 8.01-9.15, P < 0.001). JOA scores (mean ± SD) improved from 4.5 ± 2.94 to 26.42 ± 1.31 1 year postoperatively (mean difference 21.92, 95% CI 20.57-23.26, P < 0.001). Kirkaldy-Willis grade was excellent in 6 (50%) patients, good in 5 (41.7%), and fair in 1 (8.3%). Patients became ambulatory within 2 weeks, with no major complications during 4.15 (IQR 3.45) years of median follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In LMICs, patients with medically refractory postoperative discitis potentially have good outcomes after debridement plus 2-week local antibiotic instillation.

Gossypiboma larynx: a rare cause of post-tracheostomy stridor-case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Gossypiboma, a retained surgical sponge with a foreign body reaction, is an unusual but serious complication seen in open abdominal surgeries. It is exceptionally rare following head and neck surgeries. Here, we present a case of Gossypiboma of the upper airway following tracheostomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old male presented with stridor and difficulty breathing one-month post-tracheostomy after a severe head injury following a road traffic accident. A neck radiograph was unremarkable, and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the neck showed a well-defined homogenous curvilinear membrane extending from the hypopharynx to the upper trachea. Bronchoscopic evaluation of the larynx and upper trachea revealed a retained surgical sponge, which was retrieved. The patient's breathing improved drastically post intervention. CONCLUSION: Gossypiboma may go undetected in radiographs and may also present atypically as a homogenous membrane on a CT scan of the neck. Though rare, retained surgical items can have profound medicolegal and professional consequences on physicians. Hence, a strong clinical suspicion and vigilance for gossypiboma is necessary for patients presenting with respiratory distress post-tracheostomy.

A modern history of neurosurgery and neurology in India: lessons for the world.

The compendia of medical knowledge of the great ancient Indian physicians Susruta, Caraka, Jivaka, and Vagbhata all attest to the practice of neurosurgery and neurology starting in the 1st millennium bce. Although a period of scientific stagnation ensued between the 12th and 20th centuries ce, Indian medical neurosciences once again flourished after India's independence from British rule in 1947. The pioneers of modern Indian neurosurgery, neurology, and their ancillary fields made numerous scientific and clinical discoveries, advancements, and innovations that proved influential on a global scale. Most importantly, the efforts of Indian neurosurgeons and neurologists were unified at the national level through the Neurological Society of India, which was established in 1951 and enabled an unprecedented degree of collaboration within the aforementioned medical specialties. The growth and success of the Indian model bears several lessons that can be applied to other nations in order to garner better collaboration among neurosurgeons, neurologists, and physicians in related fields. Here, the authors elaborate on the origins, growth, and development of neurosurgery and neurology in India and discuss their current state in order to glean valuable lessons on interdisciplinary collaboration, which forms the basis of the authors' proposal for the continued growth of societies dedicated to medical neurosciences across the world.

Gearing Up for the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Pass/Fail Transition, Evaluating the Role of Research Productivity as an Alternative During the Neurosurgical Residency Selection Process: An Overview.

Neurosurgery residency programs are the most competitive among the surgical specialties for applicants to match into. U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 scores are staple and pivotal in narrowing down applicants for granting interviews and ranking in the match process. The upcoming transition from a numeric to binary step 1 scoring shifts the emphasis on using the status quo Step 2 Clinical Knowledge numeric scoring as the only objective measure. It can prove insubstantial for accurate assessment of competencies, further urging residency programs to widen their selection protocols to allow multiple assessments of competency. Research experience has consistently proved to result in higher successful match rates, and a positive correlation is seen with the number of research publications and Hirsch indices. However, with a predicted emphasis on research with the shift in scoring practices, these tools provide inadequate insight into authorship, contributions, type of publications, and community impact, warranting the need to include supplementary modifications, surrogates, or alternatives to such tools for a more comprehensive and equitable assessment of research. This study summarizes the role of research in the neurosurgical match process, describes nuances in research evaluation, and introduces novel Hirsch indices and additional strategies to address these nuances for equitable evaluation of research productions.

Surgical Resection and Clipping of an Atherosclerotic Partially Calcified Middle Cerebral Artery Trifurcation Aneurysm with Clipping of an Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

It is estimated within the western population that 10%-13% of patients possess multiple intracranial aneurysms1 and are linked to certain risk factors. Thrombotic aneurysms are a rare subgroup of complex aneurysms characterized by an organized intraluminal thrombus.2,3 They differ from typical saccular aneurysms in terms of morphology, natural history, symptomatology, and difficulty in treatment with conventional strategies.2,4 The risk of rupture is poorly characterized and assumed to be comparable with that of nonthrombotic aneurysms.2 A subset of thrombotic aneurysms can be treated surgically with conventional clipping, and direct clipping has been associated with the best surgical outcome.2 Despite its safety, endovascular treatment is associated with a high risk of recurrence and retreatment compared with surgical treatment,5 with recanalization rates up to 5× higher compared with nonthrombosed aneurysms.6,7 A 64-year-old male presented with headaches and dizziness for 6 months. He was neurologically intact. Imaging revealed a calcified thrombosed right middle cerebral artery aneurysm and an anterior communicating artery aneurysm, both of which underwent clipping. The patient consented to the procedure. Preservation of blood flow in branch arteries in thrombosed aneurysms is challenging. Thrombectomy and clip reconstruction in such cases can occlude the branch vessels, compromising blood flow. Achieving adequate proximal control and meticulous dissection of the branches is necessary before reconstruction. We present a 2-dimensional video demonstrating the surgical steps of clipping and reconstruction of the giant thrombosed middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Complete occlusion was achieved, and the patient tolerated the operation well with an uneventful postoperative course.

Surgical Technique and Nuances of Resection of a Trochlear Schwannoma: Operative Video.

Cranial nerve schwannomas accounts for around 8% of all benign intracranial tumors, arising most commonly from the vestibular nerve, followed by the trigeminal nerve and other lower cranial nerves. However, trochlear schwannoma in a patient without neurofibromatosis-2 are extremely rare and to date, fewer than 100 cases have been reported in the literature. They are either asymptomatic or present with ophthalmologic or neurologic symptoms. Diplopia is the most common initial symptom. As the tumor grows, it can compress the surrounding brainstem and other cranial nerves, causing neurologic symptoms. Asymptomatic lesions are detected incidentally following imaging for some other reason. There are no clear guidelines for the management of these tumors. In general, small asymptomatic tumors are closely observed by serial imaging and symptomatic or larger tumors are managed by surgical excision and/or stereotactic radiosurgery.1-7 Here we present a 41-year-old female patient with incidentally detected left trochlear schwannoma during the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. She was followed up regularly with multiple repeat MRI. Recently she started complaining of occasional headaches, and MRI showed a left peimesencephalic cistern tumor causing mass effect on the ipsilateral midbrain. There was also significant brainstem edema. Hence she underwent left retromastoid suboccipital craniectomy, lateral supracerbellar approach, and complete excision of the tumor. Postoperatively the patient had an uneventful recovery without any new neurologic deficits. At 6 months' follow-up the patient is doing well.

Interhemispheric Approach for Clipping of a Pericallosal Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Pericallosal artery aneurysms are rare, accounting for 2%-9% of all intracranial aneurysms. They are most commonly saccular and wide necked. Although typically small, they are more prone to rupture compared with other aneurysms in the anterior circulation. They are more common in people with unpaired or azygous arteries. Rupture of pericallosal artery aneurysm results in intracerebral hematoma in approximately 50% of patients, usually in the frontal lobe, anterior interhemispheric fissure, pericallosal cistern, or cingulate gyrus. Compared with other supratentorial aneurysms, surgical clipping of pericallosal aneurysms carries a higher morbidity and mortality. A 47-year-old female presented with sudden-onset worst headache of her life followed by dizziness, syncope, transient weakness, and numbness over the left lower extremity. She was neurologically intact, and imaging revealed a right pericallosal artery aneurysm. The patient consented to the procedure. The 2-dimensional Video 1 demonstrates the interhemispheric approach for clipping of a pericallosal artery aneurysm. These aneurysms are approached in the distal-to-proximal direction along with the distal anterior cerebral artery. Meticulous dissection avoids rupture without proximal control. We highlight the key surgical steps and microsurgical techniques in approaching these aneurysms. The patient tolerated the operation well with an uneventful postoperative course.

Charles Jacques Bouchard (1837-1915) and the Charcot-Bouchard aneurysm.

Charles Jacques Bouchard was a distinguished French physician and scientist of the early 19th century. Despite his humble beginnings, Bouchard was able to achieve meteoric success within the scientific and medical fields, establishing himself as one of the most influential physician-scientists of his time. This was in part due to his superb commitment, as well as the prosperity engendered by the strong influence of his teachers, which can be seen as a testament to the importance of mentorship in medicine. Besides his myriad contributions, Bouchard is most well known for describing the Charcot-Bouchard aneurysm in 1866 alongside his mentor Jean-Martin Charcot, linking them for the first time to intracranial hemorrhage. Bouchard's thesis entitled "A Study of Some Points in the Pathology of Cerebral Hemorrhage" was regarded by some as the most original and important of all recent works on the subject of cerebral hemorrhage at the time of publication. Sadly, the great relationship Bouchard shared with his mentor Charcot would later deteriorate into perhaps one of the most well-known student-mentor quarrels in the history of medicine. Herein, the authors present a historical recollection of Bouchard's life, career, and contributions to medicine, as well as the famous controversy with Jean-Martin Charcot.

Uncharted Waters of Machine and Deep Learning for Surgical Phase Recognition in Neurosurgery.

Recent years have witnessed artificial intelligence (AI) make meteoric leaps in both medicine and surgery, bridging the gap between the capabilities of humans and machines. Digitization of operating rooms and the creation of massive quantities of data have paved the way for machine learning and computer vision applications in surgery. Surgical phase recognition (SPR) is a newly emerging technology that uses data derived from operative videos to train machine and deep learning algorithms to identify the phases of surgery. Advancement of this technology will be key in establishing context-aware surgical systems in the future. By automatically recognizing and evaluating the current surgical scenario, these intelligent systems are able to provide intraoperative decision support, improve operating room efficiency, assess surgical skills, and aid in surgical training and education. Still in its infancy, SPR has been mainly studied in laparoscopic surgeries, with a contrasting stark lack of research within neurosurgery. Given the high-tech and rapidly advancing nature of neurosurgery, we believe SPR has a tremendous untapped potential in this field. Herein, we present an overview of the SPR technology, its potential applications in neurosurgery, and the challenges that lie ahead.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Discharge Against Medical Advice and 30-Day Readmissions After Concussion: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of discharge against medical advice (DAMA) in patients admitted with concussion. OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of DAMA and its effect on 30-day readmissions and cost in concussion using a nationally representative sample. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for concussion admissions and their disposition at discharge between 2010 and 2014. Included patients were ≥18 years old who were admitted with concussion and had <1 hour loss of consciousness. We excluded in-hospital deaths or discharge dispositions other than home or against medical advice. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine characteristics associated with DAMA and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 38 919 index admissions were identified, which resulted in 998 (2.6%) DAMA. In multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with DAMA included younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88), male sex (1.47, 1.22-1.76), an Elixhauser comorbidity index >3 (1.67, 1.15-1.60), and assault (2.02, 1.48-2.75) and fall injuries (1.28, 1.03-1.60). The highest-income quartile was negatively associated with DAMA (0.91, 0.73-1.13). In multivariate analysis, DAMA (1.63, 1.29-2.06), higher comorbidity index (2.61, 2.22-3.06), and self-inflicted mode of injury (2.28, 1.30-4.02) were independently associated with 30-day readmission. The most common indication for readmission in both routine and DAMA groups was traumatic injury (21.1% and 24.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: DAMA is an independent risk factor for readmission in patients admitted for concussion. The variables associated with DAMA identified in this study can be used to design patient-centered interventions that can be implemented to reduce DAMA and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Tribute to William Edward Hunt and Robert McDonald Hess Jr.: Pioneers in the Clinical Classification of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

William Edward Hunt (1921-1999) and Robert McDonald Hess Jr. (1931-2019) were pioneers in revolutionizing the early surgical management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Early on in his career as a professor of neurosurgery at Ohio State University, Dr. Hunt adopted a systematic method to identify clinical symptoms of patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage as candidates for either immediate or delayed surgery. As an Ohio State University neurosurgery resident, Dr. Hess was an active key collaborator in Dr. Hunt's aneurysm studies. Described as a modification of the Botterell classification system, the Hunt-Hess scale grading the survival risk of undergoing immediate intracranial aneurysm surgery was implemented and validated across an 18-year consecutive patient series at White Cross Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. Dr. Hunt and Dr. Hess demonstrated that for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage on admission with Hunt-Hess grades I and II, indicating retained consciousness and minimal neurological deficits, immediate surgical management afforded a <20% mortality rate. In comparison, patients with grade III or higher had a >50% mortality rate, suggesting that conservative management should be instead pursued. As the principal investigator, Dr. Hunt was widely regarded internationally as an expert in the field of treating intracranial aneurysms, eventually serving as a World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) committee member to also publish a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. To pay tribute to Drs. Hunt and Hess for their substantial contributions, we present historical vignettes of their lives along with highlighting the role of the Hunt-Hess classification system in transforming management of ruptured aneurysms.

Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Remote Pulmonary Artery Hemodynamic Monitoring in a "Real-World" Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring has demonstrated the ability to reduce heart failure-related hospitalization, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction; however, real-world data in a Veterans Affairs patient population are limited. The present study retrospectively reviewed 53 patients with New York Heart Association class III heart failure, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction, implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure sensor (CardioMEMS) at our single Veterans Affairs institution. Heart failure-related hospitalizations were assessed in patients for 6 and 12 months after the implantation of the device and compared with the 6- and 12- month periods before implantation in the same patient cohort. Pulmonary arterial pressures and medication doses were also recorded at baseline, 6- months, and 12- months and procedural safety data were also assessed. Implantation of a remote pulmonary artery pressure sensor was associated with a 52% (95% confidence interval 30% to 68%, p <0.001) and a 44% (95% confidence interval 24% to 59%, p <0.001) reduction in heart failure-related hospitalization at 6 and 12 months after implant, respectively, compared with the 6- and 12-month preimplant periods. Mean pulmonary arterial pressures also demonstrated significant reductions from baseline to 6 and 12 months after implant. A total of 3 procedure-related adverse events were noted. In conclusion, pulmonary artery pressure sensor implantation is relatively safe and associated with significant reductions in heart failure-related hospitalization and decreased mean pulmonary artery pressures in patients within the Veterans Affairs system with New York Heart Association class III symptoms, regardless of ejection fraction.

Aortic arch anomalies, embryology and their relevance in neuro-interventional surgery and stroke: A review.

BACKGROUND: Congenital aortic arch anomalies are commonly encountered during neurointerventional procedures. While some anomalies are identified at an early age, many are incidentally discovered later in adulthood during endovascular evaluations or interventions. Proper understanding of the normal arch anatomy and its variants is pivotal to safely navigate normal aortic arch branches and to negotiate the catheter through anomalies during neurointerventional procedures. This is particularly relevant in the increasingly "transradial first" culture of neurointerventional surgery. Moreover, some of these anomalies have a peculiar predilection for complications including aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture during the procedure. Therefore, an understanding of these anomalies, their underlying embryological basis and associations, and pattern of circulation will help endovascular neurosurgeons and interventional radiologists navigate with confidence and consider relevant pathologic associations that may inform risk of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: Here, we present a brief review of the basic embryology of the common anomalies of the aortic arch along with their neurological significances and discuss, through illustrative cases, the association of aortic arch anomalies with cerebral vascular pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the aortic arch anomalies and its embryological basis is essential to safely navigate the cerebral vascular system during neurointerventional surgeries.

Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastasis from Primary Lung Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Case Report and Operative Video.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis (ISCM) account for a minority of all spinal cord tumors. Rarely, symptoms from ISCM may be the initial presentation of an unknown primary carcinoma. Intramedullary metastasis from a second malignancy or from an unknown neuroendocrine malignancy is extremely rare and has never been reported in the literature. Because of the rarity of these tumors and the low volume of cases, well-defined treatment guidelines do not exist for the management of ISCM. Here we present a rare and one of the first reports of an intramedullary metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 66-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer presented with worsening bilateral lower extremity numbness for 2 months. Imaging revealed an intramedullary spinal cord tumor at the T4 level. The patient underwent microsurgical resection of the intramedullary spinal cord tumor. At operation, the tumor had an exophytic component. Subtotal resection was achieved. Pathology revealed a neuroendocrine metastasis, likely pulmonary in origin. She achieved partial resolution of neurologic symptoms at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine ISCM are rare and lack well-defined treatment guidelines. Care should be individualized in these cases. Whenever feasible, surgical resection should be considered. Despite multidisciplinary care, the prognosis is dismal with limited life expectancy. Larger, multiinstitutional, or national database studies are needed that compare treatment modalities in the management of ISCM to identify the therapy with the best outcomes.

The contributions of William A. Hammond (1828-1900) to Civil War medicine & modern neurology.

William Alexander Hammond was an American military physician and a main driving force for the development of modern-day clinical Neurology in America. Hammond served as the 11th Surgeon General of the United States Army, acting during the Civil War. Throughout his time as Surgeon General, with influence from Florence Nightingale, Hammond enforced strict hygienic measures and called for the construction of pavilion style hospitals in order to decrease non-wound mortalities. He implemented further reformation of the American Medical Service that would improve efficiency and decrease general mortality for years to come. After his dismissal from the military service, Hammond continued to make meaningful achievements, spearheading the specialization of Neurology. He established the first private practice limited to diseases of the nervous system, published the first American Neurology textbook, coined the term "athetosis", and was the impetus for the formation of the American Neurological Association.