RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines for spirometry interpretation recommend both race-neutral reference equations and use of z score thresholds to define severity of airflow obstruction. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the transition from race-specific to race-neutral equations impact severity classifications for patients with COPD when using % predicted vs z score thresholds, and do changes in severity correspond to clinical risk? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Black and White patients with COPD and available spirometry from the Johns Hopkins Health System. Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 (race-specific) equations and GLI Global (race-neutral) equations were used to determine FEV1 % predicted and z score values. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe disease according to % predicted or z score thresholds. Associations between a change in severity classification from race-specific to race-neutral with COPD exacerbations and all-cause hospitalizations were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: This cohort included 13,324 patients, of whom 9,232 patients (69.3%) were White (mean age, 65.7 years) and 4,092 patients (30.7%) were Black (mean age, 61.1 years). More Black than White patients showed a change in severity classification between approaches when using % predicted thresholds (20.2% vs 6.1%; P < .001), but not with z score thresholds (12.6% vs 12.3%; P = .68). An increased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with increased risk of exacerbation when using z score thresholds (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.51-3.63), but not when using % predicted thresholds (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.61-1.93). A decreased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with lower risk of exacerbation with both % predicted (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87) and z score (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) thresholds. INTERPRETATION: The proportions of Black and White individuals reclassified were similar with z score thresholds, and changes in severity corresponded to clinical risk with z scores. These results support recent recommendations for use of race-neutral equations and z score thresholds for spirometry interpretation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espirometría , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/clasificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etnología , Espirometría/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Población Blanca , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Rationale: Nocturnal hypoxemia is common in sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although impaired diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO) is associated with daytime hypoxemia, its influence on SDB-related nocturnal hypoxemia is not known. Objectives: To characterize the effects of DlCO impairment on SDB-related nocturnal hypoxemia and associated health outcomes. Methods: Data from a multicenter cohort of men with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, with concomitant measures of DlCO and home-based polysomnography (n = 544), were analyzed. Multivariable quantile regression models characterized associations between DlCO and several measures of SDB-related hypoxemia (e.g., total sleep time with oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry [SpO2] < 90% [T90]). Structural equation models were used to assess associations of impaired DlCO and SDB-related hypoxemia measures with prevalent hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Results: DlCO impairment (<80% predicted) was associated with sleep-related hypoxemia. Participants with severe SDB (apnea-hypopnea index ⩾ 30 events/h) and impaired DlCO had higher T90 (median difference, 15.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.3% to 19.7%]) and average SDB-related desaturation (median difference, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5 to 1.5]) and lower nadir SpO2 (median difference, -8.2% [95% CI, -11.4% to -4.9%]) and average SpO2 during sleep (median difference, -1.1% [95% CI, -2.1% to -0.01%]) than those with severe SDB and preserved DlCO. Higher T90 was associated with higher adjusted odds of prevalent hypertension (odds ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.70]) and type 2 diabetes (odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.46]). Conclusions: DlCO impairment in severe SDB was associated with sleep-related hypoxemia, prevalent hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Assessment of SDB should be considered in those with impaired DlCO to guide testing and risk stratification strategies.