Malignant salivary gland tumors of the tongue: A multicenter REFCOR study.

Salivary carcinomas of minor salivary glands are very infrequent tumors. When located in the tongue, the therapeutic strategy may comprise upfront surgery, which may be debilitating, and/or (chemo-)radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of salivary carcinomas of the tongue in a population-based cohort. This retrospective multicentric study, based on the "Réseau d'Expertise Français sur les Cancers ORL Rares" (REFCOR), included all the patients with a salivary carcinoma of the tongue, diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2018. Dubious slides were reviewed by REFCOR expert pathologists to ensure diagnostic accuracy. Treatment was performed in accordance with national REFCOR recommendations. From 28 centers, 103 patients were included in this study. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years, and 60.2% were female. Tumors were adenoid cystic carcinomas (41.7%), mucoepidermoid carcinomas (30.1%), and other adenocarcinomas (28.2%). Primary treatment was surgical for 61.2% of them. Five-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 84.7% and 38.6%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, EFS was significantly worse in case of nonsurgical treatment, alcohol consumption, and glossotonsillar sulcus involvement. N-positive status was the only significant prognostic factor for OS in multivariable analysis. Salivary carcinomas of the tongue represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, with a high risk of recurrence. In this national cohort, surgery was associated with better EFS and N-status was the main independent prognostic factor for OS.

Oncological and functional outcomes for transoral robotic surgery following previous radiation treatment for upper aerodigestive tract head and neck cancers. A French multicenter GETTEC group study.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) opens new perspectives. We evaluated the outcomes for patients having undergone TORS after previous radiotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study (n = 138) in a previously irradiated area between 2009 and 2020. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a chi-squared test, Fisher's test, or Wilcoxon's test. RESULTS: The median length of hospital stay was 12.5 days. Bleeding was the most frequent postoperative complication (15.2%, n = 22). Prophylactic vessel ligation did not significantly decrease bleeding. Complications were significantly lower for Tis, T1, and N0 tumors. 91.6% (n = 120) of the patients with a perioperative tracheotomy could be decannulated. Larynx was functional for 65.94% of the patients. The median length of follow-up was 26 months. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were respectively 59.9% and 43.4%. CONCLUSION: Oncological and functional results confirmed the value of TORS as a treatment in previously irradiated area.

[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]. / Référentiel national de traitement des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures ­ Principes généraux de traitement.

OBJECTIVES: The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations. METHODOLOGY: To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). RESULTS: The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey. CONCLUSION: All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.