Impacts of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus on Swallowing: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common treatment for motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD), a condition associated with increased risk of dysphagia. The effect of DBS on swallowing function has not been comprehensively evaluated using gold-standard imaging techniques, particularly for globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. The objective of this retrospective, cross-sectional study was to identify differences in swallowing safety and timing kinematics among PD subjects with and without GPi DBS. We investigated the effects of unilateral and bilateral GPi DBS as well as the relationship between swallowing safety and DBS stimulation parameters, using retrospective analysis of videofluoroscopy recordings (71 recordings from 36 subjects) from electronic medical records. Outcomes were analyzed by surgical status (pre-surgical, unilateral DBS, bilateral DBS). The primary outcome was percent of thin-liquid bolus trials rated as unsafe, with Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores of 3 or higher. Secondary analyses included swallowing timing measures, relationships between swallowing safety and DBS stimulation parameters, and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity ratings. Most subjects swallowed all boluses safely (19/29 in the pre-surgical, 16/26 in the unilateral DBS, and 10/16 in the bilateral DBS conditions). Swallowing safety impairment did not differ among stimulation groups. There was no main effect of stimulation condition on timing metrics, though main effects were found for sex and bolus type. Stimulation parameters were not correlated with swallowing safety. Swallowing efficiency and overall impairment did not differ among conditions. These results provide evidence that GPi DBS does not affect pharyngeal swallowing function. Further, prospective, investigations are needed.

The Interface between Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Neuroinflammation, and Neurological Disorders.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a complex, chronic inflammatory condition affecting the gastrointestinal tract. IBD has been associated with a variety of neurologic manifestations including peripheral nerve involvement, increased risk of thrombotic, demyelinating and events. Furthermore, an evolving association between IBD and neurodegenerative disorders has been recognized, and early data suggests an increased risk of these disorders in patients diagnosed with IBD. The relationship between intestinal inflammatory disease and neuroinflammation is complex, but the bidirectional interaction between the brain-gut-microbiome axis is likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of these disorders. Identification of common mechanisms and pathways will be key to developing potential therapies. In this review, we discuss the evolving interface between IBD and neurological conditions, with a focus on clinical, mechanistic, and potentially therapeutic implications.

Comparative connectivity correlates of dystonic and essential tremor deep brain stimulation.

The pathophysiology of dystonic tremor and essential tremor remains partially understood. In patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor or essential tremor, deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the thalamus or posterior subthalamic area has evolved into a promising treatment option. However, the optimal DBS targets for these disorders remains unknown. This retrospective study explored the optimal targets for DBS in essential tremor and dystonic tremor using a combination of volumes of tissue activated estimation and functional and structural connectivity analyses. We included 20 patients with dystonic tremor who underwent unilateral thalamic DBS, along with a matched cohort of 20 patients with essential tremor DBS. Tremor severity was assessed preoperatively and approximately 6 months after DBS implantation using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The tremor-suppressing effects of DBS were estimated using the percentage improvement in the unilateral tremor-rating scale score contralateral to the side of implantation. The optimal stimulation region, based on the cluster centre of gravity for peak contralateral motor score improvement, for essential tremor was located in the ventral intermediate nucleus region and for dystonic tremor in the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region along the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border (4 mm anterior and 3 mm superior to that for essential tremor). Both disorders showed similar functional connectivity patterns: a positive correlation between tremor improvement and involvement of the primary sensorimotor, secondary motor and associative prefrontal regions. Tremor improvement, however, was tightly correlated with the primary sensorimotor regions in essential tremor, whereas in dystonic tremor, the correlation was tighter with the premotor and prefrontal regions. The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract, comprising the decussating and non-decussating fibres, significantly correlated with tremor improvement in both dystonic and essential tremor. In contrast, the pallidothalamic tracts, which primarily project to the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region, significantly correlated with tremor improvement only in dystonic tremor. Our findings support the hypothesis that the pathophysiology underpinning dystonic tremor involves both the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network. Further our data suggest that the pathophysiology of essential tremor is primarily attributable to the abnormalities within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. We conclude that the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border and ventral intermediate nucleus region may be a reasonable DBS target for patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor and essential tremor, respectively. Uncovering the pathophysiology of these disorders may in the future aid in further improving DBS outcomes.

Therapeutic Advances in the Treatment of Holmes Tremor: Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to formulate a practical clinical treatment algorithm for Holmes tremor (HT) by reviewing currently published clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles discussing the management of HT published between January 1990 and December 2018. We examined data from 89 patients published across 58 studies detailing the effects of pharmacological or surgical interventions on HT severity. Clinical outcomes were measured by a continuous 1-10 ranked scale. The majority of studies addressing treatment response were case series or case reports. No randomized control studies were identified. RESULTS: Our review included 24 studies focusing on pharmacologic treatments of 25 HT patients and 34 studies focusing on the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in 64 patients. In the medical intervention group, the most commonly used drugs were levetiracetam, trihexyphenidyl, and levodopa. In the surgically treated group, the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) were the most common brain targets for neuromodulation. The two targets accounted for 57.8% and 32.8% of total cases, respectively. Overall, compared to the medically treated group, DBS provided greater tremor suppression (p = 0.025) and was more effective for the management of postural tremor in HT. Moreover, GPi DBS displayed greater benefit in the resting tremor component (p = 0.042) and overall tremor reduction (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: There is a highly variable response to different medical treatments in HT without randomized clinical trials available to dictate treatment decisions. A variety of medical and surgical treatment options can be considered for the management of HT. Collaborative research between different institutions and researchers are warranted and needed to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology and management of this condition. In this review, we propose a practical treatment algorithm for HT based on currently available evidence.

Pallidal Connectivity Profiling of Stimulation-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to identify anatomical regions related to stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID) after pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and to analyze connectivity associated with SID. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical and imaging data of PD patients who experienced SID during the monopolar review after pallidal DBS. We analyzed structural and functional connectivity using normative connectivity data with the volume of tissue activated (VTA) modeling. Each contact was assigned to either that producing SID (SID VTA) or that without SID (non-SID VTA). Structural and functional connectivity was compared between SID and non-SID VTAs. "Optimized VTAs" were also estimated using the DBS settings at 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Of the 68 consecutive PD patients who underwent pallidal implantation, 20 patients (29%) experienced SID. SID VTAs were located more dorsally and anteriorly compared with non-SID and optimized VTAs and were primarily in the dorsal globus pallidus internus (GPi) and dorsal globus pallidus externus (GPe). SID VTAs showed significantly higher structural connectivity than non-SID VTAs to the associative cortex and supplementary motor area/premotor cortex (P < 0.0001). Simultaneously, non-SID VTAs showed greater connectivity to the primary sensory cortex, cerebellum, subthalamic nucleus, and motor thalamus (all P < 0.0004). Functional connectivity analysis showed significant differences between SID and non-SID VTAs in multiple regions, including the primary motor, premotor, and prefrontal cortices and cerebellum. CONCLUSION: SID VTAs were primarily in the dorsal GPi/GPe. The connectivity difference between the motor-related cortices and subcortical regions may explain the presence and absence of SID. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Quality of life outcomes after globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation in idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported the beneficial effects of globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with inherited or idiopathic isolated dystonia. However, the impact of this intervention on physical and mental/psychological domains and the effects over time remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review from January 2000 to May 2019 and performed a meta-analysis of HRQoL outcomes based on the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) after GPi DBS in patients with inherited or idiopathic isolated dystonia to evaluate the effects of DBS on physical and mental QoL. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 144 patients with dystonia (78, generalised; 34, segmental; and 32, focal cervical) were included in this comprehensive analysis. The mean (SD) age at DBS implantation was 41.0 (11.4) years, and the follow-up period after implantation was 3.2 (3.8) years. The random effects model meta-analysis revealed that both physical and mental domains of SF-36 improved following DBS with a significantly larger effect size for the physical domains (effect size=0.781; p<0.0001) compared with the mental domains (effect size=0.533; p<0.0001). A moderator variable analysis demonstrated that effect sizes for HRQoL improvement were maintained over time. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis that demonstrates significant benefits in HRQoL following DBS in patients with inherited or idiopathic isolated dystonia. The benefits are greater for physical QoL domains compared with mental/psychological QoL. These findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to improve mental/psychological QoL.

King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale for Assessment of Pain Relief Following Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Pain is a prevalent and debilitating nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is often inadequately managed. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to relieve pain in PD but an effective method of identifying which types of PD pain respond to DBS has not been established. We examine the effects of DBS on different types of PD pain using the King's Parkinson's disease pain scale (KPDPS), the only validated scale of PD pain. METHODS: We prospectively followed 18 PD patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) or Globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS. Subjects completed the KPDPS, low back disability index (LBDI), and McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. Subjects underwent the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale-III (UPDRS-III) with preoperative scores ON medication and postoperative scores ON medication/DBS stimulation. RESULTS: Of the 18 patients, a total of 12 subjects had STN DBS and 6 had GPi DBS. As a group, subjects showed improvement in total KPDPS score at six-month postoperative follow-up (p = 0.004). Fluctuation and nocturnal pain were most significantly improved (p = 0.006, 0.01, respectively). Significant improvements were found in fluctuation-related pain domain following GPi DBS. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we are the first group to employ KPDPS to monitor pain relief following DBS in PD patients. We demonstrate that fluctuation-related pain and nocturnal pain significantly improve with DBS. Use of the KPDPS in the future will allow better understanding of how STN and GPi DBS treat PD pain over time.

Shaking Up the Debate: Ensuring the Ethical Use of DBS Intervention Criteria for Mid-Stage Parkinson's Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for the management of severe motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Until recently, device regulation, medical, and insurance practices limited DBS to patients with advanced stages of PD. In February 2016 this changed, however, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted formal approval for the use of brain stimulator in mid-stage PD patients. In this article, we examine whether DBS in mid-stage PD can be ethically justified beyond the FDA approval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We scrutinize the current risk-benefit profile, the costs-benefit profile, and the capacity for informed consent requirement, to ask if use of subthalamic nucleus (STN) in mid-stage DBS is ethically appropriate. RESULTS: We propose that mid-stage DBS decisions could be appropriate under a shared decision-making model, which embraces a broad quality of life perspective. CONCLUSION: Although it might be too premature to know how the FDA decision will affect medical and insurance practices, we conclude by arguing that revisions to persisting guidelines seems justified both on scientific and ethical grounds.

Evaluation of Quantitative Measurement Techniques for Head Tremor With Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Ventralis intermedius thalamic deep brain stimulation (VIM DBS) has shown to be safe and effective for medically refractory essential tremor (ET). We evaluate the use of quantitative tremor measurement methods for head tremor in ET using a "smart" hat and a smartphone application. METHODS: We enrolled 13 ET patients who previously underwent VIM DBS. Head and arm tremor was measured ON and OFF stimulation using the clinical gold standard Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). Results were then compared to two quantitative measurement techniques: Lift Pulse (smartphone application) and modified Nizet (adapted laser point measurement from Nizet et al.). Spearman's rank correlation was used to compare tremor severity and improvement on stimulation using TRS and quantitative methods to measure tremor. RESULTS: Lift Pulse tremor severity measurement significantly correlated with TRS for head (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.01) and arm tremor (ρ = 0.49, p < 0.01). Modified Nizet tremor severity measurement significantly correlated with TRS for head (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001) and arm tremor (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.01). Inter-method correlation for head tremor severity was significant (ρ = 0.45, p < 0.05). Lift Pulse tremor improvement measurement significantly correlated with TRS for arm tremor (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.05). Modified Nizet tremor improvement measurement significantly correlated with TRS for head tremor (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our results show that Lift Pulse and modified Nizet are both effective techniques to quantitatively measure head and arm tremor severity. We also show the utility of a "smart" hat to measure head tremor. Modified Nizet technique is more effective for measuring head tremor, while Lift Pulse is an effective measure of tremor severity, especially arm tremor improvement.

Effect of Eye Opening on Single-Unit Activity and Local Field Potentials in the Subthalamic Nucleus.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an established treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigate the effect of eye opening on neuronal activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in the STN. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 25 PD patients undergoing STN DBS in our institution. During DBS, single-unit activity (SUA) and LFPs were measured when eyes were open and closed. As movement is known to result in changes in LFPs, we tested response to eye opening in the presence and absence of movement. RESULTS: Neither eye state nor arm movement has a significant influence on SUA recordings. There is a statistically significant interaction between eye state and arm movement (p < 0.05). In the presence of movement, STN SUA increase when eyes open (p < 0.05). When eyes are closed, STN SUA decrease with movement (p < 0.05). STN theta LFP oscillations decrease when eyes are open compared to closed, irrespective of movement status (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: STN activity is influenced by eye state and arm movement. It is unclear whether this is attributed to a change in the STN's role in oculomotor control or from a change in attentional state. Understanding how physiologic normal activity alters neural activity is critical for the optimization of DBS therapy, particularly in closed-loop neuromodulation.

A Comparison of Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), Simultaneous Bilateral DBS, and Staged Bilateral DBS Lead Accuracies.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of lead placement within the brain can affect the outcome of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Whether performing unilateral lead implantation, simultaneous bilateral lead implantation, or staged bilateral lead implantation affects accuracy has not yet been assessed. We compare lead placement errors to evaluate whether one approach affords greater lead accuracy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 205 leads placed in 125 DBS surgeries. The accuracy of lead placement, defined by differences in x, y, and z coordinates and error vector magnitudes, was compared between three surgery groups: unilateral leads, bilateral leads placed simultaneously, and bilateral leads placed in staged surgeries. We also compared accuracies between first and second leads within each bilateral cohort and between second leads of the bilateral cohorts. Finally, we examined the effect of target and age on accuracy. RESULTS: The accuracy of lead placement was comparable among unilateral, simultaneous bilateral, and staged bilateral leads. Timing of placement of the second lead in bilateral cases was not found to affect accuracy. The mean number of microelectrode trajectories was greater for first leads in simultaneous bilateral DBS (p = 0.032). No significant correlation between either age or target and accuracy was found. CONCLUSION: Although there may be other important reasons for performing DBS in a staged fashion, our study finds that neither laterality nor timing of second lead placement, patient age, or target site have significant impact on DBS lead accuracy, a finding that indicates with appropriate approach selection based on patient factors, accuracy does not have to be significantly compromised.

Evolving Concepts in Posterior Subthalamic Area Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Tremor: Surgical Neuroanatomy and Practical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Although thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established as an effective therapy for refractory tremor in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, reports investigating the efficacy of posterior subthalamic area (PSA) DBS for severe, debilitating tremors continue to emerge. However, questions regarding the optimal anatomical target, surgical approach, programming paradigms and effectiveness compared to other targets remain. OBJECTIVES: In this report, we aimed to review the current literature to assess different stereotactic techniques, anatomical considerations, adverse effects and stimulation settings in PSA DBS. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed searching for articles discussing tremors and PSA stimulation. We performed a quantitative analysis comparing different DBS tremor targets. RESULTS: Tremor improvement is consistently documented in most reports with an average reduction in tremor of 79% depending on the specific tremor syndrome. Tremor benefit in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) tremor was significantly higher than for other stimulation targets. Transient paresthesias, imbalance, dizziness and dysarthria are the most common side effects with PSA DBS. CONCLUSIONS: PSA DBS is an effective and safe treatment for tremor control and should be considered in patients with refractory tremors with associated cerebellar or dystonic features, proximal tremors and MS tremor.

The Effects of Mechanical and Thermal Stimuli on Local Field Potentials and Single Unit Activity in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major, debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to improve pain outcomes, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unclear. Microelectrode recording allows us to measure both local field potentials (LFPs) and single neuronal unit activity (SUA). OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined how single unit and LFP oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia are impacted by mechanical and thermal sensory stimuli and explored their role in pain modulation. METHODS: We assessed changes in LFPs and SUAs in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus interna (Gpi), and globus pallidus externa (Gpe) following exposure with mechanical or thermal stimuli. Sensory thresholds were determined pre-operatively using quantitative sensory testing. Based on these data, patients were exposed to innocuous and noxious mechanical, pressure, and thermal stimuli at individualized thresholds. RESULTS: In the STN, LFP alpha oscillatory activity and SUA increased in response to innocuous mechanical stimuli; SUA further increased in response to noxious mechanical, noxious pressure, and noxious thermal stimuli (p < 0.05). In the Gpe, LFP low betaactivity and SUA increased with noxious thermal stimuli; SUA also increased in response to innocuous thermal stimuli (p < 0.05). In the Gpi, innocuous thermal stimuli increased LFP gammaactivity; noxious pressure stimuli decreased low betaactivity; SUA increased in response to noxious thermal stimuli (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Our study is the first to demonstrate that mechanical and thermal stimuli alter basal ganglia LFPs and SUAs in PD. While STN SUA increases nearly uniformly to all sensory stimuli, SUA in the pallidal nuclei respond solely to thermal stimuli. Similarly, thermal stimuli yield increases in pallidal LFP activity, but not STN activity. We speculate that DBS may provide analgesia through suppression of stimuli-specific changes in basal ganglia activity, supporting a role for these nuclei in sensory and pain processing circuits.

The effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on mechanical and thermal thresholds in 6OHDA-lesioned rats.

Chronic pain is a major complaint for up to 85% of Parkinson's disease patients; however, it often not identified as a symptom of Parkinson's disease. Adequate treatment of motor symptoms often provides analgesic effects in Parkinson's patients but how this occurs remains unclear. Studies have shown both Parkinson's patients and 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats exhibit decreased sensory thresholds. In humans, some show improvements in these deficits after subthalamic deep brain stimulation, while others report no change. Differing methods of testing and response criteria may explain these varying results. We examined this effect in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were unilaterally implanted with subthalamic stimulating electrodes in the lesioned right hemisphere and sensory thresholds were tested using von Frey, tail-flick and hot-plate tests. Tests were done during and off subthalamic stimulation at 50 and 150 Hz to assess its effects on sensory thresholds. The 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals exhibited lower mechanical (left paw, P < 0.01) and thermal thresholds than shams (hot plate, P < 0.05). Both 50 and 150 Hz increased mechanical (left paw; P < 0.01) and thermal thresholds in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats (hot-plate test: 150 Hz, P < 0.05, 50 Hz, P < 0.01). Interestingly, during von Frey testing, low-frequency stimulation provided a more robust improvement in some 6OHDA lesioned rats, while in others, the magnitude of improvement on high-frequency stimulation was greater. This study shows that subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals at both high and low frequencies. Furthermore, we suggest considering using low-frequency stimulation when treating Parkinson's patients where pain remains the predominant complaint.

Treatable causes of cerebellar ataxia.

The cerebellar ataxia syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders clinically characterized by the presence of cerebellar dysfunction. Initial assessment of patients with progressive cerebellar ataxia is complex because of an extensive list of potential diagnoses. A detailed history and comprehensive examination are required for an accurate diagnosis and hierarchical diagnostic investigations. Although no cure exists for most of these conditions, a small group of metabolic, hereditary, inflammatory, and immune-mediated etiologies of cerebellar ataxia are amenable to disease-modifying, targeted therapies. Over the past years, disease-specific treatments have emerged. Thus, clinicians must become familiar with these disorders because maximal therapeutic benefit is only possible when done early. In this article, we review disorders in which cerebellar ataxia is a prominent clinical feature requiring targeted treatments along with specific management recommendations.

Deep brain stimulation significantly decreases disability from low back pain in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients suffer from low back pain (LBP) during the course of their disease. How LBP affects daily functional status and how to manage this aspect of PD has not been adequately explored. METHODS: We examined 16 patients undergoing bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) who met the inclusion criteria for moderate disability from LBP, as classified by the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OLBPD). RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 patients had attempted additional treatments for LBP, including medical management, massage, chiropractic, epidural steroid injections and/or surgery, with minimal relief. Following DBS, there was a significant improvement in the OLBPD at both the 6-month and 1-year time points (p < 0.02, p < 0.005, respectively). A mean improvement of 31.7% on the OLBPD score was noted. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) similarly decreased significantly at 1 year (p = 0.015). There was no correlation between the OLBPD score and other measures, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), age and other nonmotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: Given the prevalent yet undertreated disability associated with LBP in PD, these results are novel in that they show that STN DBS has a significant positive effect on disability associated with LBP.

The Influence of Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Impulsivity and Prepulse Inhibition in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: At least 14% of Parkinson disease (PD) patients develop impulse control disorders (ICDs). The pathophysiology behind these behaviors and the impact of deep brain stimulation in a real-life setting remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We prospectively examined the impact of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on ICDs in PD patients, as well as the relationship between impaired sensorimotor gaiting and impulsivity. METHODS: Patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS were assessed for ICDs preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively using a validated questionnaire (QUIP-RS). A subset of patients completed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and auditory prepulse inhibition (PPI) testing. RESULTS: Analysis revealed 12 patients had an improvement in score assessing ICDs ('good responders'; p = 0.006) while 4 had a worse or stable score ('poor responders'; p > 0.05). Good responders further exemplified a significant decrease in hypersexual behavior (p = 0.005) and binge eating (p = 0.01). Impaired PPI responses also significantly correlated with impulsivity in BART (r = -0.72, p = 0.044). DISCUSSION: Following bilateral STN-DBS, 75% of our cohort had a reduction in ICDs, thus suggesting deep brain stimulation effectively manages ICDs in PD. The role of impaired PPI in predisposition to ICDs in PD warrants further investigation.

Unusual complications of deep brain stimulation.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a successful therapy for the treatment of several neurological disorders with potential implications in management of psychiatric disease. A variety of well-characterized hardware and surgical complications have been reported after the procedure, including postoperative hardware infection, system failure, and intracranial hemorrhage. Fortunately, serious surgical complications are rare, but they can lead to immediate or long-term disability. As the number of patients undergoing DBS continues to increase, newer and less common complications continue to emerge. It is imperative that clinicians become familiar with these complications in order to promptly recognize them and institute adequate early treatment. In this report, we examine the occurrence of unusual complications after DBS with emphasis on surgical, hardware, and stimulation-related complications.

Characterizing Disease Progression in Parkinson's Disease from Videos of the Finger Tapping Test.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms whose progression is typically assessed using clinical scales, namely the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Despite its reliability, the scale is bounded by a 5-point scale that limits its ability to track subtle changes in disease progression and is prone to subjective interpretations. We aimed to develop an automated system to objectively quantify motor symptoms in PD using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to analyze videos and capture nuanced features of disease progression. METHODS: We analyzed videos of the Finger Tapping test, a component of the MDS-UPDRS, from 24 healthy controls and 66 PD patients using ML algorithms for hand pose estimation. We computed multiple movement features related to bradykinesia from videos and employed a novel tiered classification approach to predict disease severity that employed different features according to severity. We compared our video-based disease severity prediction approach against other approaches recently introduced in the literature. RESULTS: Traditional kinematics features such as amplitude and velocity changed linearly with disease severity, while other non-traditional features displayed non-linear trends. The proposed disease severity prediction approach demonstrated superior accuracy in detecting PD and distinguishing between different levels of disease severity when compared to existing approaches.